Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Three Reasons We Need an Economic Wake Up Call

By Robert Kuttner, Huffington Post. Posted July 7, 2009.


Several events of the past week should be a wake-up call to the Obama administration. Bottom line: the medicine isn't working.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The June Unemployment Numbers. The green-shoots school was expecting that the rising rate of unemployment would continue to slow, as it did in May. But instead the number spiked back up. A total of 467,000 jobs were lost. The unemployment rate rose to 9.5 percent, and OECD economists project that U.S. unemployment will still be in double digits as late as 2011.

The 9.5 percent official figure -- the worst since 1983 -- conceals even worse news. The number of long-term unemployed is at record levels. This is the only recession since the Great Depression in which the job loss wiped out all the job growth of the previous recovery. As our friends at the Economic Policy Institute report.

We now have fewer jobs than in May 2000 when the recovery began, though the economy now has 12.5 million more workers. And there is less than one job opening for every five people seeking jobs. Hidden unemployment is also setting records - people with part time work who want full time work, as well as people whose hours have been involuntarily cut.

Until strong economic growth returns, companies will not resume hiring. And as long as layoffs continue, that means fewer customers and the downward spiral continues.

As EPI observes, President Obama's economic stimulus simply wasn't designed for a recession this deep. And I would add that stimulus funds are getting out too slowly. Compounding the problem is inadequate government policy on three crucial fronts:

State Fiscal Collapse. The states, unlike the Federal government, are not permitted to run current budget deficits. So in a deep recession, when tax receipts fall, their only choice is to cut program spending or raise taxes. Both are of course perverse in a recession, since they only further undercut consumer purchasing power.

As the new fiscal year begins, nearly every state is raising taxes or fees, or laying off workers and reducing programs. At least 48 states face red ink. Some of the state budget crisis is self-inflicted, as in the dance to the death between California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Democrats in the legislature, compounded by a two-thirds supermajority requirement for any kind of tax reform. But most states are just plain hurting.

Massachusetts, with one of the most liberal governors, Deval Patrick, just hiked its sales taxes by 25 percent. A total of 24 other states have enacted tax increases and another 12 all have tax hikes on their agendas. Federal aid under the stimulus covers just 30 to 40 percent of the state shortfall, which is expected to total $350 billion by 2011. And 39 states have cut program outlays on the needy, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

The New York Times reports that several states are cutting out summer school. This is just plain nuts.

Some aspects of the recovery program, such as rebuilding a banking system that serves the real economy, are truly challenging. But this part is really simple. Washington is the one part of the government with the capacity to run deficits. So Congress should pass an emergency revenue-sharing law, giving the states another $150 billion immediately. The only condition is what policy wonks call maintenance-of-effort. To receive the money, the states must maintain program outlay levels and taxing systems that were in effect on a date certain, say July 1, 2008.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, bailout, unemployment, economic policy institute, epi

Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Wake Up Call Indeed !
Posted by: mmckinl on Jul 7, 2009 6:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a complete economic restructuring. The old model was a scam. Reaganomics robbed from the poor to give to the rich while hollowing out our productive capacity. It left us deeper in debt than at anytime in history as a percentage of GDP ... $50 trillion worth...

Here are seven policies that we must implement to start to change our economy

~ Nationalization of all banks ... to get liquidity and trust back into the banking system.

~ Nationalization of the Fed ... Why should we borrow our own money? We need a Public Central Bank that creates our currency and credit for the benefit of the public who underwrite its value and shoulder the risk.

~ HR 676 Medicare for All ... Saves millions of jobs, helps the under and uninsured, helps business, helps the states and can start to be implemented within a month or two and finished within 18 months.

~ Higher taxes on the well to do, the closing of loopholes and all income counted as ordinary income. The top rate, on over $1 million, should be at least 60%... A Carbon Tax, A Tobin Tax, Taxes on carbonation,salt, sugar, sweeteners, trans fat .... The budget deficit must be contained and our food has to give us nutrition not disease ...

~ A shorter workweek ... Why should we have a 40 hour workweek? Efficiency has been going up for decades, yet real wages and benefits are flat and falling and it now takes two incomes instead of just one! The new economy won't have tens of millions of jobs in retail anymore, we have to spread the work. How about a 30 hour workweek? We went from 48 to a 40 hour work week six days to five and it worked just fine.

~ Bankruptcy "CramDowns" for consumers to get them back on the right track. Acorn and other social agencies could prepackage BKs for bankruptcy judges. And then credit has to get much tighter.

~ Cut the Defense Budget by 70% ... we spend more than almost all other countries combined! Military spending is dead end spending.

Kuttner and most of the liberal economists are putting their political credibility ahead of the real solutions ... This preemptive compromise gets us nowhere, it is the antidote to real reform, real progress ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: mmckinl
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: SDGreg
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: mmckinl
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: mmckinl
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: mmckinl
» Are you pissed yet? Posted by: Spot
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: crazy carlos
» RE: Wake Up Call Indeed ! Posted by: mmckinl
» Great ideas... Posted by: zigy
» RE: Great ideas... Posted by: mmckinl
Go figure
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jul 9, 2009 2:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In crafting his economic plan, didn't Obama ignore every major economist in the world?

Why, yes he did. Look for a Jeb Bush Presidency in 2012.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Go figure Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Go figure...Jeb Bush? Posted by: wallisp
Wake-Up Call
Posted by: CornetMustich on Jul 9, 2009 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Re: Obama, DOMA, DADT,"war" funding, national health/single payer, bail outs for banksters, Israel-Palestine, etc..

It seems like we got a Bush with a nice tan with Obama. And we need to understand it and move forward with real economic justice.

Joe Mustich, Washington, Connecticut...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wake-Up Call Posted by: Spot
Where is this guy coming from? Most of the people I know couldn't care less about the economy
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jul 9, 2009 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as long as THEY have a job. Those who lose their jobs, cars, houses, etc, just disappear - they're no longer part of 'the community' - they've moved on... to hell knows where, but at least they're out of sight and out of mind. There can be no solidarity under such circumstances - and without solidarity, there can be no freedom, and no hope.

Surely Kuttner knows that none of the economic 'cures' were ever intended to help the ordinary Americans being ground up by the Great Machine (mostly the War-Machine and the Ponzi-Banking Scam Machines) - so this entire article is a farce.

Furthermore, the Obama administration is the enemy of working people. His reality has been affirmative action and political correctness. These are not the realities of most working people. He simply got a free ride and does not know the meaning of real struggle. There is no place for "cool" in the lives of struggling people. There is hardship and grief and a slap down from Washington. Unfortunately hardship will increase exponentially as will the denials of politicians and elites. Nothing but total collapse will change that.

Perhaps if Congress wasn't spending all our money on the banks and the military-industrial complex, there'd be more money to help the average American. So far all I see is some stimulus money going to fix roads, except that more and more people aren't getting in a car and driving anywhere. Oh, and don't forget that no money plus a humongous debt equals NO cost of living to seniors for the first time in decades. Nice to know the extra money I would have gotten each month is going to Goldman Sachs instead. Now it's clear how Obama plans to privatize Social Security silently.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» rgd Posted by: rgd
» We can still fix that. Here's how. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Kuttner couldn't care less Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
The first "bailout" was Bush's.
Posted by: PJAW on Jul 9, 2009 4:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, it was the Bush administration that called for (and got) the first 700 billion to "bail out" the banks and other "financial institutions". (if you're an institution, it's imperative that you be kept alive, even if you're killing the rest of us)

The whole thing has been "trickle down" on steroids, the coup de grace of Reaganomics. And it was timed pefectly to stain the new administration.

This article is thinly veiled propaganda for a return to Republican rule. Note the comment inserted in the first page about the "economic recovery" beginning in 2000. I almost threw up on that one.

The bailouts aren't working yet because this is still a Bush initiative which was based on Reagan's principles. Anyone who thought this thing would get better in 6 months (regardless of who is POTUS) using the failed policies of the last 28 years, needs a cranial enema. This has been like feeding fat people to end world hunger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bailouts Posted by: Spot
» That is true but Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
rgd
Posted by: rgd on Jul 9, 2009 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have noticed a few things about the gov't.

-It really doesn't give anybody anything.
-It takes a problem and makes it bigger and then solves (I guess its how you would look at it)the bigger problem, leaving us with the original problem to live with.
-Would never make it in the private sector because it cannot conseptualize working in the framework of a budget.
-Cannot balance it's checkbook

Feel free to add to this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I HAVE THE SOLUTION
Posted by: what-it-is on Jul 9, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If journalists and government alike...would just say "what it is", instead of what it mightbe,could be, may be, wanna be....we could get somewhere. That the phrase "bailout" was changed to "stimulus package" is my point. Here's the solution: there are over 80 million workers over the age of 50. Hand each and every one of them, a million dollars with these stipulations.
1. you must retire
2. you must buy or pay off your home
3. you must buy a energy efficient vehicle
4. you must enroll your child in post graduate education.
THE RESULT>>>
1. 80 million new job openings ! ! !( 80 million new people spending money)
2. no mortgage crisis..(too bad for the financially manipulating sector)
3. no car maunfacturer bankruptsies.
4. no more "dummied down" DUMMIES>>>>

how simple do you want it....and at a fraction of the actual " BAIL OUT" cost....

YES , people , it CAN and SHOULD be that simple

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the blind leading the oblivious
Posted by: oregonstu on Jul 9, 2009 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is disheartening to see that so many of the commentators on the current economic implosion, left, right, and center, display such a fundamental naivete and ignorance about core elements of our corporate financial system.
Kuttner displays this naivete when he asks "when a bank forecloses, it loses about 63 percent of the loan value. Wouldn't it be better to reduce the monthly payments by 63 percent, and allow people to keep their homes?"
What is he missing here? Well, if he understood how our fractional reserve banking/debt based monetary system functions, he would realize how silly this question is. The fact is, banks actually create money out of thin air when they "finance" a mortgage on a home, or make car or credit card "loans". Most people are still unaware of this very strange fact. They do not "loan" out the money that is deposited in accounts, as is commonly believed. Bank loans are literally created out of thin air.... this is a fact and is easily verified in any economics textbook.
So, to answer your question, Robert, we need to ask.... wouldn't it be better for whom if the loan payments were lowered by 63 percent? Obviously it would be better for the borrower, and clearly it would be better for society and the economy as a whole, but why would it be better for the bank? The "loan" costs them NOTHING! So what if they lose 63 percent of nothing? So what if ridiculously inflated property values continue to decline? They end up with the title to millions of properties that cost them aproximately .....nothing!
When you further consider that these so called losses are then written off on their taxes, the full beauty of their scam begins to emerge.
I know that Mr. Kuttners heart, along with those of a good many other well meaning liberals, swells with pride when Obama gives one of his stirring speaches to the Arab world or the Russian people... no doubt the man is brilliant at that. And such a refreshing Change....of image, at least.
But don't kid yourselves, people. He knows who his masters are. He wouldn't rock the boat if he could. He sold his soul to get where he is... because he understood on some level that if he wanted the platform upon which to make those lovely speeches, to evoke those emotions (that of course reflect back on him), he must sacrifice the actual subtance and reality of the change he would promise, particularly when it came to the matter of money and power.
For anyone who might be interested in an eye-opening expose on how the banking system works, I highly recommend a documentary called "Money as Debt". you can see it free online.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't pinch yourself when you think Obama is President
Posted by: frankly1 on Jul 9, 2009 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead, smack your head with a large blunt object that may bump start your brain. "Brilliant speech in Egypt" indeed. It was the same insipid garbage spouted by every post war President. Our imperial, corporate facist foreign policy has not changed at all.
Wall street paid to put Obama in the White house, he works for them, not us. Look who he is surrounded by, his advisors and cabinet. He's just there to distract the masses while they finish the plunder. Wake up and smell what your writing, pwew!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's worse than we think it's worse than ... oh, hell, we're in trouble.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jul 9, 2009 11:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep in mind, too, that when the "recovery" began in 2000 (I might even dispute this), it was classed as a jobless recovery, in much the same language we're hearing now; so that if long-term unemployment is worse today than then, it is, shall we say, worse than worse. Each of the last several downturns have resulted in PERMANENT job loss, with our current one trending to be the Grandaddy of them all.

Something will have to be done for the millions who will possibly never work again and the destabilizing effects such widespread permanent unemployment (and hopelessness) will produce. So, what has been our government's solution to this economic cataclysm? Create jobs by funding necessary repairs to our crumbling infrastructure, as China is doing? Create jobs by stimulating the move toward a sustainable energy future – as, again, China is doing? Find a way to sustain the permanently displaced to head off social chaos in the future?

No.

Our solution is to give trillions of taxpayer dollars to banks and the Pirates of Wall Street, the very-same criminals who caused the cataclysm in the first place by stealing trillions more. The "stimulus" money we handed them might as well been bet at the craps tables of Las Vegas, for all the good it will do on Main Street (at least in an actual casino there might have been a CHANCE of recovering some of it.)

Oh, we're in trouble all right – and the policies of our corrupt government are almost guaranteed to make things even worse yet. It may be time to go local, get off the grid as much as possible, and batten down the hatches for a very stormy future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The statistic that counts
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Jul 9, 2009 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget all that garbage coming out of Washington: inflation, unemployment, deficits, etc. It's all fake statistical rubbish. Watch the price of gold. That will tell you when the Fed and JP Morgan have lost control of the financial system and the dollar is about to flame out. $2000 gold means financial collapse.

Gold is like the cop on the beat who blows his whistle when something bad occurs. Meanwhile, the Chinese, Russians and the Saudis will be loading up on gold. Who won the cold war?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who won the cold war? Posted by: Spot
» Good point Posted by: ReallyBearish
Constant world war of military-merchant-missionaries
Posted by: maxsmart on Jul 9, 2009 1:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It might just be that the profit motive is a false profit. That mass consumerism is consuming our planet and it is not going to be sustainable much longer. That screwing everyone else for one's own personal profit in an interdependent world is suicidal. That the toxic nuclear family of over-consumption is starving us of connection to our world by isolating us in private solitary padded pill boxes of sexual repression. That the rape and pillage of the global village is getting us nowhere.
Socialist-capitalist ideas and rhetoric is totally out of touch with the global eco-economic crisis facing mankind in the 21st century. A crisis of learning to coordinate our bodies and minds, instincts and conceptualizations that rationalize vast collateral damage to us and our world as a kind war of our world scenario of our making that threatens to cause our own extinction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hardy har har
Posted by: zigy on Jul 9, 2009 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So friggin' funny I couldn't stop laughing. Alternet, why do you print this crap!? Obama know what the f&#@ is going on! And he doesn't care. Let me repeat that Alternet because you may be a little slow, He does not care; Geithner is running the show and the Banksters have decided to "off' the economy. Why don't you get it and start running articles about impeachment and the definition and implications of treason? If you keep printing stuff like this you just give citizens a false sense of hope.

Oh, and by the way, when things get really bad there are always those FEMA concentration camps for you and your family to go to. Think I'm crazy? Just Google Dr. Paul Craig Roberts' article on Counterpunch entitled, "Fear". Don't take my word for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Furchter euch nicht
Posted by: MOTELCALIFORNIA on Jul 9, 2009 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do not fear

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh Shit; Another Wake Up Call. I Need Some Sleep
Posted by: AlteredStates on Jul 9, 2009 5:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we need is another remedy; another bailout; another speech...by anybody; another plan like Reagan's, or Roosevelt's, or Hank Paulson's, or John McCain's...whaaat? You get the message...I think.

Obama is learning that as soon as a new president crosses the threshold of the Oval Office for the first time, he is introduced to the "real power behind the thrown". And, it ain't Obama or any other president. The real power is controlled by the ruling class, the super rich and they aren't about to let go.

What happen to the promise by Obama that he was going to bring about an entirely different way of doing business in D.C. and Wall Street. The old ways just don't work anymore. That's what he said and campaigned on.

Aside from changing some of the Bush's policies that dealt with moral, ethical, and religious issues, Obama is pretty much carrying out the Bush doctrine on economics and defense/war.

The change that is needed to save this nation is not going to occur. We are headed for an economic collapse that is going to dwarf "The Great Depression". But this one could likely include hyperinflation, so don't bother saving your pennies, they are going to be worthless, including your 401k's, IRA's, etc., unless you have gold coin in your pocket to buy and sell.

Even in economic collapses, the super rich still win. They always win. That's why they are called, the Super Rich/Ruling Class. Who are the ruling class? Well, some of them own the Fed. and other institutions that control and manipulate world currencies and other vital instruments of power, so don't expect Obama to bring about the kind of change needed to reverse this trend. This financial "crisis" was planned.

That's the bad news. I don't even want to talk about the really bad news that is just around the corner. You will just have to wait and see for yourself. Sorry folks, that's just the way it is. And, "It is what it is"!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

whats it going to take?
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jul 9, 2009 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...another depression?
tis a sad day indeed when this generation has no living memory of the pain and suffering that was experienced during the 1920's, 30's & 40's... those where extremely lean years people and we are seriously talking about a revisit to those bad ol days!

If we're not careful we're going to have an economic meltdown not seen for 80 years...and then history will repeat itself with another call for social programs to restart an economy stripped to its nuts & bolts by the greed factor that runs the entire country and economy at this point in history... it needs corrective action right now and a single desk healthcare for all plan is only one step to a true visionary plan in correcting the problem!

If we have/had true visionaries in elected positions [now], we can/could correct this problem before it happens but I fear that the amount of money corrupting the political process in DC
is in reality a devil in makeup asking for one last dance!

The government is there to govern and the economy needs to be regulated... that's all... guidance and vision is needed and I don't see either ATM

greed isn't good... its a sin for a reason!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: whats it going to take? Posted by: monkeywrench
Economic Wake Up
Posted by: Atheistno1 on Jul 9, 2009 9:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robert Kutner hit the nail on the head when he said it would have been better to support the home buyer.
The stimulus package would have supported the public & the banks at the same time but Obama is too entrenched in damage mode after the Bush administration. I find that with America & Australia's Kevin Rudd, in fact I see it in all the western cultures that have been involved in the monetary screw up & corporate greed.
A stimulus package that would have supported the home owners to maintain a standard of living, reduce the need to support the now homeless & create stability for the banking system was what was needed & I submit, still is. Homeless are still a growing concern & the unemployment rates are rising whilst the corporate bullies are still going a high level of protection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement