Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Everyday Low Vices

By T. A. Frank, Washington Monthly. Posted March 9, 2006.


Why should we hate Wal-Mart? One glance at the company's reliance on low wages, low-quality goods and anti-union policies gives plenty of reasons.
Advertisement

In the late 1940s, when Sam Walton was franchising a Ben Franklin's variety store in Newport, Ark., he had a simple but momentous idea. Like any retailer, Walton was always looking for deals from suppliers. Typically, though, a retailer who managed to get a bargain from a wholesaler would leave his store prices unchanged and pocket the extra money. Walton, by contrast, realized he could do better by passing on the savings to his customers and earning his profits through volume. This insight would form a cornerstone of Walton's business strategy when he launched Wal-Mart in 1962.

The quest for low prices came naturally to Walton: He was freakishly cheap. Although he was ranked as the richest man in the United States by the 1980s, he continued, it is said, to have his hair cut by the local barber, a $5 expense that he never supplemented with a tip. (Perhaps he wasn't satisfied.) Cost-cutting was, as one might also expect, an obsession in the Wal-Mart culture, and Walton was almost as chintzy with his executives as he was with his cashiers. On business trips, everyone, including the boss, flew coach, and hotel rooms were always shared. Even a cup of coffee at the office required a 10-cent contribution to the tin.

But coffee taxes only went so far. Walton understood that a major requirement for keeping costs down was controlling the payroll. As he would write in his 1992 autobiography, Made in America, "No matter how you slice it in the retail business, payroll is one of the most important parts of overhead, and overhead is one of the most crucial things you have to fight to maintain your profit margin." Not only did Walton prefer to hire as few people as possible, but he also dreaded paying them more than he had to. Unions were particularly feared, and Walton did everything he could to fight them, almost always successfully.

If such a regimen seems stifling, Walton's employees nevertheless accepted it. In part, it was because Walton framed his cheapness as a crusade on behalf of the lowly consumer and as a quest for a better life for all Americans. It was also because he lived an outwardly modest life, driving an old truck with his hunting dogs in the back. Mostly, it was because he had charisma. Even when Wal-Mart grew outsized, Walton made a point of keeping in touch with his employees on the ground or, as he termed them, his "associates." This would often involve flying from store to store -- Walton had a pilot's license -- for impromptu visits.

But Walton's ability to keep his staff happy also relied on a sense of when to let penny-pinching take a backseat to other priorities. In 1985, amid anxiety about trade deficits and the loss of American manufacturing jobs, Walton launched a "Made in America" campaign that committed Wal-Mart to buying American-made products if suppliers could get within 5 percent of the price of a foreign competitor. This may have compromised the bottom line in the short term, but Walton understood the long-term benefit of convincing employees and customers that the company had a conscience as well as a calculator. He also made sure to give his staff a stake in the company. In 1971, he introduced a profit-sharing plan that allowed employees to put a certain percentage of their wages towards the purchase of subsidized Wal-Mart stock. For employees who stuck around, this could mean quite a bit of money. According to a truck driver named Bob Clark, quoted in Walton's autobiography: "[Walton] said, 'If you'll just stay with me for twenty years, I guarantee you'll have $100,000 in profit sharing' … Well, last time I checked, I had $707,000 in profit sharing, and I see no reason why it won't go up again."

Equally important was Walton's ability to sell employees on the notion that working at Wal-Mart meant limitless opportunity. Here, from Fortune, is a portrait of Walton at a Saturday-morning meeting in 1989:

[Walton] proposes that whenever customers approach, the associates should look them in the eye, greet them, and ask to help. Sam understands that some associates are shy, but if they do what he suggests, "It would, I'm sure, help you become a leader, it would help your personality develop, you would become more outgoing, and in time you might become manager of that store, you might become a department manager, you might become a district manager, or whatever you choose to be in the company…It will do wonders for you." He guarantees it.

And things could get downright cultish:

Then, just to make sure, Sam asks the associates to raise their right hands and execute a pledge, keeping in mind that "a promise we make is a promise we keep." The pledge: "From this day forward, I solemnly promise and declare that every customer that comes within ten feet of me, I will smile, look them in the eye, and greet them, so help me Sam."

Of course, Wal-Mart's success relied on more than just charisma and thrift. Technology, in particular, put the company ahead of its competitors. Already by the 1970s, Wal-Mart was using computers to link its stores and warehouses. Sales data allowed Wal-Mart to keep track of specific items and reduce inventory miscalculations. Only years later would Kmart realize how far it had fallen behind. Throughout Walton's career, a focus on innovation of this sort would make Wal-Mart a consistent leader in efficiency.


Digg!

T.A. Frank is a writer in Los Angeles.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Wal-Mart is simply good business
Posted by: oldsmobile on Mar 9, 2006 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Workers don't have the luxury of buying more expensive stuff. Besides, Wal-Mart is simply good business. Workers should fight it by unionizing and organizing, not by whining about it. You can't beat the system without realizing there is a system.

Wal-Mart are just better capitalists than the rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wal-Mart is simply good business Posted by: Asses of Evil
Wal-Mart vs. the unions: fight spreads to Britain
Posted by: THIAHB on Mar 9, 2006 2:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talking of unionization, British unions are gearing up for a fight against the supermarket chain Asda: Union gives Asda boycott warning. Asda was recently acquired by Wal-Mart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When Walmart is not the top dog they cry for Government help
Posted by: ciccio on Mar 9, 2006 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4192746.stm This BBC report should have hit the headlines in the US, but
it seems to have been totally ignored. Above all it shows the
incredible hypocrisy of these @#$&**.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wild! Posted by: YogiBear
When Walmart is not the top dog they cry for Government help
Posted by: ciccio on Mar 9, 2006 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4192746.stm This BBC report should have hit the headlines in the US, but
it seems to have been totally ignored. Above all it shows the
incredible hypocrisy of these @#$&**.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only the Tip of the Iceberg/Wal-Mart's Effect on Other Jobs
Posted by: DonnaM. on Mar 9, 2006 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
T. A. Frank wrote an excellent article, but Wal-Mart's destruction to other businesses (small & large) should have been included. Maybe the next article will be about that.

My husband has a small manufacturing/wholesale business that is now down to about 9 employees from 90. He calls this reduction the, "Wal-Mart Syndrome". Wal-Mart's control over the market with their push for low prices has actually forced other retailers to import. It has pushed their small & large Amercan vendors to do the same.

While my husband, and probably many like him, tried to hold out on a total import business, he too succumbed just to stay in business. Business still isn't good, because the retailers still want more for less, making even imported goods from China too expensive. Now goods from Indonesia are entering the warehouse.

If you think that the, "Wal-Mart Syndrome" only effects the discounters, think again. High end department stores are also competing with Wal-Mart as they try to get the comsumers out of Wal-Mart and into their stores. In other words, they want cheap goods made in China or other parts of the world in order to offer more attractive prices & to fatten their own profits.

This result is the destruction of good paying factory jobs in our own country. Now the workers are stuck with low paying retail & fast food restaurant jobs. Those people can't afford to buy much of anything. It continues to get worse & I believe that most of us know where this is headed. I see a two class nation in the future with the middle class shrinking
every second.

Try to find goods made in America in any retail store. Even groceries, other than produce, are coming from off shore places. That was the last hold out.

Techical jobs are another serious subject. We all know what's going on with computer jobs. Ask where your x-rays are being read. Chances are good that they're being sent to India, a place where medical practices are deplorable, but cheap.

-Donna

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

signsong@earthlink.com
Posted by: signsong@earthlink.com on Mar 9, 2006 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparently the person who made this comment did not read the article, which devotes several paragraphs to what happens to people within Wal Mart if they try to unionize. Or, perhaps this person is one of the many shills within the company who is slipped a tenspot to write party-line comments like this. During a recent job search, I was told by a State of Maine jobs counselour that there was an opening
for a postion in the Paint Dept. at our local Wal-Mart, but that even though I was qualified, and had 25 years experience working with paint, that I would most likely not be hired, due to my having been a union organizer and lifelong union member in Minnesota. I decided to test his theory, and lo and behold, I was told I was "overqualified", a transparent bucket of bogus, as the person who was hired for the job had even more experience than I did. Who was he? The former head of the paint dept. at the hardware store in town that had closed two years earlier, the victim of the Walmonster's predatory pricing.
This ain't whining ,folks. It's the cold truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: signsong@earthlink.com Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
Getting Radical
Posted by: LuisaO on Mar 9, 2006 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as folks focus on Wal-Mart as an individual entity, rather than recognizing it as a symptom of a diseased corporate regime, we have little hope of progress.

These folks have it nailed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I love Walmart!
Posted by: clntbrtn on Mar 9, 2006 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I absolutely love shopping at Wamart!
The only way to get me to stop shopping at Walmart is if another business comes along with better prices.

Everyone at this site can complain and cry about Walmart all you want. I think you're all a bunch of fools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: Asses of Evil
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: marcinde
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: clntbrtn
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: Asses of Evil
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: clntbrtn
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: Daniel Shays
» Don't feed the trolls!!! Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: granz
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: Roverton
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: clntbrtn
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: Asses of Evil
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: stuck_in_FL
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: Daniel Shays
» RE: I love Walmart! Posted by: wetblanket
» RE: $5 he works for WalMart Posted by: dangerouslysane
Discount buying: the carrot-on-a-stick hanging over the abyss
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 9, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was good to get an even more thorough understanding of how WalMart treats its workers and suppliers – just how onerous the company really is, and why. But only the title of the article touched upon another aspect of WalMart, and many other discount chains, that is not much talked about: cheap-quality goods. The low prices charged by these chains mask the reality that much of what they sell is cheap junk. My daughter has had to replace music CD players bought at one of these "low-price leaders" (NOT WalMart!) on average of once every six months, because they simply fall apart. My wife is a quilt artist, and she is appalled at the poor quality of fabrics and finished clothing items in these places; oh, they look good, but will lose their color, turn into wrinkled messes, or even fall apart after just a few washings.

While we fill our houses with this sweatshop trash, on credit, to make us feel as if we possess the wealth that we actually do not, landfills, the final destination of all this detritus, are overflowing, waterways and our air are fouled by the effluent of production, and we are eating up the planet's resources at a rate impossible to maintain. For God's sakes, we're running out of oil and the POLES ARE MELTING! Doesn't anybody make the connection?

What the hell happened to buying quality and keeping it awhile? We buy bright, colorful, shiny objects like children now and pretend that we are rich –– but real wealth includes having a world that is both comfortable to live in and one that makes sense. What the mind-set of both the cheapo big-box stores and our own buying habits are doing is destroying that world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Compensating for powerlessness Posted by: monkeywrench
Don't believe Walmart's Commercials
Posted by: LeslieGem on Mar 9, 2006 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest myth about Walmart is that they have low prices -- just because that's what they say in their commercials, doesn't mean it's true. Shop around -- not only do they not have the lowest prices, the stores are a mess, the service sucks, the merchandise is low quality, and worst of all, all of the things mentioned in this article. You don't have to pay more to protest exploitation of Walmart workers and the taxpayers who subsidize them, just go next door to Target and get the same stuff for the same price.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Meh. Always exceptions. Posted by: ABetterFuture
No choice but Mallwart?
Posted by: Daniel Shays on Mar 9, 2006 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hear this all the time--that people have "no choice" but to go to Mallwart, because it is so cheap. I believe there may be an ounce of validity to this, but by and large I think it is a cop out and a crock. Certainly for families with children, trying to get by on what passes for wages nowadays in this country, it is probably often true. But the few times I've been in one, I've seen lots of typical lardass, moron Americans, giddy with glee while they filled up their carts with a bunch of useless JUNK that they clearly had no real need for. I have sympathy for working poor families on a strict grocery and clothing budget. But if America as a society really wanted to resist Wallmart, they could. The truth is, they don't. Most of them like the cheap, easy consumer lifestyle. It's just one more sign of how this country is going straight down the tubes, which is frankly what it deserves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» True, true Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
Boycott!
Posted by: ScottP on Mar 9, 2006 12:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Walmart
Cheap plastic toys
TV
Exxon
NY Times
Wall Street Journal
Video games
Snack food with individual wrappers
Candy
Bottled water
Credit card debt
Add your boycott item to the list!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boycott.... no, just think occasionally. Posted by: jonestown kool-aid
» RE: Boycott! Posted by: qidproquo
» RE: Boycott! Posted by: kooz
» RE: Boycott! Posted by: YogiBear
If you don't like WalMart don't go
Posted by: kooz on Mar 9, 2006 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone hates WalMart but you know damn well you all go sneaking into one when you want your favorite things because you know the prices are the lowest. So what if the associates make less than liveable wages and no health insurance. They can go elsewhere for a job, or, stay at home eating chips and chunky man soup while getting fatter, older, or more mentally or physically disabled or disgruntled. WalMart takes care of millions of Americans by offerring them low paying jobs and self-respect and they even give non-Americans good jobs by letting them clean the stores and stock the shelves at night while in a safe and securley locked environment. God knows those undocumented workers that WalMart indentures would undoubtedly stand around waiting for some day labor job if nothing else. I for one defend WalMarts right to send our economy spiraling down the tubes impovershing hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people world wide. If it was not for WalMart where elses could you buy more cheap stuff at a better price?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If you don't like WalMart don't go Posted by: dangerouslysane
Somehow, the history of Walmart's paying practices
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 9, 2006 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
reminds me of the way the cons have brought up SS privatization and I'll bet they're working on doing it the Walmart way.

It's one thing to invest in the market. It's another to decide about getting a guarenteed pay vs gambling all your hard earned dollars.

Also, the article doesn't mention how Sam's evil children are wasting taxpayers' money lobbying for the estates tax cut for the uber-rich or the way they're lobbying to kill public education and brainwashing people in impoverished areas into fighting for private school vouchers which would do nothing to save them from getting into deeper debts as a result of the HIGHER prices of private schools approaching the levels of college tuition.

One more thing. Lakoff said this about "The high cost of low price". You need to give a better title because people will only remember "low price" and nothing else. Reframe please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real question about Wal-Mart
Posted by: nanobubble on Mar 9, 2006 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is "are they breaking the law?"

Apply that question to whatever policy you consider 'bad' and if the answer is "no" then Wal-mart isn't the problem.

The law is.

A corporation's goals are always business related (assuming no biased malice). Businesses are controlled and regulated by law. If law permits business to be 'bad' and also be legal, then the laws should be the focus of any social organizational efforts.

Which is precisely why corporations lobby lawmakers. Because they are focusing on the right target.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's almost poetic
Posted by: YogiBear on Mar 9, 2006 5:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should we hate Wal-Mart?

Sounds like the begginning of a poem:

Why should we hate Wal-Mart?
Let me count the ways...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Race to the Bottom
Posted by: antiapathy on Mar 9, 2006 5:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's walmart by a furlong!

why do people shop at walmart? because americans are addicted to consumption. buy in bulk, throw it away when you're done with it, don't bother to recycle. Don't worry little sheep, you will be invincible forever, and your quality of life will never decline. Just keep shopping for america.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thrift
Posted by: DaveB on Mar 9, 2006 7:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Use it up, wear it out
Make it do, do without

--Yankee proverb, from an earlier time

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor Richard VIII
Posted by: The critic on Mar 9, 2006 7:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, how we who do not have power must lick the hands that beat us. As our economy is wrecked by the rich, we are caught in a web that drives us to Wal Mark. As they fleece the poor we are caught in falling income that forces us to buy at Wal Mart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm very PC
Posted by: tstark37 on Mar 9, 2006 8:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I a bad person if one of the reasons I dont shop at Wal-Mart is the fact that 85% of the shoppers are overweight and white trash? It makes me too depressed to think that our country is full of stereotypical Wal-Mart shoppers and Wal-Mart ethics.

Whatever it takes to not shop there, I guess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop Whining About Sexual Harrasment & Racism @ Wal-Mart?
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Mar 9, 2006 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the person who posted "stop whining about it and organize". Have you been asleep under a rock? Wal-Mart has lost every single class action lawsuit filed agaisnt them for sexual harrassment, gender discrimination, racial discrimination, age discrimination, disability discrimination. You need to see the DVD "Wal-Mart the High Cost of Low Price" when you hear the black employee who had to put up with being called "nigger" several times a day and seeing a lynched dummy hanging from a rope in the employee lunch room made up to look like a black man........do you call speaking up against that "whining". Wake up and smell the coffee. Wal-Mart is too cheap to hire a minimum wage clerk to drive around the parking lot in a golf cart with a cell phone. Because there is NO security in the parking lots, hundreds of thousands of rapes, muggings, assualt, car theft, purse snatching - you name = they've all happend in Wal Marts in every city in the country. The parking lots are so dangerous the police call them a "war zone". Watch the DVD and then you will eat your words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wal-Mart is Recruiting New Position "Director of Global Ethics"
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Mar 9, 2006 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just saw a job announcement that Wal-Mart is interviewing to hire a brand new position "Director of Global Ethics". Fascinating to read their job description. It pays about $120,000 a year - but who the hell would want this job? They have to field all the complaints all over the world from pissed off consumer groups. This is couched in very interesting language in the job description. To get a copy of the job description contact Wal-Mart's Human Resources office in Bentonville, Arkansas......the job description is HILARIOUS because it is three pages long and blathers on ad infinitum about how the candidate must have impeccable morals, ethics and be second cousin to a saint! If you were Jesus and the 12 Apostles combined all rolled into one, then maybe you'd be "ethical" enough to get hired to be their new Director of Global Ethics. Hah, hah, hah, hah...........tell the personnel department you're a corporate ethicist......that will convince them to send you a copy of the job description......maybe we can just BUG them and waste their their time, money and resources getting the Director of Global Ethics job description.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To the person who said "Costco" is just as bad....WRONG!
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Mar 9, 2006 9:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Costco pays outstanding wages. There are cashiers earning more than $40,000 a year at Costco. If you work for Costco for about 10 years - even as a clerk, you could be upper middle class. Costco is not unionized, but they want workers to be happy and content so they pay them extraordinary wages, fantastic benefit package. Costco is a great store. You can return electronic merchandise up to six months and get a full refund if it is defective. If you must shop in a "big box store' then Costco is the best place to shop. Costco donates millions to local chairites - Wal Mart doesn't donate diddly sqaut to charity.....although Wal Mart advertises about their alleged philantrhopic donations - that money comes from EMPLOYEE fund donations. Minimum wage, working poor Wal Mart employees have donated out of their paycheck and given $5 million to communitiy chairities. The Walton Crime Family is the richest family in America.

I've bought merchandise at Macy's at 75% off sales. Who needs Wal-Mart? I quit shopping there six years ago and never felt inconvenienced. I used to buy their fish for my aquarium but quit because every single time I bought a fish - it would die within three days after I took it home. I think Wal Mart is too cheap to have a clerk clean the tank and feed the fish - so they die quickly. I switched to buying my aquarium fish at a mom and pop aquarium/fish shop and never had a problem with any fish dying right after I bought them. Just do some comparision shopping and read newspaper ads for great bargains around town.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

40% of New Wal Mart Stores in 2006 in Foreign Countries
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Mar 9, 2006 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans are so turned off by Wal Mart that thousands of cities across the country refused to let them build in their town. The hatred towards Wal Mart is so strong they decided to build new Wal Marts ONLY in foreign countries. Consumers have POWER - the last two years Wal Mart's Christmas sales were down - Wal Mart knows they are loathed - so they are building stores abroad

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wal-Mart is the logic of capitalism
Posted by: coberst on Mar 10, 2006 2:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wal-Mart is the logic of capitalism

“X is a” is a way of expressing the metaphor, “X” the unknown is “a” the known. ‘X is a’ is the way we say ‘X’ can be understood by recognizing that the unknown reality is much like ‘a’ the known reality. Metaphor—a figure of speech in which a word or phrase literally denoting one kind of object or idea is used in place of another to suggest a likeness or analogy between them.

‘Logic’ is a word with more than one meaning and can be confusing. Most people seem to use the word to mean the domain of knowledge connected with syllogism and fallacies but ‘logic’ can also mean the principles of any domain of knowledge. To be clearer in some uses one might use the metaphor ‘logic is grammar’.

When I say ‘Wal-Mart is the logic of capitalism’. I mean ‘Wal-Mart is the grammar of capitalism’. Also I mean that Wal-Mart has become what the principles of capitalism could be expected to produce if the principles of capitalism are extended to their logical conclusions.

I suspect that Globalism is the grammar of capitalism. Consumerism is the grammar of capitalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

haiki
Posted by: haiki on Mar 23, 2006 4:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With all the money, profits from low wages, that Walmart makes, do you think they can afford new carpets at there front entrances? No. Walk in any Walmart and you see these filthy, dirty, gum embeded, worn out disgusting carpets. Now, go to a Target store and notice there entrance rugs, same color. Almost spotless, No.. spotless. I cut through Sears auto repair area, they have a cleaner rug! Some gum, not worn out. Walking through Walmarts entry way is disgusting. Yuk!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: delta faucets Posted by: slavik