Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

How Unions Gave My Redneck Family a Chance at the American Dream

By Joe Bageant, AlterNet. Posted June 22, 2009.


Restoring dignity to laboring America won't be easy. It won't be pretty, and it won't be "within the system." Because the system is the problem.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In looking back on growing up, I always remember 1957 and 1958 as "the two good years." They were the only years my working-class redneck family ever caught a real break in their working lives, and that break came because of organized labor.

After working as a farmhand, driving a hicktown taxi part time and a dozen catch-as-catch-can jobs, my father found himself owning a used semi-truck and hauling produce for a Teamster-unionized trucking company called Blue Goose.

Daddy was making more money than he'd ever made in his life, about $4,000 a year. The median national household income at the time was $5,000, mostly thanks to America's unions. After years of moving from one rented dump to another, we bought a modest home ($8,000) and felt like we might at last be getting some traction in achieving the so-called American Dream.

Yup, Daddy was doing pretty good for a backwoods boy who'd quit school in the sixth or seventh grade -- he was never sure, which gives some idea how seriously the farm boy took his attendance at the one-room school we both attended in our lifetimes.

This was the golden age of both trucking and of unions. Thirty-five percent of American labor, 17 million working folks, were union members, and it was during this period the American middle class was created.

The American middle class has never been as big as advertised, but if it means the middle third income-wise, then we actually had one at the time. But whatever it means, one-third of working folks, the people who busted their asses day in and day out making the nation function, were living better than they ever had. Or at least had the opportunity to do so.

From the Depression through World War II, the Teamsters Union became a powerful entity, and a popular one, too, because of such things as its pledge never to strike during the war or a national emergency. President Roosevelt even had a special-designated liaison to the Teamsters.

But power and money eventually drew the usual assortment of lizards, and by the mid-'50s the Teamsters Union had become one corrupt pile of shit at the top level. So rotten even the mob enjoyed a piece of the action.

The membership, ordinary guys like my dad, was outraged and ashamed, but rendered powerless by the crooked union bosses in the big cities.

My old man was no great follower of the news or current events, but he tried to keep up with and understand Teamster developments. Which was impossible since his reading consisted of anti-union Southern newspapers, and the television coverage of Teamster criminality, including murders and the ongoing courtroom trials.

All this left him conflicted. His Appalachian Christian upbringing defined the world in black-and-white, with no gray areas. Inside, he felt he should not be even remotely connected with such vile things as the Teamsters were associated with. And he sometimes prayed for guidance in the matter.

On the other hand, there was the pride and satisfaction in providing for his family in ways previously impossible. He'd built a reasonable, working-class security for those times and that place in West Virginia. Being a Teamster certainly made that possible. But for damned sure no one had handed it to him. He drove his guts out to get what he had.

There were rules and log books and all the other crap that were supposed to assure drivers got enough rest., and ensure road safety and fairness for the truckers. Rural heartland drivers saw it for the bullshit it was, but it was much better-paying bullshit. For a little guy hauling produce from Podunk, USA, to the big cities, it still came down to heartburn, hemorrhoids and longer hauls and longer hours than most driver's falsified log books showed. And sometimes way too much Benzedrine, or "bennies."

Bennies were a type of speed commonly used by truckers back then because of the grueling hauls. As a former doper who has done bennies, I can avow they are some gritty, nerve-jagging shit. Their only virtue is making you wide awake and jumpy, and after you've been awake on them a couple of days, which many drivers were, crazier than a shithouse rat.

Nearly every truck stop sold bennies under the counter. Once, while hallucinating on bennies, Daddy nearly wiped out a roadside joint. He recalled “layin' on the jake brake, down shifting and watching hundreds of the witches like in The Wizard of Oz come down out of the sky in the dark." Somehow he got 30,000 pounds back onto the road while several folks inside the diner were pissing themselves in the windowside booths.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: labor, unions, teamsters

Joe Bageant is author of the book, Deer Hunting With Jesus: Dispatches from America's Class War (Random House Crown), about working-class America. A complete archive of his online work, along with the thoughts of many working Americans on the subject of class may be found on his Web site.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RE: Just bring in Illegals.
Posted by: richholland on Jun 22, 2009 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let us face it.

every country in the world no matter how poor has underpaid illegal workers...
the sad thing is that PETAlovers without anyknowledge of animals, vegans without knowledge of food, feminist hating women and all those strange homo sapiens are the warriors of capitalisme...

let us realise some illegals are no problem, some lazy people can be fed but as soon there is an organization, paid jobs, money going around .

it is so cheap and easy to be politically correct.

Some of our europe green members of parliament do have big big cars and and huge mansions.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ??? Posted by: Tricia
Actually, ...
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Jun 22, 2009 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back before the Reagan revolution, when unions still were reasonably strong, unions stood as one of the barriers to illegal immigration. Well, they really stood as a barrier to illegal employers and that is the real problem.

Starving immigrants will always be willing to jump a border if that is how they can survive. If there is no work in Mexico, unemployed Mexicans will hop over the border if possible and if they think there is a job for them on the other side. Stop hiring them and they will not come.

We have this severe illegal employer problem now in significant part because unions have been destroyed. When unions were powerful, they exercised strict control over their membership and unionized shops were unable to hire undocumented immigrants - the union just would not allow it.

So, Honky, take your choice. Welcome unions and the prosperity that comes from good paying jobs, or continue to discourage unions and accept a failing economy, declining wages and an increase in cheap foreign workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Just bring in Illegals-matches?Yes,we have it now
Posted by: trusetufree on Jun 23, 2009 12:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know a family's 3 generations wiped clean with this
meltdown,even moving in with their late 80s
grand,grands.This is the stuff that triggers
social upheavals.
That is why Beck and others are so busy with
their smoke screans,throwing sand to blind
people,so they do not react,or if they do,
against the wrong culprits.
But you can't hide the sun,soon or later
it will be so evident,that the propaganda
can't stop the true to come up,then....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once Again you're a clueless fool. Liberals don't oppose Unions having supported them to the utmost!
Posted by: yellow on Jun 23, 2009 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberals and the Left in general have always supported unions for a variety of reasons. They believe in pay equity; they believe that its the only way to build and sustain a viable middle class (witness the crisis today with only 7% of the private sector economy unionized); it allows stability in the workplace through a grievance proceedure and, finally, it is a basic democratic institution in any open and democratic society.

The meatpackers union was being busted through union busting techniques like "runaway plants" to "right to work states" in the late 1970s long before there were any illegals in the US meatpacking industry. Even today illegals make up little more than 25% of the total number of workers in the meatpacking industry. The illegal issues is just another divisive issue to turn workers against each other so there won't be a union in any US industry, meat packing or otherwise.

Honky is just another fascist troll who is trying to derail the discussion. Ignore him!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Real Progressive- Amen
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 22, 2009 12:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing of real value has ever happened in America until the common people got pissed off enough to demand it. From the earliest days of our republic through voting rights for women, the end of Jim Crow right down to today's LGBT rights movements, people had to lay it on the line.

Nothing has changed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ex pat obsever
Posted by: davy on Jun 22, 2009 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody tells it like it is better than Joe. He doesn't write, he paints pictures. His writing keeps me in touch with "real" America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bravo
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Jun 22, 2009 3:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
excellent personal narrative. i empathize(yeah, like Obama) with the writer-some of his experience is mine and my family's. union busting is a key reason for income disparity and a lack of capital in the hands of workers.

The Democrats are especially guilty, the writer's lampoon of Obama is justified but even more so would be the hurling of our disgust against the allegedly prounion Reid and Pelosi.

Where is card check, doofuses? Is not card check more important than shoveling Bernankebucks into the vaults of banks that don's lend out the money to small business and workers? Ben would disagree with me. Obviouslyhe learned his compassion at the Passover Seder.

Small quibble with the writer: George Meany was not a Teamster like Beck and Hoffa, which the author claims. Meany was head of the AFLCIO and the old AFL before 1955 and the great merger between the AFL and CIO(in retrospect a bad idea as it diluted the more radical CIO). I believe Meany started out as a union plumber.

Meany hated Hoffa and Meany was never a Teamster. Meany threw the Teamsters out of the AFL-CIO in the late 50's, or maybe a bit earlier because of the obvious infiltration of the Teamsters by the Mob.

Nevertheless, Hoffa was a great man, built a great union, and the Kennedys' vendetta against him was inexplicable unless one concludes the reason wasn't Hoffa's Mob ties but the effectiveness of the Teamsters to organize not only truckers but as the 60's progressed, workers in various public and private sector areas.

The Teamsters' dream under Hoffa was to be a rival of AFLCIO, and to aggressively organize even as the author here urges us to do today.

Finally, a germane leftist article in an allegedly leftist website. No side irrelevant issues like immigration or how your orgasm ought to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bravo Posted by: JSquercia
» which side are you on Posted by: johnwinthrop
My family too
Posted by: Christian Southern Liberal on Jun 22, 2009 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both of my paternal grandparents were from Europe. My paternal grandfather came to the USA around the turn of the century and moved to the W.Va. coal fields for work. He dug coal, in the mines, with a pick axe 9 hours a day and half a day on Sat. Remember the song "St. Peter don't you call me..."? That is the life that my Dad's family lived. Papa John wasn't allowed to get ahead, he was only allowed to subsist...that is until the mines were unionized.

My mom's Dad was a "super" in the mines during those years when workers were virtual slaves. His house was the same size as the rest of the company houses, but his was on the hill with the other management. He was killed in a mine cave-in during the mid fifties. He, too, "owed his soul to the company store", but had a bit more buying power and actually owned a car.

Unions created regulations that made the mines safer and allowed those workers, whose jobs are among the most dangerous on earth, to become middle class citizens.

My Dad, a WWII veteran, worked the mines. He attended school on the GI bill and was a electrical engineer in charge of infrastructure for over 8 mines. The GI bill, along with unions, gave all of the WWII veterans a chance at becoming middle class.

What I don't "get" is the lack of reasoning of the "ruling class". When there is a strong middle class the ruling class income is increased even though they are receiving less as a percentage of profits. Example: Right now a large number of Wal-Mart employees cannot afford shop at Wal-Mart, this is especially true if they are the sole bread-winner for the family. Those employees buy their clothes at thrift stores, or more likely are given vouchers that allow them to shop for free at the thrift store. They recieve food stamps and public housing. Their children are on Medicaide. If they are women they also can have healthcare when pregnant. If Wal-Mart were unionized and paid a living wage then those workers would be paying their own expenses plus be able to shop at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart would expand, i.e. bringing those workers into the middle class would "float all boats". The added benefit is that those workers would be contributing to the "system" instead of being on the recieving end.

If a strong middle class is once again created, then the upper class will benefit even more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right on!
Posted by: tulugaq on Jun 22, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have argued with many of Joe's articles.

Not this one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

basically...
Posted by: ellie on Jun 22, 2009 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
go unions!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

at least I know the end
Posted by: richholland on Jun 22, 2009 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of USA as a country for people.
After World war II the quality of life between
1958 and 1974 stopped the socialisme and communisme.
workers had homes and cars...russian workers stood quee to buy bread so it was obvious who was the best.

In Europe we didnt kill capitalisme but kept our social benefits....

And there is no communisme anymore (only for Wallstreetbankers) so who keeps the creepy lizards calm:
PETA???
Vegans???
Feminists????

maybe you might find tips on Mother Earth or become an expat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're all in this together...
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 22, 2009 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the things that I have to admire about the right - even when those pundits, talking heads, politicians are dead wrong and the twisted logic is strained at best - the sheeple are still more than willing to "follow the leader"! The other thing that has happened is "faux divisive issues" (family values, lip service to children, homophobia, etc.) has separated the electorate.

What is true is that this is a class war (rich corporate oligarchy vs. the rest) that has gained a massive amount of ground over the years - and whether you are: a redneck, African-American, Latino, Asian, Native American - you are an American, and we have been and continue to be preyed upon by the power elite! That is a fact, and we all must see thru the mist and lies of the corporate oligarchy that keep us divided! Their aim is to keep the masses of people dumbed down and servile, our aim needs to be to even out the playing field for us all! To that end, I not only have the match, I've got tar and a pitchfork, so who's with me!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When we let coporations or elite individuals own the "means of production" it's
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jun 22, 2009 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like letting them own all the drinking water or the air we breathe. Ordinary people must then psychically "sell their labor" to survive.

Unions help level the playing field somewhat so that the corporations & elites don't pay people slave wages!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LET'S STOP THE SNOBBISM
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 22, 2009 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The term "Joe Six Pack" became popular as labor unions were losing their clout. People have a need to distinguish themselves from the working class. As the unions became weaker those opportunities vanished. The poor lost their shot at the American dream. The idea that someone working a union job in a factory might send his kid to an Ivy League school makes them sick. The real fear is that the present arrogant corporate mentality will be challenged. Their security consists of keeping out the competition. Labor unions are a threat to their status. Tough! ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nevertheless.... Posted by: CatDad
Union losses
Posted by: Gerald on Jun 22, 2009 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well said! I'd add, there's two "middle classes". The smaller one, and is getting smaller, is middle class. The much larger one thinks they're middle class and would never vote "Union". Greater fools they.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Radical Unionism
Posted by: wbblack on Jun 22, 2009 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well said Joe. I know in my union the problem is business unionism. The union boss and the company boss join forces to screw us. The union president preaches collaboration instead of fighting back. Just last week our union president sent out a letter telling us we should be glad we have jobs and that we need surrender to the company's agenda. Not exactly in those words of course, but that's what he meant. I'm trying to convince some of the other workers we need to bring real democracy into our union. We need radical unionism not business unionism. I blogged a little bit about it. You can read at www.workingfertheman.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: adical Unionism Posted by: CatDad
Does anyone know what's ACTUALLY going on?
Posted by: willymack on Jun 22, 2009 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone see the big picture?
World events are pretty complex, so much so that no one could possibly be current on all of them.
We rely on our "leaders" to do all the work of informing themselves of all the facts, analysing them, and arriving at prudent and beneficial decisions to best run our affairs.
I'm reasonably certain most of our national leaders worldwide have SOME idea of what effects the uncontrolled population explosion are having now, and are likely to have in the future.
One of these effects is happening right now.
Does anyone seriously think the "war" in Iraq and the abundance of oil there is a coincidence? This is the beginning of what will be called the Resource Wars. Oil is just one item on a long list. Water and food will almost certainly be next.
Criminals posing as businessmen are taking full advantage of the situation. The insanity of their mindset is such that they're blinded to the ghastly consequences of their actions. The only people who won't lose everything will be those with nothing to lose.
In the past, the collapse of the civilizations of old had local effects. We have a worldwide civilization now, and if it falls, who knows what legends the survivors will concoct to tell their children? Maybe something like the legend of Atlantis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Benny Waters
Posted by: Benwa on Jun 22, 2009 5:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Damn Joe. You are one clever practicioner of class warfare. Admitting you "were" a redneck is just not PC hillbilly! I bet after your encounter with the union you had the best outhouse in the neighborhood! Still eat possum and cornbread Joe?? I thought not. I bet you traded in your Pontiac Trans Am for a hybrid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And didn't he move out of the US? Posted by: countingdaisies
Don't ignore the Employee Free Choice Act
Posted by: ctguy on Jun 23, 2009 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article except for the conclusion.
The Employee Free Choice Act would dramatically change the balance of power going forward, by significantly increasing workers' ability to organize without employer interference.
Forget about "fighting in the streets" if we cannot even get labor law reform.
Workers in the public sector have higher union density because employer opposition during the campaign is less. It's one of the reasons public employees have done better, and also one of the reasons they are under attack.
The pizza delivery guy, the independent trucker, the Wal-mart cashier cannot do much against corporate power without organization. Unions are imperfect, but they are the biggest worker organizations we have, and generally are now where they should be, among the leaders of the progressive movement.
If you have not urged your Senators & Congressional Reps to support the Employee Free Choice Act -- do it now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wish you well, brother; too late for me
Posted by: Fcisco on Jun 23, 2009 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was born in Chicago, working class all my life, a Union man, Able Seaman in the Merchant Marine, sailed with the SIU and then little company 'house unions'(bless their lost-cause struggles). Retired now, screwed out of my pension--what else is new, eh? IRA is gone, but so what?. I GAVE UP ON THE UNITED STATES years ago. I live in Mexico now and have become a Mexican citizen. I feel lucky that I found a way to escape the EMPIRE, I know most of my working class brothers don't have that option. I think the Amerika is doomed...God, I hope I'm wrong. In any case, my heart is with you young bloods in the struggle to come. God bless you guys and girls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bennies to stay awake and heart problems
Posted by: sandy55 on Jun 26, 2009 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to add my five cents as it is common knowledge that the drugs your Dad had to take to do his job are likely what caused his heart problem. I know truckers today with the same problem from these drugs.
Just thought I would point that out to you and anyone else who would care. More and more performance enhancing drugs are needed to maintain the demands of the work place. Employers know they just don't give a shit. It is all about profit then now and always.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Government Employees are Rednecks Too
Posted by: PFW on Jun 29, 2009 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole labor movement agreed to the no-strike pledge during WWII, not just the Teamsters. Meany was a plumber from the Bronx, and was never a Teamster. Dave Beck and Jimmy Hoffa do not deserve your scorn either. Why would you want to divide the working class government employees from the rest of the working class by calling them (us) "commissars"? Also, why would you refer to today's America as a police state? Good bad or indifferent, this is no police state, and getting carried away with your rhetoric is no excuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement