Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Home Loan Scamming Is Still Going Strong -- and Now You're Paying for It

By Yasha Levine, AlterNet. Posted June 16, 2009.


Welcome to subprime swindle 2.0: the feds' desperate attempt to reinflate the popped housing bubble.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Everything the real estate industry tells you is a hustle. No industry is more geared toward pumping up the positive and burying anything remotely negative, leaving you -- and truth -- out in the cold.

The crash has not made real estate agents any more honest, but at least the gap between the industry's crazed optimism and stark reality has grown so obvious that even the real estate industry can't hide it anymore.

Nowhere is this more obvious than in Victorville, Calif., an exurb of Los Angeles situated in the high desert where housing bubbled up higher than just about anywhere at the peak of the subprime-lending craze and is still in free fall today.

These days, there are a lot of lies and broken dreams buried in the gravelly sand on which Victorville was built. During the last real estate boom, this barren wasteland was the mecca of low-income homeownership, proof that the American Dream was within reach of all.

Tract-home developers stripped away the rocks and tumbleweeds and Joshua trees, replacing them with mazes of curvy streets and cul de sacs with soothing names like Cottontail Drive, Steeplechase Road and Ladybird Lane, lining them with the cheapest McMansions in California. Things exploded out of control this past decade, with the population doubling to 100,000 in just eight years.

But that whole way of life is over now. Unemployment in Victorville is way above the national average, and violent crime has shot up. Homes prices have plunged to 1989 levels and many stand empty. Banks don't even bother to putting them on the market.

Yet, last week, the press started hyping up the supposed real estate sales-driven economic turnaround that was about to sweep the country. "Honk if You Think It's Over," read a June 7 New York Times headline. "The panic in the Manhattan real estate market of the winter of 2009 lifted in the last few weeks, brokers say, as more and more buyers and sellers have found the courage and the comfort level to sign on the dotted line."

The Washington Post went even further: "Economists, senior government officials and ordinary consumers are all showing greater confidence in the outlook for the economy. ... There are unquestionable signs of economic progress." ABC News went with a rhetorical structure: "Has the Recession Finally Ended? Strong Home Sales Are Just One Indicator That the Economy May Be on the Mend."

From where I sit, this reads like pure fiction. It runs contrary to virtually every economic piece of data available: rising unemployment, growing credit card debt, a massive shadow inventory of foreclosed homes and a wave of defaulting ARM and commercial loans that's just around the corner.

But there is something else, too. And it is as deadly to our vampiric debtor economy as a stake through the heart: the FHA loan. By guaranteeing certain mortgages, the Federal Housing Administration has been helping middle- and low-income Americans purchase their first homes ever since the 1930s.

But this modest leg-up program has been been hijacked and transformed into the new subprime-loan market operated by lenders who are as corrupt, predatory and shortsighted as the original, and maybe even more so. Because this time taxpayers have been put on the hook for the risk well in advance. Real-estate insiders have been sounding the alarm about this new shadow subprime mortgage market -- which is now almost $600 billion strong -- for months now. But instead of listening, Congress has been trying to expand the FHA loan program.

Not surprisingly, it seems that risk-free loans are the only way they banks can be persuaded to start lending again. But I wanted to find out firsthand how much of an impact these loans were having on the housing market. So last weekend, I shaved, put on a clean shirt and headed out for a day of shopping in Victorville.

Around here, it is much easier to shop for a brand new home than to find someone who will show you one of the many foreclosed ones. You don't need to make an appointment with a real estate agent, hunt down open houses on a Sunday afternoon or attend auctions. All you have to do is take a drive any day of the week during normal business hours and look out for the huge signs plastered around town. They are not easy to miss.

It took me five minutes to spot a new development on the very edge of Victorville's sprawl. The sign was dark green and advertised a development called "Braeburn at West Creek," with luxurious and spacious homes offered for around $200,000. The development had a quiet, upper-class suburb feel to it: new cars, landscaped lawns, no traffic and wide streets. Passing a group of kids playing basketball in the middle of one of the streets, I pulled up in front of the Braeburn sales office, built into the garage of a model two-story McMansion painted a trendy brown.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: subprime, real estate, victorville

Read more of Yasha Levine's work at eXiledonline.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
My cat could buy a new home
Posted by: DrSuess on Jun 16, 2009 2:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In early 2000, I went out shopping for a house. I was gainfully employed as a computer programmer, and had a good income. I quickly discovered there were two housing markets- one for new homes, such as is described in this article, and one for existing homes. I quickly discovered that my cat could have bought a new home in 2000. The new home builders wanted me to buy a house that would consume 40% or more of my take home pay (before the adjustable mortgage kicked in), and were shoving me towards the biggest house that they could possibly justify putting me in. Their standards were incredibly loose at that time (and became looser as the 2000's rolled on).

The existing home market had much stricter standards. I had to bring a downpayment, have a decient credit score, and do all kinds of qualifying. My cat was welcome in an existing home- but could not buy one.

What this article describes is that the desperate homebuilders are playing the same game that they have been playing for some time.

In Indianapolis, the foreclosure crisis has been running for over 10 years. The problem is not confined to the "inner city" and subprime homes. In fact- it is actually worse in the under 10 year old "new" home subdivisions than it is in the inner city. There is no market for a two year old house sitting in the same subdivision where the new home builder is building new homes just down the street. I know of real estate investors who make a living convincing despirate 2 year old home owners who are forced to sell to sign over the deed to their house and keep the mortgage in their name (Its called Subject To), and there are enough despirate homeowners in those two year old subdivisions that they make a good living doing this.

The newspaper talks about the subprime housing crisis, and uses the inner city of Detroit as an example of what the problem is. But don't believe it- the low price of the houses could not bring down the system. It is the million dollar mansions in California that were sold to middle and upper class Americans that are going into foreclosure due to job loss or some other crisis that are taking down the system. The biggest culprit in the long 10 year foreclosure crisis in Indiana is the new home builders and what they are doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottom line: Fools and their money are soon parted...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 16, 2009 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...unless you're an Obama or Bush crony, or a heavy democrat or republican donor. In that case your paid-for politicians will go to bat for you, bravely fending off both market and political forces that would otherwise leave you with only your bad decisions in hand to show for your failed efforts.

I'd say let the chips fall; let those who sought after shady loans enjoy those loans, and those who sought shady borrowers reap those just desserts, also.... ...

...But that doesn't take into account the new machine in White House and the new tools in Congress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The recession is not over - Housing Bubble part deux
Posted by: pgrand on Jun 16, 2009 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good expose'. This information has been out there for a while, if looked for in the right places. Also, coming down the pike are another round of adjustables that are locking in with interest and principal. The "recession is almost over" is truly smoke and mirrors - you are correct.

One criticism - you state "What a neighborhood. Prison guards, cops and their school-teacher wives. All die-hard small-government Republicans, no doubt."

I almost didn't read any farther - that kind of nasty generalization undercuts the nice investigative work you've done - it smacks of reverse "O'Reilly" ideological BS. Most teachers - at least - are liberals. Just stick to what you're good at - otherwise, nice job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad
Posted by: aaweeble1 on Jun 16, 2009 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, as long as there is a buck to be made, the abuse will continue! Greed is what makes that industry in general go round!

RT
Absolute Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This all happening because what you have...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jun 16, 2009 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is a representative oligarchy government.

The politicians represent only THEMSELVES...their only purpose in life is to do what gets re-elected over and over ad-nausium. And what is worse, we fall for the rhetoric and wedge issues EVERY time.

The pimp in this oligarchy is the corporate world and Bam Bam is just one of its whores.

The only solution is a third party. All we have now is one party with two different types of rhetoric.

Wake up Obamabots...your boy is NOT what his platitudes led you to believe he is...he is NOT a progressive...he is Shrub-Lite, and you have been drinking it into a stupor. It is time to go to a 12 step program.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good luck and dream on... Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
» RE: Good luck and dream on... Posted by: monkeywrench
» Hey, Obama is what he's always been: Posted by: photon's feather
why buy a home now???
Posted by: ellie on Jun 16, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it would be like buying the Titanic as it brushes against icebergs before crashing...

home ownership is no longer 'the american dream in an ownership society' anymore... too risky... the first wave of foreclosures aren't over yet and people are willing to jump further into debt with an uncertain future???

in this article, the investigation was in the california market... why risk buying in a state that is going totally bust with no end in sight??? what about employment??? in a bankrupt state will these civil servant neighbors be forced to hand over a state IOU (remember the famous IOU's from calif in the '70's) for next month's mortgage payment??? will HA say thank you for that IOU???

no thanks... back to coffee...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why buy a home now??? Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS
Once more into the breach......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 16, 2009 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have Americans learned nothing, yet again!? It was a false housing bubble and the shenanigans of unscrupulous lenders that lead to the current bubble, and are "we" falling for the banana in the tailpipe again?! Come on people, stop, think, what are you doing? Wake up! Wake up! Once again the oligarchy is making money at the expense of the "average American", wake up! Whatever happened to buying an existing home? Ok, so you don't get your 10 year warranty on construction and appliances! But did you ever stop to think those older homes - they never came with a 10 year warranty, why, because they were built right to begin with! You know when it took about 18 months to put a house up vs. the 3 months that it takes today!

We're still in a recession, health-care is becoming more and more expensive, hell - just the price of living is more expensive! Global warming is wreaking havoc on the Earthly environment (draughts, tsunami's,etc.), and people in America are still looking at new houses! Lord help us all! Will we never learn! We as a nation cannot go back to rampant consumerism, we must make better choices - not just for ourselves but for our children that will inherit the mess we bequeath them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bubbles are the only thing political hot air is good for.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 16, 2009 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, keeping the housing bubble inflated is what is it all about still. People have to have some place to live. Developers want to sell the largest homes they can, as the profit on big homes is higher, while the expense to the developer remains low. Trade unions in construction have been replaced by day laborers. Buyers don’t know the difference. Just have more babies and fill the McMansion’s bedrooms.

The water tables on the edge of the desert, as in Victorville, continue to drop dramatically. There's no other work out there besides construction. Government employees charged with monitoring communities only need to try to do their jobs; it’s better than being out of work.

The street violence in my mid-sized southern California city is the only growth you can count on, along with increasing unemployment. If that is the change we voted for in the last election, that’s what we are getting. That’s what Reagan gave us with his promise of “the American way of life is not negotiable.”

We are now repeating “the Roaring Twenties,” so hold on to your hat and cover your other end. And Hollywood will give us more "Public Enemies" to feed our worship of guns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Staving Off a Tsunami or Running for Higher Ground?
Posted by: snax on Jun 16, 2009 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bottom line right now is that we are looking at a lose-lose situation with our economy and banking system. It boils down to the too big to fail concept, where total economic chaos would ensue vs. controlled crash.

As negative as the article paints FHA borrowers, the reality is the vast majority of them will pay their mortgages and stay in their homes for years. It's their first home, and the last thing they want to do is abandon it. And while the defaulters may appear to be a substantial liability to the FHA, the tradeoff is the thousands of tradespeople and builders on the cusp of unemployment and default without these loans.

Our economic problems in this country are so much more broad than this mortgage mess suggests, and either way, it's going to get allot worse before it gets better.

Free trade is not Fair trade, and without a single payer health insurance option, nobody but the top 1% in this country will ever have much of a chance to see improvement. The banks are simply capitalizing on the needs of our population against an unsustainable cashflow, and that cashflow is about to dry up almost completely without sweeping reforms to trade, health care, and taxation of the investor class at a rate that the rest of us who actually work for a living are taxed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prison guards, Cops, and Teachers....
Posted by: manderson on Jun 16, 2009 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....are part of the Conservative (read Republican, at this time) vision of Government----limited to Police and military to keep order---teachers play a vital role in this bullshit too---teaching obedience to authority from Kindergarten on up. When they don't obey authority, then Daddy the cop comes to punish them. Same system as any authoritarian government----and so they get the breaks (the home), and are too fucking stupid to see the system for what it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

working class zero
Posted by: fearbiter on Jun 16, 2009 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rehabilitating the real estate market would be quite simple and straight-forward if we just imposed a moratorium on new construction until 90% of existing homes were occupied, by district.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: working class zero Posted by: osd
Here we go again ....
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jun 16, 2009 8:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The government is knowingly flooding the market with homes at inflated prices, setting young families up for default and massively increasing taxpayers' exposure to more toxic debt ... and for what? ... It's all about taking care of the banking and finance industry."
. . . . .

And may I add: bankrupting the middle class.

This instead of temporarily nationalizing industries like real estate and high finance and throwing out their crooked managements, as FDR did in the 1930's. (Oh, no; that's only reserved for the auto industry, which is not a Washington D.C. club member.)
. . . . .

"The second contraction will come, and when it does, it'll be bigger and badder than ever. And the government bailout will come straight out of our pensions and health care."
. . . . .

Uh, huh; and, apparently, the new admninistration is playing this dangerous game hoping that the fall won't happen until just into Obama's second term? Or, maybe, I should say: The "Powers That Be" BEHIND the Obama administration.

We suffered through a overtly corrupt administration for eight long years, and this new one was supposed to be an FDR-style "breath of fresh air" –– but have we been duped again, with the "new" administration simply substituting "covert" for "overt?"

Frankly, for reasons outlined in this article and far too many other backtracks from Obama's promises, I'm starting to get quite worried that we've been duped again – and I'm starting to remember the ugly, tainted history of Illinois politics, Obama's political birthplace. Anybody else making that connection?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here we go again .... Posted by: donl51
» RE: Here we go again .... Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
Belling the cat
Posted by: willymack on Jun 16, 2009 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some people put collars with bells on them on their cats in the hope that birds, mice, and other critters will be forewarned and escape being killed. All I can say about that is that those people don't know much about cats. Cats haven't survived for some forty million years without being resourceful, and I've seen many a cat wearing collars with bells dispatching a bird or rodent.
Our corporate predators are like cats in their resourcefulness. They have an impressive repitoire of dirty tricks and back-stabbing treachery, which they gleefully employ whenever any hint of opposition appears. Just take a look at what they've done to us, for instance. They, in simple terms, have eaten us alive. Who, out there hasn't suffered from their insatiable greed or doesn't know someone who HAS?
They buy off those hired by us to stand between them and their evil ways, get laws passed favoring their theft and fraud, and go about their merry way, safe in the knowlege that there's no impediment to their crimes.
Unless those in congress and in the senate suddenly change their avaricious nature, or are forced into positive action by US, it'll be the same old story, same old song.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is turning out to be the worst SHISTER of them all
Posted by: lunamina on Jun 16, 2009 10:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My vote for Obama was very conflicted. I had been campaigning for Kucinich. When he dropped out to save his house seat, I was convinced to join the Obama campaign to 'guarantee that we did not have another Republican in the white house'. At this point, however, I am wondering if McCain could have possibly been as bad as Obama has turned out to be. I know the Democrats are REAL happy. There are 80 Progressives in the House of Representatives. If they all left the Democratic party and formed their own, I would bet that 1/3 of the country would follow them. That is because about 1/3 of the population, at any one time, identifies as Independent. Most of them voted with the Democrats in 2008 for the same reasons I did. We also had a lot of Republicans vote for Obama because they were pushed out of the Republican party by its stupid campaign. I think this would be a GREAT time to start another party. I am not quite sure why, but the GREENS do not seem to be attracting people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How did we go from the most prosperous nation some decades ago to this financial disaster???
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jun 16, 2009 11:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Was is just some poor judgement??? Were some boo boo's made?

IMO, severely corrupt governments + corporations are why so many people are suffering!!! There are abundant resources on this planet for EVERYONE to have clean water, food, shelter, decent jobs, medical care, etc.!!!

Wake-up, sheeple!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To answer the question for the poster above...The FEDERAL RESERVE...that is how.
Posted by: rafaeltoral on Jun 16, 2009 2:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the people who created the financial crisis are about to get MORE power to regulate THEMSELVES under the auspices of this being a real solution and ANYTHING other than total fucking fascism.

END THE FEDERAL RESERVE. THERE IS NO GREATER GENERAL OBSTACLE TO TRUE DEMOCRACY, FREEDOM, AND EQUALITY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Home Loan Scamming
Posted by: dwolsky on Jun 16, 2009 5:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a mortgage originator for fifteen years in Arizona. We are in the epicenter of bad loans and foreclosures. I work in the resale market, not for new builds. I agree that FHA loans offered easier guidelines, but the borrowers that I have put through the process have experienced tough underwriting reviews and have been required to put down a 3.5% down payment. Our lenders require a minimum FICO score of 620 and the rate is higher for borrowers under 660. The appraisals are under strict scrutiny as well. One more point, each FHA loans has two types of mortgage insurance to mitigate failure. An up front premium of 1.75% of the loan amount is charged. It is typically added into the loan as well as a monthly premium. A small percentage of borrowers will default and everyone pays the insurance which presumably minimizes the exposure the government will have with future foreclosures. Builders have been desperate and up to real shenanigans. It would be a real shame if they cause another wave of foreclosures. In the past FHA loans have performed well. It would be terrible for the housing industry if they were not available.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same As "Auto Maker" Swindle
Posted by: cashelboylo on Jun 17, 2009 3:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The common and only objective in the "Rescues" is to bail out usurious moneylenders who lost all their borrowed money to on-borrowers who can't and never could pay.
The GM chiefs almost certainly committed major criminal fraud in lending on worthless securities at exorbitant interest the billions they had borrowed from investors on the promise -- real or implied -- that those billions would be used to finance the purchase of GM autos at equitable interest and so underwrite employment.
Not one red cent of the multiple billions milked out of taxpayers by the bankrupt GM Corp went to any entity that makes autos.
Every penny went to GM ACCEPTANCE Corp -- one of the most usurious lenders in the world.
If the billions had gone to the GM auto-maker companies, leaving GM Bank to drown in its reservoir of worthless securities, we might already have a functioning auto-maker run by line management.
All top and corporate management having been executed for high treason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Writer is definitely not an economy major
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar on Jun 17, 2009 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You start out by belittling realtors for being involved in real estate. Hmmm who else should do it? Did you buy your home from a plumber?

You go on to label cops and school teachers as "probable Republicans" (OH MY GOD). what the f*&k do democrats do for a living?

Then you attack the FHA for (Hard to believe but), Helping banks lend money to people. "shivers run up my spine". I believe its in thier mission statement.

But you justify it by explaining that the FHA has been HIJacked by the real estate and banking industry. If by hijacked you mean patronized you can go to the front of the class. Without the real estate and banking industries where would the FHA promote its services to help people? To a Barber perhaps?

I will agree with you on one point, Dobbs and Frank headed up legislation for the last 12 years that applied pressure to the banking industry to give loans to people that should have never recieved them. It was done for political gain and favor and when the industry went belly up they stepped away like a couple of roaches caught in the glow of a refrigerator light at 2 am.

Now at least one of them is back, And now (For the 1st time) they are actually needed and requested by the president to push the FHA loans and thus stimulate bottom growth in the housing market. That trend WILL climb up if it takes.

Absent from your rather shallow report is the fact that the Govt. is also pushing for regulations to require banks to hold 5% interest in bundled mortgage securities as a measure to assure solid lending practices. This is big. And will make banks require more from borrowers in the way of credit and collateral, thus facillitating the need for the FHA to step up its program.

I still am not sure what the intention of your article was, But to kick the banking industry, the real estate industry,FHA, and the first time home buyers in the teeth while they were down.

By the way, How many Joshua trees were cut down for your little slice of home ownership?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement