Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Who Ran Away with Your 401K?

By James Ridgeway, MotherJones.com. Posted October 8, 2009.


What starts with "f," ends with "k," and means "screw your workers"? That's right -- 401(k).
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Like most people whose quality of life depends upon the fluctuations of an IRA, 401(k), 403(b), or other acronym-soup retirement account, I was born long before such things existed. It's easy to forget, now that more than half of us have been made shareholders, that until well past the middle of the 20th century, most people had nothing to do with the stock market: Wall Street was for the wealthy and the reckless. It was a world most Americans didn't understand and, after 1929, didn't trust. Some lucky people had pensions, but few had the privilege of even thinking about retirement. They were too busy trying to survive the present -- which in my childhood meant the Great Depression and then World War II.

I spent the war years in Washington, DC, where my father had a minor position in the Roosevelt administration. After school, my brother and I spent most of our time running around the streets, trying to get the air-raid wardens to give us a scrap of nylon parachute, or maybe even one of their cast-off World War I helmets, before the blackout drill began. One evening, my mother called us into the dining room and solemnly presented each of us with a $25 war bond. That was my first contact with the world of investment. Compared to a piece of parachute, it was a real downer.

Sixty-five years later it's a downer still, as I contemplate my future at a time of deep recession with no pension and a depleted 401(k). And it occurs to me that the very notion of a comfortable, paid retirement may turn out to have been a temporary phenomenon, with a life span almost precisely the same as my own.

 

The United States instituted military pensions after the Civil War, but German chancellor Otto von Bismarck is generally credited with creating the first national pension system, in the late 1880s, partly to combat the growing appeal of Marxism. Since Bismarck's pensions kicked in at 70, and the average life expectancy in Germany at the time was under 45, it wasn't much of an investment on the part of the state. In fact, until about World War II, a majority of people died before they reached what we now think of as retirement age; those who made it to 65 depended on savings or relatives, or went to the poorhouse.

The truly pivotal moment in the history of paid retirement came in the year before my birth, 1935, which saw the passage of the Social Security Act (again, in part to ward off more radical proposals). This system lifted millions of the elderly out of poverty, though it would never, by itself, provide a comfortable living. That came with the rise of employer-funded pensions, which were fought for by unions in the early part of the century and expanded during World War II, when they became a way to reward workers during government-mandated wage freezes. Suddenly, retirement became a possibility for millions of American workers.

These workers had "defined benefit" plans, which promised a steady monthly payment at retirement. Although a portion of the pension funds might be invested in the stock market, the payout to workers didn't depend on the market's fluctuations.

After the war, my father joined IBM and remained there for about 15 years. I remember that he was constantly in debt from paying our college tuitions and medical bills for his ailing parents. He never talked about it, but every so often, I would see a line of bills from credit companies spread out on the bed. He had a fierce dislike of Wall Street and the banking industry, formed during the Depression and abetted now by his high-interest debts. Although he had a three-hour round-trip commute on the New York Central Railroad every day from our home in a then-unfashionable part of the Hudson Valley, he often remarked how grateful he was that he didn't have to ride the New Haven trains with all the cocktail-wielding brokers. Even if he'd had any money to spare, he wouldn't have invested it on Wall Street. But when he retired, he got his pension, which my mother continued to collect after he died -- not much, but enough to live on in a frugal way.

I was plunged into the world of finance when I got my first job, at the Wall Street Journal, at the beginning of the 1960s. They put me to work writing up corporate bonds, especially new public offerings, on the Dow Jones ticker. Every time there was a bond sale, I would call up the manager of the syndicate of investment banks selling the securities to find out what had happened. He would invariably say, "Over-subscribed, and the books closed," which would be duly noted, along with the selling price, on the ticker. The bonds were always quickly snapped up by institutional investors and others in the know. I had only the thinnest understanding of how any of this worked, but I dutifully wrote everything down, and no one seemed to complain.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: retirement, 401k

James Ridgeway is a senior correspondent at Mother Jones. For more of his stories, click here.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Social Security Insurance
Posted by: ender on Oct 8, 2009 1:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a good idea to always include the word "insurance" at the end of the words "social security" as a reminder to all that social security is an insurance policy against poverty in old age whose premiums are 6.2% of your earnings.

Why is there a cut off at $102K/year of earnings? It's a proven fact that social security bankruptcy would be altogether avoided if everyone pays 6.2% - and don't give me that horseshit "I make $10 million a year and will never need to collect social security insurance benefits, so why should I pay?" It's social security insurance and like automobile or health insurance, you buy it whether or not you'll ever actually need it.

So always refer to it as "social security insurance" to drive that point home and don't let wealthy dickheads control the language of the debate. It's insurance. If I pay 6.2%, so should you. And if you never need to collect, thank your lucky stars that you are in a financial position to not need it. Christ! I mean, what kind of asshole would complain about never getting into a car accident? "Gee, I've been paying car insurance premiums for years and never made a single claim..."

My second suggestion is that social security insurance benefits should not be taxable. No other insurance benefits are taxable...when I break a leg and my medical insurance company pays the bill, I don't pay taxes on what the insurance company paid out to the doctor; when my car is damaged and my insurance company pays for repairs, that's not taxable income either and neither are life insurance payouts. So why in the hell are social security insurance payouts taxable?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Social Security Insurance Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Social Security Insurance Posted by: Birdland
The article wasn't entirely visible but
Posted by: dingham on Oct 8, 2009 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I totally agree, it's an insurance program as is unemployment insurance. We pay into that weekly and some say we are freeloaders when we collect. We are also taxed on UE insurance(thanx Ronnie Raygun).
What really pisses me off is that when things get bad and you have to cash in your IRA/401K the IRS gets 10% penalty, adds to your taxable income, resulting in under witholding, resulting in more penalties. I have been thru this 3 times and think it's is unfair, and punitive. At least this last time the damn thing had lost so much $ the tax penalties won't hurt quite as bad.
They just keep screwing the working people, year after year, doesn't matter which party has which branch or the white house, just keep pounding away on us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

401K conspiracy
Posted by: peacelf on Oct 9, 2009 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 401K stock market investment system is the greatest rip off ever perpetrated on working people. 401K's, money market accounts, all of the "pension" programs offered today do nothing more than prop up the stock market.

Workers' pensions provide a base-line of $$$ to keep the stock market from crashing. While the rich investors move money around at the touch of a computer button, and withdraw their money when the stock market takes a dive, workers' pensions and investments are locked in for the ride.

At least that's what your money market management company will tell you: "Keep it in there, it's a long term investment, you'll get it back."

Every person I know with a 401K prior to 9/11, lost 50% or more of their investments after 9/11. And, again, in this latest crash. Pensioners, working people, people who had little to spare but listened to corporate investment crooks about investing their money in this "safe" system lost their asses and little bit of relaxation promised after retirement.

Several $trillions disappeared, gone down the memory hole, and whose money was it?

I honestly think Bush's attempt to privatize SSI in 2005 was purposely a last ditch effort to head off the bubble crash we experienced last year. Bush and his Treasury department cronies from Goldman Sachs, - Paulson, et al. - knew the banking and investment system was teetering on the brink before 2005.

When the move to privatize SSI failed, Bush and Paulson held back the crash news until just prior to the 08 elections, knowing that they could create a firestorm that needed to be dowsed in huge amounts of cash to head off a supposed catastrophe, the same infusion of cash that would've come from new investors in a privatized SSI program. Dems caved in too soon before the election.

Obama followed suit, for what reasons I don't know except to head off a faux crash. Had Bush and Obama not given in to bankers and investment houses, those companies would have bankrupted, and the $700 billion could have been used to create jobs for the huge numbers of unemployed that would follow.

Instead, well, you know what happened. More 401K money down the memory hole along with $trillions more in taxpayer's dollars. Too good to be not true.

Peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good post, but there's more Posted by: ReallyBearish
Taxes vs Tithing
Posted by: BankingOnHeaven on Oct 9, 2009 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't see the difference between over taxing and over tithing. Our leaders over tax us, like jeffs over tithes his followers.

If thy can't raise your taxes, they take your retirement. What difference does it make? Evil knows no boundaries.

BANKING ON HEAVEN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whoa ! What's up with the print on this article?
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 9, 2009 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About some ways down the article, all these strange characters show up. What's going on?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

401k's.........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 9, 2009 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about we go back to those "Defined Pensions"! The 401k's originally were an effort by a few banks to scam (once again) the tax code! They are now being used to screw (yet again) the workers! This casino gambling should only go on in Las Vegas - at least there you know the odds are always in favor of the house! And as Congress is now bankrolled by the Corporate Oligarchy I wouldn't look for them to change the laws or structure of the 401k's any time soon! As for Social Security Insurance the rethugnikans can't wait to get their hands on that "entitlement" program do defund it further so that the Corporate Oligarchy can get more tax cuts!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 401k's......... Posted by: maxpayne
here's a link to the original article...
Posted by: jimbomn82 on Oct 9, 2009 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
since the formatting here is broken:

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/05/
who-shredded-our-safety-net

i had to put a space in it since the link was too long

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A WORLD MOST AMERICANS DON'T UNDERSTAND
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 9, 2009 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That says it all. 401K is investing with all the risks. It is not saving. While the markets were looking good many people didn't even open their statements. At the same time houses were bought for much more money than they were worth. After all, real estate always goes up. I worked in the financial sector for almost 20 yrs. It's almost impossible to explain 'risk'. People don't want to hear about it. For so many years things had increased in value. How could it be any other way. That includes company executives, they also 'were taken to the cleaners'. So nobody was ripped off by their boss. There's a world of difference between saving and investing.
The same Administration that shredded the Constitution didn't pay much attention to the S.E.C. either. Letter after letter and report after report were ignored. Now they're blaming lack of training at the S.E.C. Nice try. Yet another present from our worst president ever. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amazing
Posted by: ssbeeno on Oct 9, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No doubt about it someone pocketed some serious cash! The rich get richer....

Jessi
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

401K Ripoff
Posted by: zepher on Oct 9, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The great 401K scam has decimated millions of workers retirement/pension funds. While I had a 401K for 4 years while working for a trucking company, the value of my investments did not increase. The trucking company kept changing 401K investment companies and each time they traded into a new company, the value shot up and then it decreased rapidly after a few months. There seemed to be no reason for the decreases. Meanwhile, I was sending them up to 95% of my income to make the trucking company's maximum contribution to my 401K. Someday maybe I'll sit down and add it up but now I feel demoralized and defiled by the financial system in USA. My retirement funds are reduced to almost nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BA
Posted by: mnstra on Oct 9, 2009 10:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YOUR 401K TOO AUTHOR.. WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. DONT SAY "YOUR 401K", IT IS INFLAMMATORY TO READERS and designed to piss people off. like FOX

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"All wealth is the product of labor" c.1654 John Locke
Posted by: ak47blog on Oct 10, 2009 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come on everyone grow up. Your lifetime of labor and property assets are gone victims of 400 year old scams. Schemes that began in England c.1660 under King Charles ll "Merry King" copied in America c.1792 "Buttonwood Agreement." Wall Street Barons churn the pyramid transfers of worthless paper and fiat money in exchange for the masses of public labor, property and hard assets.

Get A Grip on reality, "To Big To Fail" Wall Street criminal insiders and their sycophants media and financial crony operatives are robbing the publics "To Small To Save" hard assets. They are not in the business to increase your portfolio values, 40lK, pension funds, mutual funds, stock, bonds. Centuries old news. The only item that is news in this article is the systemic use of the word fail. The spirit of America currently encourages and rewards failure to insiders only......"All wealth is the product of labor" c.1654 John Locke

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you James Ridgeway
Posted by: zyclop on Oct 10, 2009 7:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for this very informative article.
I am watching this whole "grand guignol" as an outsider. Hailing from good "old" Europe I can only shake my head when realizing how the American populace [the ordinary working class people] are held hostage by their own government: left, right - doesn't matter as sheeple for the money people who pay their bribes to the politicians using the workers' money while all the while brainwashing the ordinary people to believe that they are living in a democracy. It's a rigged game from the beginning to the end and by keeping Americans ignorant of the ways of living of the rest of the world population, just about an unimportant 6 Billion they prevent the people ever being able to make reasonable decisions.
And since the main stream media are in on the "game" the only way to spread some enlightenment is what you and others are doing. Thanks for sharing your lifetime experience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the scam
Posted by: Evelyn on Oct 10, 2009 7:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are right, the stock market is a big scam and the brokers are even worse. My husband is 74 and retired. Last year, his "financial advisor" suggested that he buy bank of America stock, and he took that advice. Who in his right mind would be advising a man in his 70s to invest in a bank that was already teetering on the edge of the abyss? Needless to say, most of that money is gone. But the "advisor" got his commission.

We are led like sheep to the slaughter. Anyone who thinks that Joe Worker can compete in the "free market" of Wall Street would probably also send their bank account number to a person in Africa who wants to deposit $5.4 million of their late husband's funds in it for safe-keeping. Your odds are about the same in iether case. Heads they win, tails you lose. Bend over and assume the position.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement
splash content