Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

A $210 Million Tip? Nice Work If You Can Get It

By Barbara Ehrenreich, The Progressive. Posted March 23, 2007.


Home Depot salesclerks get about $8-$10 an hour for lifting heavy objects and running around the floor all day with no tips while its departed CEO got $210 million bonus for sinking the value of the company's stock.

I’m not upset by the $210 million golden parachute Robert Nardelli received as a send-off from Home Depot. Not at all. To those critics who see it as one more step in the slide from free market capitalism to wholesale looting, I say: What do you really know about Nardelli’s circumstances? Maybe he has a dozen high-maintenance ex-trophy wives to support, each with a brood of special-needs offspring. Ever think of what that would cost?

Or he may have a rare disease that can be held at bay only by daily infusions of minced fresh gorilla liver. Just try purchasing a gorilla a day for purposes of personal consumption, or any endangered species, for that matter. There are the poachers to pay, the smugglers, the doctors and vets. I’m just saying: Don’t start envisioning offshore bank accounts and 50,000-square-foot fourth homes until you know the whole story.

Another reason I’m not troubled by the $210 million payoff is that the Home Depot board may see it as a kind of tip for its fired CEO, and like me, they may see no reason to link tips to performance. I don’t tip as a reward for good service; I tip because it’s part of the tipped person’s living. Waitstaff, for example, earn about $2 or $3 an hour -- a bit more now in certain states -- so a tip is just my contribution to their wage. Sloppy waitress? Surly cabdriver? I’m not their damn supervisor. They get their 20-25 percent anyway.

So what if Home Depot’s stock fell from $50 to $41 on Nardelli’s watch? Maybe the board should be commended for its generous tipping policies. Possibly it’s trying to send a message to us stingy 20 percenters: that 300 percent (based on Nardelli’s $64 million earnings over his six-year tenure) is more like it.

Or it could be that Home Depot has a more profound philosophical message to impart. The board may have decided to flout the very principle of capitalist exchange: that what you get paid should in some way reflect the work that you’ve done -- or the "value added," as they say in the business. If that seems unlikely, consider that Pfizer has just rewarded its own failed CEO with an exit package of -- and this can’t be coincidental -- $200 million.

Picture the board members sitting cross-legged on the floor in a circle, munching s’mores and giggling about how cleverly they’ve undermined the basis of our capitalist economy. Home Depot salesclerks get about $8-$10 an hour for lifting heavy objects and running around the floor all day; the CEO gets a total of almost $300 million for sinking the stock.

We’re not talking about a rational system of rewards—just random acts of kindness, vast sums of money alighting when and where they will, generally in the outstretched hands of those who already have far too much.

Now, could anyone in this store please tell me where to find the little doohickeys that hold up shelves? Oh well, I guess you have to scrap a lot of sales associates to come up with a decent CEO tip these days.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: home depot, ceo

Barbara Ehrenreich is a columnist for The Progressive. Her latest book, "Dancing in the Streets: A History of Collective Joy," has just been published. Her website is www.barbaraehrenreich.com.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Money For Nothing, Executives For Free
Posted by: edith on Mar 23, 2007 1:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Nardelli's reward for incompetence has been well-publicized; I saw a show about it a while back. 60 Minutes? Clearly Wall St and investors aren't endorsing the stupidity of the board of Home Depot: a 20% drop in equity value is a lot more than Nardelli's loot.

My gut tells me this is theft and Nardelli and the board should be on an icy island (assuming there are any left after climate change) off the north coast of Russia. My mind tells me however that if Home Depot continues this spendathon, that it will not exist in a few years. An asset rich company with cheap stock invites takeovers with the inevitable cutting of both corporate and store staff.

Capitalism is both brutal and sanitary: eventually the rot is excised so the value of what's left increases. It's a bloody way to "do the right thing", but it's all we have and are likely to have in the new world of emerging capitalist powers lilke China, India and Russia.

These New Capitalists are, if anything, more brutal and less employee and public oriented than the justly maligned big US corporations and their Wall St bankers. Interesting how the former commies and socialists adapt so well to Wall St ruthlessness and luxury. Not such a difference, eh, Comrades?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Money For Nothing, Executives For Free Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
We May Have Lost.
Posted by: edraven on Mar 23, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It isn't right v. left, it isn't political systems, it would be a class struggle - - but no one seems to be struggling to change anything.

As Cornel West said, everything is "...fueled by corporate greed."

When an entire nation is able to look at the story above, and many other examples of what is happening in America, and not be ready to revolt, we may have lost already.

Every decision by the Bush White House and the Congress seems to be "...fueled by corporate greed."

So far, electing democrats hasn't brought about the kind of change that has to happen. I hope there is change before there is martial law.

Ed Graham

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another terrorist weapon: RPG (Republican-Propelled Greed)
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 23, 2007 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the United States goes the way of Rome, its demise will be caused by Bush and his greedy corporate cabal, not Al Qaeda.

Right now, my fifth great-grandfather, John Scott, a Vermont farmer who fought the British in 1776 with Colonel Seth Warner's "Green Mountain Boys," is spinning in his grave. About 10,000 RPM. Minimum.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption (one reason why Bush won’t let Karl Rove testify under oath in the U.S. attorneys’ firing scandal).

NOTE to prior visitors: I recently installed an email link at the top of King-George’s home page for submitting website suggestions and/or criticisms. Load me up, fellow Americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This robbery is why...........
Posted by: tap17x on Mar 23, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.............the top tax rate should be absolutely confiscatory, say approaching 90% for incomes over 2 million, with specially higher rates for loot stolen the way this Refucklican thief did. (Rates did go up to 90% during or after WW2.) Granted, this would severely cut into big philanthropy like Gates', but their money could be put into a special fund where voters could determine how it was to be spent. And don't give me bullshit about punishing success: the richer they are, the more they profited from public resources, so the more they owe us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps?
Posted by: Bart Thesc on Mar 23, 2007 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps part of the reason the stock took such a precipitous drop might be that savvy stockholders became aware that Home Depot was paying outsized compensation packages to management and realised that the corporate structure was holier than Swiss cheese. Perhaps the investing public should become more aware of these type of deals and shun them in their IRA's etc.

Perhaps I am whistling past a graveyard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nardelli, and the ridiculous amount of waste lead me out the door...
Posted by: Graciebaby on Mar 23, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I worked for the HD for just over a year... HD was always touted as one of the "employers of choice". They offered good wages, benefits and a fun atmosphere... I was so proud when I was hired in. THD has always had this reputation of being asolid job, with room to grow... I was one of the higher paid employees as a "specialist" in my store. My job performance always validated by fellow associates, managment and, most importantly, the CUSTOMER.

It was great...the fellow associates, the customers, the comraderie....I've only been gone for a mere 3 months and miss aspects of the job terribly...I REALLY did enjoy my job!

However, Once I witnessed the way things were done, the "corporate structure", the wages, no longer competitive, the gutting of the benefit package. How merchandise was handled! I could not get past the resentment that filled me as I watched marred, discontinued or slightly damaged merchandise go into a dumpster to be taken to a landfill. Entire displays, removed and crushed, Area rugs, discontinued by vendors, with NOTHING wrong with them...trashed. I kept reeling over the thought that there were people everywhere that could USE the merchandise to rebuild (Katrina?), provide comfort in shelters for the homelss or the battered... it filled me with sadness and, at times rage, knowing that so much was being discared, un-used and that that amount of waste was being tossed, times 2000 other stores just like mine. But hey...thats the POLICY! can't waver from policy can we?

I was also very bothered by Nardelli...I was not alone among my fellow associates...many, having worked for THD for years were watching their retirements, their stock, their futures dis-integrate before their eyes. Nardelli was the topic of many a conversation in the stores, it was never pretty.

Nardelli traveled with pricey body guards, due to constant death threats! Such was his destruction to a company that HAD been built on an entirely different philosophy than it now operates under. I wonder what the founders, regular guys with a dream, think about the choices made, the changes to their company that for a while, WAS the employer of choice?

When I gave my notice, they tried several tactics to encourage me to stay...Hec! they even offered me a managment position...one that would garner me an ENTIRE $0.27 cents more per hour!! Gee, thanks!

In the end, I joked I wouldn't be back until Nardelli was out... imagine my surprise when after just three weeks of leaving...I got an email telling me he'd been fired and when was I coming in?

Well, where's MY tip, BOB!?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't buy at WalMart, Kmart, Hollywood Movies, COSCO, and
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Mar 23, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
things made in exploitative countries like China, Mexico, Pakistan, etc. Don't buy from corporations that gouge customers, abuse workers with low wages, and give crazy salaries (and 'golden parachutes') to their executives. Divest of all stocks held in those companies personally (and force institutions to divest those held by government or union entities (pension funds, teacher pensions, government holdings, etc.) Don't attend Hollywood movies (their 'actors' are some of the most over-paid workers out there. Even worse than HomeDepot exec considering the ilk they 'produce' and the wages paid to the vast number of poorly-paid people used behind the scenes to make the films and outsourcing stuff to Korea and China. Don't participate in supporting the greedy amongst us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ah Home Despot
Posted by: redjenny on Mar 23, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But of course, rich people are so because they are smart, hardworking, and moral, while poor people are lazy, dumb and immoral. Home Despot just helps the cream rise to the top.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ah Home Despot Posted by: fedupw/bush
Yacht-flation
Posted by: eddie torres on Mar 23, 2007 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$210 million doesn't buy the same kind of ship as it would have 10 years ago.

That bastard Vincent Tchenguiz (property tycoon) parks some big floating palace in Cannes every year and there's a perpetual mad scramble to out-keel him.

Ted Turner spends his spare cash on McMillen Yachts' renovations like the Onawa; Brad Pitt bought the Kalizma for Aniston and then divorced her. And she kept the boat.

Do you think it's easy to survive and prosper in the Yacht world with less than $210 million? Please, you people earning $10 per hour have no idea how lucky you are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hang
Posted by: opeluboy on Mar 23, 2007 3:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Even better... Posted by: HeroesAll
Parallel universe - and the one way road there, if everything works out as planned
Posted by: medbear on Mar 24, 2007 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems to me many executives live in a parallel universe to ours. One divided from ours by a very important one-way mirror. A mirror that, to them, reflects their higher thoughts of prestige and infalliability, and at the same time lets us see what they do.

The latter part is darned importand, by the way. Because that is what makes the system work. If we didn't see how they were doing, who would want to go there in the first place? And if noone wanted the perks, the good pay, the "parachutes", the bonuses, and what have you ... we would get really pissed off when we saw things like top executive greed on display.

But we're not. At least, the middle class is not, only mildly morally concerned. But not so much that it hinders us from aspiring to get higher and higher on the ladder - not for the love of responsibility and long hours, but for the promise of these before mentioned "extras". Any objection is more of the "well, it might not be absolutely perfect" kind.

As for the workers? Pity them. If they don't like it, see if they can get work elsewhere.

Those who aspire for higher ranks - realistically or just plain fantasy - turn a blind eye to the wrongs they themselves would love to share the benefits from. One could even argue that the lousy CEOs and the like functions as recruiters, as they prove the statement "How hard can it be".

Those who has no such aspiration, or see no realistic way to get to such a level of employment, they object. Because they have this funny idea that it is they, not the CEO, that makes things go around. The CEO is happily insulated from such psycho ideas by a good layer of middle class wannabes.

Which keeps this dysfunctionality in place. No executive is worth millions upon millions. Even more so if they do a lousy job. But the crowd of next-in-liners and next-in-next-in-liners (and so on) wont let the promise and hope of future riches down by righting the bleedin obviously wrong.

Money talks. For a bunch of millions US$, most can take a little bad press.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CensorNet
Posted by: Wassermann on Apr 4, 2007 2:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Censoring valid information isn't a very 'progressive' thing to do now is it AlterNet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]