Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Americans Are Jobless and Scared -- The Government Must Spend More to Kickstart Our Economy

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog. Posted October 5, 2009.


The federal government should be spending even more than it already is. This is the only way to put Americans back to work. We did it during the Depression. It was called the WPA.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Unemployment will almost certainly in double-digits next year -- and may remain there for some time. And for every person who shows up as unemployed in the Bureau of Labor Statistics' household survey, you can bet there's another either too discouraged to look for work or working part time who'd rather have a full-time job or else taking home less pay than before (I'm in the last category, now that the University of California has instituted pay cuts). And there's yet another person who's more fearful that he or she will be next to lose a job.

 

In other words, ten percent unemployment really means twenty percent underemployment or anxious employment. All of which translates directly into late payments on mortgages, credit cards, auto and student loans, and loss of health insurance. It also means sleeplessness for tens of millions of Americans. And, of course, fewer purchases (more on this in a moment).

Unemployment of this magnitude and duration also translates into ugly politics, because fear and anxiety are fertile grounds for demagogues weilding the politics of resentment against immigrants, blacks, the poor, government leaders, business leaders, Jews, and other easy targets. It's already started. Next year is a mid-term election. Be prepared for worse.

So why is unemployment and underemployment so high, and why is it likely to remain high for some time? Because, as noted, people who are worried about their jobs or have no jobs, and who are also trying to get out from under a pile of debt, are not going do a lot of shopping. And businesses that don't have customers aren't going do a lot of new investing. And foreign nations also suffering high unemployment aren't going to buy a lot of our goods and services.

And without customers, companies won't hire. They'll cut payrolls instead.

Which brings us to the obvious question: Who's going to buy the stuff we make or the services we provide, and therefore bring jobs back? There's only one buyer left: The government.

Let me say this as clearly and forcefully as I can: The federal government should be spending even more than it already is on roads and bridges and schools and parks and everything else we need. It should make up for cutbacks at the state level, and then some. This is the only way to put Americans back to work. We did it during the Depression. It was called the WPA.

Yes, I know. Our government is already deep in debt. But let me tell you something: When one out of six Americans is unemployed or underemployed, this is no time to worry about the debt.

When I was a small boy my father told me that I and my kids and my grand-kids would be paying down the debt created by Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Depression and World War II. I didn't even know what a debt was, but it kept me up at night.

My father was right about a lot of things, but he was wrong about this. America paid down FDR's debt in the 1950s, when Americans went back to work, when the economy was growing again, and when our incomes grew, too. We paid taxes, and in a few years that FDR debt had shrunk to almost nothing.

You see? The most important thing right now is getting the jobs back, and getting the economy growing again.

People who now obsess about government debt have it backwards. The problem isn't the debt. The problem is just the opposite. It's that at a time like this, when consumers and businesses and exports can't do it, government has to spend more to get Americans back to work and recharge the economy. Then - after people are working and the economy is growing - we can pay down that debt.

 

But if government doesn't spend more right now and get Americans back to work, we could be out of work for years. And the debt will be with us even longer. And politics could get much uglier.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: debt, government, unemployment, federal

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He understands the problem and anger but I have issues with his spending solution.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 5, 2009 12:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Reich, you are an honorable public servant and I salute you for this excellent article on understanding the anger and frustration of the working class. Your third paragraph especially says it all. The culture wars are only the result of fear and restlessness.

For spending, we must be careful here. In my state of Virginia, military spending puts more people in military related jobs in various fields and professions. This kind of spending and tying people to the military industrial complex is going on in other states and is already proving to be dangerous. The reason is that when more people are finding their jobs being tied to the Military Industrial Complex, this creates another wave of fear and anxiety against reducing and eliminating warfare altogether. You see, these people are made to fear that they have no hope or future in trying to find jobs outside the Military Industrial Complex thanks to more military spending.

This need not be related to military alone. Government spending is also faulty on the financial realm. Last year's bailouts to Wall Street have only made those companies along with its employees and stockholders feel "entitled". It will now be much harder to pull people away from being dependent on corporate criminals such as Goldman Sachs and Bank of America to name a few.

In the meantime, there is very little government spending where it is supposed to count such as in actually offering financial relief to local and state governments across the nation. Both government spending in these wrong directions for the elites and tax cutting and loopholing for the wealthy/corporate elite will have to be done kind of like the 1990s. I don't see how government spending will kickstart anything especially since we're still borrowing like mad from China. China can and will flip the foreclosure switch on the US at will. Debt is debt and will have to be repaid sooner or later. Right now, we're in a hole because of bad spending and that needs to be fixed first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Debt? Jobs? ... That's the Easy Part ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 5, 2009 12:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cut the military budget in half ...

Pre-Reagan Tax rates on income, dividend, capital gains and estate taxes ...

Print our own money, responsibly of course ... Not borrow it ...Why should we borrow our own money?

Oh that's right the banks have a monopoly on money and credit creation. We have to borrow our money from the banks, the same banks that committed the waste fraud and abuse that got us into this mess.

Jobs?

Single Payer would save millions of jobs says a study done for the California Nurses Association.

Reduce the workweek to 30 hours from 40, longer vacations ...

Money in people's pockets with a carbon tax that is paid right back out to each person. Alaska does this with their oil money ... per capita payouts ...

There are perfectly viable, workable solutions to ease the misery of the poor, working and middle classes but they won't be implemented because this country is run by and for the already wealthy.

The hard part is returning this country to the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agreed...the hard part... Posted by: corylus
Build something of real value
Posted by: lclark on Oct 5, 2009 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The administration had the opportunity to get people working and add value to the infastructure. Instead of rewarding the bankers who swindled people they could have taken that money and started a focused program of constructing a smart grid and mass deploying wind turbines and solar panels. That's a work program and an investment that would have paid for itself.
Yeah, and the Congress should do what the Constitution says and take responsibility for creating the currancy of the country, not continue to pretend the Federal Reserve is a part of the government and not a private bank benefitted unknown people who were given the country's gold reserve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

spot on..
Posted by: dougontrack on Oct 5, 2009 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Reich yes!! Your making complete sense here.

Questions to POTUS Obama...
- Why the delay?
- When do the green and alternative energy jobs kick in?
- How do we make this become reality?

- Invest in the "people"not the "money-changers"!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, can't do
Posted by: bonapartist on Oct 5, 2009 1:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After Shrub started it and left Bambam and his cronies picked up and made sure that wars are well funded and rich are bailed out.

To put it simply there is no money in the till to create jobs for the people. Add to that the fact that US economy is now based on services that don't really create anything of value.

Those two facts combine mean there is no jobs and there will be no jobs until and unless at least one of the above two changes. Money will not appear from nowhere so that leaves only option two.

However I don't see the will or the interest in US today to overhaul its economic structure and go back where it was half a century ago. Not yet anyways, the rich are happy and the rest are not desperate enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to invest in people
Posted by: zrants on Oct 5, 2009 2:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is China's economy doing relatively well in spite of the slowdown in exports? Could it have anything to do with their investment in large infrastructure projects and jobs?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The bluest dog of all
Posted by: Perry Logan on Oct 5, 2009 3:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before the election, I thought Obama was just a corrupt Democrat whose fans acted like brain-damaged wesels and who didn't mind cheating to get ahead. That's what I thought when I voted for Cynthia McKinney.

But now I see it's much worse. Obama is not a crooked Chicago pol. A crooked Chicago pol might institute some good programs). He's the bluest dog of all. He is the leader of the Blue Dogs. We all know he's the Gorbachov of the Republican Revolution.

PS: My new video, on this very subject, is called A Pig of a Bill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who?? Posted by: Stogie
Build something of value
Posted by: robchapman on Oct 5, 2009 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Reich's call for a modern WPA is the right remedy at the right time. Mr. Reich avoids the usual palaver of blame and self-righteousness and explains the lasting value of WPA work.

In my home town in upstate New York, Governor Roosevelt experimented with WPA programs and built state parks that have made some of the most beautiful and ecologically complex natural wonders available to the public.

WPA type projects would leave a legacy of improvement from our time to future generations. What better use is there for a person's work ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Build something of value Posted by: Basenjis
Reich not Geithner
Posted by: weathered on Oct 5, 2009 3:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the oval office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eich not Geithner Posted by: JSquercia
The USA simply cannot afford it
Posted by: kahuna_2bears on Oct 5, 2009 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is very honorable to want to do something to help someone. I am involved in a charity, and I like nothing more than helping the down and out.

However the USA simply cannot afford to throw tons of money down the proverbial rat hole.

First off the national debt is NOT $11 trillion. The actual national debt is over $56 trillion.

You check with the government and there is the number$11 trillion.

However the government raided all of the Railroad retirement fund, the money in Social Security, AND the money in Medicare. They did this to keep from being forced to tell the American people the deficit was three or four rimes worse than it really is.

There is NO money in ANY of the funds mentioned above. The government has taken all of that money and spent it on lots of make work and bridges to nowhere.

The government started stealing all of this money with Predident Lyndon No-Brains Johnson with the attack on poverty, and Johnson's lie about the Gulf of Tonka incident that got us mired down in Viet Nam.

There was NO national interest in Viet Nam and I don't blame the draft dodgers who fled to Canada.

the aforementioned trust funds have $0 money in them. All they have is a bunch of IOUs. When those IOUs come due there are only two ways to solve this dilema.

1. Drastically cut benefits. this will make the Great Depression look like a picnic.

2. Raise income taxes to around 80-90%. This will start a civil war,

America is in this mess because the politicians did not have the backbone to say "NO!" to this liberal spending.

If you don't believe me that is fine, watch the documentary "IOUSA"

Just to show you that I blame both parties; George W. Bush should NRVER have signed the Medicare Part D.

The seniors on Medicare have no idea that America in in debt up yo it's eyes, and the seniors demanding more and more from a government that cannot afford it are LITERALLY stealing their children, and grandchildren's future.

I just wish I was 40 years older than I am; so I would not be aware of what is coming down the road.

Until America wakes up and demands that Congress stop spending money like drunken sailors and return to some semblance of fiscal responsibility

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America has eaten the Goose
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 5, 2009 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think its quite as simple as the following, and I believe the problem can be fixed. However I read this a few days ago, and I think its worth repeating

From www.tickerforum.org


"I would like to make the point that for years we exported our manufacturing economy, first to japan, and then elsewhere..... We made up for the loss in wealth creation by selling off some assets and borrowing a little.

But that's okay, because we became a service, value add, and intellectual economy.

But then, we began to export our value add economy, but that's okay, because we substituted finance, insurance, and real estate.... We made up for the loss in wealth creation by selling off more assets, and borrowing a little more.

But then we began to export those service jobs that didn't require face to face interaction between servicer and client..... We made up for the loss in wealth creation by selling the last of our good assets, and borrowing a lot more.

But then we began to export the intellectual economy by outsourcing our software design, engineering design, insurance underwriting, and other industries that didn't require face tame with the client..... We made up for the loss in wealth creation by borrowing even more money, and print up a little bit extra...

And when the finance blew up, and insurance blew up, and real estate blew up..... There was no way to make up for the loss in wealth creation.

The moral of the story?

We killed our golden goose for a feast, instead of being satisfied with just a slow steady stream of eggs."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

my Dad always gratefully remembered the WPA
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 5, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a farmer in Nebraska, and my dad (who passed away at the age of 89 a few years ago) always told us kids how grateful he was for the WPA.

It was 1934 and my dad was a young man of 24 who had just married my mom. As a farmer there couldn't have been a worse time to try to get a start in the world. Nebraska was in the midst of a terrible five year drought. Corn (if you had any to sell) was going for 3 cents/bu. Despite the mass farm foreclosures, thousands of homeless men roaming the roads and railroad tracks (my mom remembers counting 25 in one day walking/riding the railroad near our farm), and breadlines in Omaha and Lincoln; we had a Republican governor--a Hoover-era relic--who declared that there was no economic distress or people going hungry in Nebraska. And because of that we didn't need any of FDR's programs in the state.

Well, the WPA came by and much to our great gov's surprise and embarassment, thousands of young men swamped the sign-up locations trying to get on. The sign-up was run by the U.S. Army, and dad said how many of the younger men in town were somewhat intimidated by these guys in uniform.

Anyway--my dad along with many other farmers in the area were fortunate enough to get on. He spent 1 1/2 years doing work all around the state: planting windbreaks (many of which still stand) doing road work, building conservation structures to halt the massive soil erosion in the area. All things that were desperately needed around here and had been sadly neglected during the Coolidge-Hoover years.

The pay wasn't great, but it was fair. It helped my dad get on his feet again. And it helped so many others around here. And it did so many great things for the area. In short--it was a lifesaver for thousands.

I am dismayed by many of the comments on this board to Mr. Reich's proposal. Too many people have forgotten our history, and how FDR's programs helped so many truly desperate. I also take a dim view of the old mantra--expressed in some of the above comments--that "the country is $$$ in debt. We can't AFFORD to do this! etc.,etc." Well that was a common objection back then. And the money spent was balanced by what it brought back to the country. Better then spending it on wars.

When I look around and read the stories about the massive crumbling infrasturcture in this country, I can't think of a better time and reason to resurrect a WPA-style program as Mr. Reich suggests. We need it now more then ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real unemployment number stands at 17% today
Posted by: PakiBoy on Oct 5, 2009 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And high-tech and bio-tech jobs are still getting outsourced.

Foreigners on 65,000 H1-B visas are taking more jobs because Americans can't afford to and are incapable of graduate level studies in engineering and life sciences.

I received an announcement from my alma mater about the recent addition of new faculty in the Engineering department. The school hired 8 new faculty members in the Electrical/Bio-tech/Nano-Tech engineering department - not one of them was an American (at least not by birth).

By the time America comes out of this recession, the quality of life of average American would have gone down the toilet, and deservedly so.

You can't wage illegal, immoral wars and kill millions around the world for the profits of corporations and expect to live happily ever after!

Karma is a bitch, ain't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Improve America, dismantle GoldmanSachs
Posted by: weathered on Oct 5, 2009 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and impeach Obama

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ruthg
Posted by: ruthgott on Oct 5, 2009 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolutely. I am amazed it hasn't happened yet. When I look around my tiny, rural county in eastern California, I can identify several projects that could employ local people, and immediately improve our lives. Our Miwok Indian state park is losing its staffing and maintenance. A no-brainer. Our roads are lined with weeds--a fire caused by a tossed cigarette would cost many thousands...road improvement is a natural. None of these projects are expensive, but they would be immediately beneficial. And, going back to WPA days, there are bridges and trails in our nearby forests still in use and wonderful--built by WPA money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easy targets??????
Posted by: grn1 on Oct 5, 2009 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Unemployment of this magnitude and duration also translates into ugly politics, because fear and anxiety are fertile grounds for demagogues weilding the politics of resentment against immigrants, blacks, the poor, government leaders, business leaders, Jews, and other easy targets. It's already started. Next year is a mid-term election. Be prepared for worse."

And so this is class war right, the first three groups mentioned would be at arms with the second three groups. The second three groups need to start spending NOW

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CAN'T ARGUE WITH COMMON SENSE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 5, 2009 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A WPA project has been 'a good idea' for at least two years. It translates to America investing in itself. We've done it before. The news is cluttered with Neo-Con nonsense. But the real news is people without jobs, living in parks, empty lots, under bridges, and in tent cities. We can't continue to occupy Iraq and Afganistan with American troops and mercenaries in the thousands while our own people don't have homes or enough to eat.
P.S. The Republicans don't have to like it !
ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cheap perspective
Posted by: grn1 on Oct 5, 2009 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to pay quite a sum in taxes. I no longer have the responsibility of rewarding bad behavior. I don't call it unemployment, I work every day toward improving the environment. No one pays me money but I sleep well and feel free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK! I have read the article and the comments...
Posted by: djnoll on Oct 5, 2009 9:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NOW ARE YOU READY TO JOIN ME? It is one thing to offer suggestions and it is one thing to complain or slam (depending on your political persuasion) about the current administration and its policies (of course, conveniently forgetting that this mess started two years ago under BUSH and CHENEY). Well, if you do not like the party, then do something to change it!

Come with me to DC on November 3rd! Join my journey across this country, encourage people in your hometowns to strike on November 3rd, get people to stand in front of government offices or the offices of senators and representatives - and then get them to go do something for their communities (plant trees, clean up vacant lots, help the elderly winterize their homes, you think of something). Make it a day (or two or three) where governments and corporations see us - THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - doing for each other while holding them accountable!

If I can bankrupt myself to try to make a difference and foster change, then why can't you? Help me, please! Stop just blogging and get out there and help me! For too long I have encourage others to do this, but now I realize that until someone (in this case, me) steps up and does it, the rest of us sit home and do nothing! It is time, AMERICA, to unite and stand up and say
ENOUGH!
WE WANT JOBS!
WE WANT A GOVERNMENT THAT ANSWERS TO US!
AND IF YOU WILL NOT GIVE US THAT, THEN YOU ARE GONE IN ONE YEAR!
WE VOTED YOU IN AND WE WILL VOTE YOU OUT!


How many more people must lose their jobs? How many more people must lose their homes?
How many more people must die in illegal wars?
How many more people must lose their retirements?
How many more people must die for lack of health coverage and care?
How many more children must go to bed hungry?
How many more children must grow up ignorant?
and finally,

HOW LONG BEFORE OUR NATION DIES BECAUSE WE SAT AT HOME AND DID NOTHING?

Answer those questions, then go to my website and make your plans to be seen and heard on November 3rd!

Let Freedom Ring.Community

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dear Mr. Reich, Let's be honest, shall we???
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Oct 5, 2009 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The implosion of the world's economy is being orchestrated by our private Federal Reserve & the other private central banks!!! It's a scheme of the NWO/globalists to destroy U.S. sovereignty & usher in a one-world dictatorship!

The NWO/globalists are sick eugenicists who want a herd of merely 500 million sheeple in the entire world, under their control, to serve them under a feudalistic system!

http://www.endthefed.us/

Furthermore, FDR was a member of certain elitist groups who wished to abolish U.S. sovereignty!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stormy skies
Posted by: underledge on Oct 5, 2009 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately “…getting the jobs back, and getting the economy growing again.” is like wishing for “world peace”. When you add the teenage unemployment rate together with the national, there are a significant number of unemployed. Of course we have to remember there never was nor ever will be 100% employment

The WPA was 70 plus years ago. Thinking we can somehow miraculously employ hundreds of thousands of people, to do pick and shovel manual labor, planting trees, digging ditches, repairing roads and other make work programs is far fetched. One experienced bulldozer or backhoe operator can probably do the work of a 100 or more hand laborers. Likewise, building solar panels or erecting wind turbines requires skilled workers which your not likely to find in the unemployment line. American workers have been spoiled and taught to believe manual labor is beneath them. Also for what its worth, consider the potential labor force that hundreds of thousands of prison inmates could offer instead of sitting idle, 24/7.

I can’t believe anyone thinks the millions of jobs that have been moved to foreign shores or simply are no longer needed will reappear - ever. I would like to believe there is a bright future at the end of the road but all I see is grey, stormy skies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stormy skies Posted by: richholland
» RE: Stormy skies Posted by: underledge
Which brings us
Posted by: teon6 on Oct 5, 2009 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which brings us to the obvious question: Who's going to buy the stuff we make or the services we provide, and therefore bring jobs back? There's only one buyer left: The government.

Let me say this as clearly and forcefully as I can: The federal government should be spending even more than it already is on roads and bridges and schools and parks and everything else we need. It should make up for cutbacks at the state level, and then some. This is the only way to put Americans back to work. We did it during the Depression. It was called the WPA.

Yes, I know. Our government is already deep in debt. But let me tell you one tree hill season 7 subtitles oth subtitles flash forward subtitles flashforward subtitles two and a half men s07e01 subtitles two and a half men subtitles seropol5 something: When one out of six Americans is unemployed or underemployed, this is no time to worry about the debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sir James
Posted by: Sir Jim on Oct 5, 2009 1:34 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the greatest respect - spend more? Have you seen the debt clock? It would be suicide.

Having said that, a solution must be found to problems in the real economy. Otherwise, I fear a race or class war inside the country.

It took three decades to create this problem; it will not be resolved overnight. Worse is the fact that the ideology that caused this mess spread to other countries in the West that are not in the same untenable positions.

Repairing the system that got us here is totally misguided. Wall Street is again a casino. Expanding the money supply beyond a certain point will prove a disaster. Borrowing from foreigners (if they will buy government Treasuries or Bonds) means a huge price will be paid later.

The USD is falling in value; the industrial heart has been ripped from the country; the only viable industry seems to be war and it is too expensive. Why would those who saw their way of running things fail so drastically work so hard to put that system back in place?

Why won't they look at options? Their saying the Recession is over is as bad as Bush on the Aircraft Carrier declaring the war in the middle east won. There is no magic bullet. And as long as Washington and Wall Street stick with their insane notions of capitalism - which are incorrect - it is highly unlikely solutions will be forthcoming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overproduction and Stagnation.
Posted by: yellow on Oct 5, 2009 1:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most classical economists believe that overproduction crises can't exist for very long because if there is a shortage of demand which has prevented the absorption of output and the pulling of the economy back to full employment and capacity utilization, massive savings will be given time to build up. Savings will exceed investment. The growth of savings will push down interest rates which will make it cheap to borrow and invest until savings and investment are in equilibrium. Thus, conservatives see no reason for government intervention.

Yet the problem is that savings equals investment at both high and low levels of economic activity. There is no reason to believe that the economy can pull itself back to full employment levels of activity and high capacity utilization without government stimulus because (a)capitalists will not invest without the prospect of profitable business activity which itself is impossible without income and employment growth and, (b)government spending will not "crowd out" private spending if the economy is at very low levels of employment and capacity utilization.

Currently, the US economy is at about 12% unemployment officially and about 69% capacity utilization, the lowest since the depression!! Government spending is needed to stimulate the US economy. GDP growth is the only way to pay off the current deficits. Only through growth can employment and income and hence savings grow. Trillions of dollars injected into the banking system has done little to stimulate growth. The money needs to go into the Main Street economy and not the Wall Street economy in order to pull us back from the recession. Without such fiscal stimulus we will remain in a the current economic rut charactorized by chronic stagnation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wasn't there already a stimulus package?
Posted by: dover23 on Oct 5, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess there's another one on the way. Maybe this one will trickle down to those who need it, and maybe even before the dollar collapses.

Please rate my comment a 1 if you feel the fed ponzi scheme will continue long enough to benefit you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What I Like About Reich
Posted by: Gravitas on Oct 5, 2009 2:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is that he always makes his point very well without rambling on and on. He is absolutely right. We should watch out and me extra vigilant about prejudice and scapegoating. Social breakdown is a huge risk factor for this. And the power-elite encourages us to turn on each other!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Michelle lied
Posted by: njguy73 on Oct 5, 2009 3:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On 2/15/08, at UCLA, she said,

"Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zone . . . Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual - uninvolved, uninformed."

Require, huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Michelle lied Posted by: djnoll
my life...
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on Oct 5, 2009 3:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...could be worse, but it still sucks.

I graduated a semester early from my California State University (Dec of 2008 instead of June of 2009), and my parents paid for my education.

I immediately (literally a day after I graduated) moved out to live with my girlfriend/future wife in Illinois.

I've been living in Illinois since December of 2008, and I've been looking for work in this area since August of 2008, FOUR MONTHS before I moved out here in the first place.

I have now been looking for work for over 14 months in the same thirty mile radius just outside Chicago, and NO ONE has hired me.

The only work I've been able to do is a job as a substitute teacher.
I go where they send me, pre-school through 12th grade.
I deal with whatever level they need, special ed through honors.
I work what DAYS they need, usually about two or three days a week.

Two or three days a week of work.
Oh, and of course an entire summer without work, which included a wedding to finance.

That's all I have to show for graduating in the top 8% of my high school class with a 4.7 GPA and finishing four years of college with A's and B's with a Bachelor's Degree.

That, my friends, is one fucking sick joke.

I won't be able to procure a full time teaching job anytime soon either, as I need a teaching certificate, which takes about a year or two to earn.

Something is fundamentally wrong with the system.
I know full well I'm not the worst one out there, but having to live in a situation where you know that all you've got is two days of work a week AT THE MOST..... is a real sign that we need change, and that a lying, backstabbing, base-abandoning retard like Obama refuses to provide us with what we need. It's insanity.

WE NEED socialism in this country, or at least a semblance of it, because this free-market, pro-military shit really isn't going anywhere.

I know that even once I get a teaching certificate, I'll still need a Master's Degree too, which eats up more of my precious time and money.

And once I'm done with that, there's STILL no guarantee of a job. Just the guarantee that I'll owe a lot of money to someone.

And for what? For a degree I can't use, and a profession that, if I even got the job, doesn't pay well anyway.

What's the point in living in this sort of a society where educators are treated like shit, despite their endless hours and dollars spent in schools?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You should read this book Posted by: njguy73
» RE: my life... Posted by: badkitty
» hang in there Posted by: frantic1971
» Excuses, excuses Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: my life... Posted by: mrfixdit
Reich is part of the problem....
Posted by: corylus on Oct 5, 2009 6:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
considering his role in the Clinton administration, the one that repealed Glass-Steagall, the one that imposed sanctions on Iraq, the one that parlayed a progressive mandate into further promoting all the crimes committed by the banking and investment industry.

Furthermore, if you want real reform, why does Reich tiptoe through the tulips and fail to even suggest that a complete annihilation of the current economic paradigm is in order? Instead, let's fix the completely failed capitalistic system...let's prop up the false economy, based now on killing US as well as those in foreign countries, just to maintain the status quol

Robert Reich is a traitor, and deserves hanging for his part in crimes against humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And to pay for it, repeal the Bush and Reagan tax cuts.
Posted by: Dickinseattl on Oct 5, 2009 7:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have been deliberately driven into debt ($11 Trillion dollars?) by tax cuts for the rich designed to defund government programs (except for $war) and make the rich richer at the expense of the rest of us. (A Stockman plan?) However, repealing these wrongfull tax cuts for the rich would allow us to pretty much right this floundering economic ship of State. If it's not done it's not out of cowardice so much as complicity. Let's see what Obama does? I guess complicity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jobs for All -- National Conference
Posted by: BenL8 on Oct 6, 2009 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The group National Jobs for All Coalition is hosting a conference in New York City, November 13 and 14, 2009. See jobsconference.org. Also see njfac.org. I have also posted an essay, Forbes 400 Own As Much as Non-Forbes 150,000,000 (see http://benL8.blogspot.com). Our economy is really sick. Dean Baker reported that the Congressional Budget Office predicts 10.2% unemployment for all of 2010. Where will new jobs come from? Jobs create purchasing power or aggregate demand. Aggregate demand means that the producers of goods and services have enough income to buy what they create. Over the past decades (see professor Emmanuel Saez's essay "Striking It Richer") wealth and income have polarized. When that purchasing power is cut away from the economy, as it now is, the economy has to shrink, and high unemployment becomes chronic. Where will new jobs come from? Mr. Reich is correct, only government can hire, private enterprise cannot. It is time to realign priorities, tax extremely high income, and create jobs and income for the less affluent. This is our present #1 task, as a society. See economists Ravi Batra, Jeff Madrick, Dean Baker, Les Leopold, and also TooMuch.org, Inequality.org, and the jobsconference.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's time
Posted by: sounwel on Oct 7, 2009 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Indeed it's time to kickstart our economy!Rip Blu Ray

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What to DO now?
Posted by: morningstar777 on Oct 7, 2009 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's true. we need jobs. we need to go back to work. It is nice to have Unemployment IF you qualify, but when you don't, the whole system is just absurd. What is worse is when employers turn on you for asking for a job, not allowing you to have a job application, or just plain firing you, after you have worked for them for three hours because they were just playing with you. Resentment sets in, and when their business fails, well then ahhhh! you get the last laugh.
I was hoping. No, I was praying for a 2009 end of year recovery so that I could go back to work. Instead I found a bunch of hypocrites in the corporate world leeching off of the government, and NOTHING trickling down to the working class. Now my husband and I are standing in the begging lines of our local churches along with our family and friends hoping for Obamas recovery act, and as time passes, regretting that hope as false hope. America has turned us working class into a bunch of beggars. If this is the New America, screw it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We don't need to go back to the depression years
Posted by: larische on Oct 9, 2009 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the 1970's, before Professor Reich became the Secretary of Labor, we at the Department implemented programs operated through State and local governments and non-profits called the Public Employment Program under the Emergency Employment Act, Public Service Employment under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act, and Community Service Employment under the Older Americans Act. The latter continues to operate at the Department of Labor.

There's no reason why we can't bring back and expand these programs. To deal with today's massive unemployment crisis, we can tailor these programs to employ the maximum number of people. More than minimum wage, but less than prevailing wage. More than part-time work, but less than full-time. With union consultation, but outside of public personnel hiring systems. And with skyrocketing elderly unemployment, preference for those age 45 and older.

And for what it's worth, evaluations in the 1980's showed these programs to be far superior to new tax credits for private employers now being touted by inexperienced economists with no knowledge of employment and training programs.

- Retired E & T specialist from DOL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement