Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

How Far Down the Economic Hole Are We Headed?

By Frank Rich, The New York Times. Posted February 23, 2009.


No one knows, of course, but a bigger question may be whether we really want to know.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

And so on the 29th day of his presidency, Barack Obama signed the stimulus bill. But the earth did not move. The Dow Jones fell almost 300 points. G.M. and Chrysler together asked taxpayers for another $21.6 billion and announced another 50,000 layoffs. The latest alleged mini-Madoff, R. Allen Stanford, was accused of an $8 billion fraud with 50,000 victims.

“I don’t want to pretend that today marks the end of our economic problems,” the president said on Tuesday at the signing ceremony in Denver. He added, hopefully: “But today does mark the beginning of the end.”

Does it?

No one knows, of course, but a bigger question may be whether we really want to know. One of the most persistent cultural tics of the early 21st century is Americans’ reluctance to absorb, let alone prepare for, bad news. We are plugged into more information sources than anyone could have imagined even 15 years ago. The cruel ambush of 9/11 supposedly “changed everything,” slapping us back to reality. Yet we are constantly shocked, shocked by the foreseeable. Obama’s toughest political problem may not be coping with the increasingly marginalized G.O.P. but with an America-in-denial that must hear warning signs repeatedly, for months and sometimes years, before believing the wolf is actually at the door.

This phenomenon could be seen in two TV exposés of the mortgage crisis broadcast on the eve of the stimulus signing. On Sunday, “60 Minutes” focused on the tawdry lending practices of Golden West Financial, built by Herb and Marion Sandler. On Monday, the CNBC documentary “House of Cards” served up another tranche of the subprime culture, typified by the now defunct company Quick Loan Funding and its huckster-in-chief, Daniel Sadek. Both reports were superbly done, but both could have been reruns.

The Sandlers and Sadek have been recurrently whipped at length in print and on television, as far back as 2007 in Sadek’s case (by Bloomberg); the Sandlers were even vilified in a “Saturday Night Live” sketch last October. But still the larger message may not be entirely sinking in. “House of Cards” was littered with come-on commercials, including one hawking “risk-free” foreign-currency trading — yet another variation on Quick Loan Funding, promising credulous Americans something for nothing.

This cultural pattern of denial is hardly limited to the economic crisis. Anyone with eyes could have seen that Sammy Sosa and Mark McGwire resembled Macy’s parade balloons in their 1998 home-run derby, but it took years for many fans (not to mention Major League Baseball) to accept the sorry truth. It wasn’t until the Joseph Wilson-Valerie Plame saga caught fire in summer 2003, months after “Mission Accomplished,” that we began to confront the reality that we had gone to war in Iraq over imaginary W.M.D. Weapons inspectors and even some journalists (especially at Knight-Ridder newspapers) had been telling us exactly that for almost a year.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, depression, recession, economic collapse

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We can start calling things by their real names again
Posted by: Perry Logan on Feb 23, 2009 2:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of the denial comes from the virtual inability, during the last eight years, to call things by their real names. The corporate media would never hurt the Republicans by calling things by their real names, so we've been living through eight years of denial.

But now that a Democrat is in office, the problem has disappeared. Now a depression is a depression again. Torture is torture. Deficit is deficit. It's OK to call things what they really are, if you can pin it on a Democrat. That's our system.

Myst

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rich for NY Crimes POLICE STATE LIAR-FEST
Posted by: PointMan on Feb 23, 2009 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pity our new president. As he rolls out one recovery package after another, he can’t know for sure what will work.

Excuse me while try to hold my dinner down.

This whole column is based on a complete crock. Obama was bankrolled into his DC easy chair by the same Wall Street criminals that created the meltdown. Obama's entire cabinet and White House staff are run by these corporate mafia sharks. To say this Police State poser should be the subject of pity is moonbat insanity.

What Obama has done so far is to back a national FISA Big Brother spy program and the lunatic genocide of "war on terror" before he rubberstamped one "Wall Street Bailout" theft spree after the next pushed down the nation's throat as "rescue". The "stimulus plan" is just another big dollar crock that won't do much but enrich corrupt political hacks across the country.

For anybody that takes the NY Times or any of the MSM at face value - remember the past. This is the paper that year-after-year sold Iraq invasion "war on terror" when anybody with a web hookup knew it was a Big Oil grab and absolute bloody murder for corporate crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FASCISM HIJACKS Washington
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Feb 23, 2009 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crash "Depression" created by Wall Street crime that now wants "nationalization".

Isn't that convenient?

The Organized Corporate Crime snakes that looted the system all the way down the bubble and then raped it to the bone through Obama pushed "Bailouts" now want so-called "nationalization" that the New York Times is pushing hard from writers like Frank Rich and economic quacks such as Paul Krugman. (economics is not a science by the way)

Create the criminal problem and then offer the criminal phony solution.

When the Mafia pulls this con on a smaller scale it's called bunko extortion. When entire countries are shaken down, it's called FASCISM. Of course, you won't hear that from the monopoly corporate media or Ivy League that serves the same crooked paymasters that Bush and now el presidente Obama work for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: particle
» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: Man_vs_Kleptocracy
» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: FASCISM HIJACKS Washington Posted by: bornxeyed
How Far Down? Way Down!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 23, 2009 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last week on MSNBC a person whose name I cannot remember (it was a white guy with glasses - is that enough of a clue?) was the first person I know of to utter the grim and awful truth. This economic meltdown will last for at least a decade. Let me add this further pearl to the conversation:

If this lasts only a decade, we'll be damned lucky.

And why not? It took us twenty-eight years, one month and three days to dig us into this hole (do the math). Why should any rational person expect this mess to be over and done with in a matter of months or even a few years?

Forgive me for raining on the parade, but the next ten years are going to be rough - really rough. America is going to so through some serious changes in the next decade. Fasten your seat belts.

The seeds of America's economic self suicide can be traced back to that day in 1981 (you did the math, didn't you?) when the American people decided that sending a feeble-minded, dirty old dingbat named Ronald Reagan to the Oval Office - TO THE WHITE HOUSE, FOR PETE'S SAKE! Why are so many people so shocked that something like this has happened? I predicted it on my blog when I referred to "the inevitable, catastrophic economic collapse that is months if not weeks away" (Gentlemen, Start Your Rhetoric, June 8, 2008)

How was I - and so many readers and contributors to AlterNet - able to see it coming? It's very simple: We were paying attention.

They Hate the American People

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'd go back even further Posted by: DCostello2
» RE: How Far Down? Way Down! Posted by: badkitty
9-11 Was Not a Slap but an Inside Job
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Feb 23, 2009 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9/11 was an inside job. You can watch an independent video on my website that shows mainstream media's reporting on 9/11. this video puts together the mainstream media pointing out all of the discrepancies and lies of the 9/11 Commission.

David Ray Griffin, author of several books exposing the lies and deceptions while at the 9/11, will be talking in Boston on April 11 at 6:30 PM On the Boston University campus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: so can we have the truth now? Posted by: realtruther
One more thought:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 23, 2009 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't Frank Rich great? As far as I'm concerned, the guy can do no wrong. Fifty years from now he will be remembered with the awe and reverence that we remember Edward R. Murrow today. I am as convinced of that as I am my own name.

You rock, Frankie!

Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Too bad he works for the NYT Posted by: DCostello2
» RE: One more thought: Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: One more thought: Posted by: GEM-592
nationalization?
Posted by: archivist on Feb 23, 2009 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Energy and banking should be nationalized for the common good under a smart uniqe "American" form. These sectors are bleeding us dry and have been for a long time. Now is the time to turn these sectors into non-profit cooperatives.

These sectors by allowing profit end up sucking away vast resources from our creativity. These are not luxeries much as the post office is not a luxury, they affect EVERYONE. Scraping off the profits doesn't introduce any efficiancy whatsoever it only takes resources away from viable job creating businesses and households.

Nonprofit banking AND energy if done right (bulldog oversight) will empower everyone. Energy use can be regulated fairly with a sliding scale fee system based on increased use. On top of this we need balanced global wages for workers (i.e. to allow imports US equivilant minumum wages for "foreign" workers and property rights, period)

America's economic troubles are tied directly to the grossly underpaid workers who now have our jobs for literally pennies on the dollar. Oh yeah, and they barely eek out a living by- the-way, whereas we used to have disposable income, all of our needs met and a fat retirment.

Much more to disscuss but you get the idea.

Read:
Who Will Tell The People
By William Greider
You won't be able to put it down and shouldn't.
Rather sobering but optomistic book detailing America's (the World's) decline over the last 50 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "...balanced global wages..." Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: nationalization? Posted by: Dboy
the loss of the real
Posted by: Naty on Feb 23, 2009 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is an excerpt from Catherine Constable's essay "Postmodernism and Film" found in the book "The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism":

"...The destructive power of capital is demonstrated in its undermining of the concept of "use-value," in which an object would be purchased because it fulfilled a particular function. Capitalism introduces a system of exchange in which the value of any object is determine by the others for which it can be substituted. Moreover, the overproduction of goods has resulted in the rise of advertising in order to distinguish between them, ensuring that objects are no longer purchased for their use-value but rather for the lifestyles that they represent. In this way, the capitalist dismissal of the criterion of functionality is seen to destroy objective reality. Baudrillard describes this logic as a "catastrophic spiral" because the circular dynamic or intersubstitutionality shatters a series of key oppositions including real/imaginary, true/false, and good/evil (p. 43).

The loss of the real and the consequent undermining of the logic of opposition are demonstrated by attempts to interpret the meaning of political events."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which sounds better
Posted by: solrev on Feb 23, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nationalization or bankruptcy. How long will it take Obama to come out of denial and stop listening to his economic team? The grand alchemist team can not turn lead into gold, nor can they create a value for the toxic asset waste. The sooner we nationalize so we can pretend it was not bankruptcy the better off we will be. Sell the toxic waste for pennies on the dollar then sell the clean bank. The people who buy the waste will buy the bank. The toxic waste will have real value, although it maybe nothing. Trying to create an accounting mechanism to create a toxic waste value, or throwing public money into the system to avoid bankruptcy, will keep us sliding down the hill and the toxic waste in never-never land.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The party's over
Posted by: Democritus on Feb 23, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only are there "zombie banks" out there pretending to be viable, but also our entire economy is on life support. It's kept barely alive only by the willingness of the Chinese and Japanese to buy our paper.

We are now $10.7 trillion is debt, and our only hope is that when the bills come due, our rampant inflation will allow it to be paid by our great-grandchildren in cheap dollars. But that's a slim hope. The more realistic picture is for us to continue fighting our meaningless cultural, sexual, and drug wars as we stumble down the road to ruin, empty champagne glasses in hand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You know, they tell you when you have a catastrophic disease...
Posted by: clvngodess on Feb 23, 2009 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like cancer. Or something else. They tell you to put your things in order.

It's fair. I'm so fucking sick and tired of this, "do we want to know the truth" shit. Yes we want to know the truth. We're adults. We wear big boy and big girl pants. We can tie our shoes and we drink coffee instead that sugary crap in a box with straw in the morning. So give it to us straight.

Am I gonna die, doc?
Yep.

Are we fucked by this depression.
Yep.

Rip the goddamn bandaid off. Stop with the making nice and fucking denial language already. If I want denial, I'll go the bar. Thank you, very mush...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressives need to offer answers, not doomsday scenarios
Posted by: frantic1971 on Feb 23, 2009 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet seems to take delight in gloating over the economic hardship facing Americans.

However, Progressives need to offer solutions and hope for better things to attract people to the cause.

If you are a Moderate-type person--I cannot offer the current Progressive movement as an alternative that you might find attractive or support.

There seems to be two types of advice on the current problems available to middle-of-the-road middle class persons, and neither is attractive:

The Conservative and/or Right-wing advice: "SCREW YOU!"

The Progressive answer and advice: "YOU'RE SCREWED!! YOU'RE SCREWED!!"

Let Progressives offer some hopeful solutions, rather then--as so many posters seem to think--gloating in the misfortunes of others. We (Progressives) need to move away from the "glad to see it happening to you! you're a wasteful pig and it is just retribution!".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think you are right . . . Posted by: dustdevil
» Who knows the solutions? Posted by: Bliss Doubt
SLAPPED BACK TO REALITY?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 23, 2009 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's what should have happened, but it didn't. On every other point I agree with Rich. But George Bush used 9/11 to drive the point home no matter how ridiculous it was. That included invading Iraq for reasons manufacutred by his faithful servants. Wall St. was left unsupervised and behaved accordingly. Like teenagers left alone for the weekend. George Bush turned a tragic day in our history into an old whore. When Americans should have been taking to the streets because we were being sold down the tubes people went shopping. That ain't reality! Now we have a new president and people act as though they went out and bought yet another gadget that will improve their lives and make everyone beautiful. I agree with the commentor who suggested that we call things what they really are. Obama is on the right path, no doubt. But Americans have to stop behaving like brats, demanding that he clean up everyone's act. It takes time and how bad can it get? Very! This is yet another slap back into reality. This time we should pay attention. We aren't going to get many more chances. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DENIAL - A river in Africa?
Posted by: stellabloo on Feb 23, 2009 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are all about Denial, here.
Following Black October/November/December, I volunteered at a sports event - leading up the "Greenest Olympics Ever" - out of 800 volunteers I was one of the few who had their own non-disposable water bottle and go-cup.

How can we be so OBLIVIOUS - in spite of the financial meltdown, not to mention the fact our beautiful planet is dying beneath our toxic garbage. Is there ever a point where we start to say: too much plastic, too much disposable crap, too many cars, too much pollution, too many mindless lives fed by usury and speculation and lived in excess, too many wasted lives lived in squalor and despair?

We have been talking for a long time about the value of a fulfilling career that contributes society, the need for education opportunities and affordable housing, and the environmentally imperative goal of sustainable living. Do you think NOW would be a good time to start?

My thought is that the word "socialism" is a bit out-moded and too reminiscent of the McCarthy-witchhunting definition of "communism" - I prefer to think of it as "co-operation". Otherwise the bully with the biggest stick still gets to make the rules. What I REALLY want is for this Ship of Fools to sail away without me, but I seem to be having a little trouble finding the exit :.?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How far down?
Posted by: sirios on Feb 23, 2009 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope, so far down that we completely forget what it it was that we were falling from. If after the suffering from the fall, some lucidity appears, with the recognition that life at it's core is unified, then we can rebuild the objective world based on that inherent unity. The trick is to not trivialize that common field of compassion by a return to greedy consumption of objects, which by the way have NO intrinsic value.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

down the rabbit hole
Posted by: pfm on Feb 23, 2009 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today the American society punctuated after 8 years of nearly daily diet of fear mongering and bogusly “colored” terrorist threats is it any wonder most Americans are still afraid to venture too far from the alleged safety of their rabbit hole…? One I believe could make the claim – Americans – like those young military personnel (men and women) we sent abroad to die in mindlessly promulgated wars, who upon returning home find they are victims of post traumatic syndrome (PTS), shell shocked and feeling emotionally virtually alone. We chose to in silence sit and watch as those in the DC beltway irrespective of the political mantle they wear, allowed our nation to dismantle our protective core, leaving everyone on their own.

Economic recession, depression is but a state of mind, and interesting those pulling the string of our puppet minions know this well and guard it be revealed NOT to us. As long as we permit them to deceive and not fully, openly disclose, we will remain the marionettes of their fear. We have only to rise and stand firmly on our own two feet and accept nothing less than full complete open disclose from all of them – including you – Mr. President.

No more games, not more backroom bullshit, just lay it our clear, concise and understandably and most important – HONESTLY – we’ll do the rest.

Respectfully,
Paul F. Miller
striving to promote sustainable awareness

BLOG SITE NAME ... AUTHENTICALLY WIRED

BLOG SITE ADDRESS ... http://waterman99.wordpress.com/2009

... everyone has the right to clean & accessible water, adequate for the health & well being of the individual & family, and no one shall be deprived of such acess or quality of water due to individual economic circumstances ... Article # 31 - United Nations

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TELL NO-BAMA THANKS for the $65 it will be a big help/ BIG LIE
Posted by: lorado on Feb 23, 2009 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BIG LIE NO-BAMA $65 a big help compared to the bankers--CEO's WHO GOT $MILLIONS thanks NO-BAMA for your NO-STIMULI for average taxpayer. YES we actually pay taxes which CEO's squirm out of them like the WORMS they are!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Stock Market Tumble
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Feb 23, 2009 1:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Treasury Secretary Geither explained his program to save the banking system, the stock market tumbled dramatically. In response, the MSM dutifully reported on what a failure his plan must surely be; after all, the stock market fell as the program was revealed.

Do you buy into this interpretation? If so, I have to ask why, after they have failed you so consistently in the past, are you paying any attention at all to the MSM? All they seem to want is to hold their audience. Nothing else matters, not accurate reporting, not the public interest, well (I stand corrected) maybe their political access and furthering their own agenda do matter to them.

And what about the stock market? Does it care about the public interest and the good of the country? In happier times, you probably recall how, when a big employer laid off a big fraction of its workforce the stock market always responded by a big jump upward of that company's stock price. No, the stock market cares about profits and it cares about profits right now, not in the distant future (say, after next quarter).

Returning to the original issue in the light of these observations, how should we interpret the drop in the market that happened in response to Secretary Geither's remarks. Maybe it is merely that the market taking offense at the fact that some oversight of banking practices is to be included in the bill; maybe they were expecting another handout with no strings attached and the market thought that this pesky and unexpected oversight would hurt the profit picture.

There is more than one interpretation for their disappointment that is possible, and just maybe the MSM chose an inaccurate one. It seems quite possible that if this proposal had been more to the liking of the public generally, the stock market would have behaved even more adversely

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Even if and when we hit bottom
Posted by: willymack on Feb 23, 2009 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trying to scramble up to the same old crap as before will only ensure a fall right back into the pit. How many times do we have to be bamboozled by greedy psychopaths to see this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The NY Times saying I'm in denial - - pot ... meet kettle
Posted by: GEM-592 on Feb 23, 2009 4:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well written, but insubstantial. At least it was free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are f%#ked!
Posted by: buddyedgewood on Feb 23, 2009 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wait until the Credit Card bubble bursts! We're talking trillions, upon trillions of dollars. All these laid off workers are using their CC's even more so now than ever before. They know they don't have money now or in the near future to pay them off, yet they continue to use them - they're willing to default. I see people using CC's every time I visit the supermarket - a sure sign of fiscal irresponsibility - but I know, what else are they going to use to pay for food, clothing, rent/mortgage, the BMW payment, etc... And guess who gets to bail them out? That's right, you and me - the tax payers that are lucky enough to still have jobs.

The CC companies started planning for the bubble burst a while ago - maybe you've noticed your credit limit decrease and your APR increase? That's so you don't go spend-crazy when you get laid off. Don't worry, the CC companies will still be asking for (and probably get) a bailout from Uncle Sam and the saps that pay taxes.

I say let them all fail. Let the CC users default on their CC's. Maybe after they've digged themselves out of the hole after 10 years (like me), they'll have a new appreciation for credit. Let the CC companies fail too - that'll teach them to be more careful who they give credit to in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We are f%#ked! Posted by: bouyant
We will all be herdered into shelters and fed Benzodiazepines
Posted by: cori on Feb 23, 2009 7:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are all feeling stressed. I can't remember a time like this. We all need to do what we have to do to survive. Move to where there may be a job, live on less, rent out a room in your house, eat less, save, you name it. No more shopping for fun anymore. There were many who were warning us about this for years but no one listened. Maxine Waters just said on the Bill Maher show "we are on the edge of collapse." We better make sure Obama doesn't mess with Social Security though. All they have to do is raise the caps so that everyone pays into the system like they should. Its about spreading the wealth right? And Obama better get tough with the military budget cause we're not going to be the militaries collateral damage. It’s time to enjoy the moment not the mall and make sure our senators get a big loud message from all of us. Our tax dollars are for us not for special interests anymore!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Were as concerned as hell and we're hoping to not have to take it any more.
Posted by: ImSwiss on Feb 24, 2009 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is that the American people will accept anything. There isn't much more that could be done to a people to make them protest than has been done to us but all we can muster up is to whine and post messages on the internet. For the cause of all our problems over the last 25 years we need only look in the mirror. But that would mean we would have to turn off the TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OBAMA SPEECH: POINTS
Posted by: reelman on Feb 25, 2009 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OBAMA SPEECH: POINTS TO REMEMBER

1. Its not what Obama says, its how he says it
2. You are not hearing what he really means
3. Obama is a radical secular socialist
4. Radical Pelosi was cheering wildly
5. Obama is a known liar
6. Jimmah Carter approves
7. Expect more borrowing and excuses for failure in 2009
8. Let the DOW be an indicator of Obama’s success

http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

deegee
Posted by: deegee on Feb 26, 2009 6:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Deck chairs...Titanic...The game is over.This month,next month.My debts are all paid off.I know how to grow & preserve food.I have an independant heat/cooking/water system.It is going to all be down to this!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all going to be fine.
Posted by: PJAW on Feb 28, 2009 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop worrying so much, if you still have access to the internet, you're not among the most deprived. And it will get better, just not overnight. The ship of state is like a huge freakin' ocean liner, it takes awhile to stop it from going in the wrong direction before you can set off on a radically different course.

The drunken nephew of the steamship line owner has finally been thrown overboard, but that just means we have a new man at the helm not new ownership. Once we change course, we can have a more effective mutiny and reclaim ownership of the vessel. It was an illegal transfer anyway while we were at the buffet table. (burp)

Stay busy, keep a glad heart. If it doesn't work out, at least you can die happy, just don't give in to the gloom. Remember, rich folks can't do anything for themselves, so don't let them scare you. If times get too tough, we can eat them, they're not very elusive. Avoid the brains and the heart though, very toxic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Declining Dow
Posted by: liz-at-blackrose on Feb 28, 2009 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The stock market took a dive because Obama's new budget favors the middle class over corporate titans, and the financial industry doesn't like his proposal to tax hedge fund managers' income at the same rate as other working people. This is not a problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement