Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Ad Wars: 'Dr. Evil' vs. Unions Over Employee Free Choice Act

By Art Levine . Posted January 21, 2009.


Can supporters of the EFCA overcome the smears and intensive lobbying orchestrated by corporate flacks like "Dr. Evil," Richard Berman?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The pro-union American Rights at Work launches Thursday a new $3 million ad campaign promoting the right to organize unions and the Employee Free Choice Act. But it's also facing a savvy, if deceptive, PR and ad blitz against the Employee Free Choice Act led in part by Richard Berman, a Washington attorney also known as "Dr. Evil," whose specialty is organizing front groups that attack proposed corporate reforms and public interest organizations, including Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Richard Berman, though, sees his role as simply telling hard truths liberal interest groups want to ignore and serving as an attorney just doing his job. In an exclusive interview, he says, "You can either say I'm a shill -- or an attorney who is representing my clients' interests, depending on how you want to characterize it." And he relishes the "Dr. Evil" nickname, originally coined by his friends: "It helps my businesses and distinguishes me from others who aren't as effective."

As for his 501-c-3 tax-exempt organization, he's not required to disclose his donors -- and he doesn't, although the New York Times has reported that state Chambers of Commerce are among those backing his Center for Union Facts. He refers to it as having a "very small budget," but also says it spent about $20 million on ads and other initiatives last year. He's defeated, so far, efforts by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to have the Center for Union Facts and another one of his anti-regulation groups' tax-exempt status revoked. The real reason he's faced such criticism from unions and progressives, he insists: "Unions are desperate for changes because they can't win fairly."

(That's a claim easily disputed by evidence of unionbusting and corporate abuses of the federal union election system. But he dismisses as essentially worthless and biased the huge body of evidence regarding widespread corporate intimidation and abuses during organizing campaigns under the current toothless system, with as many as one in five of union organizers or activists fired during organizing drives. As my "Unionbusting Confidential" piece showed in In These Times, employers often justify such firings for other reasons.)

His sympathies for such unionbusting were illustrated by his apparent work on behalf of Smithfield Foods, the unionbusting company cited for illegal actions. As CREW reported about the Center for Union Facts: "Coinciding with a notorious anti-union campaign by Smithfield Foods, CUF ran a website called 'UFCW Exposed,' smearing the union organizing at Smithfield. Berman was retained by Smithfield Foods, and CUF pays Berman and Co. for 'management services,' according to The Hampton Roads Business Journal."

But now Berman is facing a taste of his own medicine, with in-your-face criticism on a new website put together by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) called Bermanexposed.org. He's hardly alone in his role as a tool of corporations seeking to undermine workers' rights, but he's become a lightning rod for criticism because of his high-profile media campaigns. CREW's press release didn't pull its punches in unveiling the new information-packed resource:


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: unions, employee free choice act, center for union facts, dr. evil, richard berman

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hard to believe
Posted by: mkdelta69 on Jan 22, 2009 7:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unions give the little people a chance to challenge the corporate friendly economy. Part of the reason why the economy has frozen is the little guy is saddled with debt. He can't afford what corporations are producing.

In the 60s the average CEO made 40 times the average wage of the workforce. Today it's over 500 times. The aristocratic elite has used this to buy the government,regulation,and control of the resources.

To take back your future you have to break the straglehold of the elite on government regulation and resources.

Unions are an easy simple tool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

leftbank
Posted by: markw4786 on Jan 25, 2009 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, the Chamber of Commerce, The Heritage Institute, CATO, WAL-MART, HOME DEPOT and every other corporatist lackey group will spend billions to fight Employee Free Choice. And some will make $$$$$ acting as mouthpieces, to disseminate their lies. Ironically, regrettably and "who would have 'thunk'" among this latter group we find THE HUFFINGTON POST, AIR AMERICA radio and yikes!!!, ALTER NET. All three are airing ads sponsored by and paid for by the WORKERS FAIRNESS INSTITUTE. This is a front organization advancing the WAL-MART, Chamber of Commerce line. I guess money talks.
Please don't start with the "we must air both sides of an issue to foster dialogue" crap. Lies and distortions never advance dialogue. I hope these three reconsider their association with this corporate canard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right Bank
Posted by: pujol on Jan 26, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever been subjected to constant pressure by union organizers? I have and I found it rather unpleasant. I fail to see why so many find secret ballot representation elections unsatisfactory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ight Bank Posted by: markw4786
» RE: ight Bank Posted by: Quannah
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement