Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Wal-Mart and Target Spy on Their Employees

By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted April 6, 2007.


With Target and Wal-Mart acting as though they are entitled to spy on, stalk and imprison their own employees, we are on the road to a full-scale workplace dictatorship.
Advertisement

It reads like a cold war thriller: The spy follows the suspects through several countries, ending up in Guatemala City, where he takes a room across the hall from his quarry. Finally, after four days of surveillance, including some patient ear-to-the-keyhole work, he is able to report back to headquarters that he has the goods on them. They're guilty!

But this isn't a John Le Carré novel, and the powerful institution pulling the strings wasn't the USSR or the CIA. It was Wal-Mart, and the two suspects weren't carrying plans for a shoulder-launched H-bomb. Their crime was "fraternization." One of them, James W. Lynn, a Wal-Mart factory inspection manager, was traveling with a female subordinate, with whom he allegedly enjoyed some intimate moments behind closed doors. At least the company spy reported hearing "moans and sighs" within the woman's room.

Now you may wonder why a company so famously cheap that it requires its same-sex teams to share hotel rooms while on the road would invest in international espionage to ferret out mixed-sex fraternizers. Unless, as Lynn argues, they were really after him for what is a far worse crime in Wal-Mart's books: Openly criticizing the conditions he found in Central American factories supplying Wal-Mart stores.

In fact, the cold war thriller analogy is not entirely fanciful. New York Times reporter Michael Barbaro, who related the story of Wal-Mart's stalking of Lynn and his colleague, also reports that the company's security department is staffed by former top officials of the CIA and the FBI. Along the same lines, Jeffrey Goldberg provides a chilling account of his visit to Wal-Mart's Bentonville "war room" in the April 2nd New Yorker. Although instructed not to write down anything he saw, he found a "dark, threadbare room... its walls painted battleship gray," where only two out of five of the occupants will even meet his eyes. In general, he found the Bentonville fortress "not unlike the headquarters of the National Security Agency."

We've always known that Wal-Mart is as big, in financial terms, as many sizable nations. It may even have begun to believe that is one, complete with its own laws, security agency, and espionage system. But the illusion of state power is not confined to Wal-Mart. Justin Kenward, who worked at a Target store in Chino CA for three years, wrote to tell me about his six hour interrogation, in 2003, by the store's "Asset Protection" agents, who accused him of wrongly giving a fellow employee a discount on a video game a year earlier:

After about an hour of trying to tell them that I don't remember any thing about that day let alone that transaction, I had to use the restroom. I asked if I could and was denied. This goes on for about another hour when I say "Look I have to pee, bad, can I go to the restroom?" Once more I was told no. So I stand up and start walking out the door, and was stopped. At this point I thought to my self "They're looking to fire me!" So I start to think of ways that transaction might have came to be. I say something like "I would never give a discount unless an L.O.D. (Leader On Duty aka: a manager) or a Team Lead (aka: supervisor) told me to ......" I was interrupted and told that it sounds like I was trying to place my mistake on other people. 3 hours in to this and still needing to pee I was told that I need to write an apologetic letter to the company with the details, every detail, that we just went over and then I could use the rest room...

Kenward not only lost his job, but faced charges of theft.

My efforts to get a comment from Target were unavailing, but I did manage to track down a person who worked in security for the Chino store at the time of Kenward's detention. Because she still depends on Target for her health insurance, she asked not to be named, but she writes that Kenward's experience was not unusual:

What I know for a fact is that they took each of the twelve youngsters [Target employees] to their office separately. They locked them in an office without a telephone, would not let them phone their parents or anyone, and kept them there browbeating them for six to ten hours. They never told them they were being arrested...only that Target was disappointed in them and if they would write a letter of apology that they'd dictate they could go and all would be forgotten. None of these children knew their rights...all of them ended up writing the stupid letter. Of course this too was a lie...as soon as they had the letter in end the police were called and that person was hauled off in handcuffs and arrested.

This is the workplace dictatorship at its brass-knuckled best. When companies start imagining that they are nation-states, entitled to spy on, stalk, and imprison their own employees, then we are well down the road to an actual, full-scale dictatorship.

As for those "moans and sighs" that issued from the hotel room in Guatemala City: Maybe Lynn and his companion were reflecting on the sweatshop conditions they encountered in a Wal-Mart subcontractor's factory. Or maybe they were aware of the man spying on them, and were mourning the decline of democracy.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: target, wal-mart, big box, dictatorship

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, most recently "Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream."


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So What Can Be Done?
Posted by: magickalrealism on Apr 6, 2007 12:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article reflects a LOT of fears I've had as employers increasingly use credit checks for jobs not related to finance and who have increasingy invasive policies, wherein it's practically demanded that you show up at company functions with family members so they can get a look into your private life one way or another.

My question is: what steps need to be made to get back some civil rights for the worker? Unionization has its limits, this needs to go directly into applying the 9th Amendment and good old "unennumerated rights."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So What Can Be Done? Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: So What Can Be Done? Posted by: VZEQICVA
U-N-I-O-N
Posted by: NoPCZone on Apr 6, 2007 1:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The next person that I hear bad-mouthing unions and contending that they are not necessary in the US is going to hear about this. My congressional delegation will as well. I've about had my fill- thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: U-N-I-O-N Posted by: boing007
» RE: U-N-I-O-N Posted by: CatDad
» RE: U-N-I-O-N--Would've done NO good Posted by: apophenia_monkey
Where is this coming from?
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Apr 6, 2007 1:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who is driving the dehumanization of the workplace?

In Wal-mart, is it the Walford (sp?) family that is setting the tone, or some senior management trying to make the next big bonus?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where is this coming from? Posted by: VZEQICVA
Vote with your feet.
Posted by: colinmeister on Apr 6, 2007 3:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If readers of AlterNet don't like the way Wal*Mart treats its employees, the answer is simple: Don't shop at Wal*Mart.

The only way to punish corporations is through their bottom line - if trade unions would also push this message to their members in answer to Wal*Mart's refusal to recognise unions, then something might be done, or if not, Wal*Mart would make less cash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the same everywhere.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 6, 2007 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many retail places frisk their employees before they leave the store.

A friend who worked at a department store was issued a special see-thru purse for employees to carry their personal items. She was cranky all the time, but now they knew when she was supposed to be cranky.

It's another way Catholic grade school helped prepare me for the real world. Those nuns were ahead of their time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's the same everywhere. Posted by: VZEQICVA
Hi Drones!
Posted by: paschn on Apr 6, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, all you painfully gullible Working class Republicans. Read the above again, carefully. Absorb it well. This is the way ALL WORKERS were treated before Bull Moose President T Roosevelt smacked the REPUBLICAN Corporations down at the turn of the century. You were forced to work in unsafe, unclean, work places for 12 or 14 hours a day, paid in "scrip" from the REPUBLICAN company. Scrip which was redeemable only at the REPUBLICAN company store at REPUBLICAN company prices. You lived in REPUBLICAN owned "homes" and were charged whatever the REPUBLICAN company felt like charging you. The mantra of the REPUBLICAN CORE is they own you body and soul. You Liberals need to shove REPUBLICAN TREATMENT of the common man down the throats of these morons who support the REPUBLICANS!! Show them the history of all the Ludlow massacres! Wake em up to the insanity of supporting the filthy swine, ( many are actual decendants of the REPUBLICANS that sicced "our boys" on hapless workers who were burned alive at the behest of the legislators OWNED by the REPUBLICANS.) The legislation they passed on the south after the civil war was even called mean spirited and severe by their own REPUBLICAN president, Lincoln. It shows just what a bunch of mindless fools we can be seeing the South is now a bastion of REPUBLICAN support. Use their own nefarious history to wake your fellow drones up to these swine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Southern plantation culture--in the 21st century
Posted by: zooeyhall on Apr 6, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You think slavery was ended in the Civil War? Hell no! They never really did accept the idea that slavery was wrong. And now their inheritors i.e. the present leaders of American corporatocracy, won't be satisfied until we again have it. Only now they won't call it the plantation system, it will be something like "a workplace environment conductive to PROFITABILITY and PRODUCTIVITY".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need new privacy laws to match the new technology.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 6, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to repeal the "patriot" acts and Military Commissions Act and new laws to prohibit the "big brother" ways being used by private companies or individuals. Currently the biggest threat is still the government but corporations, especially under the 'special relationship' between politicans and companies, are quickly catching up on the Orwellian dream.

In the meantime citizens, employees, and government workers need to use the same 'big brother' technology against the companies, governments, and citizens. Use them for embarassment, whistleblowing, expose fraud, expose corruption, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I bet
Posted by: chaoslegs on Apr 6, 2007 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Smiley Face Corp is putting RFID tags in their employees vests so they can track their movements in store.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Makes sense Posted by: ateo
That sounds similar to a hospital I worked for
Posted by: rhinojos on Apr 6, 2007 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have video cameras in the lounge...in the lounge! There is no privacy in that institution, you are constantly monitored and made aware of your possible infractions. They see to it that you are utilized to the fullest when your there to work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sounds pretty bad Posted by: ateo
Reagan and the Air Traffic Controllers
Posted by: boing007 on Apr 6, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw it coming when Reagan's anti-union administration took power in 1980.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OLD TACTICS
Posted by: dagnymeetsassisi on Apr 6, 2007 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll bet they learned this from a MA company called Cumberland Farms - which was, I beleive, alledged to have been used by organized crime to launder money. Part of that involved claiming huge amounts of inventory as stolen. In order to do that convincingly for the IRS, they had to prosecute a fair number of employees for theft. This way they demonstrate how their "inventory" got "lost".
I worked at one over the summer while I was in college in the 80s. I remember there were all kinds of elaborate ways employees were supposed to handle their own purchases in the store (you had to circle the time/purchase on the register tape - then open the register and do the same on the interior master tape - tripple initial everything in red ink.... blah blah). A lot of thier process were arcane like this. It was a min-wage job, and they also made you do all kinds of other illegal (as in unfair labor practice) things like refill the dairy case AFTER you punched out - which usually took at least 45min, and on a busy day 1.5hr. And they fired people right before they'd qualify for a raise, and hire them for only 30hr per week so as not to pay benefits.
Of course, we're all teenagers and college kids, and the stores get busy, and none of us followed what seemed to be very silly policies. Plus, we all went over our allotment of fountain soft-drinks and slush-puppies. Anyway, after I'd been there about 10 weeks, this smarmy - but BIG guy - from "Corporate" takes me alone into a back room I never even knew was there. He starts with BAD COP - telling me that Cumbies prosecutes to the fullest extent, that there were irregularities on my register tapes, theft is serious.... Then he plays GOOD COP - how if I admit my "problems" - in writing - Cumbies will rehabilitate me with employee retraining, and I'll be reinstated. Heck, people go on to be managers that way! OH he was charming - like a friggin COBRA and a mouse.
Unfortunately for him, lets just say my upbringing in NYC had taught me never tell the man NOTHIN. I sure wasn't going to sign anything over a couple of flat Cokes and all. I got fired for "inapropriate use of the register". Had a waitressing job two days later. Got a check for $1.92 in the mid nineties as my part of a class-action settlement against CF by former employees.
I decided then and there that I'd sling hash till the end of my days rather than work for jerks ever again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OLD TACTICS - had a job like that Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Huge cult corporations....
Posted by: hannah on Apr 6, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that's what these businesses are. They hire weak, undereducated, often foreign people who feel they won't be able to get a job anywhere else. These people are gullible followers who are easily led, and they are scared into submission. They are made to believe that if they even THINK union, they will be burned at the stake. As long as there is no union representation, the employees have absolutely no rights whatsoever and they are at the mercy of wally world and tarzhay. Until these people rise up, collectively, and demand union representation, they will continue to be underpaid, have little to no health coverage, and will be spied upon and basically treated like cattle. Unions are not perfect, but they are certainly better than what these poor folks have now. A voice to speak for them as one. Someone to say, "HEY, YOU CAN'T TREAT US LIKE THIS ANY MORE!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ONE WORD .........
Posted by: hannah on Apr 6, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BOYCOTT!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ONE WORD ......... Posted by: ARTLADY
» RE: ONE WORD ......... Posted by: marykane
» RE: ONE WORD ......... Posted by: sheena2u
Yep, Target's got issues...
Posted by: astudent on Apr 6, 2007 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking as a Target employee (the only job I could find in my area that would work with a student's class schedule), I can say I haven't had any problems with Asset Protection personnel like what was described in this article. Target has other problems, however.

Number one, the pay is terrible. Starting pay at Target is $6.75/hr in my area. (Obviously, it is higher in states that have minimum wage set higher than the abysmally low federal standard.) Although employees are given a 90-day review, they do NOT get a raise at the end of 90 days, which is a common practice in retail. Employees only get raises at yearly reviews. I haven't had my first yearly review yet, but from what I've heard, the raises are ridiculously tiny.

Another annoyance: I generally work a closing shift, which theoretically means I get off work an hour after the store closes. Nice idea, but it doesn't work that way. If the store isn't zoned (cleaned up so it doesn't look like a mess), people are required to stay until the job is done, regardless of how long they are there. I left a half-hour late last night, and was only allowed to leave by insisting that my ride was there and had already waited a half-hour for me. Everyone else was still there. Even worse, this policy is enforced by setting an exterior alarm after closing time. Anyone who opens a door, even if it's just to leave for the night, sets off an alarm that directly summons police and the fire department. You cannot leave without having an L.O.D. (Leader On Duty = manager) manually shut off the alarm, which means you must not only get permission to leave, but you still cannot leave until the L.O.D. gets to the area where the alarm controls are and lets you out.

To add further insult to the above, I have begged Team Leaders and L.O.D.'s to give me at least a general idea of when we would be getting out so I could give my boyfriend a semi-accurate estimate of when to get me, thereby sparing him a long wait in a cold car in the parking lot. (Note: I can only call him on break. No personal calls on the clock except in case of emergency, and no cell phones on the floor!) The last time I asked for an estimate, the L.O.D. said she didn't really know, but would give me an estimate around 9:30 p.m. We close at 10 p.m., and we are asked not to take our breaks during the last hour before close. When I pointed out that I needed to call my ride while on break, she refused to give an estimate, but said she would rather have him wait than have me wait. I realize that they don't think they have a stake in keeping my ride happy. After all, he doesn't work there. However, if he decides he's had it with waiting for me night after night after night ad nauseum, I won't have a ride home. I'm sure they don't care about that, but I do. Also, they don't seem to understand (or care) that he is a potential customer they're offending. In that vein, it's worth noting that although my boyfriend has been willing to let me pick things up for him on occassion (I get an employee discount and it has saved him some cash), he now generally refuses to shop there. He's heard enough from my kvetching about how the employees are treated to have no urge to contribute to their continued retail success.

Besides that, a depressing percentage of their products are cheaply made and badly overpriced. Kind of sad, really. When I was a kid, Target had some good products and really good prices. They have gone downhill over the years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember the Haymarket Martyrs
Posted by: YinRising on Apr 6, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“If you think that by hanging us you can stomp out the labor movement – the movement from which the downtrodden millions who toil and live in want and misery – the wage slaves – expect salvation – if this is your opinion, then hang us! Here you will tread upon a spark, but there and there, and behind you and in front of you, and everywhere, flames will blaze up.” – August Spies

http://www.themartyrindex.com/lyrics/blaze/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haymarket_Riot

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's also unionized companies
Posted by: truthteller on Apr 6, 2007 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a certain Class I railroad that has installed security cameras in train crew areas of a major terminal, supposedly as an anti-terrorist measure, but really because of a big steaming load of editorial comment that a disgruntled employee left outside the office door of a supervisor.

I'm not condoning the actions of the person with bowel trouble, but the reaction of the management was definitely an over-reaction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Criminal Offenses
Posted by: Camilla Cracchiolo on Apr 6, 2007 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a nurse. My husband a security guard. We're in California. In our various trainings, it was made quite clear to us that the kinds of actions taken by private security above could constitute not just civil, but *criminal* offenses, especially the crime of false imprisionment. If hands were laid on the person to prevent them from leaving the room, it could also be assault or battery.

Has anyone pursued criminal charges against the security in these kinds of situations?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Criminal Offenses Posted by: polyquat50
THE OLD WAY IS STILL THE BEST WAY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 6, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a company mistreats its empoyees DONT SHOP THERE. If this were done on a grand scale it would work. If some of these retailers were serioudly boycotted for three months they would have no choice but to change. Problem is that too many people refuse to inconvenience themselves. Everyone is 'busy'. It takes some effort on everyone's part. Laws are ineffective. Things are hard to prove. Lawyers can't be bothered with small stuff. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wal-Mart and Target Spy on Their Employees
Posted by: pfm on Apr 6, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surprise, surprise, surprise…? Is anyone really surprised…? I mean like “we” – that’s you and me – have for the past several decades assumed an ostrich position and allowed government in a truncated manner to usurp most of the so-called inalienable rights found in our Constitution. WOW …! … Wal-Mart and Target spy on their employees, well so does many forms of your government and we obediently comply. We allow TSA “security” at our air ports near dictatorial powers to stop and without provocation “search” a person and his property. We allow our Supreme Court and our President to deny “habeas corpus ” rights not only to so-called “enemy combatants, but to the citizens of the USA and again “we” meekly comply. We really don’t care, we merely like to hear ourselves and see if our slogans might make the 6 pm news and we attain our 30 second’s of fame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the other hand many employees are retailers are thieving criminals
Posted by: ateo on Apr 6, 2007 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of the tactics discussed here existed at Wal-mart when I worked there and that hardly kept people from stealing and giving their friends "discounts."

I worked in electronics and one of the guys I worked with would steal a Playstation 2 game every night of the week until he was eventually fired.

What many people say when the statistics on employee theft are pointed out to them is that such criminal theft is justified by the low wages and poor working conditions. Is it? Nobody forces you to work at Wal-mart let alone steal from Wal-mart.

You've gotta do whatever it takes to survive but unless you're selling playstation games for food I'm not seeing a connection between survival and theft of video games. You have no rights in the work place. Your employer can read your email, remotely watch your every move with remote desktop management tools etc. Why shouldn't they be able to? They own the computers, they own the building - let them put cameras wherever they deem necessary.

What confuses me is why people think Corporations should act against their own best interests. America's culture today is the most ruthless it has ever been. Soccer mom's are at war with one another to put their children at the head of the class and captain of the sports team - strategically controlling their lives to get them into choice schools and high paying careers. You expect companies to accept defeat at the hands of thieving employees and unions? No, expect them to squash unions before they form and hire Blackwater mercenaries to assassinate union leaders if they do form.

America is at war with itself, this is our culture - kill or be killed. You don't make the rules, all you can do is learn them and play the game.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dignity= an old fashioned word.
Posted by: wisewebwoman on Apr 6, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And dignity is being stripped from these mostly fearful employees.
And where does this all start? with the unconscionable "blackmail" paid to both the dem and rep parties by these nation-state employers. A lid has to be put on these donations, sheeple, otherwise this abuse of their slaves by the Walton plantation owners will continue.
Start with protest, refuse - REFUSE to patronize these hell-holes as I have done for the past four years. I will not shop any of them and pay the little premium of dignity at the private enterprises which are trying so hard to survive but who do know my name.
The change starts with YOU. And I know I'm preaching to the choir.
Peace for 24.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bentonville uber alles
Posted by: eddie torres on Apr 6, 2007 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gotta love the Orwellian overtones of language like "Asset Protection" agents. See also:

- "Information Retrieval" officers (Gitmo, Abu Ghraib)
- "sub-prime" borrower (citizen with non-white skin)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Children gone wild
Posted by: makesenseofit on Apr 6, 2007 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anyone the Wal Mart legacy is one of the examples of children gone wild. Old man Walton was the epitome of the entrepeneur... the good old days to be reckoned with. He made more millionaires when millionaires were not made so often.
Mr. Walton would turn in his grave knowing the epitath written by his children. ...the greed of the fancy and selfish ..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Children gone wild Posted by: sheena2u
Moving towards the corporate (slave) society...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 6, 2007 2:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush wants to be the head of an 'ownership society', in his own words, and the corporatization of all aspects of American life is the goal. It's the new totalitarian system struggling to be born: a mixture of corporate fascism and religious dogma; instead of Naci racial eugenics or Soviet communist principles as the driving ideology, you've got billionaire worship and Christian fanaticism.

People who work in the corporate environment are perpetually in fear, just as slaves in the Southern plantation system were. They engage in passive protest (stealing, doing crappy work) but they know that outright rebellion won't be allowed; they'll lose their jobs and be blacklisted by their previous employers if they try and buck the system.

The corporate surveillance of employees, the pre-employment screens and drug tests, the ability to monitor the employee at all times (including monitoring political views) - that's what Bush would like to make the norm for the entire society. Right now, this goes on inside the walls of corporate and government institutions - but Bush tried to make the corporate model into the American model - door-to-door drug tests for all citizens, combined with East German police surveillance of citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking of spying...
Posted by: YogiBear on Apr 6, 2007 7:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next time you get online, go straight to the Alternet, do not pass go, and then run a spyware detector like Spybot right after you visit this site.

Progressive indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Speaking of spying... Posted by: LinearBob
» RE: Speaking of spying... Posted by: YogiBear
Just figure this out today?
Posted by: jim_altman on Apr 6, 2007 8:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The surveillance techniques described in the article above are very, very old news. Businesses ranging in size from the warehouses that supply the big box stores to the little corner tavern have been employing them for over twenty years. A series of court rulings have even validated the rights of employers to be concerned with their employee's behaviors outside the workplace. The tightest surveillance I've seen anywhere is in the Magic Kingdom of Disney World and it's a more pleasant experience because of it. If an eye in the sky in a big box store can improve employee performance and reduce the consumer expense of employee theft, bring em on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tin-Foil Hat Collective
Posted by: licciogelli on Apr 6, 2007 10:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if people working at Google could relate to all this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surveillance and Psychosis in the NWO
Posted by: Lady X on Apr 7, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The current unelected administration and their violative,
Constitution and Bill of Rights stripping laws- have brought
all the Ro*e wannabes out of the woodwork.

In passing "laws" like The PATRIOT Act- and encouraging people to narc on their neighbors, kids to narc on their parents and librarians to narc on library members- it has a become
reminiscent of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia.It is a
dangerous game. It is not normal or lawful to violate
other's privacy or rights.
The tragedy is that this happens in all areas of our lives. It is happening daily. It is happening right now. If we are all criminals - and everyone is the enemy- what becomes
of privacy, sovereignty and believing in the basic decency and integrity of others?
Seeing specific examples i.e. Walmart, Target and other corporate mis uses of"power". We should make it clear that
if NOT STOPEED through legal channels and economic boycott-
this is what we all have to look forward to.
Fascism and totalitarianism are being encouraged and rewarded.
Unions might help. These issues are so widespread that
the only way to stop this is through economic sanction: NOT shopping at these stores owned by specific corporations
(or most for that matter) and saying NO to any entity that violates our Constitutional protections, Bill of Rights protections and unalienable rights. Political administrations
come and go. Laws are repealed and rescinded.
KNOW your rights. Know the Constitution. Know the Bill of Rights. Start class action law suits against entities that
are violating rights that belong to you.
We have always used economic embargo to change poltical
positions of countries creating policies not in our interests.
We have been taught by the masters. Maybe we are being tested. It is up to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It all started with drug testing
Posted by: pokerfayz420 on Apr 11, 2007 2:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are all good comments. Especially vis a vis Americans desparate to hold down a job, will do anything to keep it, even if it means signing away your soul... and your rights.

But please, realize that corporate America began heading down this slippery slope back in the 1980's - the Reagan years - when they bought into the theory that drugged up employees were costing corporations zillions of dollars in productivity and bajillion hours of lost time and injuries.

The problem is, this was also the beginning of the era of junk science. Real science has since determined that these claims were all baseless. But now we have a gigantic drug testing industrial complex that won't go away - ever. But, I digress.

Big Gummint had to "do something" about the so-called "drugs issue", but quickly realized that having the entire populace drug tested by Big Gummint would quickly be found unconstitutional. So instead, they had Big Binness do their bidding. "Drug testing by private companies is not unconstitutional - they can do anything they want, if they think they are maximizing shareholder value". Or so the thinking went.

And to force Big Binness to drug test, they allowed discounts in unemployment insurance and other perks if Big Binness randonmly drug tested it's employees. And if you want to work with Big Gummint contracts, well, by God, you better be drug testing, or we will yank that juicy contract.

So, now that we are already gliding quickly down the slippery slope, if Big Binness can be unconstitutional, it is no huge leap to believe that they own you and have sway over your personal time away from work. "We can and will test for drugs, becasue they are evil, and they are evil because they are illegal, and they are illegal because they are bad, and they are bad because they are scarey, and they are scarey because they are evil....". Big deal, running a red light or speeding is against the law, too, but I don't see you firing them for breaking the law. Besides, the bajillions of dollars they lost were really due to non-drug taking, thieving employees.

So, clearly you have the Republic party to blame, and Reagan was clearly complicit. And the boycott argument won't have one nit of an impact. I mean, how in the world can you boycott Texas Instruments when they have at least one chip or component on every single printed circuit board on every piece of electronic equipment on the planet? They are in your cellphones, for certain. DSP's and all that. As if boycotting cellphones is going to go over. It would, like a turd in a punch bowl.

So thank you, Ronnie Reagan for leading us to the slope, and thank you, Republic party, for giving America the big shove.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]