Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Who Controls the News?

By Gemma Puglisi, Women's Media Center. Posted March 27, 2007.


For the third time in history, a woman has been hired as a nightly news executive. That's a sorry commentary in 2007 considering the first network newscast aired sometime just after Adam and Eve.
Advertisement

When NBC nightly news execs got the ratings for February and could sense ABC nosing ahead, they decided to do something drastic. They hired a woman.

"Nightly News with Brian Williams" had maintained a comfortable position as number one since Tom Brokaw left in December 2004. But during the last week in February, ABC's Charles Gibson pulled about 9.4 million viewers to NBC's 9.1 million, with CBS at 6.9 million.

Almost as quickly as Nielsen popped out those ratings, NBC executives tossed out John Reiss, Williams' executive producer for almost two years, and hired Alexandra Wallace, a vice president of the network's news division, for the job. Now, the pressure is on Wallace, 41, to put the newscast into overdrive and move it once again past ABC. She is only the third female executive producer for a nightly newscast in the history of network news in the U.S. That's a sorry commentary in 2007 considering the first network newscast aired sometime just after Adam and Eve.

Progress has to start somewhere. Let's just hope three is the charm and she has better luck than her two female predecessors in one of the toughest jobs in the news business. Emily Rooney and Kathryn Christensen, both executive producers for "World News Tonight with Peter Jennings," didn't last long. Rooney held the spot for only nine months in the early 1990s while Christensen worked for Jennings in the mid l990s for just under two years.

Rooney, who had a small child at the time, and whose husband commuted to New York to see her in the first few months, said she "didn't think too much" about the announcement of Wallace's appointment. "There are pitfalls for any executive producer," she said. Rooney's reign was apparently harsh. After three weeks on the job, an ABC executive pulled her aside. Maybe she shouldn't move to New York from Boston where she had been living, he suggested. "They told me this after I had sold my house," said Rooney, who now hosts WGBH's "Greater Boston." Overall, Rooney says she was not valued, and that her advice about stories was often "dismissed."

Christensen talked about her somewhat longer tenure. "Emily was different from me. She came from outside and wasn't familiar with the players. I was at ABC for more than ten years and had worked as a senior broadcast producer." Christensen discussed the challenges facing anyone in network news. "I don't think this is a gender issue. The challenges are the same for men and women." She said it "really is no different in the TV area than in the business world. I'm sure there are men out there who felt they were very deserving of the job and did not get it. The ratings are always an issue, but today it is more intense with the Internet, the declining audience." In her case, there was a management change after two years. "The job shifted for me. Everyone took a step down, and I was given the title of managing editor." Asked about her feelings when she heard a third woman would "rule" a newscast, Christensen was enthusiastic. "I think she will do a great job."

Why did it take nearly ten years for another women to get the job? The networks have given a few women, present and past, opportunities as executive producers, including Phyllis McGrady (ABC's "Prime Time Live"), Susan Zirinsky (CBS's "48 Hours"), Shelley Ross (ABC's "Good Morning America"), and Betsey Fischer (NBC's "Meet the Press"). That doesn't include senior producers of the nightly world who served as acting exec producers for one reason or another-like NBC's Cheryl Gould back in the l980s. Rooney mentioned one important item in the equation: the position "does have a lot to do with the chemistry of an anchor and the exec producer." The camaraderie can go way beyond meetings or traveling on remotes. Getting together to play tennis becomes an opportunity to discuss the program, or just bonding in time spent outside the newsroom is a factor.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: news, journalism, women, alexandra wallace

Gemma Puglisi worked at NBC "Nightly" from l985-l99l. She is an assistant professor in the School of Communication at American University.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
That Explains A Lot
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 27, 2007 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over at HuffPo I commented on the disconnect between NBC Nightly and the NewsHour that I watched immediately after. Not one story in the 10 minute news digest on PBS was even alluded to on Ladies Home Journal (NBC Nightly Edition). A puff interview with Alberto (the soon-to-be-ex-AG) and a bunch of blithering newz-U-can-use about aspirin. It looked like what you would imagine if Lifetime Cable produced a magazine show.

Unless I am dreaming or having a nightmare we are involved in 2 wars and staring at the real possibility of a 3rd, the Middle Class is dissolving before our very eyes, our nation's credit markets are teetering under the weight of the housing bubble and bad consumer debt, inflation is creeping in, 46 million have no health coverage, the Congress and the White House are on a collision course on multiple fronts, etc and this new ExecProd wants to show us Medical Newz about Cardiac Cath labs? Jesus, where did she go to school- Concorde Career Institute School of Journalism? Podunk Community College of Hackensack? C'Mon, give me an effing break.

If NBC needs an Executive Producer that has at least a minimal amount of judgement they should give Amy Goodman a call. I'm sure she could spare somebody over there to educate NBC Newz on what needs airtime and what assignments to make. I'm guessing that NBC is going to sell out and ruin it's newscast like CBS did when Couric got hired over a ton of more experienced and qualified people, from within and without CBS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That Explains A Lot Posted by: MartianBachelor
What about the glaringly obvious ethnic bias in the U.S. media?
Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon on Mar 27, 2007 1:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the Ashkenazic Hebrews amazingly over-represented in the media, why aren't more people talking about the obvious ethnic bias that exists in the mainstream media? What about the VERY close relationship(s) that these so-called 'journalists' have with their ethnic bretheren in advertising and in the business community, relationships which they use to propagate and further entrench a broken and ridiculous American media system?

When a minority group that comprises only 2-3% of the entire population of the U.S. is VASTLY over-represented in media and media-related fields (Hollywood, etc.) to the tune of 70% or more, one knows that SOMETHING is most certainly wrong. I call this "slow covert seizure." Take note: 'the press' in America is FAR from being 'free' as guaranteed by the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.


I refer to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent '2006 letter to the American people' -- "What have the Zionists done for the American people that the US administration considers itself obliged to blindly support these infamous aggressors? Is it not because they have imposed themselves on a substantial portion of the banking, financial, cultural and media sectors [of the U.S.]?" (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's 2006 letter to the American people)

And 'Ahmadinejad's 2006 letter to Pres Bush' -- "After 9.11, instead of healing and tending to the emotional wounds of the survivors and the American people – who had been immensely traumatized by the attacks – some Western media only intensified the climate of fear and insecurity – some constantly talked about the possibility of new terror attacks and kept the people in fear. Is that service to the American people? Is it possible to calculate the damages incurred from fear and panic? American citizens lived in constant fear of fresh attacks that could come at any moment and in any place. They felt insecure in the streets, in their place of work and at home. Who would be happy with this situation? Why was the media, instead of conveying a feeling of security and providing peace of mind, giving rise to a feeling of insecurity? Some believe that the hype paved the way – and was the justification – for an attack on Afghanistan. Again I need to refer to the role of media. -- In media charters, correct dissemination of information and honest reporting of a story are established tenets. I express my deep regret about the disregard shown by certain Western media for these principles. The main pretext for an attack on Iraq was the existence of WMDs. This was repeated incessantly – for the public to finally believe – and the ground set for an attack on Iraq." (Ahmadinejad's 2006 letter to Bush)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ASKENAZI 'HEBREWS'.....
Posted by: gellero on Mar 27, 2007 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure you mean "Jews" , the usual scapegoats for everything political. Sometime read 'Mien Kampf' by Adolph Hitler. He said EXACTLY the same thing.....a conspiracy by 'the Jews' in the mass media and entertainment. But wasn't David Sarnoff READ ABOUT HIM HERE, founder of RCA and NBC just a poor immigrant kid who lived the American dream? Or do you think he had some 'genetic connection' with the 'International Bankers' ( AKA 'Jews') to 'control the media'. But then again, banking in the USA in the early 1900's was pretty much closed off to Jews precisely because of that sort of predjudicial thinking.
The same goes for Louis Mayer, an off the boat immigrant who started MGM. Same with Samuel Goldwyn READ ABOUT HIM HERE , another penniless 'off the boat' immigrant. Fools like the above poster always see a conspiracy rather than innate ability.
Jews are way out of proportion to population in Medicine too.......conspiracy there as well?? And a disproportionate number of Nobel Prize winners....maybe the Swedes are part of 'the plot'.
And why is everything a 'conspiracy' rather the innate ability?? It seems that if you look through history, that in any society that allowed Jews to flourish freely, they achieved success. And because of this innate ability to achieve, they are singled out and SCAPEGOATED for their achievement and wealth.
The above poster is a BIGOT , pure and simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you able to follow simple logic? What about cause & effect relationships?
Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon on Mar 27, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's all very simple, really.

1. Seizure of the banks = keep them in debt and slaves to their creditors; this keeps them quiet.

2. Seizure of the media/press = keep them stupid and uninformed; flood them with 'choices' in order to confuse them.

3. Seizure of the medical systems = keep them sick so that they keep coming back to be 'cured'; the worse that the food/air is in a society, the better it is for the 'medical business.'


Do you happen to notice the three most broken 'institutions' in American society? Would they happen to be the banks, the media/press, and the medical system(s), the three areas that I just mentioned above? WHY YES, of course! And what group of people is VASTLY over-represented in all three those arenas? I believe that I've already made that clear (it's the Jews).

It's all very logical, calm, and rational -- no wild-eyed conspiracy theories here, just an examination of the FACTS. To them, the "goyim" = cattle, nothing more than 'dumb beasts' to be herded, exploited, and then slaughtered at their own discretion.

Look, I really WISH that it wasn't the Jews that are at the root of so many problems in Gentile societies, but unfortunately they so often are (Jews haven't been expelled from 100+ countries/territories/regions in the past two thousand years for NOTHING...). I agree: the last thing the Jews need is more grief (just look at their painful and terrible history of expulsions, forced conversions, violence directed toward them, genocides, etc.). If it were Japanese-American lesbians that were at the root of these problems, you better believe that I would be calling them out just as I call out the Jews. It is solely the fact that (since the Holocaust) Jews have now become semi-immune to criticism of any kind, because to criticize them and their destructive/exploitative/parasitic role(s) in Gentile societies means that you are supposedly trying to provoke a 2nd Holocaust -- thus, to criticize Jews is now entirely taboo, and they use Gentile guilt over the Holocaust to manipulate public opinion. Well, I am not proposing a 2nd Holocaust, and no reasonable person is. I simply seek to lay the rational facts on the table and let you put the pieces together yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In the end, gender makes no difference to the media elite.
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 27, 2007 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every reporter, commentator and talking-head pundit seen on national TV and their bosses behind the scenes, man and woman, is paid $500,000 a year or more. As nonpartisan pigs at the trough, they could care less about poverty or unfair tax breaks for the rich, to name few conveniently ignored social issues.

And forget Iraq. Because America has no draft during a war for the first time in modern history, children of the media elite will never serve in uniform, much less see combat. Shamefully for uppercrust kids in our two-class, Have & Have-Not society, "American Idol" in the United States is more important than American casualties in the Middle East.

Hugh E. Scott, Ariana Huffington fan, Vietnam veteran, four-year member of MoveOn.org and the editor King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE 'Baboon' ABOVE
Posted by: gellero on Mar 27, 2007 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now I've heard everything......'The Jews'.....who maybe comprise 25% of MDs and DOs.......are the cause of the problems in medical care delivery !! If that's not a BIGOTED statement, I don't know what is.!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tom Englehart:
Posted by: rwa on Mar 27, 2007 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under the many conflicts between George W. Bush and most of his opponents in the Democratic and Republican parties lies an area of agreement seldom challenged in the mainstream political or media world (or, when challenged, given remarkably little attention). On the deepest points, major politicians and the most influential parts of the media are actually in remarkable accord. In fact, you could say that, in the world of our media gatekeepers, there's just another version of the sort of accord that existed before the invasion of Iraq...
But perhaps this sort of deep agreement on the "realities" of our world should not surprise us. After all, we're talking about a literal "conspiracy" here - in the original Latin sense of the word: to con-spire once essentially meant to breathe the same air. Indeed, our politicians and top media figures do breathe the same air and, in a way that wasn't true decades ago, cohabit in the same rarified class atmosphere.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032607H.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re the media elite: White House spinmeister Tony Snow and cancer
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 27, 2007 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While on a human level I have great sympathy for the former FOX (Fascist Obsessed Xenophobic) News commentator, I can’t help wondering if, before dying, Tony Snow Job will express remorse for aiding and abetting the most dishonest administration in U.S. history -- the way Lee Atwater did on his death bed? I won’t be holding my breath.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption, one reason why more “Justice” Department officials will take the Fifth Amendment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

descrimi-nation
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Mar 27, 2007 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hiring all the women, blacks, hispanics, i-rabs, whatever, will not change the fact that the media is completely controlled. I guess being a slave with no control over the information that enters one's head is perfectly ok, as long as everyone has that "right".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Pointless Story
Posted by: faultroy on Mar 30, 2007 7:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This writer certainly has an incredible ability to churn out copy about nothing. She must be related to Jerry Seinfeld. Undoubtedly this will suit her well in her quest for full professorship at the University where she currently teaches.
Leave it to a skirt to move her gums about the inane.
I mean two of the women she interviewed said that they did not consider gender an issue in they being successful or unsuccessful within the position of executive producer. So what is the point to this ridiculously pointless story?
What is the point of even running the story since the premise of the article (an alleged inequality in giving these kinds of positions to women) has not been shown let alone proven?
Oh...now I get it...political correctness...Alternet does not want to have anyone think they may be favoring "male" journalists therefore they must seek "something" no matter how trivial, mindless and airheaded to feed the fairer sex.
Sorry how stupid of me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]