Autoworkers Forced to Take Concessions in Industry Bailout

By Tiffany Ten Eyck, Labor Notes. Posted December 20, 2008.

President George W. Bush announced on Dec. 19 a $17.4 billion bridge loan for General Motors and Chrysler, a day after he hinted that the companies could be forced into "orderly" bankruptcy.

Autoworkers, who advocated for short-term aid to the auto industry's crisis, bristled at the conditions attached to the loan. The Bush administration's requirements mirror demands from anti-union Republicans who torpedoed congressional action last week. They would decimate United Auto Workers contracts and place retiree health care funds into company stock.

The plan hinges on a demand that UAW autoworker wages and work rules become "competitive" with wages and work rules in foreign-owned, nonunion transplant factories in the South.

Lost in the discussion, autoworkers said, is any recognition that wages and benefits are less than 10 percent of the cost of a vehicle and can't pull the Big Three back to profitability.

"We've already taken concessions to help the industry become viable," said Brett Talbot-Ward, a UAW Local 1700 member, who works at Chrysler's Sterling Heights [Mich.] assembly plant. "Why are they asking for more from us, when there are all sorts of other costs in the vehicle-production process, much less the CEO pay, that haven't even factored into the debate?"

Bush's terms will eliminate the jobs bank, a concession the UAW signaled it would accept two weeks ago. The program gives laid-off workers income and sends them into communities to provide public services. Foreign-owned auto firms have similar programs and often use production downtime to train workers.

"The jobs bank was our safety net," Talbot-Ward said. "That in and of itself is a huge sacrifice, when we know that there will be a huge amount of safety needed."

Chrysler announced plans this week to suspend all production for a month, two weeks longer than its usual holiday break.

The bridge loan calls for auto retirees to sink half of their retiree health care fund, the UAW-administered Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association, into company stock. Autoworkers questioned the wisdom of putting the remaining VEBA payments into stock, having watched GM's stock plunge from $29 a share in February to $2.79 in November.

"It's not worth the paper it's printed on," said Tom Brown, a member of UAW Local 600, who works at the Ford Dearborn [Mich.] Truck Plant. "They're going to attack the retirees badly on this one."

VEBA began as an underfunded vehicle: financial analysts predicted at its outset that General Motors was only willing or able to offer less than $35 billion of the estimated $50 billion that it owes retired workers.

The underfunding could lead to a simple, grim arithmetic: each dollar shortchanged translates into a dollar that can't be spent on health care premiums, co-pays, deductibles or quality of care. Under VEBA, the remaining costs of maintaining health care benefits will have to be shifted back to the workers.

"I don't think the rank-and-file will go for it -- to bring our wages down, to put our benefits into (company) stock -- that'll be too risky," said Tony Browning, UAW Local 1700 member at Chrysler's Sterling Heights Assembly.

See more stories tagged with: bush, labor, unions, ford, labor rights, gm, uaw, chrysler, auto industry, bailout

Tiffany Ten Eyck, a veteran of the successful Taco Bell Boycott campaign, is promotions coordinator for Labor Notes.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »