Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Nestle Eyes Spring Water for Bottling, But Small Towns Are Fighing Back

By Jenny Tomkins, In These Times. Posted July 13, 2009.


Communities across the country are fighting back as Nestle tries to drain their water and their finances.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When Nestlé Waters North America, the world's largest bottler of water, comes a-courting, promising jobs and increased tax revenues in exchange for local water rights, many small, rural towns get nervous.

Deborah Lapidus, an organizer with the Think Outside the Bottle campaign, says this skepticism stems from Henderson, Texas, which in the '90s saw Nestlé suck one of its wells dry.

"The company prioritizes its own use over the environment and other uses," says Lapidus.

As well as draining water, Nestlé also attempts to deplete these communities' finances, Lapidus says. Towns trying to defend their reservoirs have found themselves in costly legal battles. Fryeburg, Maine, for example, has been sued five times by Nestlé for "interfering with the right to grow their market share."

Last summer, when Nestlé Waters North America/Poland Spring negotiated with the Kennebunk, Kennebunkport and Wells Water District, public outcry forced the proposal to be tabled. The trustees of Wells Water District discussed a deal in which 433,000 gallons of water were to be extracted daily from the Branch Brook Aquifer for 0.06 cents per gallon.

Wells residents organized in the group Save Our Water proposed a local ordinance to prohibit the corporate withdrawal of water for resale. Such legislation, first implemented in Barnstead, N.H., had been adopted by two other towns in Maine. Barnstead's ordinance declares water a common resource for its residents and, more importantly, decrees that within its jurisdictions, corporations may not wield state or federal constitutional powers.

But Wells' ordinance was defeated in May, after Nestlé poured money into a campaign convincing local businesses that the ordinance would also curtail their rights.

Jamilla El-Shafei believes the community made a tactical error by introducing the ordinance before Save Our Water had time to present its case. However, she's optimistic that Wells' trustees will turn Nestlé down.

McCloud, Calif., began its struggle with Nestlé in 2003, when the town negotiated a deal wherein the community would only receive 0.001 cents per gallon of water for a minimum of 50 years. No environmental assessment was conducted, nor was any community input sought in this proposal. It took five years and intervention by the California Attorney General to break the agreement. And Nestlé is still courting the community for a revised deal.

Faced with increased public scrutiny and a growing bottled water backlash, Nestlé is launching a charm offensive. "We're one of 70,000 different types of beverages you can buy. … We use the least amount of water and the least amount of plastic, and we're good for you," says Nestlé spokesman Brian Flaherty.

Peter H. Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute, disagrees. In the February issue of Environmental Research Letters, he wrote that bottled water requires "as much as 2,000 times the energy cost of producing tap water." Americans consume around 33 billion liters each year, which requires between 32 to 54 million barrels of oil to produce.

While Nestlé is focused on staking out the environmental high ground, the Out of the Bottle campaign is assisting communities whose water supplies are being threatened and educating the general public on the fundamental question of water.

There are some signs that water activists are succeeding. In 2008, for the first time in its history, the bottled water market declined -- mostly due to the recession. This victory was followed by New York Gov. David Paterson's decision to impose a statewide ban on public expenditures for bottled water.

Will 2009 be the year when Americans begin to kick their bottled water habit? Small towns like Wells and McCloud hope so.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, water privatization, nestle

Jenny Tomkins, a member of the In These Times Board of Editors, lives in Sycamore, Ill. She has an M.A. in journalism from the University of Wisconsin and currently works as an interim innkeeper. Her abiding passions are politics, her family, and eating, growing and writing about food.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on Jul 16, 2009 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anyone still believes that any corporation is a friend to them and their community please read the above article twice. Most corporation drain local coffers in the form of subsidies to keep jobs. But eventually it becomes to expensive for the local government, more paid to a corporation than the benefit of having them, to support and then the companies either move to another area or out of this country completely.

The time has well past to keep giving corporate welfare and subsidies to businesses which could care less about the environment, the state or even this country. Just look at how well our money was used after it was stolen from us and given to the a..holes of Wall Street. It really must be nice to get a bonus for being a fool. Would it not be cheaper to pay these ignorant bastards to stay home rather than allow them to play on Wall Street or the real world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tiffany
Posted by: ekoljos on Jul 18, 2009 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tiffany for her. Exquisite tiffany jewelries in high quliat
, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry, earring jewelry.
Tiffany Jewellery.shopping tiffany

offering bangle jewelry, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry and earring jewelry
Tiffany Bracelets
Tiffany Rings
Tiffany Earrings
tiffany
links of london
Tiffany Style Silver Jewelry: Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Bracelets and more Tiffany Jewelry at low prices
Tiffany Necklaces

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on Jul 24, 2009 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is amazing that one of our planets most important resources gets so little attention from the public. Maybe they will become more aware when no fresh water is left to come out of their taps and they need to pay the people who stole it and placed it in convenient plastic bottles for them. Sounds like Wall Street a little.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bob S.
Posted by: Bobert on Jul 28, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nestle is indeed an evil corporation. Here in Oregon in the little town of Cascade Locks in the Columbia Gorge, Nestle wants to build a water bottling plant.
Close by Cascade Locks is the Bonneville Fish Hatchery which uses spring water out of the Cascades to rear endangered salmon.
Nestle wants to take that spring water for their bottling operation and have the Hatchery drill new wells for the Hatchery... the water from which will need to be tested for use in rearing salmon. In my mind this is beyond insane.
Has anyone realized what the brand Evian spells backwards? Naive. Anyone who buys any bottled water is both naive and ill-informed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bob S. Posted by: gimmie shelter
It really must be
Posted by: hahaho on Jul 30, 2009 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The time has well past to keep giving corporate welfare and subsidies to businesses which could care less about the environment, the state or even this country. Just look at how well our money was used after it was stolen from us and given to the a..holes of Wall Street. It really must be nice to get a bonus for being a fool. Would it not be cheaper to pay these ignorant bastards to stay home rather than allow them to play on Wall Street or the real world.links of london
tiffany

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement