Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Undeclared War on America's Middle Class

By Thom Hartmann, AlterNet. Posted September 6, 2006.


Under the guise of free market capitalism, conservative policies have made 80-hour work weeks the norm. Working harder for less money means middle class families are getting screwed.
090606story
090606_story
Advertisement

This excerpt is reprinted with permission from Screwed: The Undeclared War Against the Middle Class by Thom Hartmann; Berrett Koehler Publishers, 2006.

You can't be middle class if you earn the minimum wage in America today.

The American dream and the American reality have collided. In America we have always said that if you work hard and play by the rules, you can take care of yourself and your family. But the minimum wage is just $5.15 per hour. With a 40-hour workweek, that comes to a gross income of $9,888 per year. Nobody can support a family, own a home, buy health insurance, or retire decently on $9,888 per year!

What's more, 30 million Americans -- one in four U.S. workers -- make less than $9 per hour, or just $17,280 a year. That's not a living wage either.

The U.S. Census Bureau's statistics for 2004 show the official poverty rate at 12.7 percent of the population, which put the number of people officially living in poverty in the United States at 37 million. For a family of four, the poverty threshold was listed as $19,307. If the head of that family of four were a single mother working full-time for the government-mandated minimum wage, she couldn't even rise above the government's own definition of poverty.

Becoming middle class in America today is like scaling a cliff. Most middle-class Americans are clinging to the edge with their fingernails, trying not to fall. In the 1950s middle-class families could live comfortably if just one parent worked. Today more than 60 percent of mothers with children under six are in the work force. Not only do both parents work but often at least one of those parents works two or more jobs.

Middle class at 80 hours per week

In a 2005 article in the Chicago Tribune, reporters Stephen Franklin and Barbara Rose introduce us to Muyiwa Jaiyeola. Jaiyeola, who is 33 years old, works a 40-hour week as a salesman at a Sears store, then works another 20 hours in the stockroom of a Gap store in downtown Chicago. When Jaiyeola pulled two all-night shifts at his stockroom job in late August, he was able to sleep only two hours in the afternoon, then two more in the morning before going back to his sales job. He hoped to nap during his break in the middle of the night.

Jaiyeola is not hoping to get rich -- he's just trying to pay his bills. Working two jobs at this wage level is what it takes to be middle class these days. And he's not alone. According to Franklin and Rose:

Nearly 7.6 million Americans straddle two or more jobs and must find time to work, sleep and live somewhat contorted lives in a very full 24 hours. According to a 2001 U.S. Labor Department survey, most workplace moonlighters do it because they want or need extra money to pay bills ...

Those who specifically need the extra work to pay bills are most often women who take care of their families, and divorced, widowed or separated workers. For a quarter of the American work force, not only is the American dream not a reality, no part of it is.

Low wages are being paid not only to entry-level workers at places like Wal-Mart and McDonald's but also to adults like Jaiyeola who have work experience. The people being forced to work two jobs to make a living are the heartbeat of our society. They are child-care workers and nursing home workers, janitors and security guards, salespeople and stockers. They often have the most hazardous jobs, the late-night jobs -- the jobs that rarely include benefits.

Americans have traditionally believed in an economy where those who make a contribution are rewarded. A man like Jaiyeola should be able to work eight hours at Sears and then go home.

Low prices, low paycheck

Cons argue that we have to choose between having high wages and having low prices. They are wrong.

Take the case of Wal-Mart. According to the United Food and Commercial Workers union (UFCW), Wal-Mart could pay each employee a dollar more per hour if the company increased its prices by a half penny per dollar. For example, a $2 pair of socks would then cost $2.01. This minimal increase would add up to $1,800 annually for each employee.

I wouldn't mind paying more for a pair of socks if it meant that my fellow Americans would be able to pay for good health care. That would save me money because right now Wal-Mart's uninsured employees run up hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills at emergency treatment centers when their problems often could have been solved more cheaply and with better results had they been caught earlier at a doctor's office.


Digg!

Thom Hartmann is an author and nationally syndicated daily talk show host.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Here we go again!
Posted by: TT2 on Sep 6, 2006 12:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
F**** the ruling class!!! F*** there immigrants slave servants! MOB RULE!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mob rule beats tyrannical rule Posted by: YogiBear
It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 6, 2006 12:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 'Right To Work' laws, pioneered in southern states to draw companies with union workforces to the non-union south started the trend long before Reagan ever went to Washington. Later, other states followed and it has cascaded since then.

The people in the south who thought it was O.K. to undercut unions in the north screamed when the jobs started leaving the south for Mexico and elsewhere. The south cut a deal with the devil when they actively sought out industrial jobs with lax rules and no unions. They got pollution, a crappy tax base and a huge working poor population for a couple of decades and now have little to show for it.

Friends, America is a family and it's time we started acting like it. Until these 'Freewill Employment' and 'Right To Work' laws are struck from the books unions will not gain much traction outside of government and service jobs. Manufacturing will continue to hollow out and leave our country until we replace or repeal a whole list of treaties and trade agreements designed to export US jobs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It Started Before Reagan Posted by: lively56
» RE: It Started Before Reagan Posted by: willymack
left out
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 6, 2006 1:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Hartmann's To-do list but he left out one item that has recently been stolen: free and fair elections with all of the votes of poor and other liberal voters being correctly counted from uncorrupted ballots/machines and no long waiting lines. We cannot have fair elections with unfair partisan vote situations of tampering/counting/storage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: left out Posted by: kww355
» RE: left out Posted by: Patrissimo
» RE: left out Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: left out Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: left out Posted by: Madam Hatter
» RE: left out Posted by: willymack
Flip side...
Posted by: ahmlco on Sep 6, 2006 1:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, unions aren't panaceas that cure all ills, and can make things worse. Like many organizations, unions often need a reason for perpetuating their existence long after their original function has been served.

Look, for example, at the state of the automotive and airline industries. US automakers are bleeding cash (mostly due to once again zigging when they should have been zagging).

Be that as it may, many unions continued to demand an ever larger share of an ever-dwindling pie, with little to no thought as to the future consequences of their actions. But hey, at least today they can go back to their membership and say, "Look what we got you for your dues."

Yeah, plants closed when they're no longer competitive. Layoffs. Bankruptcies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Flip side... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: hms2004
» Unions are their own enemy! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: lively56
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: yesman
» RE: Flip side... Posted by: magistre
» A non-union story Posted by: YogiBear
The working class and the unions can regain power.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 6, 2006 3:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The working class and the unions can regain power. In my opinion they can do it before the November election. In fact the only time it's possible is before an election. That's the only time our votes have clout.

The way to get the power is to use the strategy of the labor unions. Make demands with an "or else".

The Lincoln Initiative is a a simple strategy. Each member tells the campaign commitees of both parties the issue that he/she wants in their platforms. The "or else" is that he/she tells them that he/she won't vote for a party that doesn't include that issue in their platform.

The working class has been divided by fear. The Republicans scare the religious right with "sinful wild-eyed liberals" and the Democrats scare the liberals with the "intolerant radical religious right. Each group votes for the "lesser evil" party.

Both parties need our votes. Now's the time to make them compete for them on issues important to the working class.

Bob Reichenbach
Director, The Lincoln Initiative

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

there's another factor operating here too
Posted by: profmarcus on Sep 6, 2006 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we cannot and must not forget that, in addition to all the things you cite, the middle class is also being screwed by its adoption of the insidious and destructive "consumer mentality..." the notion that we somehow must always possess new and better "stuff" and spend our weekends at the mall or walmart keeps those bills coming in... i'm not arguing that the middle class isn't under attack... it certainly is... but we had also better take a look at our media and corporate-inculcated beliefs that stuff = happiness...

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Now Makes What You Buy
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Sep 6, 2006 4:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next time you are in any Mall go inside some of the stores and look at the items for sale and where they are manufactured. Over half of all mall stores are for womens apparel and at least 80% of those goods come from China, India, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Mariannas, Shri Lanka, Pakistan. So whatever money is being spent by those who shop (including Walmart) is going to foreign countries. It does not take much speculation to reach some conclusions where this is leading.

As for Reagan he certainly began the process. I was in California when he became governor and we had never witnessed such an inhumane elected offical like that before. Among other mentioned acts he closed all the State Hospitals creating what we now call the "homeless." For all his acting skills he was a heartless man whose true alooftness reflected his personal view that the masses were a "lesser" population to be used for the benefit of those more "superior." It continues today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who Now Makes What You Buy Posted by: ALANHESTER
ozlock
Posted by: ozlock on Sep 6, 2006 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a few corrections:
"In May 1, 1886, the Knights of Labor took to the streets to call for an eight-hour day. Eighty thousand workers shut down the city of Chicago. On May 4, 3,000 workers gathered in Haymarket Square. A bomb was thrown that killed seven policemen. Eight of the people present were rounded up, tried for murder, and sentenced to death. The Haymarket riot became the symbol of labor injustice in America."

Although not a scholar, I don't even think that all the defendants were present at the gathering. Moreover, not all defendants were sentenced to death.

Four were hanged. One committed suicide in jail, Governor Ogelsby commutted two sentences to life, and one had received a 15 year sentence. Governor Altgeld pardoned the survivors in a brilliant summation of the illegal actions of the prosecutors and the judge.

See http://www.kentlaw.edu/ilhs/prisoner.htm

The Haymarket affair gave rise to May Day commemorations around the world. It has never been accepted by the U.S. government as such, partly due to the fact that it had been a big day for Russia, the Soviet Union and other Socialist governments.

My only hope is that people who jump on the Haymarket bandwagon would at least get the facts straight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ozlock Posted by: oneyedjack
» RE: ozlock Posted by: drmflorida
Taxation without representation
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 6, 2006 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though we the people have the clout
To vote the politicians out
We’d still be ruled by sleazy smarties
Who give money to both parties
Here’s the truth without a doubt
No one can vote those rascals out!

It does no good to rant and holler
Can’t outvote that mighty dollar
People that our votes elected
Work for dollars they’ve collected
We can only take the reins
If we finance all campaigns!!

The candidates are not to blame
They play in a losing game
They can’t do good if they’re not in
But need both cash and votes to win
Our horse sense points to just one course
Cash and votes from just one source!!!

Bob Reichenbach
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions are a 'check and balance'
Posted by: kww355 on Sep 6, 2006 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as the three branches of our federal government are supposed to act as a check and balance to each other, unions were created to act in much the same way to protect the workers from greedy corporations.

Our country would be a lot better off if we could mend both of these broken systems.

A strong national presence of unions even helps people who work in non-union places. Employers are forced to raise the wages and benefits offered ( perhaps not to the level of union workers, but still above the minimums ) in order to keep the good workers they have. A rising tide raises all boats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point. Posted by: jreinhart1
» RE: Unions are a 'check and balance' Posted by: dangerouslysane
albiegf13
Posted by: albiegf13 on Sep 6, 2006 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DUH....! It's about time that one of our fine bloggers finaly comes up to the plate and hits a single rbi..... This is what it's all about..... It's about DOMINATION of the masses by the corporations.... It's all about total global domination. No more middle class, just two classes, the ruling class and the working masses... This is what every fat cat corporate douche fantasizes about. The question is, are you going to let them get away with it....? So far, so good. They are setting up these little oasis all over the globe where they can hide and play. They are protected by our institutions and they will either buy you on the cheap, or coerce you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: malcolmartin on Sep 6, 2006 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American bourgeois democracy is being drowned. It will never be resuscitated. The liberal intelligentsia of the petty bourgeois spins its wheels in the mud of this reality. Thom Hartman's book is alot like Al Gore's movie. Al Gore sees what is being done to the planets ecosystem and tries to sound the alarm with a film like An Inconvenient Truth. Lay out the incontrovertible facts of global warming, organize and agitate, and a tipping point will come that changes governmental policy. A young Al Gore saw Dr. Martin Luther King do just that in his confrontation with racial injustice and clings to the memory along with the idea that rationality still has influence in American ruling circles. The real inconvenient truth is that even the great Dr. King could not generate an effective civil rights movement in 2006 and that the assault on the environment will not end until a stake is driven into the heart of capitalism.

The sad truth is that the petty bourgeois cannot defeat the capitalist ruling class! They are a timid and passive group who, in this time for warriors, gather at the gates of the palace to nag and complain essentially to each other. There are scores of Internet websites, magazines, newspapers, radio programs and networks like AirAmerica Radio, and some small television networks where liberal, left, progressive, and other commentators show up to whine out loud. They rail against the outrages and inhumanity of the U.S. government and the Bush Administration. They point out the duplicity, the corruption, the hypocrisy, the inhumanity, and the utter criminality loosed in the world today but to no useful end since capitalism will not be reformed nor shamed to death. Pointing out the defects of capitalism has become as easy as shooting fish in a barrel. The ruling class brushes its liberal democratic critics off like gnats as long as they stay away from the third rail. But let one of these voices dare mention unity based on working class-consciousness and a mobilization to strike at profits and great danger would shortly thereafter visit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Reply to daw13 Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: eply to daw13 Posted by: daw13
» Reply to Gatsby Posted by: malcolmartin
Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: JohnnyM on Sep 6, 2006 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you think slavery ever left the USA, I think you're wrong.

It's just that most of the modern slaves, who are willing to work 80 hours per work and think us that refuse are 'losers,' are just that...willing slaves. It's the slave master whipping the other slaves into the 80 hours of work, only now most are willing.

Whoever above said there's another factor involved here, it's consumerism, is right. To combat this problem, the best way is stop buying! Bring our economy to it's knees!! It's the only way to revolt now, since mass rallies, unions and the press have all lost their effectiveness.

* Walk or ride your bike everywhere.
* Find the natural remedies to your minor illnesses.
* Buy your food from local small farmers, if they exist
* Don't buy that new gadget, you really don't need it
* etc, etc

To fight the system within the system (i.e. with politics and law) doesn't work anymore. So the democrats are useless too - We, the people, have to change the rules.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Modern-Day Slavery Posted by: loril
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery Posted by: PJH67
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery Posted by: yesman
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery Posted by: yesman
Whenever these discussions come up, I get confused
Posted by: sln70 on Sep 6, 2006 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It certainly does seem like the ruling elite are trying to force the "rest of us" into poverty. It goes hand in hand with their new obsession of being able to observe, record and track our every move, too. They are clearly getting richer and more powerful while the rest of us are seeing our options dwindle...
BUT...
Why?

What could be the reasoning behind this madness? Sure, they want poor workers to exploit, it is their wet dream. But do they not also necessarily need people to buy the products that they produce?

Henry Ford was smart enough to see that he had to pay his workers enough to afford them one of his vehicles. Where has that mentality gone, and do "they" not see how shortsighted it is to impoverish EVERYONE?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» why?? Posted by: Iconoclast421
America regressing
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 6, 2006 6:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America is regressing because no one is willing to do the work required to secure workers rights. They'd rather watch survivor and do nothing. Even though it results in the destruction of our own future. When you consider the massive amount of private debt, it becomes clear that the middle class is gone. It just doesn't know it yet.

The idea that this war is "undeclared" is just total nonsense. Many saw this coming 30 and 40+ years ago. Get the people dumbed down, use debt as a smokescreen to allow people to think they're doing alright. Then pull the rug out from under them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And Remember
Posted by: dadanbetty on Sep 6, 2006 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's those damn immigrants fault. It is all their fault. The US gov is very fair and square.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And Remember Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: And Remember Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: And Remember Posted by: dangerouslysane
It's Human Nature...
Posted by: albiegf13 on Sep 6, 2006 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To dominate, coerce, rule. Seeking prestige. This is the way that our culture is programed. Eat or be eaten. It's in our genes. The American dream... ? Don't make me laugh... There is no such thing and never has been.... It's a delusion... We want more, more, more, it's never enough... Pride, greed, vanity, lust, gluttony, sloth and anger. That's the American dream... Take a look at Leiberman, look at how desperate he is, clining on to power, he can't let go. His life is a living Hell.... Everything is just the way it's supposed to be, the Universe is a perfect place. So just quit whinning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's Human Nature... Posted by: agapegirl
We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: rtdrury on Sep 6, 2006 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Labor unions are the corporations' great enablers. What we really need in place of giant corporations are cooperatives of small local independent businesses owned by small local business people.

Instead of retail corporations we need small local merchants. Instead of industrial corporations we need small local craftsmen. Instead of factory farms we need small local farms. Instead of giant electric power plants and grids, fossil gas, municiple water works, sewage and landfull waste disposal, and fossil transport fuel networks, we need small-time local electric/thermal cogeneration and biofuel production, water wells, composting and recycling.

Efficiencies of scale is a myth. Efficiencies peak at a very small scale enterprise. And that's a good thing for people because people need to work for themselves, not for the boss man.

While a giant retail or industrial enterprise appears to benefit society by forcing better prices from suppliers, much of these savings feed verious white-collar fluff industry - expensive advertising/marketing, "public relations", lobbying, legal, accounting, executive pay, perks, political donations, philanthropy, and more. Thus efficiencies peak with a smaller enterprise that omits all these extraneous expenditures.

Smaller enterprises mean more independence for more people so more people take on more responsibility in the civic arena. A larger pool of people involved in civic decisions is more effective at filtering out ideological extremism and replacing it with common sense policies in the public interest.

Centralized bureaucracies are less flexible. They encourage one-size-fits all solutions with the appearance of efficiency but which don't utilize local expertise particularly in agriculture. Also, more enterprises means more experimentation and trials undertaken. Nature succeeds with redundancy and diversity. We can benefit with more of that, especially if we can communicate results.

Smaller software enterprises have proven to be much more cooperative in building open stansdards for interoperability and platform independence.

Smaller enterprises tend to avoid violating the sovereignty of the consumer in the market and the sovereignty of the people in civic affairs. Smaller enterprises tend to avoid manipulating the public discourse and debates, perceptions and policy. Smaller enterprises tend to play by the rules instead of trying to set the rules.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions Posted by: mobile68
This country is a mere shadow of its formal self, and it has nothing to do with Al Qaeda!
Posted by: haddit on Sep 6, 2006 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The work climate in this country changed in so many ways over the past few years, and not for the better. Some of us remember what it used to be like, and we miss it. Other have no idea how great it once was.

I was forced to leave the workforce early because of stress. The "open door" policy was simply a name with no basis in fact, and employers and their pets are aware that harrassment is the first step in getting rid of someone who "doesn't fit". If that fails, the laws back them up to terminate for no cause.

My main jobs were sent overseas. The last one I had was in a company which downsized, and I was one of those left to do twice the amount of work.

When I was younger, work was my release, my pride. The last few years of my working life involved overwork, verbal abuse, intimidation and, on one job, if I even stood up to head to the restroom, I had three supervisors arrive to find out why I was standing up!

My son is going through the same thing now but, luckily, is young, is very good in the profession he loves, and has learned to stand up for himself. But, still, there is no insurance, no paid vacation, and must pay $200/week in gas to get between his home and his jobsite.

As for me, I am now living on less than half of what I used to make, and was forced to move from a my 3-bedroom home into a studio apartment, all I could afford in my new life.

But I've been put in a position to see some who have really been shattered by this economy. Every time I hear Bush talk about this booming economy, I want to scream -- but I can't afford to lose my home for a noise violation!

The bottom line is we need to bring our jobs back to the US, and we need to return to an atmosphere of pride and mutual respect in the workplace. Until we do that, students will continue to drop out of school, seeing no future for themselves or families.

We're in a sorry, sorry situation in this country. I want better for my grandchildren. We should all stand up and demand better. When Bush talks about how great things are, we should bombard him with letters from real people. I can think of something else, too, but that could get me arrested!

Wel need to stand up for ourselves, because our government has enough money that it has been able to buy dark glasses that cut off their view from the real world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do it right
Posted by: bigart on Sep 6, 2006 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm retired now, but I put in 30 years as a Union Steward and Officer. I'm for Unionism but only if there are laws to keep it honest. Too often Unions are nothing more than career vehicles for their officers. First all national officers have to be elected by the rank and file in direct elections, second natiuonal officers must have a two term limit to time in office. Dues must be controlled by rank and file. Impeachment proceedures for all officers must be readily available. The Unions must be seen to belong to the rank and file and not to the officers abnd stewards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We the People and Reality
Posted by: wawa on Sep 6, 2006 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many claim to be Christians in the USA, but there is NOTHING Christian about Capitalism, overconsumption and greed.

There are 64 lobbyists PER USA Congressperson, thus those with the most money, are able to buy 'democracy'

The most revolutionary minded of all the founding fathers was the radical writer, Tom Paine. With flaming hopes, a vision of a new world and compelled by the spirit and determination of its people to resist British occupation, Paine devoted himself to the American cause. He began with a forty page pamphlet, "Common Sense" which emboldened the settlers to become compatriots and rise up in rebellion. His words formed a nation where democracy is still being defined.

"Soon after I had published the pamphlet "Common Sense" [on Feb. 14, 1776] in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion... The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine

William Blake penned, "Imagination is evidence of the Divine" and Tom Paine imagined, "We have it in our power to begin the world again." Paine's imaginary democratic government would guarantee freedom to all, and above all else freedom of conscience and worship -which required keeping the church out of state affairs. It was in that spirit that he wrote about Independence Day:

"Let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter; let it be brought forth placed on the divine law, the Word of God; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know...that in America THE LAW IS KING."

"...a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion... The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine

On with THAT Revolution!

public service message from the
.org
WeAreWideAwake

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you, Alternet....
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 6, 2006 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for publishing an article of such importance and topicality for the Middle class!

If the progressive movement would focus more on these sort of things rather than gender/race/global warming/ back-to-nature-movements/etc., they would recapture alot of the power and influence that created the early reforms mentioned in the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

words to live by
Posted by: wawa on Sep 6, 2006 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our enemies...never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
~George W. Bush


Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official...
~Theodore Roosevelt


The greatest menace to freedom is an inert people.
~Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis


The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault.
~Major Ralph Peters, US Military


DO SOMETHING
~eileen fleming

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elites have a plan
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Sep 6, 2006 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to use illegal immigrants to under-cut labour costs. Use monetary and fiscal policy to weaken the dollar and cause inflation. Sign illegal treaties to create things like the EEC-->EU and NAFTA--->AmericanUnion, essentially merging successful welfare states with stable middle-classes with countries without middle-classes to cheapen wages and cause increased income gaps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Undeclared, Unions, and Middle Class
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Sep 6, 2006 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Thom Hartmann . . .

Earlier today, I wrote to you and Laura Barcella on “The Slow Death of the Middle Class.” I think your discussion there and here is extremely essential. I believe the need for unions is also significant one. I will submit my previous comment here, though I will add an additional missive to the reading list.

A month or more ago I wrote an exposé on the subject of unions and their recent demise. I cited the campaign to eliminate them further. I invite you to review and comment on,
“The Center for Union Facts” Fuels Fiction ©.

I greatly appreciate this assessment. I think this discussion is infinitely important. However, I believe talk of the classes and the masses is often too narrow.

I experience that Economists look at policies and practices and not at the pervasive philosophy that lies beneath these. While I think it is true, after the Depression and World War II gains among the average Joe and Joann were made, the poorer began to prosper and the middle class became more settled and secure, I believe the truly rich never allowed for an authentic advancement.

Now, that the Bush Dynasty is solidly in place, the plan is firmer. Bush and his corporate cohorts have advanced strategies that secure their status in society. They have also made certain that all others know their station.

I surmise that there are the elite and those that serve them. Some within the service branch are given greater privileges. Therefore, they feel comfortable, even independent. Yet, in a nation where only the top one percent of the population is doing better I think the middle class has virtually vanished. It won’t be long now.

I invite you to read two treatises that I recently authored.
"Income Inequity. The Real Reason the Rich Get Richer. ©"
"Death Tax Keeps The Wealthy Rich. With Increased Wages, Poor Lose ©"

It is only the giving that makes us what [who] we are. - Ian Anderson. Jethro Tull . . . Betsy
Betsy L. Angert Be-Think

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive tax yes, but not 70%
Posted by: y_hat on Sep 6, 2006 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I support all of this article except for one thing: the suggestion of a harsh regressive tax of 70% on the top 5% of households. If by the wealthiest 5% of america he means the top 5% in annual income, that would today mean any household earning $157,000 or more. While this might seem like a lot of money, all it takes is two professionals in science/technology both earning $80k or a very successful year in a small business. If he really means a 70% income tax, that household will be down to $47100 after taxes, which means that they would have a much larger pay take home if one quit their job and the fell back down to a, say, 35% tax bracket.

Raise the national tax up to 40% for the upper income brackets but once it head north of 50%, I can assure you that the incentive to work in a higher paid professional career *in* *america* will drop. While I can't speak for doctors and lawyers, I can say that top scientists and engineers in america (with masters or phd) will start looking to other countries to do their work, particularly if they are a two-income family, and it is common these days for higher-end scientists and engineers (including software engineering) to have a partner with the same career. This just sounds like a way for ending any desire to do innovative work in the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WOW!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 6, 2006 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm speechless! This is the best piece I've read in a very long time. 'Nuf said
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WOW! Posted by: Aim
» RE: WOW! Posted by: Tom Degan
J-Bonnes
Posted by: J-Bonnes on Sep 6, 2006 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google the words, Quiet War, Silent Weapons and you will find the source of your frustration in a document that has been identified as a military reference to the Bilderberg group agenda. I posses a real copy that I compared to the one I refer you to and it is verbatim the exact wording. This is not about any certain president which are told what to do anyhow or the left right paradyme , this is about the agenda for the world dictated by the Bilderberg group which is very relevant today. This 1979 document refers to 1954 as the first anniversary of this SILENTLY, DECLARED, WAR on the American public by announcing in the opening statement "congratulation on the 25th anniversary of the third world war also known as the Quiet war fought with silent weapons". Now you know why the Neo-cons of today call the next war the fourth world war. This military briefing document is a declaration of intent and was intended for a military officers eyes only. Read for yourself the whole story of orchestrated control for every member of your family, of the masses, and the government and military through Rothschild's economic formula. When they control the money they care not of any laws that are written as Nathan Rothschild's had stated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A revolution in the works
Posted by: mom'z the word on Sep 6, 2006 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In order for predictable change to happen there must be some agreement as to what the problem is. Once the cause is identified a concerted effort can be made to resolve it. This article is historically accurate and defines the rise and fall of the ‘middle class.’ What is missing in the article is questioning the basic principle of having a ‘middle class’ in a democracy. Historically the idea of a democracy was equality. All for one and one for all. We pretty much all started out as the working class except for the slaves. The fact that we started out with a slave class was indicative of where we were headed. There cannot be equality if separation by means of classification is part of the equation. In a true democracy, and I assume that is the goal here, having an upper, middle and lower class is a misrepresentation of what it means to be a democracy.

We would have to go back and change some fundamental errors made at the offset by our founders before we can even hope to change the direction we are now heading towards which is a 2 class society upper and lower. It is impossible to promote one class without exploiting another. If the middle class regains its status it must happen at whose expense? The middle class originally existed at the expense of the lower class. As we became a nation of every man for himself, Reagan legacy, no one seemed too concerned with the hardships endured by the lower class. Their situation was of no importance to the majority and ruling middle class and this sealed their fate. In order for a middle class to exist, someone has to be on the bottom, and on top, that’s is what class is all about. Is this really what we want?

Because we started out with slaves it was only natural that once the slaves gained status someone had to take their place in a society built on slavery. What we are seeing today is the natural progression of that slave mentality taking the next step. The middle class has taken its rightful place as the slave class in order for the upper class to secure its place on top. The middle class was o.k. with doing this to the lower class so none of this should come as a surprise.

A corporation as an individual with all the rights and protections of a citizen of the United States has taken the upper class position. It gained status with the Rockefellers, Carnegie, and just got worst. If you want class this is what happens. Class as in fictitious person, definition of a corporation, is diametrically opposed to the whole entire concept of a country owned and operated by the people for the people and of the people.

Unless we can all agree on what makes a democracy it stands to reason that we can never achieve that which is unknown to us.

What it would take to turn this country around and put us all on equal footing is a selfless act establishing once and for all Equal Justice for all. Our Bill of Rights guarentees Equal Justice for all. But the Bill of Rights is not a Law and therefore has no legal standing in any state in the U.S. This means no one is automatically entitled to free speech, equal protection, due process, etc as a citizen living within a state in the United States, which is everyone. To get your rights you have to go to court and beg for them. Rights are not inalienable if they are not the Law. That is why citizens do not have any rights as workers. Make the Bill of Rights a Law and all that changes. Citizens are now automatically recognized as persons with rights because it is Law. Bonus is corporations now have no legal standing in the eyes of the law because they are not a real person. This pretty much wipes out the upper class per se. Forcing Congress to vote the Bill of Rights into a Law would be the single most revolutionary act of our history. And no body died in the process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A revolution in the works Posted by: mobile68
The Power of the People
Posted by: jende on Sep 6, 2006 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the way to take back the nation as well as the world is to exercise the one true power of the people--boycott. Deny the coporate greed mongers their outrageous incomes and they will do our bidding for the good of everyone. Yes, they'll scream and threaten and try to destroy our will and even our lives, but if we determine to sustain the effort to deny them the power that belongs to us, we will win back and retain our right to enjoy fulfilling lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Power of the People Posted by: Lincoln fan
boundaries
Posted by: Gregor on Sep 6, 2006 4:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You ha