Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Activists Confront the Military Industrial Complex

By Benjamin Dangl, AlterNet. Posted November 25, 2008.


The diverse group of activists rallied in support of building a peace economy and movement beyond election day.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

 

On November 1st, in Montpelier, the capital of Vermont, one hundred activists gathered to protest against General Dynamics, a weapons manufacturer operating in the state. The diverse group of activists rallied in support of building a peace economy and movement beyond election day. Speaking to the crowd in front of the statehouse, VT-based filmmaker and writer Eugene Jarecki talked about the presidential election and activism. "There's a moment of real crossroads here," he said. "But it's a crossroad for all of us not to be happy and go to bed but for all of us to be absolutely unrelenting and dissatisfied until real change happens."

General Dynamics has profited more than any other defense contractor from the Iraq War; its revenues have tripled since 9/11 and in 2007 it earned $27 billion. In spite of this wealth, the company received $3.6 million in Vermont tax breaks in 2007. It's not as though the state doesn't need this money -- bridges and roads are in disrepair, 2/3 of Vermonters can't afford the median price of VT home, and 60,000 residents in the small state lack health insurance.

 

These realities underscored the November 1st rally. While the VT Food Not Bombs group spooned out lunch, and seasoned anti-GD activists mingled with children and college-aged activists, Jarecki and others spoke of the billions of dollars spent on US defense while unemployment soars and the funding for schools and healthcare is slashed.

I asked Jarecki, the producer of "Why We Fight" -- a film which explores the roots and results of America's military industrial complex -- to comment on the irony of GD operating in VT, a state known for its liberal politics and green businesses. "It's a stain on Vermont's record," he said. "Vermont is at its best when it strays from the widespread corruption that is a national affliction."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war, iraq, general dynamics, weapons manufacturing

Benjamin Dangl is the editor of TowardFreedom.com, a VT-based progressive publication.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
General Dynamics - IS A GREAT CORPORATION
Posted by: ds1st on Nov 25, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am surprised that Eugene Jarecki has spoken out against General Dynamics, but not that surprised.

The products that General Dynamics produces protect us from the expansion of the anti-homosexual and anti-feminism fascist Al-Quada regimes. These regimes want to be-head HOMOSEXUALS and make WOMEN subservient to man. We need to protect our GAYs and WOMEN from this type of Al-Quada imposed treatment.

We all need to thank General Dynamics for protecting our citizens. We should also question Eugene Jarecki ANTI-HOMOSEXUAL activities. Either he wants to disregard the threat or is uninformed, either way … SHAME ON THE ANTI-GAY and ANTI-WOMEN-RIGHTs protesters in Vermont.

I am a VT Gay black man and am appalled at Eugene Jarecki and friends activities, he wants to stop me from my god given birth rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement