Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Let’s Get Physical: What's So Great About Working in a Cubicle?

By Margaret Wheeler Johnson, AlterNet. Posted June 13, 2009.


Author Matthew Crawford publishes a jeremiad against white-collar culture and the educational system designed to populate it.
alleyportrait067
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Children of the '60s and '70s may remember Robert Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Over the course of a 17-day motorcycle trip across the northern United States, Pirsig's narrator uses the relationship between man and bike to reflect on technology and reason.

"The Buddha, the Godhead, resides quite as comfortably in the circuits of a digital computer or the gears of a cycle transmission as he does at the top of a mountain or in the petals of a flower," reads a typical passage. Academics dismissed his ideas as New Age bunk. The public bought 4 million copies.

Thirty-five years later, Penguin Press is hoping to repeat Pirsig's success with a new philosopher-mechanic of its own. This month, the publisher will release Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work, motorcycle repairman Matthew Crawford's jeremiad against white-collar culture and the educational system designed to populate it.

Crawford, who has a Ph.D. in political thought from the University of Chicago, takes America to task for devaluing skilled manual labor. Trade work, he argues, is more psychologically, financially and intellectually satisfying than the white-collar information-processing jobs for which schools and colleges typically educate their students.

Crawford's book grew out of a piece he wrote for the conservative online journal the New Atlantis in 2006. The essay drew the attention of many, including 100,000 unique visitors on the web and New York Times columnist David Brooks, who named it one of the best of the year. Brooks joined Crawford's condemnation of "the way managers take decision-making authority away from workers, the way parents take decision-making authority away from kids, the way educators close off options without any debate."

By the end of the day that Brooks' column appeared, Crawford's agent had sold his book to Vanessa Mobley, a young editor at Penguin Press known for her way with big ideas.

In person, Crawford manifests the quiet confidence of a guy who got over himself a long time ago. Sitting in the lobby of New York's Roosevelt Hotel this spring, he wears jeans, a pressed navy blue button-down shirt -- tucked in, sleeves rolled -- and clean black suede work boots. At 43, he is inconspicuously fit, clean-shaven with short, wavy brown hair and boyish features.

He has just returned from a meeting with his publishers, bound manuscript in hand. He places it on the coffee table in front of him, along with some cover-photo options. There's a line of dirt and motor oil under his fingernails.

"It would've been nice to have that feeling of finishing," he says of the writing process. "It was done in stages. I was learning up to the last minute." Still, he is pleased with the book. "It's nice to have written something on a topic that people care about rather than some ancient Greek crap," he says.

Skilled labor has been part of Crawford's life since he started doing electrical work at age 14 in the Northern California community where he grew up. As an undergraduate physics major at the University of California, Santa Barbara, he did electrical work to support himself through the summers.

Crawford was an indifferent student until his senior year, when he happened on his roommate's copy of The Closing of the American Mind. Written by University of Chicago classics professor Allan Bloom, the 1987 polemic was an angry, unapologetic defense of high culture. Bloom credited liberal relativism and rock music with the decline of American universities and the degradation of our intellectual life. The book sold close to a million copies and turned a little-known academic into a celebrity.

It's a book Crawford is now wary of associating himself with, given the extreme reactions it often provokes. "It blew me away," he admits, after some hesitation. "Bloom offered a convincing diagnosis of contemporary life by tracing our intellectual genealogy, showing the sources of our confused, taken-for-granted opinions in the works of serious thinkers. It was incredibly liberating and exciting."

Crawford applied to do his graduate work at the University of Chicago in the hopes of studying with Bloom. But when they met, Crawford says diplomatically, they "didn't hit it off," and Bloom died shortly after Crawford arrived.

Chicago's philosophy department is the stronghold of the ideas of influential conservative philosopher Leo Strauss and is arguably one of the past century's most influential schools of political philosophy. Crawford ended up writing a dissertation on Greek political thought with Nathan Tarcov, Bloom's literary executor and an influential Straussian in his own right.

After earning his doctorate in 2000, Crawford spent a year as a postgraduate fellow at the university's prestigious Committee on Social Thought, attempting half-heartedly to turn his dissertation into a book. When the Marshall Institute, a conservative environmental think tank in Washington offered Crawford a high-paying executive job, he accepted.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: labor, education, work, corporations, white-collar

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
interesting idea, interesting background
Posted by: sekfetenmet on Jun 13, 2009 2:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A) Strausian philosopher... Big Oil Corporate shill...
B) who turned away from that life, in a kind of self-imposed exile.
hmm
I think A outweighs B in terms of whether I'd trust this guy's message. If a copy fell in my lap I'd read, but I'd keep his background in mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fortune cookie wisdom Posted by: DHopper
the perfect corporate ploy
Posted by: socialpsych on Jun 13, 2009 3:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What could be a better, now that we are on the cusp of Great Depression 2.0, than for the corporate masters to pitch a book that portrays manual labor as somehow "mystically chic"? After all, a lot more of us will be doing more manual labor very soon, so why not adjust us to our new circumstances? Simply beautiful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Greek crap?
Posted by: taxidriver on Jun 13, 2009 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad this guy has the talent both to fix old bikes and to write about it. But he also seems embittered about the failure of his academic degree to open doors for him. Instead of teaching (perhaps he couldn't get a job in a tight academic market?), he prostituted himself to a so-called "think tank" where no real thinking is done.

I don't blame him for wanting to escape that, but why does that make his study of the Greeks into "crap"? Lots of authors have written stimulating books about the Greeks, and some have even sold well.

In opening a new door for himself, he seems to have slammed his old door shut.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Greek crap? Posted by: inverse_agonist
hold it buddy...
Posted by: ellie on Jun 13, 2009 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
having to read and discuss Persig's Zen for the entire life of a theory course in grad school, it turned out to be one of the most memorable book in the process... the true question is 'what does it mean to be human???'...

many academics have sideline 'blue collar' craft skills that were necessary to pay for that sheepskin... many still ply their manual working skills on the side because academic pay isn't high enough to pay the bills... average undergrad even in this economy upon graduation makes more $$ then their professors with terminal degrees... teaching is not something to go into to make $$, you do it because you love to teach...

haven't read this book yet, but from this article it seems to follow and update Persig's same argument... you do what you love to do even if it will put you in the poorhouse (college and university teaching which when time required alone pays far below federal minimum wage), but what you learned at a survival job turns into something you return to because it has meaning and value, highlighted by the thought processes you learned in grad school...

knowledge for knowledge sake, doesn't always have to mean making big $$...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who thinks this?
Posted by: Beck on Jun 13, 2009 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Why do we see the labor of carpenters and electricians as inferior to processing information in some austere corporate space, usually without any sense of an ultimate product or goal?"

Who actually thinks this? I don't, and I've never heard anyone say this. While corporate America in and of itself may validate certain occupations over others, the problem isn't that they do that. Each of us will make our own decisions about how to spend our time, and about what we think of others. What actually seems to happen is that the "useless" occupations seem to HAVE to elevate themselves. Anyone who needs a carpenter because they can't do the work themselves knows who is really important.

But culture and especially capitalist culture is no judge of worth. Probably most modern cultures have had pointless blather from the elite about who is more or less valuable. The thing to teach our own kids is which beliefs are worth ignoring and which paying attention to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who thinks this? Posted by: Ayla87
» RE: Who thinks this? Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Who thinks this? Posted by: DangerDuckie
» RE: Who thinks this? Posted by: DHopper
Choices
Posted by: otherworlds on Jun 13, 2009 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be a great thing for our society to question the value of the corporate servitude that millions of cubicle-bound people suffer. I was excited to see the title of this article and happy to hear of a writer that could encourage that discussion.

But as it turns out this is just another elite conservative (in the most basic sense of the word) with a wide range of choices in life (he can have a high-paid, prestigious job in D.C. or work on vintage motorcycles or be an academic or write pop philosophy or heck, all of them!) trying to convince us that some people don't need a liberal education because being a tradesperson is just so darn romantic.

Appearing to be some form of a disaffected "youth" has given Crawford a platform to make arguments that seem to be about freedom from corporatism. But if those same arguments were made by a suit in the think tank Crawford escaped from, no one would be confused about the intention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Choices Posted by: inverse_agonist
Is there an exit?
Posted by: justAnEgg on Jun 13, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would discern two crucial problems of the modern industrial societies (nothing new, you might notice):

1. Dehumanisation of both blue- and white-collar work in a mass-production economy.

2. Education as a servant of such economy.

No wonder Matthew Crawford found fulfillment in "repairing things, not manufacturing them" (with the exception of artisanship, like making pipe organs). Repairing things requires expertise and is intellectually challenging, unlike assembly-line work, be it in cubicle or meat-packing factory. Such creative and independent work is suited for a medieval society and that's why Matt Crawford's attitude reeks of "chivalry" - it's not about him, it's about two different worlds.

Almost a hundred years ago, Alexander Niell started his fascinating educational project, Summerhill, which British authorities fought tooth and nail to this day, for such an anti-authoritarian model didn't fit into a regimented society, or even undermined it.

Economy shapes us as humans, modern economy shapes us as neurotic, psychotic, alienated humans. Our goal should be to conceive of an economy which would reconciliate a mandatory productivity with our basic need for expression of our creative and cooperative nature. Matt Crawford was lucky to have found such a shelter, but we need to create "shelters" for all of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dilbert's Revenge
Posted by: LB_AIA on Jun 13, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This seems to be another form of backlash to the "cubicle farm" culture that has spawned endless jokes and cynicism in our society.

I like the argument made here for other acceptable paths to life rather than mandating formulaic educational systems that fill white collar job slots at the expense of creative, educational and physical vocations that are more intrinsically fulfilling. Rather than citing factoids and data about what groups of people "accomplish" certain things, this delves into the personal and emotional value of a life that contributes to the real things that are important on a personal level.

Because this is written from a personal and emotional perspective in defending a view contrary to the non-thinking corporate culture, it is unavoidably tinged with some personal biases and prejudices. But I see that as fully putting the cards on the table. All the experiences are there: the educational experience, the corporate experience, and the rather un-PC attitudes towards women. Not a lot of self-editing here, which I think is the point in presenting this kind of an argument. It's more honest and not as cynical as the sanitized writings that normally emanate from an academic.

Which I find refreshing in this particular subject about culture and intellectual freedom.

BTW, I find Pirsig's book, "Lila," one of the best forms of this kind of examination of values, taking the Zen view all the way into systems theory (What is Quality?) while ostensibly being a story about traveling down the Hudson River in a sailboat with a troubled young woman named Lila.

Both authors demonstrate the accumulation of wisdom through experience and reflection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sure, the issues are real, but...
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 13, 2009 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the classic American struggle between Jeffersonian democracy and Hamilton's elitism. Does citizenship in a democracy require that we farm our own land? Or can we also be responsible citizens even if we push papers, either currency or deeds equivalent to currency?

Suspect anyone who comes down on only one side of that argument. That's simple-mindedness, even for those with a PhD in philosophy from the University of Chicago.

Pirsig's "Zen" has a lot of insight. But no one can tell another how to find fulfillment. One can only speak for oneself. Pirsig casts his journey as a search for "quality." Unfortunately, he never distinguishes high from low, since quality comes in those and endless other variations, and so we are left empty with the notion that we can find the answer in things. (I love Jefferson as much as the next man but only so far as Tom was willing to risk taking on the responsibility of political power. I love the Greek "crap" that locates the polis at the center.)

What remains unexamined is that life is more than power. The power of work? The power of words? All require the strength to endure, and that has little or nothing to do with power.

Our problem is that we need to educate each new generation in the whole of our civilization, if we hope to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. Simple-mindedness will never solve that problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

physical labor is great until your body breaks down
Posted by: gk13 on Jun 13, 2009 9:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's great to celebrate returning to the farm or working with your hands, but what about those who can no longer do such work because they are older? What about the place of unions to ensure that folks doing this work are paid fairly and work in safe conditions. It's great that this fellow was able to open his own shop, but how is this sort of life possible for those who can't afford to open their own shop and be their own boss?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm.
Posted by: maddy on Jun 13, 2009 9:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ya know who else was trained in the Chicago School? You know who else are Straussians?

The Neocons. Cheney. Wolfowitz. The authors of Project for a New American Century.

And, I'm sorry, but this is a "new" argument?

How readily we forget the popular culture of the 1950s! There are a slew--and I mean a slew--of novels, films and musicians making these types of arguments, arguments which bemoan the emasculation of corporate culture and have highly educated white men championing working class jobs as authentic lived experience. Rebel Without a Cause, Run Rabbit Run, the Beat poets, The Organization Man... this is an old old argument.

Not one without good points, mind, but it's an old argument.

First, the monotony and spiritual-deadness of "white-collar jobs?" What about domestic work? Factory work? Farm work (ask some Southern sharecroppers how they feel about working with their hands everyday!) "Working with your hands" could mean crippling, monotonous, exhausting work that literally wears your body out. Ya know, those jobs that go to people of color and women, and, in the good ol' days, children?

On the flip, there are also, I hate to break it to ya, people who find their groove writing, thinking, and organizing--there is nothing inherently deadening to that kind of work. Hell, writing this little harangue has got my juices aflowin'.

What IS inherently deadening is a corporate culture that treats all labor as replaceable and demands the kinds of traits the author describes: obedience above innovation, complacency over independent thought, etc. To conflate that with liberalism or public education or to blame women for it is to dodge the increasing control that corporations and consumerism have over our lives. And, again, those conflations are old and very narrow--and this is the key point: they legitimate the very cult of individualism that is the foundation of free market thinking and corporate hierarchies.

Really, folks, be suspicious when highly educated (nearly always white) men start championing a tiny subset of working class male jobs. Its but another type of faux populism. And more rugged individualism as the refuge from American life.

Working with your hands should be a source of pride. No question there. But so is ANY kind of work that gives people a sense of self-worth and a sense of agency in their own lives. Be wary of someone thoroughly groomed by neoconservatives (gotta love the apologies the writer inserts along the way as he details it) championing wholesale individualism without discussing wages, or labor unions, or racism, or the collapse of public schools, or the skyrocketing costs of higher ed, or global starvation, etc. etc. etc.

Just get on your bikes and ride, man? Give me a break.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Political thought? From a bubble gum machine?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 13, 2009 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crawford, who has a Ph.D. in political thought from the University of Chicago, takes America to task for devaluing skilled manual labor.

Just...wow. You're sure it wasn't mail-ordered from a 'fooly accerdyted insduhtooshin' in Zimbabwe?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Artificial life
Posted by: willymack on Jun 13, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're happy with being cooped up all day in a cubicle in a multi-story building, in a place where the natural ecosystem has been completely destroyed in the name of human utility, where the air you breathe is a chemical soup of various toxins, and the tap water you drink is fouled by many drugs, some illegal, most prescription, then more power to you.
Living like this has been known to drive people crazy. In my view, urban life SUCKS, big time. Sure there's more money there, but in my mind that's a piss poor tradeoff.
I'd rather live in a place like the one I live in now, surrounded by Nature instead of a collection of artless, lifeless skyscrapers, listening to the trilling song of a meadowlark, instead of impatient, neurotic fools leaning on their car horns, and watching the majestic flight of a golden eagle instead of a police helicopter chasing after a crook.
We're sense oriented beings, and our senses are adapted to the natural world, not some grossly overpopulated, grossly polluted, noisy, dirty, and dangerous cesspool.
No wonder so many city dwellers are either neurotic or crazy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"There's a line of dirt and motor oil under his fingernails."
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jun 13, 2009 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy is educated? Wear a pair of latex gloves and your hands will be the cleanest they've ever been when you are done with your labor. This reads like he hasn't gained even the simplest of knowledge from experience.

"A carpenter faces the accusation of his level"

What an idiot! I can't imagine a truly skilled laborer would feel this way. I've been a carpenter for over twenty years and a level like most tools are my friends. They're not antagonistic. They never accuse me of anything. They guide and assist me in the completion of my work. Without their assistance my work would be much more difficult and time consuming. Next thing you know he'll be telling us how much more satisfying using a hand saw versus a circular saw is or that a hammer is more fulfilling than a pneumatic nailer. Gimme a break!

Will he romanticize cuts, bruises, and arthritis? There's nothing like the glorious flow of blood when I smash my thumb with a hammer? It's so exquisite to feel beating of my heart in the same battered thumb? God, I love trying to figure out how keep a bandage on my mangled thumb so I can keep my job. Who would not love a skilled labor position when it keeps you free of such annoyances as medical insurance and a decent home? I do all sorts of manual labor. I do not get any great satisfaction from it. It's done out of necessity. I wish I could afford to pay someone to do most of it, but then it's also not easy to find people that are really good carpenters and mechanics. I doubt I would hire this guy.

Also, what's so bad about Greek literature. That's one of the next subjects I intend to read. I also want to read about Walt Whitman. If I had my way, half of my work would be manual labor and half would be intellectual. The labor is good exercise and I get things done the way I want them done for the most part but I'd feel terrible if all I did was manual labor. I studied for three years to be an engineer to no avail. I was more impressed with calculus than carpentry. I do not think I would have been as good of a carpenter or mechanic if I hadn't studied geometry, arithmetic, and physics. Even stories like The Little Engine That Could and The Tortoise and the Hare made me a better laborer not some romanticism about the virtues of a blue collar. Nor do I think I'd have been as good a student if I hadn't worked as a carpenter.

I'm still waiting for the world I was told about as a child where robotics and computers would raise our standards of living and make life more peaceful and comfortable instead padding the pockets of parasites and making war easier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» actually, yes Posted by: inverse_agonist
Ohh man, I screwed up....
Posted by: jackie78 on Jun 13, 2009 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is great stuff. Except for the MASSIVE GLARING HOLE in Dr. Crawford's argument: He is able to appreciate manual labor as a higher discipline precisely because he has an advanced degree in philosophy. I can assure you most of the world does not conceive of work as vocation in the same way as Dr. Crawford. No matter how complicated, work is work for most people I have encountered. Damn few people have the necessary training in lateral thinking or resemblance logic necessary to realize their fittedness in the greater whole. Even less people realize this naturally. He is arguing for the unity of work and life. Fine. Catholics call this a vocation. Very few people in american Life have any sense of how their work is their vocation or how their vocation fits in with their place in the world. American work life is bereft of vocation. Does this mean the whole university system is wrong? Probably not...

I like the idea, but I have problems with it. The problems I have with it are the problems I have with Straussians in general. They act like they are the first people to discover hot water. Crawford is dealing with fundamentally religious ideas, yet he seems to have no realization that he is a fundamentally religious thinker who is criticizing the most religious institution we have left in America - the university. Anyway, I'm going to stop because to unpack what I've said here is gonna take a huge space. damn straussians.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A philosopher
Posted by: yesman on Jun 13, 2009 1:24 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crawford is an incredibly rare individual - a real philosopher. Philosophers search for truth, and then present it unadorned.

A real philosopher is an outlaw, not an academic/corporate functionary. Socrates was Athens' "gadfly," and for that they killed him. Pandering to corporations or academic departments or governments is not the work of a philosopher.

A life spent making useful and beautiful machines work again is much more philosophical than one spent churning out an endless series of publish-or-perish essays on inconsequential intellectual arcana.

Yes, Crawford has received a highly elite education, and he is now telling working-class people what's good for them. Hopefully, working-class people will read his work, and if what he says is false, he'll be called to account. That would be democracy in action.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Social Conditioning
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Jun 13, 2009 3:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The main thing that school teaches us is to sit in a chair and be quiet.


FREE AMERICA

STAND UP AND RANT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

options
Posted by: canvasrx on Jun 13, 2009 4:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's easy to think the way crawford does, when you have options. I am a self employed custom fabricator, the work used to be very fulfilling.
I still enjoy seeing a finished product, designed and built by me, coming from raw materials. The problem is, with the cost of living, the enjoyment is gone. Now it is "get it done and get to the next job". I have been in my trade for 24 yrs. I don't know how to do anything else. I do not want my children to do what I am doing. I want them to have a college education, so at least they have options. I want them to do whatever they want in life, but a college degree is a must for a backup.
there are not many job opportunities out there for people w/out a degree.
So, Crawford makes a good argument, but he has never lived in the world of having no choice but to work with your hands. It's not always as romantic as it sounds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This works until
Posted by: spencerh on Jun 13, 2009 5:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the job market gets saturated. How many plumbers/electricians do you need?

Then there's the idea that certain jobs which are safe, will remain so forever. At some point we'll have robots that fix the electrics, the pipes, and the houses. It's pretty easy to envision fully modular houses where all the parts are made in another country, and you only need to assemble them here. Taken to the next level, you could have robots follow a blueprint program and do the assembly for you.

This whole "working with your hands" being forever safe idea is bunk. I'm sure there was a time that scribes thought the same way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Right now? We need alot Posted by: Ayla87
What a hypocrite...
Posted by: jimmyaj on Jun 13, 2009 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's looking to cash in on all his notes and observations from academia by selling a book dedicated to the virtues of working. It will probably work, as short sighted and small minded as the American reading public is.

But if he's real, he'll stick to fixing bikes instead of writing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DEAR GAWD...
Posted by: AZLBRAX08 on Jun 14, 2009 12:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
…what a cynical bunch of paranoiacs you are! According to you, because Mr. Crawford has multiple college degrees but decided to turn his back on this and go out into the Real World makes him suspect??? I guess that this is a concept you, Pollyanas, can't possibly understand.

I suspect that most of you who are responding to this article are naïve little wimps who are being supported by mommy and daddy, while you float through your college years. Either that, or you are "professional students"…which, to me, is another word for "parasite"!

And let's not forget the Conspiracy Theory nut-bags: obviously, this man is nothing but a shill for Big Gubbermint…and they are, just as obviously, using him to "dumb-down" you, "intelligentsia" so that you will be content to accept "low-class" blue-collar jobs…which, frequently, pay a helluva lot better than your esteemed "intellectual" positions do.

Well, guess what, kiddies: Mr. Crawford is someone I can relate to! I have an M.A. from a major university in a totally useless subject. Even though I was successful in my chosen profession…degrees not withstanding, I found myself lacking fulfillment on a personal level…so, I chose to take a "break" and embark on a number of "low-level" blue-collar jobs: heavy-equipment operator, long-haul truck-driver, house-painter, construction/ renovation worker, warehouse foreman, etc. Generally, I found the "Ghetto Negroes" and "Poor White Trash" that I worked with to be a helluva lot more honest and down-to-earth…and these were the folks I chose to spend the bulk of my free-time with because they were such a refreshing change from the "liberal" no-nothings who take themselves entirely too seriously.

You pretentious little snots would be quite surprised to learn how up on world events and politics most of these "low-class peasants" are! They care very deeply because all of this hits them long before you, wimps, feel the effects.

Personally, I look forward to reading his book…and I suspect that I will approach it with a helluva lot less bias than you so-called "liberal" hypocrites will! Obviously, you've already made your small-minded judgements.

'Nuff said!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gotta add this in... can't resist...
Posted by: ellie on Jun 14, 2009 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the battle over snobby academics and manual labor... time for this ramp up again...

we did it in the '80's when folks got laid off in droves, no jobs doing anything, social services cut backs, unemployment running out, so the only viable option was to go back to school and at least have financial aid to live on and get hopefully something back, an education, so you wouldn't wind up back in the mess again (maybe)...

here we are again with the same discussion... many academics I know had a late start on their careers... they were blue collar workers, yes working with their hands first, so yes, they do know what hard work is like, but chose to remain in school to weather out the last recession...

problem now is cut offs in educational funding for non-traditional students, and do we have a clue as to what would be a good major because nationally and globally, there is no road plan for this recession...

could this be why we are making such a heated fuss over an academic who returned to manual labor???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Location, location, location
Posted by: littlepitcher on Jun 14, 2009 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans were taught the value of white-collar labor in the days before the air-conditioned shop. Big Business wants to own our minds and eradicate dissent, and the cube farm is his preferred venue.

Whether Big Business owns white-collar or manual labor, it will steal intellectual property. Ask the inventors of the ratchet screwdriver and the intermittent windshield wiper (whoops, he's dead and was memorialized only after his demise to keep the CorpoRats from litigation and boycotts).

Electricians and other tradesmen, like doctors, prefer city life. They can move to small towns and have lower expenses and a busy calendar.

And yes, trades are risk-prone. You trade off the MI at 45, alcoholism, and suicide for lung CA from asbestos or a back injury from crawling under sinks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some of you guys are just vicious
Posted by: Ayla87 on Jun 14, 2009 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm getting the feeling that the problem people have with Matt isn't his former place of employment, but the underlying message that he's passing on in his book (and any confused youth who happens to read it); That you don't need to go to college in order to be successful.

For many people, that message is sacrilege. And like every other heretic that goes against the established order, you feel the need to put him down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"The Case for Working with Your Hands"
Posted by: ender on Jun 14, 2009 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I very much enjoyed and agreed with this article.

I happened to read Mr. Crawford's NY Times editorial of May 24th and liked it so much that I had saved a pdf of it to my desktop.

When so many people are out of work, are out of shape, and are losing their minds the benefit of physical work becomes clear.

It is no wonder that the robber barons of the last age feared the competition from intelligent and independent skilled labor.

Moneyed interests have used the industrial processes originally meant to free humanity to instead tighten our terms of bonded servitude by banking coordinated campaigns to numb our minds, weaken our bodies, cripple our spirits and begin marketing to our children at ever-earlier ages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement