Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Why Goldman Sachs Is the Greediest and Most Dastardly of the Wall Street Pigs

By Jim Hightower, AlterNet. Posted May 22, 2009.


Goldman holds billions in taxpayer cash, plans for billions in exec bonuses this year, and has powerful friends in Obama's govt. up the wazoo.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

No doubt you're going to feel terrible about this. Top executives of Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street powerhouse, are in a pout about how they're being treated by you and me -- i.e., the public.

These execs are used to being revered as financial geniuses, but having taken a $10 billion bailout from us taxpayers last fall, they're now widely viewed as ... well, as welfare recipients. Like other welfare checks, the big one that Washington doled out to Goldman Sachs came with some strings attached, causing the chieftains to get all huffy. Especially galling to these princes of privilege is the limit on salaries and bonuses that bailed out banks are allowed to give to those in the executive suites.

Thus, Goldman recently threw a little hissy fit and haughtily declared that it will pay back our $10 billion to get the blankety-blank government out of its private business. Bold move! At last, Wall Streeters are reasserting their rugged, free-enterprise ethic, right?

Uh, not exactly.

What Goldman officials fail to mention is that they'll still be clinging to several other lifeboats floated to them by those skinflint meanies in Washington. For example, when insurance giant AIG was given some $200 billion last year to save it from total collapse, $12 billion of it was actually a pass-through payment to Goldman Sachs. Best of all, this quiet handout did not come with any of those nasty restrictions on executive pay -- so Goldman is happily hanging onto this backdoor subsidy.

Then there's another $28 billion that was slipped to these hardy free-marketers in the form of special low-interest loans guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. -- a subsidy that Goldman's chief financial officer concedes is vital to its survival. Far from foregoing this government underwriting, the bankers say they expect to ask for $7 billion more of it.

Additionally, Goldman has taken many more billions' worth of low-cost loans from Federal Reserve funds. How many more billions? The Fed and the bank say this is "proprietary" information, not for public disclosure, even though it is public money.

So, while these golden ones are loudly repudiating the $10 billion public subsidy they took from us, they are coyly retaining at least 40 billion of our dollars to stay afloat -- a tidy sum that does not include any restrictions on pay levels. Coincidentally, Goldman has since announced that it is setting aside nearly $5 billion to be distributed at the end of the year as compensation for its executives, including payments for outlandish bonuses for those at the top.

Saying that such-and-such is the greediest bunch of bankers on Wall Street is like someone claiming to have the biggest hairdo in Dallas -- the competition is fierce. But that's quite a head of hair atop Goldman Sachs. Well, sniff the executives, we merely play the game according to the rules we're given.

Sure, and the Mafia plays its game strictly according to Hoyle. The difference is that the Mafia must actually break the rules, while Wall Street simply hires lobbyists and politicians to write the rules.

Indeed, Goldman Sachs has been nicknamed "Government Sachs" by its rivals, for it always seems to have at least one of its top officials strategically placed inside government to bend federal financial rules to its benefit. In the 1990s, for example, two Goldman foxes -- Robert Rubin and Larry Summers -- were inside the Clinton administration henhouse, where they helped craft the deregulation scams that enriched their former banks, before the scams caused the crash of our economy.

Following that crash, up stepped Hank Paulson, who had been Goldman's CEO before George W. plucked him off the Street to run the very bailout that has now deposited so much of our money in his bank. With Bush's demise, Hank is gone, but not Goldman. That sly Goldman Fox from the Clinton years, Larry Summers, is back, this time in Barack Obama's henhouse, where he's top economic advisor.

Not surprisingly, our gold keeps flowing to Goldman Sachs -- but don't expect the bankers to be grateful to you.

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: wall street, bailout, goldman sachs, summers, geithner

Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the new book, "Swim Against the Current: Even a Dead Fish Can Go With the Flow." (Wiley, March 2008) He publishes the monthly "Hightower Lowdown," co-edited by Phillip Frazer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WoW
Posted by: soulrebeljc on May 22, 2009 1:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many more reasons do people at large need to realize that this country is absolutely fucked? And we're fucking the whole world in the process.

Thanks Obama, for the continuance of the treasury stick-up that's been going on for the last 8 years. Thanks for Larry and Tim, and thanks for being so damn certain that these are the heads that will find a way out of this debacle.

Goldman Sachs stocks going up quite nicely if you want to get in...General Motors also (almost doubled in the last 48hrs.) What a taxpayer bailout will do for the investor class! Now that's a free market...if you can afford the buy-in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WoW Posted by: EinMD
» RE: WoW Posted by: soulrebeljc
» RE: WoW-Thats all ? Posted by: trusetufree
One Good Investment
Posted by: DrBrian on May 22, 2009 1:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fortunately for them, these guys did make one brilliant investment when they bankrolled Obama's campaign. Can't beat that return on investment!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One Good Investment Posted by: weathered
A Feudal Democracy
Posted by: lulugeez on May 22, 2009 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The wee-people of this country are now standing on the not-so-sunnyside of the wall that separates the lords and ladies from the serfs. Citizenship has been reduced to voting and even voting is not held to be a right. The enclosure of property has continued and now we are at the point where millions of people are losing what little they owned. Unwritten sumptuary laws restrict ownership of property/wealth of any kind to the few blessed by fortune and protected by our government. $10 trillion of citizen property wiped out and they are not done.

Goldman Sachs and the other banksters would be called criminals and sent to prison for this massive theft if we lived in a true democracy. But our political class exists to support the illusion of democratic process and keep the wee-people from messing with the system. Thus we(e) get up off our couches every now and then to mark, punch or press send and our work is done. If we attempt to tinker with the system we get a good dose of: "nothing to see here", "get out of our way and let us govern", So we continue to vote "change" and things do change, but not necessarily in our favor.

We won't see the kind of change we need until we get our fannies off the couch and waddle on over to the streets. Courage! Lulu

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Feudal Democracy Posted by: freelyb
» RE: A Feudal Democracy Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
» RE: A Feudal Democracy Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: A Feudal Democracy Posted by: cberkland
» RE: A Feudal Democracy Posted by: pawheel
Banksters
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 22, 2009 2:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Da Bankstas!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Install Eliot Spitzer
Posted by: weathered on May 22, 2009 2:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as a special prosecutor, working w/Cuomo.

Goldman Sachs is a conflict of interest for American citizens. It hasn't just breached private and public protocols, its pissed all over them - its become its own dark church and state.

Their bonuses are a now a matter of civil remedy.

Where's Alan Dershowitz the big mouth constitutional talking head for NPR/PBS? He's home looking over his 1st. quarter returns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We will have to take to the streets
Posted by: bthespoon on May 22, 2009 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or we will never get honest change and freedom from corporate oppression.

We need publicly financed elections or the public will never have real representation again.

We're going to have to force Obama into becoming the new improved version of FDR that we so desperately need, or find an independent to replace him and vote him out.

Most people paid some attention and liked Obama's words during the election. The problem was they paid scant attention to his deeds. Now people too busy to pay attention are laying back and trusting that Obama's deeds wil match his words, but indeed they are not the same at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Soylent Green
Posted by: shine0854 on May 22, 2009 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the corporate greed taking us to the society depicted in this Charlton Heston movie??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Losers/Criminals
Posted by: JDutty6 on May 22, 2009 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I think EVERY one of those in the executive offices of this rip off firm should be in JAIL for the thieves they are!

RT
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Losers/Criminals Posted by: mcyclemama
Greed is NOT good!
Posted by: exoevolution on May 22, 2009 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wall Street & Washington have been in bed for decades, but with this current economic "heist" we are now seeing just how corrupt & greedy "BOTH" Washington & Wall Street really are! President Obama where is THE CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN?

President Obama it is long past time to show EVERYONE that GREED is NOT good!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Title is right on.
Posted by: freelyb on May 22, 2009 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NOW what do we do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so sad
Posted by: grkjr on May 22, 2009 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to see that this type of article.. still going on about wall street... when will we see the real rot... wall street is just doing what any other crook does to maintain its survival... keep stealing.. been going on for some time.. that isn't news nor strange... like any other criminal who has built a life out of conning others.. what is so sad is that the article gets written at all giving that the real thiefs in the house are in the white house.. by this time if you do not see the corruption that is required for this typ of wall street behavior to go on without restictions, without someone going to jail...and to keep believing in "change" is really stupid. Its like having a judge to whom every crook who comes before for sentencing, is given a pardon and you still let that judge sit on the bench.. well the administration and its wall street band of crooks are still in office and you keep sending the jury back to congress who also finds the crooks innocent... but yet "talk the talk" is enough to appease you into letting this go on and on. until???? they have it figured out.. just send the public a few bones to chew on .. nothing significant like righting presidential powers, following the rule of law nor stopping excessive spying on citizens.. just a promise to close one torture chamber and open another, sad....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

factiods...
Posted by: ellie on May 22, 2009 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the spigot is broken and there is no way to turn off the $$ flow... we allowed this to happen with campaign $$... elected officials know what side of their bread is buttered and we the peeps sure are on the dry side...

arrests may happen someday, but do you really think there will be convictions??? justice now days is for those that can pay... the judicial system doesn't have the $$ for long and drawn out prosecutions...

plus possible conflict of interest, you just can't waltz into a county clerk's office and file a case against the feds without their permission to be sued...

we just have to find ways to stop any more of this nonsense from happening in the first place... and no taking it to the streets is not the answer... you just get labeled crazy and get locked up for violating the patriot act...

how about if we all pulled what little $$ we have out of the banks and the 'street', then refuse to shop for anything till things turn our way for once... we can barter between ourselves for food and needs, no cash involved... hit them where they understand, in the wallet...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: factiods... Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Even worse Posted by: marid
» RE: factiods... Posted by: HoboHomo
Yeah I feel really empowered. Time for a new party of the people
Posted by: RR#1 on May 22, 2009 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that's all it has to be with all the progressive policies as a platform. Healthcare education, environment, garanteed annual income, right to work-all socially useful work needs to be properly compensated, not performed by wives or husbands, raising a family is a job-taking care of elderly is a job, teaching pre-schoolers is a job, etc, etc. Government for the public good. Not to hard to figure out.
Cheers,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Time for IRV! Posted by: Zaratamara
goldman and sachs those are some Irish names
Posted by: rastaman on May 22, 2009 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ever wonder why 2% of the population have 14% of the representation in the government?

ever wonder why 2% of the population seem to control a vast amount of wealth in this country?

ever wonder why 2% of this country's electorate can institutionalize billions of tax payer dollars in "AID" to Israel?

is that democracy? is that equal rights? is that one voice, one vote?

things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Goldman Sachs is an Abomination
Posted by: gmanj77 on May 22, 2009 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Goldman Sachs went public so that the Partners could avoid any liability. The SEC is inept, and the FBI must move in, suspend trading of the stock, seize all assets of the firm and all the employees of the firm, let the shareholders who didn't know, which is probably most, get their money, investigate Mutual Funds who own the stock - no doubt purchase of the stock by Mutual Funds was "encouraged," and do the same throughout Wall Street. Many of the "mergers" and "aqusitions" were done to avoid libility. For example, Sodomy Smith Barney's "merging" with Citigroup, and Earnest Olde selling Olde Discount to H & R Block.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

time for pitchforks and torches
Posted by: sharonsylvie on May 22, 2009 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One statistic is enough to make you get a gun and start shooting a CEO: Five hedge fund managers earned as much as the poorest 27 million Americans. That's right, 5 = 27,000,000. The U.S. is now a banana republic and unless we have a revolution, you can look forward to living like the Mexican illegals did below the border. We'll be moving to Canada next, if only for the health care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS will get your pitchforks out!
Posted by: Zaratamara on May 22, 2009 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get a load of THIS, People!
Banks take out LIFE INSURANCE on their oldest and sickest employees to help finance perks for their CEO's!
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak

/wsj-banks-using-life-insurance-polici

One comment from this site:
Well, you are worth more to your employer dead than alive. Wal-Mart has life insurance policies on 350,000 employees (approximately 1 third of their work force). The have discovered that hiring people over 65 to work for $6 an hour, then taking out a $1.5 million life insurance policy on them, pays very well. Especially since the employer has all your health records and hires people who are experts to determine life expectancy.

(Remember that the next time you see a Greeter in a wheelchair!...glad I don't shop at Wal-Mart anymore!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Insurable Interest" Posted by: Zaratamara
» RE: "Insurable Interest" Posted by: Knot_Rich
» This Happens In Most Banks Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: This Happens In Most Banks Posted by: JSquercia
» I love Wal-Mart! Posted by: AJR Journal
» RE: I love Wal-Mart! Posted by: JSquercia
Can You Say 'Economic Treason'?
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 22, 2009 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Far the Admin has been able to keep the 'villagers' from storming the castle Boys and Girls and dragging your Treasonous asses out to the Gallows.
As more people begin to feel the pinch from the jobs they've lost, the homes that have gone into foreclosure and the loanshark tactics of the Credit card divisions, it will not be long before the Gov't won't be able to hold US back.
I not only wnat those Top brassers to stand trial here- I want to then send them over to their foreign creditors to face whatever retribution they choose to dole out. I do Recall a Chinese Export minister having his head lopped off for endangering their export revenues. And is there a limit to the number of Wives a Shiek may have? Is there a law she must agree to the marriage? I should think a Blonde busty botoxed Babe can bring down a good chunk of Coin in a country of dark haired non enhanced females- don't you? Supply & Demand at it's most barbaric.Speaking of which are your children worth their weight in gold? The Vatican may just meet your price.
These Wall streeter have practiced greed and self gratification to the extent that turning the tables is justifiable- 'Revenge a Dish Best Served Cold'....but no silver Platters will be soiled for you may friends- you only deserve Recycle Paper plates. Want to play ball Scarecrows?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Goldman Sachs Reverse Robin Hoods Merry Men
Posted by: ak47blog on May 22, 2009 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These Reverse Robin Hoods Merry Men the select arrogant, imperious, Ivy League explosive mentality, criminal frauds, with their "YES I CAN DO INVINCIBILITY". These hoods should be outfitted in orange jump suits and white sneakers with jail time cleaning debris on the back alleys of "NO CAN DO IMPOTENCE" and Federal Interstate Highways not robbing American pocketbooks leaving our entire financial systems crippled, debt ridden for decades with massive forced welfare tax liabilities, hyper-inflation, hanging on the precipice of default, international war crime nation, and third world status.

http://21stcenturyreversepyramid.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

goto:GoldmanSachs666.com
Posted by: weathered on May 22, 2009 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
behold the trough of greed where swine dine in denial and self-entilement and MSM washes their feet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Always Felt
Posted by: JSquercia on May 22, 2009 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always felt that the reason Lehman was allowed to fail by Paulson was to eliminate a competitor .
How can we ever forget Paulson's Original proposal to Congress 3 pages long that said that HE and HE ALONE would decide on the particulars and that his decisions would be unreviewable by anyone . not the Congress and the Courts .
I believe that when the AIG bailout was discussed the CEO of Goldman Sachs was in on the meeting . AIG was bailed out in part to pay the money the owed Goldman Sachs .
Even more troublesome is the fact that we are hiring another Goldamn guy to head the Commodities Futures Exchange . They should hire back Brooksley Born who when SHE was in charge tried to subject Derivitives to regulations but was overruled by Summers , Rubin , and of course Greenspan . Turns out SHE was RIGHT and THEY were WRONG

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bushian Backlash (again)
Posted by: marjani on May 22, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the "leftovers" from the Bush administration. Albatrosses Obama can't get off his neck to save his own life.

How can America kill them off once and for all so that he can do his job, or at least do what we elected him for?

How much power can he exert without a major populist push from the 2/3rds of America who elected him to office?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He's doing his job Posted by: yesman
Don't insult the pigs. The Wall St. dastards are humans, not pigs
Posted by: stilldreaming on May 22, 2009 11:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stereotyping and insulting animals, why is that?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The-Catbird
Posted by: bob-o-link on May 22, 2009 5:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Obama:

For change we can really, truly believe in, FIRE TIM GEITHNER and HIRE JIM HIGHTOWER!

For a few billion reasons why, check out ... http://www.kycbs.net/GoldmanSachs.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

obamarama
Posted by: wormfarmer on May 22, 2009 6:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I watched with interest the state of our economy and status throughout the world,
my impression of Barak Obama was one of hope, change, hopefully a little independence of
thought and deed. I was ready to extend time and patience for the transition of President. This is not working, as I concluded with the team of economic advisors, Summers, Giethner, Volker,
keeping,but shuffling, the same military advisors, Gates, Patraeous, etc......., maintaining the same aggressive stance in the middle east, giving the future of succeeding generations to thieves and con men, letting corporations have their way with our society. I have not seen any hope or change from this administration, just the same corporate controlled domination of the populace,
keeping control of the masses.
Now we are moving our military presence into Afghanistan, soon Pakistan, I was hoping to see something other than an embracing of the status quo, but then I remembered that our country elected a corporate candidate. I would hope that by this time the population would
have awakened to the corporate shenanigans that have been so redundant throughout this
country's history, but then I thought about the collective attention span of America.
The time is ripe for us to stop the political complicit behavior, to adopt the Ralph Nader suggestion of a 1/10 of one percent tax on all stock transactions, to stop the sacrificing of this country's future to the perpetraitors of economic collapse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: obamarama Posted by: JSquercia
First, stop blaming, then...
Posted by: smckinley on May 22, 2009 10:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about everybody agree to stop going on about the American people's apathy. It's not that simple - who the hell has time to go to zillions of evening meetings when working like 90 hours/week/couple and trying to raise kids? - and in any case bitching about it is COMPLETELY unproductive, and could never imaginably do anything but encourage real apathy. I am very active, relatively speaking, and it's really, really hard.

Also, everybody completely drop any hint of violent anything. Want to doom yourself before you even start? - that's the way.

Organize as many public protests as possible. Repeat. Repeat some more. Keep doing this very frequently, but keep it fresh, and you will accrete some crowds.

We're in the calm before the real storm right now - the real outrage hasn't even begun to hit yet. How are these bank bailouts really going to play out? Great, everybody stress-tests reasonably OK (well actually with deficits that would have had Wall Street soiling itself two years ago), there's so unbelievably much funny-money pumping in that you can't help but have some things go up. If everybody's losing their jobs - praying for a decrease in the rise of unemployment really isn't a good sign - how are they going to pay off credit? If the banks have voodoo-shored themselves up, but still aren't lending, how are they going to make any money at all? If they're not lending, how's anybody else going to make any money at all? Is it really possible that rises in unemployment are permanently slowing and that the housing market has really bottomed?

So yell, march, beat drums, do Yippie-inspired events, and maybe you'll be good at it when the pitchforks REALLY come out in a year or so.

The other thing to remember is that there's "their" economy and "ours." The finance economy does a great job of enriching its participants, but most of us are shut out. The "real" economy of producing things people more or less need, in return for money you need to more or less buy the things you need isn't really part of that, although it gets sort of a reflection of it in consumer crap. On the other side, the informal economy is out there, where you work and barter or whatever for what you absolutely cannot do without.

How 'bout we all focus our attention on doing the real economy increasingly as an informal economy, rather than just hoping for a bit of warmth from the finance economy?

If everybody of some inclination to do this would focus all their attention on it, some things might just eventually change.

Through seminars, classes, and whatever, I've basically heard the first lecture of Econ 101 many times, and it's always the same: any economy is just a method of distributing limited resources. Economists are not analogous to mechanical engineers, as they would have you believe. Every damn one of them is a DISTRIBUTIONIST!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Organize and Drop Out
Posted by: macdon1 on May 23, 2009 4:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's just drop out of the consumer economy as much as possible. If we organized ourselves into productive communities, generated our own energy and bartered we could eliminate most of our participation in the consumer economy. It requires cooperation and overcoming the extreme individualism this society teaches us but it sure would be worth it. If enough people dropped out these smarmy bastards would be left holding an empty bag. What a dream!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Organize and Drop Out Posted by: trusetufree
» RE: Organize and Drop Out Posted by: gimmie shelter
WHY SOME WERE NOT BAILED OUT?
Posted by: ASH999 on May 24, 2009 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder why Lehman Brothers was allowed to go bankrupt while almost all the other big one's were saved by Government help or by forced mergers. Didn't they have congressmen/lobbyists on their bankroll? Or was it a personal thing by Henry Paulson? because LB was a rival of Goldman Sacks, the former employer of Mr. Paulson? Or was it because LB did not fall into the criteria of "too big to fail" or "systemic risk"? Or was Lehman allowed to fail deliberately, to scare Congress into passing TARP? Could some one please enlighten me? Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really Dastardly
Posted by: Chuckster on May 24, 2009 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is our elected representatives/officials! To allow this debased debacle to persist. My Lord! can we count on no one in "government" to act considerably of middle class 'main street'?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eally Dastardly Posted by: gimmie shelter
gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on May 24, 2009 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you do with so many pigs? You have a BBQ.
Simple do not be fooled into putting your money in any of these a..holes hands. Also try to use their bank cards but make sure you pay it off in full at the end of the month....slow bleed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on May 24, 2009 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BTW it is not Goldman Sachs it is Goldman Sucks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement