Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

How About Some of that Painful Welfare Reform for Wall Street?

By Les Leopold, AlterNet. Posted October 22, 2009.


We force very low income single moms to jump through hoops to get their welfare checks, but we let Wall Street's welfare kings walk all over us.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Are we becoming a nation of hypocrites?

We force very low income single moms to jump through hoops to get their welfare checks. We resent them living off our tax payer dollars. We want them out working hard to support themselves even if there are no suitable jobs available, no day care for their children, nor decent transportation to get them there. We see it as a matter of personal responsibility: they are poor because they let themselves stay that way. If that's not mean spirited enough, our politicians thrive on chastising the fictitious welfare queens who supposedly turn our hard-earned tax dollars into Cadillacs.

But when it comes to Wall Street we let the welfare kings walk all over us. Let us count the ways:

We deregulated the financial sector, starting in the mid-1970s, removing many of the New Deal era controls that constrained speculation. Then, in the early 1980s we changed the tax code so that more money could rise to the top fraction of the income distribution in order to spur investment.

Predictably, the two "reforms" spurred a series of speculative bubbles -- the savings and loan meltdown, the dot.com crash, and the housing explosion and meltdown. The driving force, especially in the latest bubble, was Wall Street's "innovative" products -- CDOs, synthetic CDOs, CDO squared and cubed -- which Warren Buffet called "financial weapons of mass destruction" (all of which are still unregulated.)

About a year ago the mass destruction did indeed hit us, but not before Wall Street "earned" more than $300 billion of which at least half went to fat compensation packages. When housing prices failed to continue their improbable rise, the assets that were layered upon them like a house of cards, collapsed in value threatening the entire financial system. The $300 billion previously earned melted away. But no one gave back their phony profits.

Meanwhile, Fannie, Feddie, AIG, and CitiGroup basically were nationalized. Bear Sterns, and Merrill Lynch were merged away. To prove that we were not going to bail out everyone, Lehman Brothers was left to fail, and the global markets panicked, froze and then nearly sent us back into the Great Depression. That's when we learned that the major financial institutions really were too big and too interconnected to fail. So we put them all on welfare.

Just like there are many forms of welfare for the poor -- food stamps, workfare, SSI, Medicaid -- there are many forms of Wall Street welfare as well. There is TARP, of course. But also there are more subtle kinds. When we bailed out A.I.G., for example, we allowed it to pay up in full on its failed bets -- something the government had no legal obligation to do. Goldman Sachs got $13 billion. Had we not bailed out A.I.G., Goldman Sachs would have received pennies on the dollar. If that's not welfare, nothing is.

Meanwhile, the government also provides low interest loans. It is allows the big banks to float bonds guaranteed by the FDIC. And on top if it all, the government guarantees a variety of toxic assets. (That is, assets that were totally speculative -- the bankers' equivalent of a crap shoot -- and would now be pretty much worthless if it weren't for the government's guarantees.) The total Wall Street welfare bill according to Nomi Prins, the author and former Morgan Stanley managing director, comes to more than $13 trillion, . (That's about 37 years worth of total welfare transfers to low-income Americans.)

Now we're witnessing the transformation of Wall Street welfare into bonuses -- the dons will soon be driving taxpayer-funded Ferraris to the marina so they can sail on taxpayer-funded yachts to visit their off-shore accounts filled with taxpayer dollars. Lo and behold, the big boys are making money again, hand over fist. In fact their profits and bonuses are expected to exceed the highest years of the bubble. Some commentators gush about the true genius of these financial gurus. Call it what you will, taxpayer welfare is making it happen.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: wages, wall street, executive compensation, welfare reform

Les Leopold is the executive director of the Labor Institute and Public Health Institute in New York, and author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street's Game of Fantasy Finance Destroyed Our Jobs, Pensions, and Prosperity—and What We Can Do About It (Chelsea Green, 2009).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Stop the Chamber of Commerce
Posted by: warrior woman on Oct 23, 2009 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a new website, not directly related to this topic, however, one that is linked:

www.StopTheChamber.com
A VelvetRevolution.us Campaign

See this article for additional information: Tom Donohue and the Chamber of Open Secrets
October 20, 2009 http://www.opednews.com/articles/Tom-Donohue-

and-the-Chambe-by-David-Swanson-091020-680.html
By David Swanson
"Pulling pranks on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is just too easy. The Yes Men held a press conference this week pretending to speak for the chamber and fooled the journalists in the room, because "We are no longer going to promote the destruction of the earth's climate" is such a compelling position that it's very tempting to imagine that any human being could adopt it.I'm working with a coalition of groups at http://stopthechamber.org and have been reading up on just how crazy and just how massive this chamber is. It's not your local or state chamber of commerce. Those are not chapters of a national entity, and they often oppose what it is doing. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a major force for the rightwingiest right-wing positions. It buys ads, it makes campaign "contributions", it lobbies, it sues, it presents court arguments, it runs a "think tank", it funds front groups that attack political candidates, and it brags about how much money it spends on activities it never reports to the government as legally required.
The chamber promoted financial deregulation and is now pouring tens of millions of dollars into a campaign to oppose any regulation. The chamber claims, absurdly, that its purpose is to create jobs. How does one parody that? Only be falsely announcing the opposite. There's no other way it can be done. Imposing stiffer regulations on Wall Street is backed by over three-quarters of Americans, at least prior to the chamber's new ad campaign…..
The chamber supports the idea that corporations are persons with human and civil rights, as well as the idea that spending money on political candidates (which we used to call bribery) is a free-speech right, even for corporations. The chamber has submitted a lengthy amicus brief in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission arguing against restrictions on corporate election spending on the grounds that this would infringe on corporate free speech and that the single greatest victim of this infringement would be the Chamber of Commerce itself, which -- in the brief, as on its website -- falsely claims to have three million companies as members. In contrast, the American Independent Business Alliance has submitted a brief arguing the opposite view and considers the chamber's position dangerous to businesses other than Wal-Mart and Goldman Sachs. The AIBA denounces the chamber as favoring the purchase of political favors over engagement in actual competitive enterprise….
"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jerestormer
Posted by: jerestormer on Oct 23, 2009 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am obsessive about trying to keep up with (and understand) this kind of information, so I congratulate Les Leopold on posting one of the clearest and most comprehensive SIMPLE TO READ analysis of what transpired that I've come across (YES Ms Prins information is compelling too)... I especially appreciate Mr. Leopold's suggestions for solutions. Remember Huey Long in 1935 suggested no one in the US should make more than 5 Million a year... FDR said (can't remember the context exactly) that $300,000 should be the capped salary of any US citizen... My point is that there IS precedence for these kinds of actions. We need to find a politcal will strong enough to overcome the money. I am tired of hearing executives/bankers/CEOs say they cannot keep talent for anything less than exorbitant salaries & bonuses - saying the talent will go elsewhere - I say: PLEASE PLEASE go elsewhere because you've done enough damage. I would actually propose some kind of "common good" clause imbeded in legislation which at least talks the talk of creating laws and regulations that do not cause harm to innocent citizens. Jere in Detroit

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on Oct 23, 2009 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is high time that the suits on Wall Street get a cleaning but not for their clothes but for their money, I mean our money. These social deletes are so stupid they don't even hide their criminality anymore.

Anyone involved in credit default swaps should be barred from ever working in financing again, sort of like how we treat pedophiles by keeping them away from schools. But this should come only after they serve time in one of our NY prisons.

After all gambling is still illegal in this state. And these a..holes gambled with our money not theirs. Theirs were protected in off shore accounts no doubt.

I personally would love to see some of them strung up as a warning to the rest. I would definitely travel into the city to see that.

But in our society only the moral and poor get punished and not the immoral and the rich. This country is toast if we can't get Wall Street and Wealth Care straightened out.

It has been much too long since our government was for "we the people".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DR_B
Posted by: Dr B on Oct 23, 2009 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BRILLIANT piece - succinct, precise, well done. Do not stop. Keep them coming. The more this theme is told the sooner we get masses of people in the streets with pitch forks and torches to STORM THE BASTILLE !!! Which was the point of M.Moore movie. Where are the PEOPLE???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DR_B Posted by: Caesar77
In responce to Gimme Shelter...
Posted by: smartalc on Oct 23, 2009 3:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would'nt say that it's stupidity in the case of the Fat Cats, I prefer to call call it what it is: Blatent Arrogance. These people are DAREING US to do something!!! At least, that's how I'm taking it as. What p***es me off even more is that even though WE THE PEOPLE are more than ready and willing to act, Our spineless, bought-off so called "Politcal Representatives" are either too chicken-sh*t to take the Fat Cats on, or blatently refuse to do thier job, which is (and always has been...) to REPRESENT THE WILL OF THIER ELECTORS. Now, about those torches...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement