Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Nike Is Leading the Race ... to the Bottom

By Zack Knorr, AlterNet. Posted March 9, 2007.


Despite promises to clean up its act, Nike is making a U-turn on its commitments to improve the sweatshop conditions for its workers overseas.
Advertisement

For years, Nike has insisted that it cares about worker rights and is improving working conditions at its overseas factories. Now the company is abandoning one of the only factories in its supply chain that respects the rights of workers

Embarrassed in the 1990s by exposés of the deplorable conditions in its factories around the world, Nike made a public promise to clean up its act. Nike pledged that its supplier factories would respect the rights of workers, including the right to organize a union.

There has been a huge gap between Nike's words and the company's actions. Despite the company's pledges, conditions remain poor throughout Nike's global supply chain and unions are scarce. For most workers, Nike factories today look pretty much like Nike factories ten years ago.

But a few factories have made real progress. Workers at these factories have taken Nike at its word and demanded that factory management follow the standards in Nike's code of conduct. And under pressure from labor rights groups, the factories have responded and ended their sweatshop practices.

One of these factories is BJ&B in the Dominican Republic. At BJ&B, workers sewing Nike baseball caps used to suffer the abuses typical of Nike's contract factories: degrading insults from supervisors, long hours of forced overtime. Anyone who spoke out and demanded better conditions was fired.

Citing Nike's own code of conduct, workers and activists demanded that Nike take responsibility for conditions at BJ&B. Nike, looking for opportunities to rid itself of its sweatshop reputation, said it agreed: Conditions should be improved and Nike would force the factory to clean up its act.

The result was dramatic improvement in standards for workers at BJ&B. Among other gains, workers were able to form a union to defend their rights -- one of the only unions in any Nike factory anywhere in the world. And workers negotiated a groundbreaking union contract that called for an increase over the poverty-level wages that are the industry standard.

Such victories in the global garment industry have been few and far between. BJ&B is one of only two factories in all of Latin America where activists have succeeded in forcing Nike to make real, lasting improvements in working conditions.

BJ&B is hugely significant in the debate of working conditions in the global economy. BJ&B demonstrates that it is possible for U.S. multinational corporations to ensure ethical behavior on the part of their overseas contract factories -- when they are willing to take the necessary steps. And BJ&B has meant dignity in the workplace and a better life for thousands of people -- workers and their families -- in the Dominican Republic.

Nike was happy to take credit for the progress at BJ&B. Nike has touted BJ&B as proof of its commitment to cleaning up working conditions -- proof that Nike and sweatshops were no longer synonymous.

Last week, Nike demonstrated the sincerity of its commitment to worker rights -- by announcing the closure of BJ&B. Nike says the factory isn't "competitive" and announced that it will move cap production to Bangladesh and Vietnam, two countries where working conditions are bad, unions are illegal, and caps are a few pennies cheaper than at BJ&B. Factory management suspended the entire workforce and set a closure date of May 22.

It's hard to imagine a clearer demonstration of the hypocrisy and emptiness of Nike's extensive "corporate social responsibility" programs. When the spotlight was on BJ&B, Nike was forced to act responsibly, but as soon as Nike executives thought no one was looking, they decided to dump one of their only decent factories -- because the product can be made more cheaply in a sweatshop.

How highly does Nike value the rights of workers? The savings the company will derive from abandoning BJ&B are less than one one-thousandth of the company's annual advertising budget.

It is not too late for BJ&B. Activists across the United States, and around the world, are mobilizing to demand that Nike keep the factory open. We invite you to join the effort by calling or writing Nike to tell them sweatshops are bad for business.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: nike, sweat shops

Zack Knorr is the International Campaigns Coordinator for United Students Against Sweatshops.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's the The American Way
Posted by: Rolomax on Mar 9, 2007 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no comment is necessary here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not do something to make a difference...
Posted by: EagleMB on Mar 9, 2007 2:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you really want Nike to change its policies, then stop buying their products. It is not just the American way, but it is the DUTY of every business, to maximise revenue and minimise costs. So how is it Nike's fault for the conditions in other countries? In fact, if wages were not so low abroad, perhaps Nike would keep more jobs in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Defense Dept. Approved Sweatshop
Posted by: Jason Jordan on Mar 9, 2007 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The illustrious Tas, late of Loaded Mouth, is still blogging on occasion. Today he sent me a link to a new post of his at Ron Brynart's blog. Tas writes: "You guys might find this story a little shocking. As far as I know, it's only been covered in my local press and hasn't made a big splash int he national news yet. Maybe it should..."

I agree. On the face of it, this should definitely be getting more coverage. Here's Tas' entire post.

Sweatshops on US soil: Condoned by the Department of Defense?

For the past couple of days, the Providence Journal has covered a massive federal immigration agent raid at Michael Bianco Inc., a textile plant in New Bedford, MA that had $170 million in contracts to make clothing for the US military. The raid by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents netted 327 illegal immigrants, and they also arrested members of Bianco's management and charged them with conspiring to hire illegal immigrants.

But I thought the most appalling aspect of the story were the working conditions in the textile plant (link is registration-restricted):

The affidavits allege that [plant owner] Insolia, 50, of Pembroke, Mass., “intentionally seeks out illegal aliens because they are more desperate to find employment and are thus more likely to endure severe workplace conditions he has imposed.” Those conditions allegedly include “docking of pay by 15 minutes for every minute an employee is late; fining employees $20 for spending more than 2 minutes in the restroom and firing for a subsequent infraction; providing one roll of toilet paper per restroom stall per day, typically resulting in the absence of toilet paper after only 40 minutes per day; fining employees $20 for leaving (the) work area before break bell sounds; and fining employees $20 for talking while working and firing for a subsequent infraction.”
Despite the chilly temperatures we're currently enduring here in southern New England, those conditions sound quite sweatshop-like to me.

No matter who is working the job, nobody should be working in sweatshop-like conditions on American soil. The Department of Defense, though, doesn't share my belief. I came to this conclusion after seeing this paragraph buried deep in the Projo's follow-up article to yesterday's raid:

According to a spokesman for the U.S. Army Soldiers System Center in Natick, Mass., a representative from the Department of Defense has an “on-site” office at the plant, where he is charged with inspecting all of the gear that is shipped to the military.
So a textile plant that hires over 300 illegal immigrants, which is blatantly illegal, expressly for the purpose of enforcing working conditions on them, conditions which are also blatantly illegal, had a representative from the Department of Defense -- the federal government -- on premise some of the time to inspecting clothing from the plant.

From what I gather, this representative from the military had absolutely no problem with the working conditions of Bianco, Inc. Which is rather ironic, given that he represents an entity which supposedly fights for freedom in the homeland.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outright Theft on American Soil
Posted by: lynnejane on Mar 9, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Caveat: This may or may not be true. You be the judge or investigate if you can.

When Nike built the last Portland, OR campus extension, 26 subcontractors lost their businesses. Why? Because the general contractor's invoices for them were never paid by Nike. The fight dragged out so long that these small AMERICAN businesses had to declare bankruptcy.

My friend's father was caught up in this and lost his retirement. He continued to work into his late 70's to make it up and keep his business open.

No one in Portland was willing to investigate (or publish?) due to Nike's support of the economy in that area.

I'd love to see that travesty come to light and further shame Nike in their own back yard. I've bought my last pair, you betcha!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dammit! Now I have to wear Adidas?!
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 9, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seriously, it's a real shame Nike is a bunch of such shits. They make a superior product when it comes to futbol (OK, "SAH-kur") gear. That Adidas shit is clammy, sweaty, holds BO for years despite triple washings, all the seams are scratchy and their boots fit only elves with narrow feet. I can only hope Adidas is into sweatshops too so I won't have to slum-it and wear their gear now that I can't wear Nike in good conscience.

Assholes. The sweatshop thing was bad enough but to hear they refuses to pay their sub-contractors and all of them had to bankrupt, sounds like just another 'Merkaan corporation. I worked for an aerospace giant who used to do that (perhaps they still do)... their AP dept drags out the bills and shortpays those who threaten legal action, but just enough to keep dragging things out until they go under then they go, oops, I guess I can by washers and rubber stoppers from the next guy (for free!). Courts won't enforce their debts because they're the "big" corporation and it's bad for business to let it be known a "big" corporation won't pay it's bills.

God bless 'Merkuh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aw ... just when Garry Trudeau was saying nice things
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Mar 9, 2007 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In case y'all missed it:

BD is having his prosthetic leg pimped out. Today he decides not to have it air conditioned "no, I don't want anything my players don't have"

Yesterday he ordered a Swoosh logo graphic. The artist reminds him of Nike's bad rep, and BD replies "That was BEFORE"

Guess they haven't changed.

Poor BD

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

corporations are blind sharks
Posted by: Ghoulman on Mar 9, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that move forward no matter what. The only thing that stops them on thier blind drive towards profits are government regulation and law.

Reasonable regulation is the only weapon the citizenry have against corporations murdering and enslaving children in their off-shore factories, poisoning people here, and generally just being lawless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DUMPING ALL NIKE PRODUCTS!!!
Posted by: Darrell Kern on Mar 9, 2007 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am going through closet and tossing out everything Nike.

This company is as bad as most other big businesses- however when you make a commitment to your employees and the public, but instead use the platform as a positive propaganda spin device, you deserve to die (go out of business). This is so gross it makes me want to vomit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]