Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Don't Worry, the Ultra-Rich Are Doing All Right

By Rob Larson, AlterNet. Posted November 26, 2008.


The obscenely wealthy still have enough money to buy massive super-yachts and overpriced art.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Rob Larson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

While America holds its breath wondering if the new president will fix the economic crisis, we citizens have to keep the root causes in mind, like our raging wealth and income inequalities. As busy as the population is investing in canned goods and small arms ammunition, there is at least some awareness of the growing gap between the rich and everyone else. Without a better social awareness of this great divide, fighting to change it is impossible. The divide itself has been widening for 30 years, and so have the rich.

A very revealing report on this development was recently produced by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the group of developed nations that includes the United States, Canada, Western Europe and Japan. The report said, "Rich households in America have been leaving both middle and poorer income groups behind. This has happened in many countries, but nowhere has this trend been so stark as in the United States." In these parts, the wealthiest 10 percent was the richest in the entire OECD; and our poorest 10 percent was the poorest.

In another embarrassing American landmark, several U.S. cities have reached levels of inequality comparable to the massive slum-cities of the Third World. Cities of great wealth, like New York and Washington, approach Buenos Aires and Nairobi in their lopsided income distributions. In particular, New York City cracked the top 10 list of the world’s most unequal cities, unheard of for the developed world.

A recent study of American tax data over the 20th century concludes that the share of total U.S. income going to the top 10 percent of American households has gone from about a third in the 1970s, to half of pre-tax income today. And over the period 1993 to 2006, the income of the top 1 percent of households increased by an annual rate of 5.7 percent, while the income of the lower 99 percent grew by only 1.1 percent over the same period.

It’s not just numbers on paper -- the well-heeled are going to town, from $700 cigars to $15,000 face-lifts to $10 million personal helicopters. What an average American would make in a hundred years, the rich drop on a chopper to take from Long Island into Manhattan, so as to shop without sitting in New York traffic. And even as the retail chains for the working and middle classes decline (except for Wal-Mart), stores with upper-class clientele are another story. With the equity markets crashing, spending by individual wealthy families is somewhat down, and analysts have found "the idea that the high-end luxury market is immune to the economic cycle is a myth." But there is a silver lining: "luxury brands continue to benefit from a sustained increase in the number of wealthy consumers, particularly in countries like Brazil, Russia, India and China."

Indeed, the world now supports more wealthy families than ever before. According to a report compiled by financial analysts and described by the Financial Times, "The ranks of the world’s rich swelled to 8 million during 2007 as the wealthy proved immune to the strains across global economies in the latter half of the year." The report suggests that wealth concentration at the top "retained its strength through 2007 and is in rude health." The report concludes that 2007 saw a 4.5 percent increase in the number of the "truly rich," even as they "shrug off the credit crunch."

The rich have been affected by the credit crisis, of course, since their ownership of financial assets it so disproportionate. But the "smart money" avoided the worst of the crisis; back in June, well before the implosion of banks invested in property-backed instruments this fall, "the wealthy have responded to the turmoil in the markets by scaling back their exposure to property and hedge funds in favor of safer investments," according to a report prepared by Merrill Lynch. The wealthy cut back on property trusts and hedge funds and committed more to cash and other liquid deposits, big moves from the "more than 10 million people on the planet with financial assets worth more than $1 million." This is not to speak of the "ultra-rich -- those with $30 million or more to invest," who grew even more rapidly than the mere millionaires.

It is these ultra-rich, the multimillionaires and billionaires, who have redefined affluence and conspicuous consumption. One notorious preserve for upper-class consumption is contemporary art, where recently the consensus among the prestigious art dealers is that "while there is some uncertainty in the middle of the contemporary art market, the top end is holding strong."  A recent high-profile art auction included "a stainless-steel cabinet of industrial diamonds," which went for £5.2 million to a Russian bidder.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, wealth, financial crisis, wealth gap

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
...and they will CONTINUE doing just fine under Obama
Posted by: Farasien on Nov 26, 2008 9:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's tax plan, what (very) little of it us slimy Little People have been made aware of, while moving in the right direction will not reverse this trend. It won't fix the problem, either. Obama might be a democrat, but he's no progressive, despite the claims of his election team. He was put into office the same way every other president since Reagan- by the banking cartels and mega-corporations. If you think he'll bite the hand that fed (and still feeds) him, you need to take another look at history.

Nothing is going to change under Obama, really. If he's much like other so-called progressive politicians, and its looking like he will be based on his cabinet picks, we'll be seeing another 4 years of empty promises, nebulous plans that won't really affect Joe and Jane Q Public in any significant way and petty scandals as the 'two' parties snipe at each other over who they want to divert tax revenues to more- the banks or typical pork.

Welcome to the new america, same as the old america...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's tax hike for the rich may be delayed
Posted by: fanny666 on Nov 26, 2008 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I find supremely sad...
Posted by: Sushi on Nov 26, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is how many working class defenders buy into the idea that "if they work hard enough, they too will join the ranks of the uber-wealthy" as they grind through each day.

I also hear the phrase, "being blessed" with fortune, as if God rewards the worthy with riches, thus, if you are poor, you are not pious enough (or praying to the "right" god.) Basically, this myth is perpetuated so that the poor do not kill the rich.

If you swing a hammer on a hot roof in the summer, you are working hard. If you wait by the pool for your dividend check to arrive, you are not working hard. Yes, some folks start from scratch, have a good idea or good product, take risks and manage to earn a comfortable living after years of struggle and some good luck. These are not the uber-wealthy. Those are dynastically wealthy, inheriting their money by having the good luck of flopping out of the right womb, having done nothing to earn their status. Their money comes typically from exploitation, plain and simple. Making money off the labor of others, exploiting natural resources or outright stealing.

Just like the beaten wife who defends her abusive husband, there will be defenders who think this inequity is normal, even while their own children are going hungry. (If only I just work harder, take that second job, work till I drop dead at age 92).

Sushi
"I need just enough money to tide me over until I need more."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Behind every great fortune
Posted by: Levon on Nov 26, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is a crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Behind every great fortune Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
If you really want to change this scenario...
Posted by: lightwing1 on Nov 26, 2008 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberals should read "The Revolution - a Manifesto" by Ron Paul. This is not a snarky attack on Liberals, btw, with whom I agree on many things including civil rights. You will understand where the real inequity in our money system lies. Tax reform isn't going to change anything except to widen the gap between liberals and conservatives - which is convenient for the true elites who run things. There is a common ground that both sides can agree upon and would be truly good for this country.

Ron Paul is a humble man who truly cares about the future of this country and the working classes. Put aside your ideological differences for a moment and if nothing else, read his conclusions about money policy in Chapter 6.

You'll have to copy/paste the link below in 2 parts:

http://www.amazon.com/Revolution-Manifesto-Ron-Paul

/dp/0446537519

An excerpt from the J. D. Seagraves review of the book:

"What's more, Dr. Paul doesn't spread the myth that the Fed somehow profits as an entity when it creates money (its profits go to the Treasury), but instead, politically connected individuals and businesses profit at the expense of working-class and poor families."

I myself don't agree with Dr. Paul on every issue. But when it comes to the money system, he's got it nailed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As to the huge gulf in the USA between rich and poor
Posted by: nikolai on Nov 28, 2008 3:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the USA needed the most help after 9/11/2001 it got it the least, and kept getting the least for 7 additional years. However, IRAQ in the meantime was blown up then rebuilt! Gee, I wonder why the economy's tanking? Sure there's the sub-prime mortgage "crisis" but that's only the tip of the iceberg, a mere symptom. If all the damn money that was spent in Iraq was spent in the USA on infrastructure, schools/education, the homeless/housing, health insurance, etc, etc, the economy would be that much stronger and we would be in MUCH better shape even with the "sub-prime mortgage crisis." I put the blame squarely on bush and his cronies shoulders; bush for Iraq (and everything else he did completely wrong) and his buddies in the banking industy for lending money via ARMs to folks who couldn't afford the loans once they went up. BANKERS ARE TO BLAME FOR THIS; the poor schmucks are OF COURSE going to snap up interest-only ARMs, ESPECIALLY with a loan officer sitting in front of them egging them on! The bankers are SUPPOSED to be educated, intelligent, and FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE people who CONTROL these types of (bad) loans, NOT HAND THEM OUT. I rest my case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]