Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Ideology of Unfettered Capitalism Is Crumbling -- It's a Huge Opportunity for Alternative Economics

By Les Leopold, AlterNet. Posted June 16, 2009.


Unfettered globalization, and trickle down economics are dead. This is the best teaching moment in 65 years.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Recently, I shared the stage with Leo Hindery, Managing Partner of InterMedia Partners, at a forum on the economic crisis organized by A New Way Forward. The organizers had warned me to be ready to do battle with this media mogul who was CEO of TCI and AT&T Broadband, founded the YES network, is a former professional race car driver, and may be about to own the Chicago Cubs.

In preparation I Googled him and discovered he also served as John Edwards’ senior economic policy advisor. That made him a big time Democrat who at least was somewhat liberal. As we chatted before the event he said, “I’m the most progressive CEO you’ll ever meet.” And I’m thinking, “So what? I’ve only met two!”

Given that I had recently written a book (The Looting of America), which isn’t too kind to the super-rich, I was nervous. I didn’t want to be rude but I had every intention of making it clear that our financial crisis was the direct result of the ever growing gaps in wealth and income. I tried to think of humorous ways to weave in my knowledge of fantasy baseball with Hindery’s potential ownership of the Cubs. I was hoping to make my points without offending anyone; I wanted to be political, not personal. However, I was caught off guard by what unfolded.

Hindery was up first. With a sincere and kindly demeanor he proceeded to blame the entire crisis on the super-wealthy who designed the game more than thirty years ago. All of it: globalization, the derivatives orgy, the asset booms, the crushing of unions—all designed by the rich for the rich. He pointed out that the top 300,000 super-wealthy taxpayers account for half of all U.S. income, which gives them as much of the total pie as the other 150 million working people combined.

Say what? I did a lot of research for The Looting of America (with plenty of help—see the acknowledgements in the book) and had not come up with that gem. He gave me the citation: According to 2006 IRS data reported in the New York Times, “the top 300,000 Americans collectively enjoyed almost as much income as the bottom 150 million Americans. Per person, the top group received 440 times as much as the average person in the bottom half earned, nearly doubling the gap from 1980."

I was stunned. This guy took my spiel!  At that point in the forum, I became tongue tied. I stammered about how the unemployment rate was a deception—that instead of the widely reported 9.4 percent figures, the real jobless rate was more like 15 percent—some 25 million people who either were without work or economically forced into part-time employment. Hindery then calmly pointed out that my numbers also underestimated the problem—that his computations using Bureau of Labor Statistics data showed that the true rate in May was over 18 percent and that 30 million people were either jobless or underemployed. (I’ve since verified that data as well.)

He then tore apart the financial system, pointing out that it was a rigged game designed to enrich the rich. He didn’t think there was any way that regulations alone could do much to prevent future meltdowns. He had been a CFO on Wall Street many years ago, and he knew it was impossible to figure out what was going on until it was too late.

Instead, he urged us to consider policies that invested in job creation for those 30 million who are jobless, rather than rebuilding a failed financial system. It wasn’t entirely clear to me what he would do with the current financial mess but it was clear that he would take no prisoners: He would construct a new financial structure from the ground up that served the needs of the real economy.

But his most chilling observation concerned where he thought we were: “We are at a critical fork in the road. We can either create the millions of jobs needed for the 30 million who are right now effectively unemployed, or we can bail out Wall Street, again. We can either re-grow the incomes of the 300,000 richest Americans, who for many years have earned half the nation’s income, or we can build an economy that serves the employment and income needs of the 150 million hard working Americans who earn the other half. For more than three decades we’ve focused on the 300,000, through ‘trickle down’ and other discredited economic practices. That’s been easy, although horribly unfair. The hard but fair thing to do is to manage our economy so that it responsibly serves the 150 million.”

He then sounded an alarm: If we don’t adequately address the needs of the 150 million it is possible that politics could move dramatically to the right. Progressives will be blamed for not getting us out of this mess and we will suffer through another round of virulent free-market policies…or worse. And if that sounds like panic mongering, just look at the European Parliament elections held a few days ago: In almost every country, virulent right-wing parties led the polls, while progressives suffered sometimes historic defeats.

It was sobering evening, but also encouraging. It’s not everyday that a very successful CEO like Leo Hindery and a harsh Wall Street critic like me share the same stage, let alone agree fundamentally on the shape of the problem and the direction we must head. I’m not implying that we should expect other CEOs to come our way. Forgetaboutit. But the ideology of deregulation, unfettered globalization, and trickle down economics is crumbling. This is the best teaching moment in 65 years. It’s now up to us to provide a hard hitting analysis and an alternative agenda. And we can’t sit around and expect the Obama Administration to do it for us.

Most of all, this is no time to be timid. I’ve learned two things: We should pull no punches in attacking the income gap and the call for millions of new jobs. And I’ll have to work harder not to be outflanked by Leo Hindery.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: leo hindery, ceo, wall street, new way forward, les leopold, looting of america

Les Leopold is the executive director of the Labor Institute and Public Health Institute in New York, and author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street's Game of Fantasy Finance Destroyed Our Jobs, Pensions, and Prosperity—and What We Can Do About It (Chelsea Green, 2009).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Glad that Leo Hindery's on the right side, but...
Posted by: SpiderWoman on Jun 16, 2009 2:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but there's really nothing here that provides information or offers a way forward.

Besides, I can't help but wonder if Leo Hindery sees the writing on the wall and is trying to cozy up to where he figures the money will be in the next couple of decades, or is figuring out how to make his next several million on a new economy. This is, after all, a guy who has the money to bid for a major baseball club.

Hindery is, after all, of an age that was part of the planning he says occurred to stage the current coup. Yet, without giving up any of his self-admitted fraudulently gained wealth, he's taken it upon himself to speak for the vast majority who have had their lives circumscribed by him and his class.

I have to wonder what he's trying to do. Set himself up as the leader of the underclass?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The 'human anti-exploitation law' will serve us well.
Posted by: Gegner on Jun 16, 2009 3:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both the Greeks and the Romans could not conceive of a society that did not exploit slavery...

That doesn't make it true.

We need legislation that bans any human from profiting from the sweat of another's brow.

This effectively eliminates the 'employer/employee' contract.

Everyone works for a paycheck and that's all she wrote.

Understand the 'Mother Nature' doesn't have a cash register.

Money has but one useful purpose to society, it limits access to perishable/high demand goods and services.

Only the individual needs money, commerce, whose purpose is to provide society with the goods and services it 'wants/desires' do not require profits to operate.

"We do what we do because it needs doing."

Which is to point out the commerce exists to serve basic (as well as convenient human needs.)

We have (for centuries now) supported the brand of commerce that enriches the 'owners' of free from nature resources ahead of the 'common good'.

While this somewhat panned out in the beginning, it doesn't fly now. We nee only roll back the clock to the time of Dickens o observe how the 'surplus population' (which never existed before) turned into a threat to the status quo.

Is it too difficult to grasp that the only successful economic model known to man was the model utilized by the American Indians?

Everyone had a job and doing that job entitled them to a seat a the communal table...

It's not too late to return to that kind of 'practical' model.

The, um, Amer-Indians didn't pay taxes because all socially necessary work paid a living wage.

The primary difference between our current 'debt driven' model and a labor driven one is the recognition that instead of working for an employer, society, the ultimate beneficiary of all labor, pays the worker directly, eliminating the 'owner' middle mans.

Understand that money is conjured up from 'nothing' and the employer uses this 'nothing' to pay their workers...

I say it's time to cut out the 'middle-man' and let society operate to advance the common good!

I'm pretty sure your pal Leo didn't propose anything like that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Robert Riech please help us!
Posted by: weathered on Jun 16, 2009 3:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
free US from GoldmanSachs:satan's investment banker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

House Resolution 1207--AUDIT THE FED
Posted by: whole2th on Jun 16, 2009 3:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
H.R. 1207:
111th Congress
2009-2010

Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009now has 224 cosponsors

The truth of the looting of the world by banksters will set us free of debt slavery. It is way past time for the "Federal" [non]Reserve's connections to the monsters of the world to see the light of day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

learn then act.
Posted by: Stew on Jun 16, 2009 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
check out The Zeitgeist Movement and The Jupiter Project.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GET GOVERNMENT OUT OF THE WAY!
Posted by: alicelillie on Jun 16, 2009 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason for all these problems is that government is helping the big guys rip off the little guys.

Get government out of the way. The purpose of government is really to keep people from infringing on the rights of others.

But the government is doing everything *but.*

Murray Rothbard has explained this fully in his books, some of which I have reviewed at:

http://www.alicelillieandher.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No way! Posted by: SpiderWoman
Teaching moment? It's going to take more than that.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jun 16, 2009 2:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just keep in mind that unfettered capitalism (and its powerful profiteers) may be entering its death throes; but it is in the same position as a cornered animal – and we all know how dangerous they can be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes, but... Posted by: zigy
» RE: Yes, but... Posted by: Aquinas
» Good to know... Posted by: zigy
Are FEMA detention camps part of the future...
Posted by: zigy on Jun 16, 2009 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...for those, "terrorists" and "domestic enemy combatants" who take issue with the banker takeover of America (See Simon Johnson in The Atlantic, "The Silent Coup"). Dr. Paul Roberts on Cockburn's "Counterpunch"(6-15-09) has confirmed the existence of these camps long relegated to conspiracy theory. He interviewed job applicants( applying to be guards at said camps) who told him that they were told that part of their job, if hired would be, to be willing to follow orders to shoot to kill. Can't happen here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Camps are in your neighborhood now.... Posted by: common intelligence
Everything . . .
Posted by: yesman on Jun 16, 2009 10:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . the author says is undoubtedly true. There are no signs yet, however, that the slide toward outright fascism will be avoided. Indeed, the increase in right-wing violence has already begun in earnest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: verything . . . Posted by: Aquinas
What's that noise? It's the empire crumbling
Posted by: Triton on Jun 19, 2009 3:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The United States is a nation that never learned anything from it's mistakes. It keeps repeating them and getting exactly the same results.This is part of the definition of insanity. For example we have a General as ambassador to Afghanistan and we have installed a president who is so reviled that his authority is limited to only parts of Kabul. We are repeating all the mistakes of Viet Nahm. We plan to build an enormous embassy in Kabul that will have all the features of a supermax prison. In Pakistan we have helped elect a major criminal as President and have forced the Pakistani army to fight in a war which serves no purpose.

We continue to suffer from imperial hubris as the rest of the world identifies our greed and cruelty. South American countries, in increasing numbers, recognize us for what we are and are determined not to be ordered about by us and to develop governments which are more atune to the needs of the people.

We have unlimited funds for the design and manufacture of weapons which kill people but cannot fund programs which are designed to improve the health and education of the citizens. We have been at war since the end of WW II. We always find an enemy to be afraid of. We have wasted the lives of our young people and our treasures on fraudlent fearmongering by our government.

We have demonized all Muslims. They are all monsters who are waiting for the chance to kill us. Our media delights in providing us with distortions and lies. We don't even recognize how deeply immersed in delusional thinking we have become.

We disserve to fail. No other nation has caused such destruction of people and resources on the scale that we have done. All this in the name of capitalism!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement