Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Challenging the Workplace Dictatorship

By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted March 12, 2007.


George Orwell's "1984" is already here and it's called the American workplace, but finally there's a law in the works that might make jobs livable.
Advertisement

With the Employee Free Choice Act heading toward a Senate vote, conservative columnist George F. Will has suddenly developed a tender concern for workers' rights. The act "strips all workers of privacy," he fumed in the Washington Post last week, and will repeal "a right -to secret ballots -- long considered fundamental to a democratic culture ..." As Will sees it, the unions are backing the act out of sheer desperation: Since they can't seem to win a fair fight for workers' allegiance, they want government to take away the workers' rights and help herd them into union membership.

OK, now let's leave Will-land and enter an actual American workplace. Are you punched in? Good. The first thing to notice is that you've checked your basic civil rights at the door. Freedom of speech? Forget about it: Some employers bar speech of any kind with your fellow employees. I saw this firsthand at a chain restaurant and a Wal-Mart store. Wanna work? Zip your lips.

How about those privacy rights that Will so concerned about? Nada -- they don't exist outside of Will-land either. You probably had to pee in a cup to get your job in the first place, which constitutes a very intimate chemical invasion of privacy. In most states, your purse or backpack can be searched by the employer at any time; your emails and web activity can be monitored.

Right of assembly? Sorry, you don't have that either. In my experience, most managers see a group of three or more employees talking together as an insurrection in the making. Shut up and get back to work!

The Employee Free Choice Act would require employers to recognize a union whenever a majority of workers sign union cards - thus bypassing the often prolonged and creaky process of an NLRB-supervised secret ballot election. The longer the delay before the election, the more time management has to intimidate, isolate, and harass the union's supporters.

Here's how they do it: Workers are called away from their jobs and required to attend management-run meetings where they are subjected to anti-union harangues and videos. Note: Not only do workers lack freedom of assembly, they lack the freedom to not assemble. If management announces a 2 PM meeting, you better be there. These are called "captive audience meetings" for a reason.

At the meetings, which may take place daily in the weeks leading up to an NLRB election, management lays out a dire picture of what will happen if the union comes in: Workers will lose the right to talk to managers individually (not true); they will see their wages and benefits decline (emphatically not true); they will be stuck paying exorbitant dues (hardly); the company may have to move to Mexico ... Sorry, no questions or comments from the audience.

Most pro-union workers can withstand the company's mass captive audiences. Harder to resist are the one-on-one and small group meetings, where individual workers are grilled about their union allegiance for as many hours as it takes. During one union drive among truck drivers, management confronted workers one by one about personal issues like their credit ratings and family responsibilities. A lot of them finally broke down, and the union drive was defeated.

There's nothing wrong with management voicing its view on unions -- say, in a flyer to workers -- and certainly nothing wrong with secret ballots. The problem lies in the abuse of management power in the period between the initial union card signing and the NLRB-sponsored secret ballot election. If workers are willing to sign a union card-- which is a courageous step all by itself -- that should be enough to signify their choice.

Will calls the Employee Free Choice Act "Orwellian." But Orwell's fascist "1984" is already here and it's called the American workplace. What really scares employers about the Employee Free Choice Act is that it will begin to change that -- and bring the first stirrings of democracy to work.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: workplace, worker rights

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, most recently "Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream."



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
If there is a better way than a struggle between labor and management, why doesn't management quit..
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 12, 2007 12:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
struggling? Labor would respond positively to conciliatory moves by management. But it seems management has to show us how tough they are. When you've seen one slavedriver, you've seen them all.

I am jealous of what I have heard secondhand about worker/managment relations in Japan. They work together instead of against each other. Maybe that's all fooey. But if not, I'd invest in Yen rather than Dollars for the decades coming up.

My union friends pat me on the head for my idealism about the benefits of cooperation and then remind me of the real blood, sweat, and tears it took for workers in the USA to get just basic workplace protection, something I hear has eroded in recent decades.

(Ah, Ronnie Reagan's influence truly does live on. The sick people are still living on the streets in California and the air traffic controllers are only now, after 25 years, talking about a union again.)

Krugman's article on AlterNet two days ago cited his evidence for the difference that it makes when laws are written to help workers rather than help the corps. Laws don't solve all problems, especially when they are poorly written. But give me a good law anyday over the word of a boss.

We hear a lot about good and bad workers. How come George Will isn't writing about bad bosses? Because bosses learn to protect each other? Even the bad ones? (Oh, sorry. Only unions do that, I forgot. Please forgive me. Sheesh.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I much appreciate the update. Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Can you imagine Posted by: Edward George
If you don't like your employers policy...quit and start your own business.
Posted by: EagleMB on Mar 12, 2007 2:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is America, the land of supply and demand, and the free market. If you think your boss is too, um, bossy...you can start your own business. You can quit. And if enough people feel the same way that you do, the employer will change his ways because a business without employees is just not profitable. You can't get more rights than that.

And let me tell you a story about unions. A family member of mine works in top-secret security for a major defense contractor. This contractor recently built a high tech security facility at one of their production plants. In order to differentiate the security workers (who are low skilled workers) that work in the new facility from the old, the company decided to give a $1.50 per hour raise to those working in the new facility. The union rejected the raise, and demanded that the raise be $2.50 per hour, and that it be applied to all security workers. The company wasn't willing to do it, and all the security guards received nothing. Way to go union!!! I am sure the security guards were happy to see their union dues hard at work denying them a raise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Employees have more invested Posted by: Edward George
» That's the bogus American Dream Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: That's the bogus American Dream Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
not part of the ten commandments
Posted by: Mamarianne on Mar 12, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 40 hour work week, overtime, and breaks were not handed down with the ten commandments. These and many health and safety protections were won for workers by union members who put their lives on the line. The younger generation does not remember and has not been taught how these conditions were established. Years of anti-union misinformation has done the work of convincing workers to reject unionization. Unions are blamed for the outsourcing of work to overseas sweatshops. The unions did not send those jobs out of the country. Highly paid corporate decision makers made those moves-- with eyes only on the bottom line. Years ago, consumers were urged to "look for the union label." Today it is nearly impossible to find that label. Shoppers seldom have the choice to buy union made goods. The middle class is shrinking, and the United States is rapidly trending toward a land of a few haves and far too many have nots. I thought it ironic that in the midst of the swirling scandal about Walter Reed, our rich and privileged Vice President Cheney was whisked away for prompt medical treatment for a condition that was easily managed in its early stages. Non-insured, non-union working poor would not have had that option.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Gen Xers and Gen Yers" Posted by: Edward George
» RE: "Gen Xers and Gen Yers" Posted by: WitchyNy
hmm
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 12, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.zpub.com/notes/black-work.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hmm Posted by: xgroverx
» Oh, make no mistake... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
JUST DO AS YOU'RE TOLD !
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 12, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the last 30 yrs. people have lost their self respect. They do as they're told even at the expense of another person because it pleases the one in charge. Leadership is never questioned. Those who take issue with anything do so at their own peril. Most people just don't have the guts to change things. Having power over people is one the the great human experiences. Caving in to it is easier than challenging the powers that be. So very few try. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JUST DO AS YOU'RE TOLD ! Posted by: Krain61
Hard to bargain when you're just lucky to work
Posted by: BeeGee on Mar 12, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to a good brain, six years of higher education, and some pure luck, I work in the software industry. I'm paid premium wages, have total flex time almost to the point of setting my own hours, have amazing telecommuting privileges, and feel completely spoiled compared to most of America's workforce. Sure, my emails and web surfing might run though a filter but I'm told the only things that would flag a managerial discussion are hanging out in porn sites or job search portals too long.

Unfortunately, most of my family and friends have blue collar and white collar jobs in less prosperous locales. They feel lucky to experience the oppression you describe. For them, every job opening --even Walmart -- has hundreds of applicants. The state where my siblings live is paying 1980 wages, still. The union manufacturing jobs that used to let blue collar workers buy the products they made, such as new cars, are mostly gone.

And don't let amount of education fool you. There's no way most of these displaced workers are ever going to train to be doctors, attorneys, or software engineers. Even a lot of the chemical companies and other venues for lab technicians and research assistants have consolidated themselves out of existence. Of course, the health professions are crying for staff -- and willing to pay a lot. But, if you didn't gobble up your math and science in middle school, you're not going to be an RN -- you're going to be toting bedpans.

In short, unless we get back the kind of jobs that used to be held by high school grads and community college graduates -- jobs on the family farm, local retail and sales, manufacturing -- the oppression could get a lot worse and permanent joblessness could become a way of life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm glad you said this Posted by: crys_may
» RE: I'm glad you said this Posted by: EagleMB
» Get your facts straight bub Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Get your facts straight bub Posted by: lessbread
Free Speech and Labor
Posted by: brucebarry on Mar 12, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a link on the issue of free speech in and around workplaces.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't Will-land a terrist country?
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 12, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice piece, but why do we need to talk about George Will? Anyone with a brain understands that man is a neocon shill. Why do we have to acknowledge his existence?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMIGOSH! I FOUND IT! RIGHT THERE IN 1984!!!
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Mar 12, 2007 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's right there on page 83 of "1984":

And veerily, if thine waiter shouldeth lecture ye on the evils of beef while ye ordereth a steak, thine waiter may hie out yon door and looketh elsewhere for his shekels.

We've got an administration that has bought into the Nike model of governance (Just Do It), and people are busy moaning and whining about being told what to do when they volunteer their services in return for money.

Sheesh Pete.

Here's a notion: find something you like better and quit doing things you can't stand, unless you really enjoy the paycheck more than you hate having to stop lecturing people on how to live their lives while you're "on the clock."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OMIGOSH! I FOUND IT! RIGHT THERE IN 1984!!! Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Two seperate points
Posted by: Boomerang on Mar 12, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. This act of legislation is useful and just. Employees shouldn't be subject to employer harangues about unions. Employees have a right to petition their employer for fair conditions, fair wages, and decent benefits. They may not get it (business will always resist things that push against the bottom line), but they have a right to at least try.

2. Following company policy is somehow bad? I'd love to see what kind of business Ms. Ehrenreich would run where workers can group up and gab about anything they want on the job rather than doing what you're paying them to do. You tell workers to hush up and do their job for a reason: because when you don't, YOU LOSE MONEY. Three workers standing in a group is three workers who aren't paying attention to their work or their environment. It's the same reason you don't hire a bunch of kids to work retail shifts together. They'll talk to each other and their friends rather than pay attention. It's loss prevention and productivity all rolled into one.

Workers get to demand compensation and a decent environment for their labor, but it's the company that sets the policies. If your employer wants you to stand on your head and juggle flaming chainsaws while you serve ice cream, then that's what you do. They'll run it as they see fit. If you don't want to, then go work somewhere else. No one is forcing you to work there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two seperate points Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Two seperate points Posted by: EagleMB
Even old line organized industrial workers are in trouble
Posted by: truthteller on Mar 12, 2007 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm union railroader, part of one of the original union organized industries in the Country. We've been without a contract for about three years now. There is a new contract coming, and while it does give some wage increases, from what I've heard, just about all of it will be eaten up by increases in health insurance deductions and prescription co-payments. We're already having major issues over the company running roughshod over the existing contract on attendance issues. People are being taken to investigations over "availability" that have good work records. The company has changed rules criteria arbitrarily, knowing they can stone-wall the union with a Republican-controlled Labor Board in place.

It is now mid-March, and we have yet to have our vacations scheduled for the year, because management wants to give us many weeks less of vacations than the workers are entitled to, and just pay people for the vacation time, clearly a violation of labor law. They also wanted to divide the number of employees by 52 and give that number of people vacation for every week - the same number in February as July - just beyond any level of fairness.

Clearly management feels they are in the driver's seat with this administration. We can't strike, because we are considered an "essential" industry, subject to being orded back to work by the President, and having an agreement imposed upon us by a Republican arbitration board. Realistically, we don't have many cards to play, but we're still somewhat better off than the non-unionized.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Big shots ruined the railroads Posted by: Edward George
» Realities of transportation today Posted by: truthteller
What is the problem? Capitalism is the answer.
Posted by: WitchyNy on Mar 12, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This whole idea of 'jobs' comes from the industial revolution.

Instead of learning a true skill..workers spend their days doing meaningless busywork that most anyone can be trained to do, creating a bunch of usless plastic/paper junk...the feed the machine.

Driving cars miles and miles each day...back and forth to offices.

What we need to do is STAY HOME. "A nation of small family farms"...Thomas Jefferson. If we are going stop pollution of the Earth...before it is too late---we need to change the way we live. There is a true strike.

You talk of workers rights..what about the right to do meaningful important work...that makes the world a better place? You talk of unions...remember-
'TAKE OVER THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION?' Take over!

All I hear is talk for more money---- Keep you doped with Religion and Sex and TV.

AH!- Liberals annoy me! LETS GET RADICAL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars 'at'
Posted by: mite on Mar 12, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.lawfulpath.com and 'Behold A Pale Horse' by William Cooper.

It has taken over 100 years to get this 'Hegelian' and 'Fascist'
society. Search for Antony C. Sutton's 'America's Secret Establishment' it may attack our denial matx, but after the shock wears off it will open your eyes. download from the WEB.

The time has arrived from the past people (1776)- remember what Patrick Henry said: Give me liberty-or-give me death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pursuit of happiness???
Posted by: SayBlade on Mar 12, 2007 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, it looks like most Americans are not doing well on the second one and never catch the third one.

Whatever happened to the quality of life, sharing, community you're supposed to get when you work hard for it? Big business has profit at its bottom line. In a free society, government (the extension of the people) is supposed to ensure that life, liberty and happiness are achievable.

Welfare is way cheaper than handing billions to corporations or blowing up billions of dollars over puny little countries on the other side of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions would not be necessary
Posted by: Seabird on Mar 12, 2007 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if employers treated their workers right. A happy, productive employee, who is treated fairly, has no reason to join a union. And companies that take care of their employees should have no reason to fear development of a union.

When a CEO pulls down millions of dollars in bonuses, when stockholders welcome the laying off of hundreds of minimum-wage peons, when overtime pay is denied or buried under corporate red tape, when health benefits are minimal and retirement funds are victim to manipulation, when human beings are treated as numbers in the company ledgers, then companies have good reason to expect organization efforts.

They don't need strong-arm tactics to hold off unions. They don't need backroom meetings and propaganda films and credit rating threats. They don't need to fear secret ballots. All they have to do is treat employees like the assets that they are. A happy worker sees no need to unionize.

And there are companies out there that prove my argument.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George Will, moral midget
Posted by: astockton on Mar 12, 2007 4:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Will divorced the mother of his Downs' syndrome-afflicted son in order to snag himself a younger trophy wife. He has no standing to speak on issues of morality in the workplace or anywhere else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Unions would not be necessary
Posted by: SayBlade on Mar 12, 2007 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
kelt65 writes:
"Your big problem here is you assume unions are bad somehow."

Hmm. I know a man who was union on both sides of the Atlantic. He told me that in Britain, the unions have access to the company's books. So, when the company cannot, in truth, come up with money for raises, the union does not press for them and employees are ok with that. The company, knowing it is not threatened in this manner can more easily negotiate and acquiesce when in comes to working conditions, benefits and other items.

Seems a lot of union busting in North America is full of posturing, pride, greed and BIG, angry penises.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unions would not be necessary Posted by: richholland
Slavery>Big Brother
Posted by: hole11 on Mar 12, 2007 8:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just look at how we make laws. Congress delegates to agencies. Name every agency? You can't. The agency makes rules and wants everyone to follow these arbitrary statements and if need be they will have their own kangaroo courts to prove they are correct. Why is it that the agencies are in the Executive Branch?

Why not just elect a dictator and be done with it? We have false hopes, false dreams and a false society. Other parts of the world might not be any better but they all look to us and despise us save the Israelis who really appreciate our strengths and generosity.

So as long as we have Goldstein as our master we are better than the Confederacy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]