Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Bush's Guatemala Visit Spotlights His Cruel Immigration Policies

By Tim Costello and Jeremy Brecher and Brendan Smith, AlterNet. Posted March 15, 2007.


Bush was greeted by protesters filling the streets of Guatemala City this week to denounce a heartless immigration raid in Massachusetss which jailed hundreds of workers, and separated many from their children without warning.
Advertisement

President Bush got a big surprise on his goodwill visit to Guatemala this week. Protesters filled the streets of Guatemala City to denounce an immigration raid that took place at a leather goods factory in New Bedford, Massachusetts on March 6th. The raid resulted in the arrest of 361 people, most of them undocumented immigrants from Guatemala and El Salvador. Even the President of Guatemala criticized the raids in his welcoming speech to Bush on his arrival. This is big news in Guatemala because 10% of the entire Guatemalan population -- many of them undocumented -- lives in the US.

The press in Guatemala - and in Massachusetts -- has been filled with stories of the raid and its aftermath of families shattered, children separated from their parents, and children being held in federal custody. According to The New York Times:

Facing pointed questions from Guatemalan journalists, Mr. Bush stood by the raid, saying, "People will be treated with respect, but the United States will enforce our law.Mr. Bush said he disputed "conspiracies" relayed by Mr. Berger [Guatemala's President] that children were taken away from families. Mr. Bush denied such accounts. "No es la verdad," Mr. Bush said, "That's not the way America operates. We're a decent, compassionate country. Those are the kind of things we do not do. We believe in families, and we'll treat people with dignity.

Well, sí es verdad. Days after the raids the Massachusetts Department of Social Services ( DSS) reported that they "... could not connect 100 children with their families." One woman arrested in the raid was flown back from Texas where she was being held when her 7 year old daughter called a hot line created to unite families divided by the raid to ask about her mother's whereabouts. Two nursing infants were hospitalized for dehydration when they were separated from their mothers.

Once again Bush is either lying or out of touch with reality. The events of this raid have been well documented and roundly condemned by the press and politicians in Massachusetts across the political spectrum. In the era of global communications, people in Guatemala didn't even have to rely on the media; they could pick up the phone and call their relatives in New Bedford to find out what was really going on.

The New Bedford raid had what is by now a familiar feel to it. On March 6, up to 500 government agents, police, and others surrounded the Michael Bianco, Inc. leather goods factory in New Bedford Massachusetts. Inside, an announcement came over loudspeakers, "Stay where you are. Immigration agents are in the building." Panic ensued as workers made a run for it, but the exits were blocked, some by police with guns drawn. Some workers scurried into hiding places, hoping to wait out the raid.

When the building was finally locked down agents instructed US citizens or green card holders to move to one area and all others to another area. Workers were interviewed. Some were released in a few hours because of compelling health or family reasons. But most were loaded onto buses and transported to a holding facility on Fort Devens, a former military base about 60 miles away.

Following processing at Fort Devens, 70 of those arrested were released for a variety reasons within a few days, 90 are being held in various jails in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and 207 were flown far from their homes and families to jails in Texas. Eight minors were picked up, three were released the rest are being held in Miami.

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick engaged in a few testy exchanges with the Department of Homeland Security as did Senators Kennedy and Kerry and other members of the state's Congressional delegation. Patrick attacked the "race to the airport," to move the workers out of state before they could be properly interviewed. Kennedy compared the effect of the raids to, "the tragedy and human suffering that we all witnessed after the devastation wreaked by Hurricane Katrina. ...These men and women had not harmed anyone. They were victims of exploitation, forced to work under barbaric conditions by an employer who knew that they could not afford to complain. Their children, many of whom are United States citizens, had done nothing wrong at all. None of them had any reason to expect that the Department of Homeland Security would decide to make an example out of them."

Kerry called for a Congressional investigation of the raid.

Meanwhile, immigrant rights groups rushed to court and won a federal court order to halt the out of state flights. But most of the captives had already been moved.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bush, guatemala, immigration

Tim Costello, Jeremy Brecher and Brendan Smith are the co-founders of Global Labor Strategies, a resource center providing research and analysis on globalization, trade and labor issues.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What part of illegal do you fail to comprehend?
Posted by: freedomhawk on Mar 15, 2007 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people were here illegally. They were treated humanely by not shipping them out of the country within a few hours. No other country in the world tolerates law-breaking illegal aliens to remain in their borders.

Illegal aliens have no rights according to American law. That the American government gave them any form of rights speaks very highly for us.

You speak as if these illegals deserve equal opportunities given to legitamite US citizens. I never realized that Alternet supported criminals!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real criminals in this case
Posted by: babs on Mar 15, 2007 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are the unscrupulous employers of illegals. While I agree that illegal is just that, if there were no sweatshop jobs available and if greedy businessmen had to pay decent wages and benefits, and adhere to basic human rights, this huge problem would be somewhat mitigated.

It's stories like this that started the labour union movement. No wonder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is the problem -- not illegal immigrants.
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 15, 2007 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If working Americans were paid a decent wage, they would fill the jobs "nobody wants" and provide less incentive for illegal immigation. But that's not the economic model George W. wants. An aristocratic member of the East Coast Elite, he prefers a two-class society of "Haves" and "Have-nots" with a miniscule middle class -- the way it is in Mexico.

Hugh E. Scott, creator/editor of www.King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A generation of Nomads
Posted by: Basenjis on Mar 15, 2007 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today's world seems filled with displaced people, refugees, homeless workers, indigents and desperate people in slave labor jobs in places far from home. No matter what is said about the illegality of anybody being where they are not wanted, resented by locals or accused of taking jobs, no one is attempting to get at the sources of the problem. Lest we forget, these people who should be anywhere but where they are, are human beings like us and this is a human problem. Sooner or later we are going to have to deal with the roots of the problem which are overpopulation and the unfair distribution of the planet's wealth. The United States can chalk a lot of its immigration problems up to simple greed and indifference. NAFTA, "free" trade and corporate greed have done their bit to make it unprofitable if not impossible for many of these modern nomads to stay home and survive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A generation of Nomads Posted by: xgroverx
What would Jesus do? - Be nice to an Illegal
Posted by: sarahk on Mar 15, 2007 2:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a choice. One one hand, we can hate the illegals and feel powerful with "righteous" anger, or on the other hand, we can "do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
After talking with the day laborers in my area, I found that some are young teenagers, many are grandfathers and most are very hungry. They need clothes and food. If you have anything to give, just stop by a group of daylaborers and give them what you have.
I don't have much money, but if I cooked too much for dinner, I wrap it up and give it to one of the laborers on my way to work. If you decide to do this keep an eye out for people with very short bodies and heads that seem to big for their bodies--this means that they have suffered from childhood starvation, so their growth was stunted. I usually try to make sure I give it to a person who shows those signs.
As far as clothing, this is what is needed: socks, white t-shirts, jeans (very small jeans, since most are petite men). If you are getting a bundle of clothing together for Goodwill, just hand it out to the day laborers.
There is also a need for toiletries: soap, shampoo, razors.

Also keep in mind that among the daylaborers, the person that needs the most help will be the most hesitant to approach you.

" The quality of mercy is not strained. It drops from heaven as the blessed rain."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most states have an agency whose primary goal is to ensure child welfare
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Mar 15, 2007 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and protection. If a parent abuses their child then the child is removed from the home pending investigation and/or prosecution. Abuse can be sexual, physical, unhealthy conditions in home, criminal activity in home, etc. Its obvious that these children should be taken away from their parents immediately for their own protection. Often these illegal immigrants have many people in one house (often not even family members many of whom are male.) Besides the zoning restrictions, sanitary, and health concerns these over-crowded conditions can lead to an increase risk of sexual abuse by the male non-family members. Also, many of these parents actually have put these children at great physical risk when they cross across the border (often hidden in trucks without a/c, crossing rivers, crossing hot deserts, climbing barbed-wire fences, travelling along with drug dealers, etc.) They also are contributing to a deliquincy of a minor because they encourage crime in these children (coming to the USA with visa, working without permit, using government services without being a citizen, etc.) These children should be taken immediately.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is perhaps most repugnant
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Mar 15, 2007 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about the Bush visit and comments is not the immigration aspect of the issue, but rather the fact that successive U.S. administrations have, over several decades, waged brutal, murderous, and completely illegal campaigns against innocent civilians in Guatamala (mostly indigenous Mayan Indians) largely in the defence of the interests of exploitative and unethical fruit companies.

When viewed in this context, the words of praise and concilliation coming from an American president are pretty nausiating.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US out of Latin America, Latin America out of US!
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Mar 15, 2007 6:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American imperialism in Latin America (and elsewhere) is what needs to end.

Opening the borders of the most wasteful country on Earth to billions of 3rd world overbreeders (with 1st world appetites, let's be honest) is NOT the solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which part of:
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Mar 15, 2007 10:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Guatemala is one of the many countries that the US and its CIA f*cked-over for many years, so the least you could do is help some of its citizens earn a wage for their family and their country" don't you get?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Which part of: Posted by: yellow
An inside view!
Posted by: diola girl on Mar 24, 2007 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I teach English to mostly undocumented employees in a company that treats all its workers (both legal and illegal) fairly. Recently the company, in trying to only hire 'legal' workers, insisted that any potential employees provide more than one form of documentation, i.e. a birth certificate and a SS#. In addition, HR is now cross-checking carefully with the SS Admin. to guarantee the legality of the new employees. With these new rules in place, the company has been forced to hire more Americans who sometimes don't last ONE 12-hour shift or who don't want to work for $10.00 an hour and just quit. Ask any of the managers! They'd take 10 Hispanic employees over the American temps who often quit because they don't have the work ethic to stick it out.

Some facts for those of you who would rather re-circulate lies told to you by the uninformed 1) most of these 'undocumented' employees pay taxes with a U.S. government-issued ITIN number, which also allows them to buy mortgages and which generates more money for the banks lending the money 2) These 'undocumented' people get insurance for themselves through the company but often don't have insurance for their 'American-born' children, so they usually have to pay out of pocket for their children's medical expenses or sometimes their kids qualify for Medicare. 3) These people get all of the same taxes taken out of their paychecks that we do, but unlike you and me, if they are here at retirement, they will never be able to collect one penny because they are working under assumed names-- the lucky people who sold them their names (often Puerto Ricans or Texan-born Hispanics) will eventually collect a ton of money off the backs of these 'undocumented' laborers 4) Yes, these 'undocumented' people send money home, but they continue to buy everything they need to live a somewhat normal, yet paranoid, life here; they help to maintain the economy in many, many ways from the groceries they buy to the gas they purchase to get to work 5) The majority I have encountered would love to learn English but either don't have the time because all they do is work or because their 12-hr. rotating work schedule doesn't allow for much other than work and sleep.

Having said all this, I am in support of tighter immigration, paying higher wages so that native-born Americans have more incentive for slugging through a 12-hr. shift, and strict conditions for the amnesty of those who have American-born children, no criminal records, proof of paid taxes, and a shown effort to learn English.

In all of this debate, no one has mentioned that Chicago has the highest illegal population of Poles; Boston, the Irish. We tend to focus on the Hispanics because of their dark skin and because of their numbers.

We cannot deport all of those who are illegal; our economy would collapse, so why not start an intelligent discussion of a very complicated issue, one that should involve these people's home countries? Real discussion needs to take place on why there are so few jobs in their home countries and what it would take to keep them there. Finally we need to have a rationale discussion of what we can do to protect the American-born children who were unfortunate to have been born here by undocumented parents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]