Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Why I'm Rooting for 3 Big Economic Bubbles

By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted December 26, 2008.


We need a healthcare bubble, an infrastructure bubble and a green bubble right now -- or else the whole thing will pop.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

    Let's see, I've lived and worked through how many bubbles and bubble pops?

    My first bubble must have been the real estate bubble that developed during the Carter Presidency. Housing prices in my Northern California region were popping up 2% a month. Everyone and their uncle suddenly wanted to buy a "fixer upper" and cash in.

    That bubble burst sometime late in 1979, if I recall properly, which I should since I owned a real estate company at the time. I knew the end was near for that bubble when suddenly the investors showing up in my office weren't grizzled old pros, but average Joes. "Hi, my neighbor and I scrapped together five grand and we want to invest it in a fixer upper," they'd tell me.

    I took that as a sure sign that the jig was up. I sold my office and went looking for another line of work. That turned out being the newspaper business, which is a story for another day.

    After that I avoided bubbles until 1996, when I suddenly found myself in wallet deep in a San Francisco Internet startup, Quokka Sports. Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeha! What ride that was. We burnt through $164 million in venture capital money in less than 40 months. And when the dust settled in 2001 all that was left were 438 over-priced Herman Miller desk chairs, a ping pong table and a couple of tons of empty Cheeto bags.

    Of course, we were just one of hundreds of dot com companies that flared like new-born stars, burnt brightly for a short time, then went super nova, leaving nothing behind but a big ass echo and lot of dust. (The dust would be all that dot.com stock ordinary folks bought like lemmings at the top of the curve…. as they always do - just like those two neighbors I mentioned above who were gonna get rich buying fixer uppers..)

    That's the way of bubbles. They are fueled by hope, greed and -- most of all -- other people's money. And the money is easy to get. Hell the bubblemisters don't even have go get the stuff. Other people bring it to them  by the truckload and beg them to take the stuff.

    When the bubble bursts the bubblemisters shrug and mumble things like, "Oh well, nothing ventured, nothing gained," and "Hey, don't blame me, you're the one who begged us to let you in on the action." (My favorite rationalization during the dot.com bubble came when a reporter asked a venture capitalist why they continue funding CEOs who ran failed dot.com companies. "Because you can't encourage risk-taking by punishing failure," he replied. Easy for him to say, since he was investing what? - Other people's money.)

    But the real problem with most bubbles is not that people lose money. The real problem with bubbles is that the amount of money lavished on bubble-stuff rarely creates anything near the amount of  useful tangibles that could have invented/produced with the commensurate amount of money.

    Nobel Prize winning economist and columnist, Paul Krugman recently wrote;

    "…once the economy has perked up a bit, there will be a lot of pressure on the new administration to pull back, to throw away the economy's crutches….The point is that it may take a lot longer than many people think before the U.S. economy is ready to live without bubbles.."

    Now, while I agree with that in principle, I am rooting for three more bubbles;
    • An infrastructure building boom bubble
    • A universal healthcare bubble
    • A green technologies bubble.
     
    Because that's the only way we're going to deal with the challenges that face us.

    Thanks to Global Warming deniers in both government and industry, we are at least 25-years behind the curve on addressing human contributions to global climate change. And there's simply no way normal market forces are going to spend what it will take to catch up. In fact many industries, like coal and oil, have taken a page right out of the old Big Tobacco playbook, pumping out junk science and junkier scientists to counter such efforts.

    The only way to catch up is to ignite the same animal passion that fuels every bubble - greed. "Make some green by investing green," needs to become one of America's investment mantras. "A healthy American is a consuming American" is another good one.

    There are some early signs that just that kind of thing may be beginning to happen. With Democrats back in power, and the billions of fresh dollars rolling off the presses in DC, investors smell new opportunities in new places - the kind of places Democrats and the incoming Obama administration say they favor - healthcare, infrastructure and all things green.
     
    Need capital? Green start-ups may fare best in tough '09

    December 17, 2008 --
    Start-up companies in green industries stand the best chance of getting venture capital funding in 2009 -- in what will otherwise be a dismal year for entrepreneurs looking for money, a new venture industry survey suggests.

    "We will likely see a marked slowdown of new investments as venture capitalists turn their attention to supporting existing companies," said Mark Heesen, NVCA president.  Despite the overall slowdown expected in venture funding, 48% of venture capitalists predicted increased investment in clean technology businesses, ranking that sector at the top of list of industries likely to get more funding. The life sciences industry, including biotech, ranked second."
    (Full)

    The pressure on the incoming Obama administration to change the direction of the Bush bailouts will be overwhelming. Ordinary Americans have no sympathy for Wall Street companies and bankers who took it up the assets when the housing market collapsed. Nor do Americans have much of appetite for saving the Big Three auto companies, which wasted the last decade rock stupid products like Hummers and other four-wheeled dinosaurs.

    So between now and eight years from now over a trillion dollars will be lavished on our long-neglected national infrastructure, expanding and modernizing our healthcare systems and on R&D/deployment of clean, renewable energy sources and technolgies.

    Sure, all three areas will become investment bubbles. Duh. America is now and will always be a capitalist  nation. It's in our DNA. Everyone wants a piece of whatever is happening now. Don't you? (Don't try that holier than thou crap with me…. you would too.)

    And so,  "The Greater Fool Theory"  will again kick in. New companies will form, new ideas will not only be funded, but over-funded, by venture capitalists eager to grow these new infrastructure, healthcare or green companies fast as they can so they can take them them public, (IPO) and start over again…for as long as the bubble lasts.

    Once again, the general public will serve as the greatest fools. As they hear about the millions being made in these three new bubbles they will begin pestering their broker to get them in on these hot IPOs.  Day traders will stay up all night online, prowling amatuer investor chat rooms where the sharks play "pump and dump," with the newbies drop who stumble in drooling for an opportunity to snap up the "hottest" new green or healthcare company IPO.

    Then, at some point, each of these three bubbles will burst, as all bubbles must. A small number of healthcare and green  start ups will actually survive in some form. The lucky ones will be acquired by biggies, like Johnson & Johnson, Exxon, Kaiser Permanente, etc.

     


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, housing, green jobs, bubble

Stephen Pizzo is the author of numerous books, including Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans, which was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bad Idea ... More Bubbles ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 26, 2008 12:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There need not and should not be any more bubbles.

Healthcare ~ Medicare for All ... what bubble ? With "Medicare for All" the country, as a whole, will spend less and less on health care until we get from 17% of GDP to around 10% ... not spend more!

Infrastructure ~ Infrastructure needs a constant source of funding to guarantee that due diligence and careful thought go into every project. We should never stop taking care of our infrastructure.

Green Infrastructure ... there is no need for a bubble here either. It is comparable to regular infrastructure in that it needs constant funding. Our big problem with the progress of our green projects is the on again - off again funding and tax subsidies. We need reliable funding and tax policy

We don't need bubbles ... we need well thought out programs and the due diligence to make sure we are getting a bridge that's needed not a bridge to no where. We do not have any money to waste on more bubbles. period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A Press release is not 'proof' Posted by: gellero1
» RE: Bad Idea ... More Economy Posted by: mgmyers79
How about an ethics bubble based...
Posted by: paulmagillsmith on Dec 26, 2008 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...on how we treat the other citizens in the world? If done properly it will grow, but never burst. Many Americans seem more concerned with the ethical treatment of animals than of humans. We are ALL animals so this way of thinking must stop. Here are two good ways to start a new era of humanity:

1)Recent estimates are there are one billion people around the globe without clean safe water. Further estimates show it would only cost $10 per person to provide it. That's $10 billion dollars, folks, far less than we stand to lose on the bank bailouts/rip-off, or even by bailing out the Big Three auto manufacturers. Check my math, but this appears to represent about one twelth of one percent of US GDP, and roughly one fiftieth a percent that of world GDP.

If the US is interested in repairing damage to our reputation as compassionate Americans, rather than the failed 'compassionate conservative' philosophy, we should consider funding the whole effort. This small burden will only be upon us a short while because when other nations see the good will this initial effort garners (and the jobs it will create) they will chime in with support & financing.

How better to tell the 1.2 billion Muslims in the world we don't give a rat's ass about your religious philosophy, we still care about people who suffer, despite stated sectarian desires to 'kill the infidel'. Who are these 'infidels' anyway? During the Crusades Europeans considered Mohammedans 'infidels', too. Doesn't this show we are all in the same boat in relation to insane religious dogma. GROW UP PEOPLE!!!

2) UN (and other) studies indicate about half the world's citizens exist (notice I didn't use the word 'live') on less than $2 per day, and about 2 bn on less than $1 per day. Let's do another math problem here...

Let's see: 2bn times $1 times 365days=$730bn + 1bn times $2 times 365days=another $730bn= $1.46trillion. Looked at another way; let's try this: 3bn times $2 times 365=$2.19trillion.

Even at the higher number that only represents about 4-5% of the estimated $50 trillion world GDP. We can't afford this to double the living standards of about half the world's population? Imagine the spending & invesment this would cause. This is a REAL stimulus package.

How much is spent yearly on military hardware that is counter-productive to society as a whole? Ask yourself that, then get back to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ethics? No way! Posted by: justAnEgg
» RE: Anxious to see Dodo... Posted by: americansheep
» RE: Labels Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Labels Posted by: justAnEgg
» right on Posted by: mgmyers79
want ethics, green and reasonably priced health care...
Posted by: ellie on Dec 26, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the hell with bubbles... time to look at things that can make a difference in lives now and in the future... not the hottest gizmo or trash... trick is how to keep these new brainstorms here in the US and not be off-shored once they gain traction...

ironically sport 2 medical devices that work like champs, don't break when you look at them cross-eyed, are US developed and made, both separate companies... co's were bought by J&J who give $$ backup but otherwise leave them alone to operate as stable companies with an iron clad contract to not off-shore them... no the J&J thing was discovered after devices were attached to me...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Rational Health Care Stimulus Package
Posted by: drricklippin on Dec 26, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The changes in heath care should be as bold dramatic and creative as we are applying to the global environmental crisis.

Dumping more $ into a fundamentally flawed "disease care" systtem would be a huge mistake.Giving Medicare to all" is the equivalent of giving US citizens bad loans to purchase more large gas guzzler cars

We need economic incentives for many more primary care docs and what I call "preventionists". Also we need to rebuild our nation's broken public health infrastructutre like the FDA,the CDC,the EPA and OSHA where incompetency has been rampant and trust severely eroded.


The US uninsured have been immorally denied basic health care services-sacrificed at the alter of the excesses of the free market- and the insured (most of us) have been duped and swindled into believing that we need medicines and medical interventions that we don't need at best - or harm us at worst

So I agree with a health care stimulus package. But throwing "Medicare for all" at everyone is a very bad idea and could be the medical and financial ruin of this nation.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southapton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:I agree Posted by: Sushi
Amen, brother
Posted by: sausage on Dec 26, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to Global Warming deniers in both government and industry, we are at least 25-years behind the curve on addressing human contributions to global climate change.

And you might add Mr. and Mrs. Average American Out There in TVland who voted for Ronald "Shining City on a Hill" Reagan over incumbent Jimmy Carter in 1980.

Had the American electorate returned Carter to the White House in 1980 many of the "green" energy goals set by president-elect Brack Obama would be met or exceeded by now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Amen, brother Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Amen, brother Posted by: Lauren
Nonsense
Posted by: kmarx on Dec 26, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ideas posed in this article are part of the mantra of many which purports that we can turn things around by "green" jobs and rebuilding infrastructure. Any "green" job, including R & D, can be outsourced to cheap overseas labor. Besides, "green" jobs are nowhere near enough to get things going since many people in this country do not have the expertise to fill such jobs. And don't give me the nonsense that we can send those in need of training to community colleges for that training. Once the money to support these jobs stops coming in from DC, the layoffs will begin en mass.

Infrastructure jobs will only employ people who have been building that infrastructure since day one. Sure, they'll hire a few people as long as the money lasts and much of that can turn out to be illegal labor.

Get off the nonsense that simplistic solutions will do much since much of our manufacturing base is now overseas and R & D is following. Corporate America will not stop with its penchant for cheap overseas labor unless it is forced to stop. Obama has yet to show that in the end he will be any different on these matters than past administrations.

On the whole this whole thing looks like a scam.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nonsense Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: Nonsense Posted by: kmarx
don't forget the unemployed "cuspers..."
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Dec 26, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don't forget the unemployed "cuspers..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: We Can Do It Again
Posted by: kmarx on Dec 26, 2008 2:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
melpol

You like many on this site are dreamers. You make one of the most complex economic situations in our history seem readily amenable to your dreams, or I might say delusions. Life is too complex for pollyanna solutions. Read about the Great Depression and you might learn something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We Can Do It Again Posted by: richholland
We don't need any more bubbles. They're nothing but false hopers and when burst, it ain't pretty.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 26, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm happy doing everything outside the bubbles, thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we don't need no stinkin' bubble...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Dec 26, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we need sustainability!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is the top story?
Posted by: don palabraz on Dec 26, 2008 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to turn people's attention to a more sound generator of ideas - joel magnuson - whose book, mindful economics, proposes more sane ideas for our economy than the ones set forth by this article.

If housing bubbles fueled by speculation result in a pop that severely hampers the economy and throws people out of their homes in record foreclosures, what would a health care bubble burst do? Oh, leave us with a few institutions that perhaps could have been constructed with less volatile fallout??

As for the green question: speculation is the agent of capitalism's 'growth imperative' which in terms of the environment and sustainability is wholly and irreconcilably at odds with it.

And these proposed bubbles are touted as pragmatism?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Why I'm Rooting for 3 Big Economic Bubbles
Posted by: unreceivedogma on Dec 26, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disagree with the premise that we need more bubbles to move forward. This article is an ideological assumption in search of meaningful, creative ideas.

What I find more objectionable is the quality of the writing (stilted and simplistic) and editing (typos galore).

AlterNet, you need to do better than this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worthless Opinion
Posted by: gellero1 on Dec 26, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where's the empirical evidence anything this guy says the government should do viv a vis the worldwide economic slowdown will do what he predicts?

IT DOESN'T EXIST. Try your theories with someone else's money, please.

If the government needs to print more fiat money to 'stimulate' the velocity of flow, just give me back the tens of thousands I paid in taxes, thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The next bubble to burst
Posted by: maxsmart on Dec 26, 2008 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Weve got one more bubble giving us trouble, the war bubble!!! The vast money sucking military,religious, industrial complex. The people who develop the next generation of weapons that somehow get spread around the world so we are forced to develop the next generation of weapons after that at even more expense.

Plus the expense of having to generate a war now and then to test out how wonderful the weapons are like as with the Gulf War. Then the weapon side effects kick in and we end of paying for the Gulf War Syndrome too and ptsd if we cover it at all and the rest of the stuff we are getting this time around.

War is a failed paradigm at solving anything but it is pretty good at destruction. Wars on drugs and terrorist aren't so good either.

War means the end justifies the means and taking the gloves of civilization off in order to save civilization. It doesn't do that, but it does destroys morality and civilization.

It is a neverending cycle of revenge and grievance, it is rape and pillage of the village. It is ancient instincts of dominance and territoriality turned loose from the bonds of normal social behavior! It is a relief valve from religious and moral structure so confining that societies can't even breathe, it releaves sexual repression and lets it all lose for just a little while. It is no coincidence that priests and missionaries follow the soldiers everywhere as well as the merchants.

But if we can't come to terms with our real instinctive needs and limit our more destructive anti-social nationalistic instincts we will probably be the cause of our own extinction. Perhaps all life on this little jewel circling the sun will be snuffed out or perhaps some random genetic mutation will elevate some other primate race to take our place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What we really need
Posted by: shipmate on Dec 26, 2008 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a currency reform. Cut the Trillions into millions, allow a certain sum for every person, keep savings accounts (but devaluated) and confiscate the ill gotten gains of the speculating crooks who run the markets and the banks. Than establish a healthcare system for all, dont worry it worked already in 1948 in postwar Germany before they too became Americanized big spenders on credits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bubbles McGee
Posted by: Perry Logan on Dec 26, 2008 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The official Republican economist is a guy named Bubbles McGee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no bubbles
Posted by: ROCCO on Dec 26, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IF the peak oil thing is real, along with climate change, then we need to re do our way of urban sprawl. We need a national rail system based on electrical power, some nukes, more intense green power, smaller communities, more rational thinking skills, local and green farming, a single payer health system based on teaching preventive healthy skills. IF the end of the age of the car is at hand, then our whole city planning must change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bubbles are illusions
Posted by: kmarx on Dec 26, 2008 2:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An economy cannot sustain itself on a bubble for any length of time. Take the housing bubble. Just because there was a high level of housing construction does not mean that things were good. A patient who walks into a doctor's office feeling great can walk out knowing of a terrible disease. It's what is going on in a bubble which we don't see that can be setting us up for disaster.

Wall Street took advantage of the latest bubble and made out well. The problem for the rest of us is that when bubbles bust, the Wall Street crowd walks off with millions and we get it in the wallet.

What we need is a 'no gimmick' economy whose goal is in the best interests of this nation as a whole, not that of a few. Why did so many Americans embrace the idea that the few had a god-given right to leach off the rest of us??? People should stop and think first rather than repeat the empty cliches of Wall Street, Reagan and the Bushs.

American Capitalism as we knew it is dead. Hopefully a new economic paradigm will emerge, one that is sensitive to the needs of this once great but now has-been country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bubbles are illusions Posted by: richholland
The Only Way Forward Is To Work Hard Developing Technology To Solve Problems
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Dec 26, 2008 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Being Nice To People.

We can't solve our problems by becoming horrible, evil and completely insanely stupid.

Just look at us

We are a complete disgrace

We have got this beautiful planet as our home and we are just being horrible to not just the place we live in - but everyone else as well

Its about time we grew up and started to use our intelligence to make our garden and everything and everyone that grows in it beautiful

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's UNFIXABLE !!!!
Posted by: sirios on Dec 26, 2008 3:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Im rooting for nature to wipe out the ENTIRE human race and start over, or not. Trying to fix even one third of the problems of the world is like trying to put out a raging forest fire with a garden hose. If there were a series of global natural disasters, or a nuclear war, or global warming times ten, almost every one would think that they would be the chosen or lucky ones to survive, because they would be the ones who could save what remains. This astounding level of arrogance is the reason why we are in this present mess. The human race has had its chance and has failed. Nature will remove us as easily as we swat a fly. At this point i would normally follow up with, we could save ourselves if the collective attention moved off of the I,intellect ego mind and back onto essence. This suggestion has met with silence or a few WTF's on previous posts and is why i am rooting for the bubble of ignorance to burst leaving no trace of bubbles or their creators.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's UNFIXABLE !!!! Posted by: tony_opmoc
BRING ON THIS BUBBLE!
Posted by: Overtone on Dec 26, 2008 5:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Revolutionary new energy conversion devices are likely to prove inherently cost-competitive. Not only can they be used to power homes and businesses of every variety, but also to make practical cars, trucks and buses that need no engines, batteries, or any variety of conventional fuel or recharge.

Advanced designs will soon be capable of producing torque and/or electricity on a self-sustaining basis. Devices without moving parts are comparable to an inexhaustible electric battery. One Proof-of-Concept prototype was concluded to be analogous to the early work on the transistor, which eventually led to a Nobel Prize and the creation of Silicon Valley.

Generators we are developing are expected to generate this much power and demonstrate replacement of the plug needed by a plug-in hybrid car, within a year. This will be a harbinger of automobiles that need no conventional fuel. With normal progress, prototype new energy conversion systems are anticipated to replace an automobile engine within three years. That goal might be achieved more rapidly if development involves four teams of engineers and technicians working on a 24/7 basis. These prototypes will open a path to mass production of entirely new varieties of automotive power plants. Vehicles powered by these technologies will never require conventional fuel of any kind.

Future cars can become a source of income
Vehicle to grid (V2G) power was demonstrated during 2007. It was recently estimated that selling power to the grid from future production hybrid electric cars might earn the vehicles’ owner $4,000 each year. This assumes that power will be drawn by utilities from the car’s batteries, by means of a two-way, plug. Cars powered by new energy conversion systems are expected to earn much more, as these generators are anticipated to replace both batteries and car engines. Therefore, they are expected to produce far greater amounts of electricity. No plug will be required.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BRING ON THIS BUBBLE! Posted by: richholland
Reality vs. bubbles
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Dec 26, 2008 6:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of calling for more "bubbles" to resuscitate the failed paradigm of a "consumer" debt-based economy, why not start thinking about developing a real production based economy? This writer is just as worthy of a Nobel as was the foolish fiat money promoter Paul Krugman and the idiots that received the Nobel for their work on hedge funds for LTCM (just before it crashed.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everyone of us...
Posted by: Micah on Dec 26, 2008 8:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone of us is trying our best and working hard for us to earn money. But it is not a secret anymore that our economy is in shamble that's why we may find it now hard to earn money to support our needs. No matter how hard we work sometimes we find it difficult to for us to budget. Financial option is a tool that can help us in times that we are in a temporary jam but before choosing any financial option you will use just like payday loan, you better search for information. Check out this article for more information.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bubbles in the Brain
Posted by: ralphzilla on Dec 28, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few points:

a) Since we are in debt by the trillions, any massive federal program will require foreign governments to buy our treasury bonds. So the more we spend, the more we hand over the keys to our future to somebody else.

b) There will be so many hands in the feeding trough that whatever comes out the end of the bubble pooper, will be pretty damned puny.

c) Unless there are taxing guarantees that whatever is built will be taxed based on the capital improvements, any bubble spending will likely be a, "we build it, they profit" scam.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't use the term "Bubble" for green technology
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 28, 2008 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American health care bubble is a bubble now, and it can pop. The average developed country spends 70% less on health care per capita and their citizens live several years longer.

The green technology "bubble" is not a bubble, it's a national security priority. It's true that the Saudi Kingdom can and will ruthlessly lower the price of oil to $10 per barrel if green technologies take 90% of the oil market. However, this country, along with any association of the world's nations, needs to cut the price of energy, first because America needs its own jobs and money more than the Saudi royal family needs a ski slope, and second because we will soon consider global warming and the consequent extinction of most of the world's species to be an abomination.

I know that green technology breakthroughs probably exist. I confidently forecast large-scale 2 cent per kwh electricity generation costs in 10 years, if and only if the government wants it. I'm not saying solar or wind, because I think they both might hit the same price target.

I'm less certain of transit dropping closer to the price of an elevator ride, although I'd like to see the government get off its chair and try 100 improvements. Currently we have such a waste of good ideas.

Moderate solar-assist home heating is cheap now, just put insulated windows on your south wall, guy. It's going to get cheaper and more effective for new houses and office buildings, along with solar hot water and daylighting. I see way too many possibilities for improvement.

For you wide open prairie drivers, I predict biodiesel fuel from algae for $2.00/gallon in 10 years. Will your next car come with a diesel engine option?

City drivers will soon use an electric with a battery swapping unit at their local gas station, and with a recharge plug in their home garage. BetterPlace.com may or may not work out the bugs, but the next company will get it.

The government should also go after every industry's energy consumption. Most industrial processes could see a 50% or more reduction in energy costs.

What we need is a government willing to find meritorious invention and bail them in. Free enterprise has a huge entry cost, but if the government sets up little companies (in exchange for a minority of the common stock, of course) America will have a better functioning free enterprise system.

Given GM's arrogance, I'd like to see the government set up two or three car companies based on new technology and sound business plans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement