Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

America in Free Fall

By Robert L. Borosage, Campaign for America's Future. Posted November 21, 2008.


Congress might adjourn without acting on the deepening economic crisis, leaving Obama to inherit the catastrophe.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Robert L. Borosage

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Free fall. The U.S. has lost private sector jobs for 10 straight months. One quarter of all businesses in the U.S. plan to cut payroll over the next year. Retail sales fell in October by the largest monthly drop on record. Auto sales have collapsed, driving the auto companies towards the precipice. Unemployment is up to 6.1 percent, with most analysts predicting it will soar past 8 percent over the next year. (That translates into unemployment among young minority men at rates of 50 percent or more). States are now facing $100 billion in deficits in operating budgets for the next fiscal year. Twelve million homes are "under water," worth less than their mortgages. The U.S. has joined Germany and Japan in what is becoming a global recession.

"The era of big government is over" is over. In the crisis, we are, as Richard Nixon once said, "all Keynesians now." Former Clinton Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers, until recently notable deficit hawks, now call for substantial fiscal stimulus -- deficit-funded federal spending -- to get the economy going.

Summers whose alliterative guidelines for this year's earlier $150 billion stimulus -- "timely, temporary and targeted" -- helped to fix its mistaken focus on tax rebates, has changed his consonants. Now he says the stimulus should be "speedy, substantial and sustained," noting that some estimates on Wall Street have gone as high as "$500 to $700 billion." Rubin agreed, saying "we need a very substantial stimulus," while mumbling about needing to reduce the budget deficit over the longer run.

A major recovery program -- featuring substantial public investment -- will be inevitably the first initiative of the Obama administration. It should feature more spending than tax cuts -- investing in renewable energy and conservation, in rebuilding everything from schools to bridges to a smart electric gird, in helping cities and states avoid crippling cuts of services, in keeping college affordable, providing health care to children, and aiding those most in need.

Our public investment needs can easily use the money. A stunning report by Eric Lotke at the Campaign for America's Future details the staggering investment deficits that have accumulated over the last 30 years. For decades, we've chosen to cut taxes on the wealthy while starving vital public investments. The result is an America that is literally falling apart, while much of the private wealth was squandered in the speculative frenzy that now has leveled our economy. Rather than adding to that folly, we should be focusing on strategic public investments that will put people to work in the short term while contributing to a more competitive economy, a better-educated citizenry and a cleaner environment.

The Last Obstruction

The time to get started has already passed, as the downturn is accelerating. Right now, as Senate Majority leader Harry Reid suggests, Congress should pass a $100 billion down payment on recovery, while instructing the Treasury Secretary to use some of the $700 billion rescue fund to help keep the auto industry from going belly up, with devastating effects throughout the Midwest.

But, as this is written, it looks like that won't happen. Republicans didn't get the message from the election, and apparently don't read the financial section of the papers. The Republican minority in the Senate seems intent on adding one last obstruction to its ignominious record. Secretary Paulson has indicated that while he's happy to throw $250 billion at Wall Street banks with no conditions, he isn't ready to save the Midwest with a $25 billion bridge loan for the automakers under strict conditions.

In the face of the threatened Republican filibuster, this Congress is likely to adjourn for the final time without acting on the deepening economic downturn. When the new administration and the new Congress convene next January, the crisis here -- and across the globe -- will surely be far worse. Make no small plans, President Obama; you are about to inherit the full catastrophe.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, depression, recession, economic crisis, financial crisis

Robert Borosage is co-director of the Campaign For America's Future, and he has written on political, economic, and national security issues for publications including The New York Times and The Nation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
By Far The Best Stimulus There Is : "Medicare for All"
Posted by: mmckinl on Nov 21, 2008 12:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sales tax receipts, property tax receipts, state income tax receipts and pension funds are falling precipitously creating a fiscal nightmare for school districts, cities, counties, states and business. How do we inject money as efficiently and fairly as possible into the economy saving jobs, government programs and pension funds ?

Medicare for All ...

Medicare for All would help re-capitalize business (especially manufacturing), school districts, state and local government, individual payers and the under and uninsured. The states and business would be required to use any excess of savings for unemployment and pension funds. Overall this could save hundreds of thousands if not millions of jobs while putting money quickly and directly into the system in the most efficient, fairest way possible ... taking care of people's medical bills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:That and Posted by: solrev
Hopeless?
Posted by: writerman on Nov 21, 2008 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One can't feel almost sorry for Barack Obama, as he risks being hammered by the same, dire economic situation that so weakened John McCain. Only it's actually worse for Obama. John McCain lost and is away, free and clear, poor Obama won and he's now responsible for trying to solve the gigantic mess the coutry is mired in. Iraq and Afghanistan, Iran and relations with Russia, are nothing comapared to the challenge of puttin the US economy back on keel!

No president in living memory has faced such a daunting task. The distinct possiblilty that the United States is sliding into a truly horrendous economic downturn rivalling the Great Depression, and at the same time public expectations about Obama's power to solve all our ills are totally out of all proportion with harsh reality. Obama is not the long awaited Messiah, he's just a man, with ordinary mortal abilities, facing extraordinary problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hopeless? Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Hopeless? Posted by: anneliese-nyc
The Sad Reality...
Posted by: gazooks on Nov 21, 2008 1:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is that there is no "fix". It's the BASIS of our system that's untenable and unsustainable.

Collapse means just that. Think WTC and the pain, hard work and duration of the clean up. It ain't easy, it ain't quick and what you begin with ain't pretty.

But the serious restructuring can't begin until AFTER this complete systemic failure runs it's course and the rubble cleared. But NONE of that can be done until the truth of the underlying, foundational rot is understood.

In this collapse, as the last, LEVERAGE is the tool of destruction. It breeds the excess that the Wharton and Harvard grads have callously dismissed, rationalized and thrown esoteric bullshit formulae at for decades. They have made the rules, we will suffer the result of the broken game.

Spew whatever opinion about which school of economics "rules", but get this. Without a BASIS of S O U N D M O N E Y , we're simply pissin' in the wind and setting the stage for the next collapse.

Confidence IS destroyed. Reestablishing it is the first priority for Obama. His great oratorical gift along with CREDIBILITY will only be of use if he has the political stones to do the hard thing, the politically impossible thing.

The longer he defers, the worse it becomes. What history will say about us depends on how much attention we've paid to history.

Read up. Quick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Sad Reality... Posted by: foius
U.S.A in freefall? Obama inherits a catastrophe?
Posted by: villager1 on Nov 21, 2008 2:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems that the folks have gotten what they wanted - to get rid of President Bush. It also seems that there is little or no agreement amongst the decision makers in the U.S.A., be they Democrats or Republicans!

That is disturbing in that it would appear that the ideology which Mr.Obama has in mind is going to be severely obstructed by many in Congress who actually do not wish to see him succeed and do not have the well being of the people in the U.S.A at heart in the least, but are serving their own ego's and self interest.

I think that he should be very circumspect in his choices of appointee's and not end up as Caesar did by exclaiming " et tu Brute'!"

I seriously believe that he needs to be bold and brave in the choices that he makes and not rely on the advice of those so-called experts who were to a large degree responsible for this mess!

I doubt that he will have the support necessary in Congress to actually put into practice even half of the idea's that he wishes to implement.

Where is he going to find those people who are totally honest and dedicated? Worse still - the $$$$$$$?

God only knows!

When the folks who are running the affairs of the U.S.A are so misguided, arrogant and so very much divided, how is it possible for them to make the right decisions?

Do not give them a mandate " to mess up again" - get rid of them! or join the club of those who " Got what they wanted, but never wanted what they got!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry.... Posted by: photon's feather
» Such a gentleman... Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Yeah, it's fun to be obnoxious ! Posted by: photon's feather
» I'm neither northeastern nor coastal! Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Yeah, it's fun to be obnoxious ! Posted by: photon's feather
» Gotten what we wanted Posted by: SteveO
Switching paradigms
Posted by: Perry Logan on Nov 21, 2008 3:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, no one ever said switching paradigms is easy.

After telling ourselves over and over again for the last twenty years that government can't do it, we now find that only government can do it. Some chaos is to be expected under these circumstances.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Switching paradigms Posted by: Beck
» RE: Switching paradigms Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Switching paradigms Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Switching paradigms Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Switching paradigms Posted by: Quannah
No bailout for the auto industry
Posted by: Harris20 on Nov 21, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Secretary Paulson has indicated that while he's happy to throw $250 billion at Wall Street banks with no conditions, he isn't ready to save the Midwest with a $25 billion bridge loan for the automakers under strict conditions.”

Paulson will most likely go back to his old job on Wall Street in January – that’s why “he's happy to throw $250 billion at Wall Street banks with no conditions”. As for the auto industry, a company like GM doesn’t deserve a bailout, its CEO and other big suits have been living high and flying their expensive jets around for decades while the company has been losing global market share because they no longer understand how to innovate and make cars that are useful. They have lost their value and they have no business plan that will show what they plan to do with the welfare check they hope to get from the government, which comes out of our pockets. Companies like this show no remorse when they lay off workers every time their bottom line earnings will not buy the big suits another yacht or villa in Europe. So get rid of these parasites. Make them an example and maybe what’s left of the auto industry will get their heads out of their asses. Putting money into the country’s infrastructure is an investment, not bailing out a mismanaged company with arrogant, overpaid CEO’s like GM. No matter what happens these guys are going to retire with golden parachutes anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Look back to the 70's Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: No bailout for the auto industry Posted by: indirect quotes
» Bailout with conditions Posted by: SteveO
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: indirect quotes
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Bailout with conditions Posted by: Quannah
» RE: No bailout for the auto industry Posted by: MausMasher54
how about this...
Posted by: ellie on Nov 21, 2008 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just read the article on the g20 class picture and wombat refused to shake hands with anyone in true passive aggressive behavior, a temper tantrum... on other sites this morning, read that the world economy is starting to rally together and leave the US out of the picture...

isolation (yup, no matter how you slice it, we are the world's wrecking ball)+ deflation + unemployment rates that are looking like they could choke a horse = we probably ARE in free-fall till 1/20, 12 noon... hang on kids!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: how about this... Posted by: Von
Twisted Plans
Posted by: US Citizen on Nov 21, 2008 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think George W. Bush and the Republicans are still practicing the Shock Doctrine on all of us. Destroy the unions by letting the US auto industry fall. It would not be surprising if the entire economic collapse is just part of Bush and Cheney's twisted plans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Twisted Plans Posted by: Quannah
We need to boot the acolytes of our blessed St. Ronnie
Posted by: popeurbanxxiii on Nov 21, 2008 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bear in mind, sooooo many of these Congress-critters who are now tasked with fixing the problems they helped create cannot see beyond their "government-is-the-problem" ideology. Some of these old coots -- like Ted Stevens (Will I miss him? NO!!) -- have been in office for decades!

And like the child who broke the fine china, when caught, these misanthropes are not likely to 'fess up and accept responsibility. Just ask Phil Gramm if he thinks he was wrong about pushing deregulation! They will hem and haw and make excuses for themselves --since they dont really understand the consequences of what they have unleashed-- while trying to hang on to their ticket to the gravy train.

So, until we get an even larger turnover in the House and Senate we will get more obstruction and foot-dragging. The children of the great St. Ronnie cannot see beyond the Reaganomics "supply-side" paradigm. We now have the blind leading the blind, and the markets know it! Seen the Dow lately?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Medicare Works
Posted by: limburger on Nov 21, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right on, Medicare for all! As a satisfied recipient of Medicare, I can tell you that it works, and with no beaurocratic hassles and delays. Implementing socalled 'socialized' medicine would be a bold step for the US. But guaranteed public health insurance has been proven cost-effective and fair in all other industrialized nations. So let's just call it 'democratized healthcare. and get on with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IMPEACH BUSH & CHENEY
Posted by: Carol Burns on Nov 21, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This, more than anything else, would give hope to the people, who are so distrustful of government that they are already doubting Obama's decisions before he even takes office. We must mount a new campaign to impeach. Kuchinich and Wexler have paved the way, but we the people need to put the pressure on NOW. Paulson and Bernanke need to be indicted as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IMPEACH BUSH & CHENEY Posted by: Bliss Doubt
You bet your ass they will.......
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Nov 21, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans tried to rig the vote with the early ballots and still lost...by a shitload! Licking their wounds ain't their style but leaveing a shitbag for the new guy is. Bush1 did it to Clinton,what makes anyone think 'junior' won't do the same?

We must be on top of our game because there's a great possibility that that ol' junior will rachet things up in Pakistan,a country we don't have a treaty to chase enemies
in. Add to that the fact that they have a nuke
and there's real concern here.

Trouble is there's an easy fix to the whole shabang,but we won't do it. Why? Because we'd have to admit that historically we've been at the forefront of the power struggles in this region since the end of WW2 up to the modern times.

Now we as a people could have stayed ahead of the curve but there's a stumbling block we can't seem to get past in our modern selves. We tend to stop listening to our Elders about living 'in the day'. There's not many of us left that remember the 91% tax bracket for the rich,but we had it. They didn't even try to call it 'socialism' back or Joe McCarthy would have had your ass. We called it 'paying your fair share.'. They still had lots of loopholes but they still had to pay tax. Now a 3% increase on the rich is called 'socialism'...BULLSHIT!! That's just the whinning of the greedy assholes that got us in the mess we're in financially now. SHUT UP YOU CRYBABIES AND PAY UP!!!!!!

Big O can end their bullshit real quick,five minutes after he takes the oath. All he needs to do is declare an 'Economic State of Emergency' and declare ALL DEBTS personal,National and International zero'd out.
Your debt is now your asset. With a flick of the switch we're back to an up tick in spending like never before and he didn't have to print one extra dollar.

But that too simple and logical for these guys. Or is it????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Feds are hiring like crazy!
Posted by: eeezzz on Nov 21, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really well-paying, do nothing really, jobs with gold-plated benefits that taxpayers cover. The private sector is over! You want job security and guaranteed paycheck - make friends with a Fed who can slide you in NOW. Look for one of those cushy GAO (or the DOE's),gigs where you get to sit around pontificating and writing "important" BS reports on BS statistics.(I mean, if they really had a clue, would the economy be in this kind of dumbster- would our children be so "left behind?") But who cares,right? Get Uncle Sam to take care of you in style - Fantastic taxpayer funded retirement program in only 20 years! Don't end up being one of the chumps collecting some pittance check from Obama. Get in now on the real wave of the future! I'm serious! Nothing else is as safe!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unemployment at 6.1% my a**!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 21, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we please, please, end this fiction that the unemployment rate is 6.1%? It is more like 10%, at least. The Bush administration has been "cooking the books" for years on unemployment figures. For instance: those who have given up looking are not counted; those who are employed part time or in (very) temporary positions are scored as if they are fully employed; people who work as volunteers or unpaid interns for companies that have paid employees are also counted as fully employed (betcha ya' didn't know about THAT one ...); and, unlike a decade or so ago, the 2.5 million members of the military are included in the total employed, which by itself makes the unemployment figure look one percentage point better. Add it all up, and the actual unemployment rate is far higher than what is fed to us over what we laughingly call the "news" media.

You cannot solve a problem until you honestly confront it; and the way our economic problems are being addressed is anything BUT honest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unemployment at 6.1% my a**! Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Put Your Hatreds Aside and Get on with It
Posted by: jbpaz on Nov 21, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Civil Rights advances of the 1960's have seriously upset white folks for the past 40 years. So angered, they elected hard-hearted leaders who lacked any feeling for the ordinary citizen. Theft was the major motivator to be a public official.
There were no ethics among those who could rig elections, demolish tall buildings or murder 1.4 millions human beings whose only sin was sitting on oilfields. This did not discourage the 55% of whites who voted for McCain.
They continue to deride the 12 millions of Americans who will lose their homes and the 20 millions destined for the unemployment lines.
Lacking moral fiber, the present government employees won't be able to save us even if they wanted to. Their only answer is to allow more fraud to take place.
We elected Barack Obama because we know he cares deeply about our survival with our democratic values and institutions intact.
One man can not undo the sins of forty years. Electing one black man will not cleanse our hearts of hatred.
However, he can inspire others with the talent, wisdom and humanity to figure out ways to get us out of this morass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» get a life Posted by: sheople
» grow up Posted by: DrZero
The Ultimate Result of Globalisation Is That We Are All Brought Up To The Same Level As The Poorest
Posted by: opmoc on Nov 21, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which actually could be rather a good thing for the human race

Cos in my perception of travelling round the world

The Poorest People I Meet Are The Nicest

They will Share Everything They Have with You

The Poorest will take you into their homes and will feed you and look after you.

The Richest Will Kill You Before You Even Get Near

So lets all Rise to a state of Poverty

When You Are Completely Fucking Wasted With NOTHING except a bed to sleep in with someone you REALLY Love

Then you are in Heaven

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Midnight measures
Posted by: Elmowilcox on Nov 21, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Off topic, just wanted to throw it out there. Just read on cnn that Bush is making a quick final push to get a repeal of the endangered species act pushed through. Apparently if done in time it can still be corrected by Obama, assuming he even has time for it, but it will be a giant pain in the ass to reverse once Bush has done it.
By passing this the last protection that near extinct species have will be lost. Future projects that were formerly required to do thorough impact studies performed by actual scientists will be done now by the companies interested only in getting the project done in a timely and cost-saving fashion, much to the despair of already devastated species everywhere.
This is the same legislation that managed to partially save our national bird, moving it from "endangered" to merely "threatened". How very very American of this fuck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Midnight measures Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Midnight measures Posted by: Dboy
» dboy Posted by: Elmowilcox
I See No Evidence of Large Scale Assassinations By The Neocon Death Squads
Posted by: opmoc on Nov 21, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Resistance Is Far Too Big and Far Too Widespread

And The Jackals are getting bored with shooting fish - and are starting to wonder about the people who hired them

They will quite happily work for anyone - but would rather work for humans preferably of their local tribe - but they aren't that bothered

Human Life is cheap

If you want someone dead

But killing Millions isn't so easy

Cos people stop being glued to their TV Reality show when they ralised one of their friends has been taken out by the CIA and Mossad at 9/11 for instance - or David Kelly'ed

You see we ain't THAT Fucking Stupid

The Resistance is Moving Up from below the Underground

You see - lots of people were underground on 7/7 and above and people saw what happenned - and were actually there

And then they read the official report

And can tell the difference - between the official story for general public consumption and what actually happenned

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Will Leave You With Iggy Pop
Posted by: opmoc on Nov 21, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cos We Are About To Go Out and See a Live Band We Have Never Seen Before

Singing

If You Want BLOOD Then You Have Got It

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iggy_Pop

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let America FALL. It needs to be rebuilt from SCRATCH anyway.
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 21, 2008 12:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jareilly
Posted by: jareilly on Nov 21, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just heard on the Diane Reems show that GM's credit division (GMAC) is still highly profitable. But they still want a massive loan so they can walk away from their union and pension commitments, their car division debts and get low-interest money from you and me to re-tool for energy-efficiency (which the Toyota and Honda did without a bailout from the Japanese government). Why can't they take a "bailout" from their credit division? And nobody has mentioned the extent to which health care employee and pensioner health care costs have driven this industry into the ground (single payer, anyone?)

Not good enough! Let the majors collapse, "rescue" the workforce and plow the money into alternative transportation in the form of long term, low interest loans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jareilly Posted by: DrZero
stop the crazy wars
Posted by: richholland on Nov 22, 2008 10:29 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
USA has 750 bases all over the world,
has a war in 2 countries.
so stop the madness...use the money for medicare...

finance environmental jobs..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sheople
Posted by: sheople on Nov 23, 2008 4:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I the only one that heard that giant sucking sound that Perot predicted? I'm gussing we can all see the results.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inept Democrats, Criminal Republicans & Rich Guys for Obama!
Posted by: DrZero on Nov 23, 2008 10:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ha ha ha! The Republicans? You've got to be kidding!! The Dems run both the House and the Senate. If they and/or the author want to stick the blame on the minority party and lame duck president they need to DO SOMETHING. Make Bush veto it. Make the Reps fillibuster it. Neither has the guts to do it, but they still have twice the guts of Pelosi and Reid, the idiots.

Bailout the people who voted for you? You know those previously Red states that went Blue and helped deliver the Presidency to Obama? NOOO. Instead, they go on vacation. Maybe GM will declare bankruptcy while Nancy is in Marin eating tofu turkey.

Meanwhile Citi get $330 billion, 12 times more than ALL THREE car companies need. Robert Rubin got over $100 million from them in 2007 for sitting on the board. He's one of Obama's top economic advisers. What a joke.

Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.

Speaking of bosses, is this article from a Soros front?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]