Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

If You Thought the Last Bailout of Wall Street Was Disastrous, Here Comes TARP on Steroids

By David Sirota, Creators Syndicate. Posted October 29, 2009.


The "Financial Stability Improvement Act" would let Geithner spend as much as he wants for as long as he wants, with no specific oversight.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I recall that September day like it was yesterday -- the explosion so stunning, so memorable. It wasn't 9/11/01, it was 9/29/08 -- a moment when a rare blast of populist democracy briefly singed the economic terrorists who hold the Capitol hostage.

It had been a dark and stormy month of financial collapse, culminating in an attempted power grab. Pushed by his fellow Wall Street Ponzi schemers, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson -- a former Goldman Sachs CEO - was threatening Armageddon unless Congress ratified his pamphlet-sized decree for a no-strings-attached bank bailout. The straightforward proposal, backed by President George W. Bush and President-to-be Barack Obama, would have turned Paulson into King Henry -- a despot allowed to autonomously dole out $700 billion to any of his business cronies.

This was too outrageous even for a rubber-stamp Congress that had long been ceding power to both the executive branch and the corporate boardroom. And so rank-and-file House Democrats and Republicans, backed by an angry public, overrode their leaders and voted down the measure.

Admittedly, the conflagration was brief. After a few days of industry lobbying, the House ultimately passed the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) bailout -- but one with at least some mild restrictions. For a time, 9/29's fleeting blast of defiance appeared to establish a maximum limit to robbery and presidential authoritarianism.

For a time.

Today, the episode -- if considered at all in Washington -- seems merely to have set minimum standards for chicanery. As evidenced by two little-noticed sections of the Obama administration's Wall Street "reform" bill, presidents and their bank benefactors are back to thinking they can pilfer whatever they want -- only now they have learned to camouflage their demands by burying them in the esoterica of lengthier bills.

Finding this latest giveaway means digging all the way down to sections 1109 and 1604 of the White House's mammoth proposal. These passages look like typical legislative asterisks -- perfunctory "oh, by the ways" inserted by some overeager law school intern in the Treasury Department's basement as a matter of meaningless parliamentary etiquette. They are anything but.

At a recent hearing, Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., called the language "TARP on steroids," noting the provisions would deliberately let the executive branch enact even bigger, more unregulated bailouts than ever -- and by unilateral fiat.

Whereas the original TARP included some oversight language and power to limit Wall Street bonuses, TARP on Steroids includes no specific oversight or executive pay constraints. Whereas TARP permitted the government to underwrite both small and large banks, TARP on Steroids allows taxpayer cash to go only to the behemoths (which, not coincidentally, tend to make the biggest campaign contributions). And whereas TARP limited the Treasury Secretary's check-writing authority to two years and $700 billion, TARP on Steroids would let him spend as much as he wants for as long as he wants.

This last point is what poker players call "the tell" -- the inadvertent tip exposing a scam. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's tell came when he publicly said the Obama administration would oppose amendments limiting the new bailout power -- even if the limit was a $1 trillion cap.

The former financial executives inside the Obama administration have labeled their bill the "Financial Stability Improvement Act," and some might say that's like Bush officials oxymoronically calling their own anti-environment initiatives a "Clear Skies" agenda. But that's not a totally fair comparison because there's an underlying consistency here: While these new "financial stability" powers may destabilize the nation's finances, they would more than stabilize Wall Street's larcenous profits.

That thievery, of course, has been the big problem all along -- and now, only another 9/29 can prevent it from getting worse.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: congress, bailout, tarp, wall street reform bill

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
TARP Act II ... The Hidden TARP ... "Financial Stability Improvement Act"
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 29, 2009 5:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mmckinl on Oct 19, 2009

I would just like to emphasize one area ... that is: The Banks' Books. The banks still have trillions of dollars of bad debt on their books ... enabled by weakening accounting rules to allow banks to value these assets at book value rather than market value.

Get ready for TARP ACT II when the banks announce they need another trillion or two or they will take the economy hostage and kill it.

"" And whereas TARP limited the Treasury Secretary's check-writing authority to two years and $700 billion, TARP on Steroids would let him spend as much as he wants for as long as he wants."" Sirota

Max Keiser – Face Off – β€œIs the Crisis Over?” TARP II

Check out the video ... it is well worth the ten minutes ...
~~~~

And two more articles that are well worth reading ... both at Naked Capitalism ...

Conservatives and Liberals Agree: Proposed Bank Oversight Bill Will Make Things Worse

Bank-Favoring Censorship in Government

Call and EMail Congress and the White House ... tell them the "Financial Stability Improvement Act" is a non-starter ... Trillions more for Banksters ! No Bailout Over Site! ... No Derivatives Over Site! Kill This Bill

Congress by Zip Code

Oh! and don't forget to thank Obama for trying to screw us once again ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drawing the lesson.
Posted by: oregoncharles on Oct 30, 2009 11:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ultimately, as mmckinl's links make clear, this is a political, not an economic issue. The lesson is that the Democrats are just as sold out as the Republicans. Check that Harpers' link: the only difference is that they think they have to make a show of responding to consumer/voter pressure - but they don't have to actually hear the guy out, or even post his testimony!

Over and over, Sirota does a great job of documenting this corruption, gets highly indignant about it,but never draws the lesson! Let's all write to him: what do we DO about it, David? Where do we go, now that we know?

"Not a dime's worth of difference."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TARP Money
Posted by: jessicamoser on Nov 5, 2009 7:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I donot understand when millions of common people in US are buried under credit card debt, variable mortgages and fast cash options. How can government completely ignore that. Bailing out big banks is no solution, we need to educate american people to live within their means.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TARP Money Posted by: EJLima
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement