Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

While Some of Us Are Hoping for Change, Others Are Literally Starving for It

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted November 27, 2008.


The swelling numbers waiting outside homeless shelters and food pantries around the country have grown by at least 30 percent since the summer.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Elba Figueroa worked as a nurse’s aide until she got Parkinson’s disease. She lost her job. She lost her health care. She receives $703 a month in government assistance. Her rent alone costs $750. And so she borrows money from friends and neighbors every month to stay in her apartment. She laboriously negotiates her wheelchair up and down steps and along the frigid sidewalks of Trenton, N.J., to get to soup kitchens and food pantries to eat.

“Food prices have gone up,” the 47-year-old Figueroa said, waiting to get inside the food pantry run by the Crisis Ministry of Princeton and Trenton. “I don’t have any money. I run out of things to eat. I worked until I physically could not work anymore. Now I live like this.”

The pantry, which occupies a dilapidated three-story art deco building in Old Trenton, one of the poorest sections of the city, is one of about two dozen charities that struggle to provide shelter and food to the poor. Those who quality for assistance are permitted to come once a month and push a shopping cart in a U shape around the first floor where, clutching a piece of paper with allotted points, they can stock up on items using the pantry’s point system according to the number of people in a household. The shelves of the pantry hold bags of rice, jars of peanut butter, macaroni and cheese and cans of beets, corn and peas. Two refrigerated cases hold eggs, chickens, fresh carrots and beef hot dogs. “All Fresh Produce 2 pounds = 1 point,” a sign on the glass door of the refrigerated unit reads. Another reads: “1 Dozen EGGS equal 3 protein points. Limit of 1 dozen per household.”

The swelling numbers waiting outside homeless shelters and food pantries around the country, many of them elderly or single women with children, have grown by at least 30 percent since the summer. General welfare recipients receive $140 a month in cash and another $140 in food stamps. This is all many in Trenton and other impoverished areas have to live on.

Trenton, a former manufacturing center that has a 20 percent unemployment rate and a median income of $33,000, is a window into our current unraveling. The financial meltdown is plunging the working class and the poor into levels of destitution unseen since the Depression. And as the government squanders taxpayer money in fruitless schemes to prop up insolvent banks and investment houses, citizens are callously thrown onto the street without work, a place to live or enough food. 

The statistics are already grim. Our banking and investment system, holding perhaps $2 trillion in worthless assets, cannot be saved, even with the $700 billion of taxpayer money recklessly thrown into its financial black hole. Our decline is irrevocable.  The number of private sector jobs has dropped for the past 10 months and at least a quarter of all businesses say they plan to cut more jobs over the next year. The nation’s largest banks, including Citigroup, face collapse. Retail sales fell in October by the largest monthly drop on record. Auto companies are on the edge of bankruptcy. The official unemployment figures, which duplicitously mask real unemployment that is probably now at least 10 percent nationwide, are up to 6.1 percent and headed higher. We have lost 1.2 million jobs since January. Young men of color have 50 percent unemployment rates in cities such as Trenton. Twelve million houses are worth less than their mortgages and a million people will lose their homes this year in foreclosures. The current trends, if not swiftly reversed, mean that one in 33 home owners will face foreclosure.

There are now 36.2 million Americans who cope daily with hunger, up by more than 3 million since 2000, according to the Food Research and Action Center in Washington, D.C.  The number of people in the worst-off category -- the hungriest -- rose by 40 percent since 2000, to nearly 12 million people.

“We are seeing people we have not seen for a long time,” said the Rev. Jarret Kerbel, director of the Crisis Ministry’s food pantry, which supplies food to 1,400 households in Trenton each month. “We are seeing people who haven’t crossed that threshold for five, six or seven years coming back. We are seeing people whose unemployment has run out and they are struggling in that gap while they reapply and, of course, we are seeing the usual unemployed. This will be the first real test of [Bill] Clinton’s so-called welfare reform.”

The Crisis Ministry, like many hard-pressed charities, is over budget and food stocks are precariously low. Donations are on the decline. There are days when soup kitchens in Trenton are shut down because they have no food.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: poverty, food banks

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, is a Senior Fellow at the Nation Institute. His latest book is Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi Civilians.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obama can be new FDR or another Hoover
Posted by: Jay Randal on Nov 27, 2008 12:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If President-elect Obama just does what Wall Street desires, then he will be another Hoover and a failed President. If he helps the middle class and the poor, then he can be a new FDR. Barack himself has to decide which he wants to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama’s “Blueprint for Change”
Posted by: Lisa P on Nov 27, 2008 1:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We’ve all heard of Obama’s “Blueprint for Change.” If you’re an employee of the federal government, and you want to see just how it will affect you. According to Eric Pianin and Lois Romano of the Washington Post, there are dozens of proposals in his Blueprint that could change the career path of many of the 1.8 million current federal employees. He plans to look at all the waste, and cut line by line. “I am not a Democrat that believes we can or should defend every government program just because it’s there,” he says. That may sound scary for some, and send others running for personal loans, but bear in mind that Obama has a broad domestic agenda that could move skilled employees from threatened divisions into new programs under his policies. He also plans to encourage young public servants with his sense of idealism to get involved in restoring the American dream through service. Read more on Obama to Bring Change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

everyone should have secure possession of their primary residence and a fair share of the world's
Posted by: Suzon on Nov 27, 2008 2:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
resources.

Think of the food that gets wasted and the large tracts of empty land in the US and elsewhere and you'll understand that the biggest lie is that of scarcity.

Yes, even with 6.5 billion people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Follow Canadian 'best practice' ... I am joking
Posted by: Bobsays on Nov 27, 2008 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the 90s in Canada, as the country put the burden of getting its debt down on its poorest people, Canadians became very relaxed about homelessness and people having to resort to foodbanks. They became used to it and turned it into an industry. The result has been the now-normal sight of homeless families on the streets in winter time.

Britain in fact has a much better approach: they actually tackled the problem head on: the outlawed begging and harassing people. But they also made homelessness a national priority, creating a special unit in the Prime Minister's office to force all the charities and agencies to work together to help people. Now it is a rare sight to see that many homeless people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ethanol
Posted by: jon B on Nov 27, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article, "The largess of Congress to Wall Street bankers and investors does not extend to the growing ranks of the poor. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Emergency Food Assistance Program donated $240 million in surplus food in 2003 to food banks and other programs. Those donations fell last year to $59 million."

The decrease in the emergency food fund began BEFORE all the Wall Street giveaways. Part of it was tied to the increased land use for corn ethanol. Part is due to drought as well.

The decreasing food fund is an unintended consequence of new federal policies under Bush and Congress. Ethanol was essentially a giveaway to farm corporations, because corn based ethanol is nothing but an energy bondoogle, it uses as much energy to produce as it's suppose to save later. And meanwhile the land is wasted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for This
Posted by: Urstrly on Nov 27, 2008 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I share your concerns and hope this makes it up the news chain. Agribusiness was a disaster waiting to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

food donations
Posted by: jon B on Nov 27, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's something to think about.

Where I work (a national bakery/cafe chain) all leftover food at the end of the day is given to shelters and food banks (depending on the location of the cafe).

Well, since the economy is now hitting retail, our business is down. This means we make less food per day and also means we end up giving away less food at the end of the day.

I've wondered about this cause and effect. How the economy pushes more people into needing food assistance and at the same time the economy forces businesses to end up cutting back how much food will be donated.

Where I work it isn't something that is happening purposely, it's just the way business works. They still have to make a profit, otherwise I suppose many of the workers would soon be also looking for food assistance, as they could become unemployed.

2009 seems to be lining up to be one the worst years America has seen in decades. I don't see anything that really is going to change that. We are in a downward spiral and these things can get rolling so fast that the bottom rushes up too fast to understand even how it happened.

The real estate meltdown causes foreclosures and Wall Street to reveal its' sins, which causes credit crisis and unemployment which causes poor retail sales which brings about more layoffs, bankruptcies (both business and personal) and back to more foreclosures. A cycle that seems to be on automatic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Community Self-Reliance
Posted by: Last Chance on Nov 27, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has always been a boom-and-bust economic system. When the credit bubble swells beyond ability to repay debt it bursts.

One solution is to set up government sponsored self-reliant communities that put people to work growing their own food and other community tasks. Some people organize such villages as a permanent way of life. For example, the present economic downturn has little effect on the Amish farming communities because they refuse to go into debt in the first place. Their motto is "Don't spend more than you make and life will be good to you."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Right Posted by: Last Chance
Just a Thought.
Posted by: Nodarse on Nov 27, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it interesting that when the majority of food production in the U.S. was run by Family-owned Farms, we had huge surpluses of everything.

So much so, that we even gave away vast amounts of grain to our sworn enemy, the U.S.S.R.

Now that most farms are Corporate-owned, "oh-gee" we have food deficits.

I maybe wrong, but I have a sneaking suspicion that this "Food Crisis" is being manufactured for some nefarious purpose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's simple economics Posted by: Last Chance
» That's a delusion Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Just a Thought. Posted by: donl51
» RE: Just a Thought. Posted by: Nodarse
It doesn't make sense to you because your not a psychopath....
Posted by: Prophit on Nov 27, 2008 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... nor do you have an agenda that this works in. If you did you would be a psychopath as these people are. You and others do not understand... they see us as "the filthy masses" of ignorant and stupid cattle that need to be managed like assets.

Our labor is their property and they see it that way. That is why you work two jobs and still struggle to make ends mean.... you pay 69 DIFFERENT TAXES TO SOMEBODY, FINES AND FEES ALL THE TIME EVERYWHERE. Then you pay for NO COMPETITION AND VIOLATIONS OF THE SHERMAN ANTITRUST LAWS AS WE SAW WITH THE OIL COMPANIES WHO DID PRICE FIXING AND SUPPLY CONTROL.

Heck I even saw a letter written by one of the corp oil company execs back in 2001 that said they had to reduce supply in order to get prices up and profits up. Well they just finished reaping the highest profits of any corporation in the history of the united states and where was our congress????? BEING PAID OFF WITH CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS. NICE, HUH?

Then you wonder why people like me want a revolution. Its in our faces and its time we act on it in some way that works.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Yes, It Does! Chaney benefits from Massive No-Bid Contracts in Iaq
Posted by: joeocho88 on Nov 29, 2008 1:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not just Chaney but ALL of the elites who are getting kickbacks and bribes to let out these NO-BOD CONTRACTS.

I used to know two guys who went there to work and THEIR PAYCHECKS were skimmed and they were supposedly threatened with the Taliban if they complained to anyone. They promised them big money but ended up skimming from their checks so bad they made MUCH less.

These people want to see 80 percent of US ORDINARY WORKER BEES DEAD! Henry Kissinger himself, Nixon's COURT JESTER and a not so closeted NAZI from Germany, called us all "USELESS EATERS." SO IF WE STARVE, THEY COULD CARE LESS... I wonder if they considered who will do the work so they can tax our earnings to maintain their political jobs...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The lost millions....
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Nov 27, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All get together to give thanks for Wall Streeter's greed, AGI's failures,banks going broke,tha automakers needing money and the Government screwing everybody out of their life's savings and taxes to give to the human slime that feels they are the only people on the Planet.

The soup lines started a long time ago,after the savings and loan collapse. By 1992 there were 10 million. Things never really got any better and now their numbers are 30% higher.

Yes,they give thanks for a fresh refridgerator box,food that wasn't stolen by a rat,and a pair of disgarded shoes that happen to fit. Never mind that their votes didn't count,never mind they don't have healthcare,never mind that unchecked greed cause their plight. That's modern America.

I wonder.... Are these the folks Mr. Obama was talking about when he said 'We must bring change to Washington.'? Probably not...for if
he did his ass would be down at CCNV feeding the very people that most politicians ignore.


Barack, it's not your blackberry that will keep you in touch with Americans 'outside the beltway'. It's the folks that sleep on the streets of DC. They actually read the papers they use for blankets. Unlike those who have heat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My sentiments EXACTLY! Posted by: joeocho88
Do you want to get there attention?
Posted by: weathered on Nov 27, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vote w/your wallet!

Buy local essentials only. Its far more effective than you'd think.

Pull the plug on aLL MSM and flourish, or stay stuck in the myths, manipulations and Lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shameful beyond reckoning
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 27, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This poverty, this callous disregard for our fellow human beings in the wealthiest country in the history of Earth, is so shameful that, if it were species wide, Homo Sapiens – we – would deserve to be wiped off the face of the Earth.

But it isn't. It exists for the most part only in amoral criminals, which, by our stupidity in putting Bush in office, have been allowed to run our country –– into the ground.

If Bush's aim was to enrich his Ivy League-educated elite buddies by stealing from the american people, then boy-oh-boy, it is "mission accomplished." The subprime mortgage mess and subsequent financial meltdown is nothing less than the most massive case of corporate criminal fraud in the history of the world – and the fact that there is absolutely no talk of prosecuting anyone for it says to me that nearly everyone in Washington D.C. is either in on it or aided and abetted it.

The heinous subhumans populating Wall Street who perpetrated this theft should be thankful that they did it in a country that honors the law (even if it doesn't enforce it on the rich); in many other places in the world, these criminals would be lined up and shot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» random musings Posted by: jon B
» more musings... Posted by: jon B
Why Don't Some Rich Unemployed Former Investment Bankers Do Something Useful?
Posted by: opmoc on Nov 27, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Currently they are sat at home wondering what to do with their enormous great pile to make it even bigger before they die.

They probably are completely oblivious of the real world having spent their entire working life in a virtual casino.

Well they could start by filling out the donate form here

http://feedingamerica.org/

But that really is just scratching the surface.

Some of these guys have literally got Billions in personal wealth and they could - if they wanted to make radical positive changes to a very large number of the poorest people - by for example....

1. Purchasing large areas of unused or underutilised land suitable for growing food - preferably in a sustainable, traditional manner - using non agri-business techniques, seeds and animal stock to build up real diversity and food security.

2. Dividing that land up into parcels of appropriate sizes that would be sufficient to both provide all the food needed by the local community together with a major surplus to fund all other requirements.

3. Employ people to not only work the land - but also reward them with significant ownership via shareholding - such that if successful the workers of the land could ultimately become the owners of their own farms.

Such an enterprise could result in totally self sufficient communities who would have the potential to become "rich" in the ultimate sense of the word. Whilst they could start off trading using conventional dollars, it would be entirely feasible to gradually convert to an economic system that provided real protection from economic events outside of the community. They could for example trade in their own farm shares mirroring the traditional system of capitalism before it got corrupted by gambling and excess. Of course it would be necessary to comply with all laws, regulations and taxes - but in reality that should not be a significant issue - as there are also likely to be large numbers of unemployed accountants willing to do the bureaucracy for some wholesome food.

Such an enterprise should be seen as commercial with the potential to grow and displace industrial agriculture - whilst both empowering local communities and returning ultimate ownership to them.

Its utilising money to do something useful rather than something destructive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lecture to homeless people about vegetarianism!
Posted by: Auk on Nov 27, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That oughta do it.

By the way, isn't that chicken noodle soup in the picture?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's an arrogant thing to say! Posted by: Last Chance
global food situation will just get worse with lack of clean water and soil depletion
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Nov 27, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
global food situation will just get worse with lack of clean water and soil depletion...
small families (and some child-free) forever into the future will be best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Misogynist Propaganda. Posted by: Last Chance
Artificial Deprevation Designed to Benefit the Few
Posted by: Daer Mi on Nov 27, 2008 1:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During a depression, all the same resources - food, technology, medicine - still exist in great abundance. Scarcity occurs not from a lack of resources, but from a lack of currency to buy them. Therefore there is never true scarcity; the suffering of the people during times of deprevation is COMPLETELY ARTIFICIAL. The same is true when you look at the situation of world hunger: we have enough food to feed the planet. People starve not for a lack of food, but because they don't have the money to pay.

The next step of our evolution as a species must be to diminish or (if possible) rid ourselves entirely of these artificial systems of deprevation that allow the few to become excessively wealthy off of resources that are so abundant they have no real monetary worth, except if access to them is controlled and limited. We can do this, but only if we shed the economic paradigm and world-view that has burdened us for the last 2000+ years.

Interested? Google the video "Zeitgeist Addendum," and visit http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/ to join the discussion on this economic idea. (Ignore the flying cars - just look at the theory of an abundance-based economy.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Economic vigilanteism and local/state level elections
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 27, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this is why NOW IS THE TIME TO MAKE YOURSELF AN ECONOMIC VIGILANTE ! Interestingly, my wife and I did just that and we withstood these last 8 years of bad policies although it was painful and stressful time and again. Still, even Obama admitted that we're gonna have to do just that when he gave his victory speech.

And if you people want change, take on the pols at the local and state level elections and pay attention to those elections because higher turnout there will most likely translate into better representation which in turn and time will make it to Washington. Plus you can put the poverty perpetrators on the defensive and force them to spend on all levels if they refuse to back down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Revolution time if BUSH is not prosecuted!
Posted by: thinkverybig on Nov 27, 2008 5:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Bush gets away with all of the crimes he's committed, I would strongly encourage everyone who's able to breathe to not obey the law!

I mean this emphatically! This criminal "BUSH" should not be allowed to walk away with a pention and live out his remaining years in peace. He should be tried, convicted and sent to jail for life!

If not, then that should say to us, that we can do anything and get away with it.

It's time for a REVOLUTION if BUSH gets away, with murder, an illegal war, destroying our financial system, illegal wire tapping, torture, etc.

DO NOT OBEY THE LAW if BUSH is not PROSECUTED!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Help by signing the "Stop Wal mart throwing food out"
Posted by: Greenhouse Neutral Foundation on Nov 27, 2008 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
see the URL
"Stop Wal-Mart From Wasting Huge Amounts of Food That Could Help the Needy!!" petition at http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/stop-walmart-waste.
I signed it today - they need another 34,000+ signatures
Bob Williamson
Founder & Chair Greenhouse Neutral Foundation
www.strategicbookpublishing.com/ZEROGreenhouseEmissions.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why just WalMart? Posted by: gar1948
change your thinking and politics
Posted by: richholland on Nov 27, 2008 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in 1850 Mr.Proudhon in France wrote re the Rich;
Propriety is the result of theft.

Since a thief is no legal owner of the goods you can take back what is yours.
But why complain ?here in Cambodia the people are real poor, schoolchildren often no eat a day. And by selling his daughter what is the father buying a mobile phone and a motorcycle.
thanks to the american way of life. And the advertising on TV
Hundreds of NGO with nice cars are spending american tax money, most is going to the Rich, corrupt cambodians....only to promote the AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE.
By admiring i.e. MADONNA because she has billions, admiring Hillary and Billy because they have millions you support your own slavery.
The first steps; health care for everyone.
No more WAR.
And then living together instead of stealing from the workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Notice anything, Chris?
Posted by: kenhymes on Nov 28, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“We collected 170 bags of groceries from a church in Princeton and it was gone in two days,” Kerbel said. “We collected 288 bags from a Jewish center in Princeton and it was gone in three days. What you see on the shelves is pretty much what we have.”

Is Chris Hedges finally noticing that there is another side to religion in America? Following piece after piece on Truthdig about how churches are the cause of everything bad, I can't let this just slip on by without comment. When the shit hits the fan locally, I can tell you from direct personal experience that people look to churches and synagogues and mosques for help, and a lot of the time they get it. It's nowhere near enough, from two points of view.
1. Churches aren't being sacrificial enough to live up to our professed belief in Jesus' teachings. (I won't critique the response of believers of other faiths) 2. The rest of the community, at least where I am, is not stepping up enough either.

But please remember the above quote the next time someone here on Alternet bloviates about how churches are nothing but thieves and empire builders. It just ain't so, any more than all scientists are creators of toxic crap, or all politicians are lying power mad schemers, or all leftists are humorless hypocrites. You can find many examples of each of the above, but it helps no one to concentrate on the negative instead of seeking allies and opportunities for positive change in each other.

Peace
Ken Hymes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Notice anything, Chris? Posted by: gar1948
» RE: Notice anything, Chris? Posted by: kenhymes
Who pays for bailouts of the rich
Posted by: littlepitcher on Nov 28, 2008 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The unemployment lines are actually the first bailout of the wealthy at the expense of working Americans. The rich corporations subsidized their stock increases, multi-million dollar wages, and golden parachutes by "downsizing"--cutting employment and creating foreclosure problems. Now the same Americans, working marginally or not working at all, will be taxed to bail out the same corporate greed-heads when the middle and lower classes are hard-pressed to pay for basic needs or commuting.

These bozos don't need a bailout--they need to be tried and convicted of treason, and executed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHILE THE RICH INSIDERS GET BAILOUTS, THESE POOR PEOPLE STARVE AND NOBODY CARES
Posted by: joeocho88 on Nov 28, 2008 11:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The elitists in Washington DC are so busy bailing out their fraternity buddies and Good Old Boys that they HAVE TOTALLY FORGOTTEN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE --ESPECIALLY THE ELDERLY AND WOMEN AND G*D HELP YOU IF YOU ARE ELDERLY, FEMALE AND ARE POOR TOO!

WHERE IS THE HELP FOR THOSE WHO NEED IT???

THOSE WITHOUT FAMILIES TO HELP THEM OUT?

THE EMPLOYERS WHO COULD HIRE SOME OF THESE FOLKS EVEN IF JUST PART TIME AND LET THEM EARN THEIR WAY BACK INTO SOCIETY INSTEAD OF JUST STICKING THE HAND OUT!

LET THESE PEOPLE WORK FOR A LIVING!

IT IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE FOR AN OLDER PERSON IN AUSTIN TEXAS TO GET A JOB! NOBODY WANTS TO HIRE THEM WHICH LETS YOU KNOW WHERE THEIR PRIORITIES REALLY ARE! OLDER WORKERS CARE, ARE NOT ABSENT AND THEY PUT IN A FULL DAY'S WORK FOR THEIR PAY. THEY OFTEN PUT IN EXTRA HOURS WITHOUT COMPLAINT!

AND NOW THIS OBAMA ADVISER IS TALKING ABOUT CUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY THE ONLY RETIREMENT MANY PEOPLE HAVE TO LIVE ON BECAUSE THERE WERE NEVER ENOUGH JOBS THAT OFFERED PENSION PLANS AND ALL OF THESE "PERKS"!

I AM GETTING SICK AND TIRED OF THIS CROOKED GOVERNMENT RUN BY THE ELITES FOR THE ELITES AND THE HELL WITH THE REST OF US!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement