Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

$2 Trillion Handed out by Paulson and Bernanke, But Who Got It, Nobody Knows

By Nicholas von Hoffman, The Nation. Posted November 17, 2008.


We have no idea who got this money or the conditions or collateral put up in return for the loans.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


With his latest policy switch to buying stock in banks and other companies, Henry Paulson has more zigs and zags to his credit than a fox trying to escape a pack of hounds.

The fox and the hounds, of course, have a clear idea of what they want to do and how they want to do it, which is more than you can say of Paulson. Sums of incalculable size are being spent or pledged by Paulson and his playmate, Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, and nobody outside their organizations, or maybe inside them either, knows who got what, how much they got, and under what conditions they got it.

In the past couple of months Bernanke has loaned out $2 trillion to unnamed companies under eleven different programs and all but three of them were slapped together in the past fifteen months of financial crisis.

To repeat, we do not know who got this money or what collateral was put up in return for the loans or what conditions were attached to them.

The sums involved are almost three times as large as Paulson's $700 billion muddled bailout efforts that Congress voted for last month. Bernanke does have the legal authority to pass out these trillions without Congressional authorization and without explanation, but secrecy breeds suspicion and loss of confidence.

These officials preface every speech by talking about "transparency," their favorite word, at the same time they are handing off $2 trillion and they won't say to whom, and leading Bloomberg News to file suit under the Freedom of Information Act.

Paulson has made off with $50 billion to give to AIG for the purpose of setting up a special entity by which the company's lousiest loans are to be kept off the books and the unknown debtors protected. When asked about this by the <i>New York Times<i>, Lynn E. Turner, who sits on the Treasury Department's Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession, complained that "We've had way too many things here that nobody knows anything about…. That's why no one has faith in the capital markets."

Paulson appears to have given away, invested, loaned or lost about $300 billion of the first $700 billion Congress gave him. But he has lost more than money: Nobody believes him or Bernanke anymore.

Every day another company steps forward with its hand out -- American Express, Chrysler, GE Financial -- and every day it appears Paulson and Bernanke are prepared to accommodate these corporate mendicants.

Paulson left his job as CEO of Goldman Sachs to become treasury secretary, and by now it may be dawning on him that CEO-ship is no substitute for an apprenticeship in public service that might have given him the political skills he lacks. The same may be said of Bernanke, who spent much of his life as a harmless Princeton professor of economics.

Both of these men are convinced, doctrinaire free-marketeers. They hate supervising this intervention into American business. Paulson repeatedly bemoans what he is doing.

Hence, both the principals are trying to devise and carry out programs that they do not believe in. They cannot have spent any time thinking about how government might regulate and intervene successfully. It's as though one were to ask a couple of pro-life physicians to conduct a series of abortions. Should we be surprised they do not do it well?

With President Bush <i>hors de combat</i> and having rendered himself a nullity, we are reduced to Paulson and Bernanke to show us the way in this maelstrom. That may explain why criticism of their work has been so muted.

Two female officials, however, have conducted their offices with distinction. Sheila Bair, chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, has moved heaven and earth to get Paulson and Bernanke to embrace a massive program to stop the housing foreclosures and take the first step toward ending the chaos. To say that she has had mixed success with the men is an understatement.

Less well known is Brooksley Born, who will be a major figure when the history of this Great Debacle is written. Born was the chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission from 1996 to 1999. She foresaw the calamity that runaway use of credit default swaps and other derivatives would cause, and battled to impose regulation on them. She was stopped by Alan Greenspan, Arthur Levitt and Robert Rubin, the major economic figures in the Clinton administration.

After a distinguished career in law, Brooksley Born has retired to watch birds and play with her grandchildren. Sheila Bair battles on against the dunderheads, and we are left helpless, waiting.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bernanke, transparency, paulson, brooksley born, sheila bair

Nicholas von Hoffman writes regularly for The Nation. He is the author ofthirteen books, including Citizen Cohn, and he is a columnist for the New YorkObserver.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Let Me Take A Wild Guess...
Posted by: jooljetkmae on Nov 17, 2008 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the top executives of the companies who got the taxpayer hand out money paid themselves many millions in annual bonuses with it. Or they went out and partied the way AIG did at that pricey resort. This is just another corporate hog wallow is all it is. No mystery here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let Me Take A Wild Guess... Posted by: 2thepoint
The message is: Crime Pays
Posted by: skizum on Nov 17, 2008 1:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are witnessing the, thus far, silent crescendo of fireworks that is ushering out the era of fully mutated capitalistic greed. Will we have a say in what new economic constructs will characterize the next era? This 2.7 trillion dollar handout seems so unbelievable that even if the mainstream news does pick this up, we the public may be outraged but still do nothing about it because we will be in such a state of disbelief, shock and desperate financial straights.

Yes, we will will have a new president 2 months from now.... but so much can happen in 2 months, as we have recently witnessed. The most interesting question then becomes, what will happen between now and then? Your guess is as good as mine, but you can be sure that whatever we don't find out about before Bush leaves office, will surface in the months to follow. By that time Bush will have already issued some sort of blanket pardon to himself and the key players of his administration; he would be a "sitting duck" fool not to.

The way I see it, we have one last chance to do the right thing; IMPEACH NOW! If we don't do this then the message will truly be that you can steal, lie, kill, destroy a global economy, ruin the environment or do whatever you want and get away with it. Yes, Crime pays, as long as you are rich and connected.

Impeachment proceedings can have the practical effect of:

1) halting or exposing any past, current or future crimes of this administration that will dig us deeper into a hole

2) shining a spotlight on other branches of our broken government, like Paulson, Bernanke, the head of other governmental agencies dismantling the very fabric of our society

3) for once, take the initiative to recognize and punish high crimes and misdemeanors to send a strong signal that those who would choose to repeat these crimes.

If we let these crimes go unpunished this time, it will happen again and again; maybe after or even during an Obama administration. A lot can happen in 2 months....

From a common sense perspective and long term view, impeachment makes a lot of sense towards righting our ship of state on a course that leads to a more balanced and just society. Maybe then we be inspired to start to exploring the root causes of what got us into all this mess in the first place and correct the most fundamental imbalances that cause the world to be the way it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dans la rue! Posted by: Bliss Doubt
yeah
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 17, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, why not.. after all, it worked out so well when we just disappeared money down the rabbit hole in Iraq.

Accountability? Who needs that! We can always just run up an even higher record debt and push more burden onto taxpayers... oh, all while cutting taxes left and right, especially for the wealthy "job creators" who oversaw the meltdown in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'Trickle Down' is the Antithesis of a Free Market system
Posted by: Purple Girl on Nov 17, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We scaped the sides of our Economic ship on this Iceberg in the '80's.
Many Americans Recognized this economic philososphy for what it was immediately- Teh same damn system whihc has topple Empires throughout history....Wealth is retained and controlled by the limited number at the top while the middle and bottom continue to generate the actual wealth. This is not a 'new'Idea, it's Feudalism.By embracing this economic system the Social and Politacl would quickely follow. Was any one else offended that Average Americans were Called 'Joe Six packs'...Images of Drunken whoring serfs come to mind? Did you notice how many of US 'serfs' were required to combat the wealthy's candidates coffers. Notice when discussing 'bailing out' the Big 3 comes up their first comment is in regards to the 'fat' unions, not the top heavy overhead of the White Collar or top brass? Not even a whisper regarding the Mismanagement and deliberate stiffling of innovation for 3 decades.Those decisions were not made by the unions. In fact the UAW (and many other unions) have been making concessions since the '70's. Even when there appeared some liquidity to the industry, the Unions were never given back what they had conceded to pull these Corps through previously.The Unions have not only lost wages & bennies, they have lost their collective power.
The Goal of Trickle Down has never been JUST a hoarding of wealth created by the middle & lower socio economic groups, but a sociological shift in Power too.
The notion that wealth should be 'trickled Down' to the masses in and of itself UNAmerican. It is the Exact opposite of a Free Market system. If you are a small business with a new innovative product, if you can't get the funds to get it off the ground (from the upper echelons) Your innovation, thus business can never get off the ground- aka those who were developing the electric car in the '80's!
Greenspan et al had Numerous examples of Trickle Down throughout history to refer to. They knew exactly which system they were infecting our Free market with when they proposed this Monarchial/Dictatorial caste system. This was no 'miscalculation' nor a 'lack of foresight', it was an intentional well foreseen attempt to resurrect the a economic system which enslaves the masses through economic deprivation, thus socio-political nullification.
America was founded, fought for and defended for the masses, not the 'elite'. To introduce and maintain such a Caste System in this Country equates to the Highest form of TREASON.
History and Logic dictates that 'Trickle Down' was an attempt to Conquer and subdue the citizens of this country...Nothing less.
Hang all who participated in this Treason, and watch the flood of funds be released from the hoarders coffers back to those who have been used produced it and neglected to maintain it.
How many Western Industrialized Countries are still run as Monarchies? What countries still maintain a 'Royal' class...Saudi's,Dubia, 3rd world countries. Trickle Down is the Antithesis of not only the Free Market, but also a Free Democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Correction: Tinkle Down Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» Bravo, PG! Posted by: westomoon
Welcome to the GREAT TRANSFER OF WEALTH...
Posted by: greentime on Nov 17, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from our pockets to theirs.

Who are they? Check the real estate records in Dubai.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

True that. Plus Main Street is still fighting against itself.
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 17, 2008 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wall $treet wouldn't be laughing its ways to the bank otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Typical Spam
Posted by: Crazy H on Nov 17, 2008 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's what happens when those of us on Main Street trying to stop the monied goons on Wall $treet
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 17, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from fucking and raping Main Street get derailed by the corn-fed deluded self-righteous "conservatives" ! Thanks a lot you deluded self-righteous yankee "conservatives" for letting Wall $treet get away with it ! We tried to stop this mess and even bail you out but nooooooooooooooo, you had to laugh, sneer, and persecute us by calling us "unpatriotic", "terrorist", "girlie-man", etc ... Well ?!?!? How do you fucking like it now ?!?!?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isarel's little bookeeper
Posted by: weathered on Nov 17, 2008 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dov left the Pentagon w/$$ missing, then we had 9/11 and suddenly forgot.

Please explain??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Derive these...nevermind
Posted by: Elmowilcox on Nov 17, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think a big problem that doesn't get enough attention is how all these problems are caused to begin with. I'm economics stupid, okay, so I won't pretend I know banking or investment terms that make no sense to me and 90% of America. But I have heard smarter people talk about it, and consider it a huge problem, and anyone listening would understand pretty quickly that the "get rich quick scheme" has been legitamized by corporate America. It seems banks and various entities, rather than making actual money selling actual goods and services, have algorithed, reverse upside down mortgaged and fuzzy mathed their way into billions...only to see it all come tumbling down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sounds like we've brought Iraq to America
Posted by: Outspokengrandmother on Nov 17, 2008 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does this not surprise me? It's the Bush way. We've thrown trillions into Iraq without accounting - now we're throwing trillions at the Banks in America without accounting. And he has two months to go - wonder how many more trillions we're going to lose before Bush exits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They're laughing in your face all the way to the bank, but relax
Posted by: 6399 on Nov 17, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's a few trillion? When all is said and done, this monster will have grown to $4-5 trillion without batting an eye. We'll only be able to collect about $3 trillion of that in treasuries so it'll be "fire up them thar printin' presses and keep 'em white hot, boys".

When that happens, we'll have alternating periods of stagflation and stag deflation until the dollar is essentially devalued out of existence. Then, look out below. The US will be an underdeveloped country within 10 years. And you guys think the L.A. riots were something--you ain't seen nothin' yet.

Honestly, there is almost nothing we can do about this short of getting off our effete, ever-widening asses, and start *now pay attention here* executing people. Spare me the peaceful resistance crap. These people are stealing what's left of OUR TAX DOLLARS and my daughter and your sons will be footing the bill for this outright rape and pillage of this country. They will not stop until they are six feet under. No one pays attention until bodies are swinging from lamp posts.

We have turned the corner. Irresponsibility and greed are virtue while thrift and hard work have become vice. This country has lost its way as evidenced by bailouts for corporate crooks and real estate fraudsters who lied about their incomes or thought they'd flip homes for 'fun and profit'. Now they want your tax dollars for bailouts and you tamely submit. Stop paying your taxes and giving corporations your business.

They think you're fat, lazy and stupid. They're mostly right. Continue to sit down for this and see where you end up. Honestly, this very well may make the Great Depression look like a slowdown. Violence is sometimes necessary, and believe me, the world would thank us for 'refreshing the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your part.
Posted by: ReformerRay on Nov 17, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody who wants to remain sane in a mad world must find some outlet.

Violence is not the answer. Too many villains and all of us are to some degree complicit - by sins of omission if not commission.

My outlet is the try to persuade anyone who will listen that the ideology of free trade must be replaced the goal of equal trade between as many of the U.S. trading partners as possible.

Of course, no one listens. Makes no difference. I have a mission and I work at it diligently. It could make a difference, if I ever learn how to be effective.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jeanruss
Posted by: jeanruss on Nov 17, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you go to www.worldreports.org/news you will get a different perspective on what really caused this economic collapse. The Bush crime family actiyities is truly breathtaking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"...but who got it, nobody knows"
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Nov 17, 2008 11:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can assure you it wasn't me.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Rich and the Super Rich: How to fleece the "system"
Posted by: foius on Nov 17, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that the American public has been silenced into accepting the premise of "financial market stability". The continued fleecing of the American public will know no bounds in the foreseeable future. Already, there have been reports by CNBC that over $4.28 Trillion dollars have already been issued out by our respective federal agencies to these new but improved corporate predators known as financial institutions. As long as we allow the financial predators to keep their own money, while taking every last penny that we, the public, have, then their manipulation of the financial system will continue...unabated and unchallenged. Who will step up to the forefront to stop these financial predators from gobbling up our meager assets? Good question. When will middle-class Americans wake up to the reality that they have bought into a failed premise in Laisseze Faire (everyman for himself) capitalism. It does not work, nor has it ever worked for anyone. We are a United States of America, but so far, we have responded to the unbelievable requests of the Super-Rich for even more of our taxdollars so that they can continue their dominance over our livelihoods into perpetuity. Apparently, that is how we like the economic oppression to manifest itself...so we accept it. This is ridiculous!!!! When will we wake up to the reality that poverty cannot be allowed to continue at this rate, and that any type or level of unemployment is unacceptable in a county with the fabulous wealth that America has. Full employment is the answer. How do we get there is the question?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, boys, we're all girls now
Posted by: redfrog on Nov 17, 2008 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
**pat**pat**pat*** Don't worry your pretty little head about it. We'll do what's right with the money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brooksley Born: 10 years ago she spoke; vested interests torpedoed it.
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on Nov 17, 2008 3:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.cftc.gov/opa/speeches/opaborn-37.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Joe The Plumber's Wealth
Posted by: master09 on Nov 17, 2008 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would think that Joe The Plumber and all those real americans are a little bit late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Broken Economy
Posted by: glorybe on Nov 17, 2008 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So now that the working class, the poor class and the middle class have been screwed into poverty just who does big business expect to have money to buy their products? If the big three want to sell new cars it is vital that the masses be able to afford to buy and keep a car.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fiscal Restraint
Posted by: westomoon on Nov 17, 2008 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dontcha love it? While perpetrating -- and countenancing -- all this fiscal carnage themselves, the Rs are already clearing their throats and warming up their pipes, getting ready to bay in outrage when Obama doesn't balance the budget in his first year in office. After they've added billions to our annual debt-servicing outlays in just the past year!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Molly Ivins and the "Shrub"
Posted by: bessie on Nov 18, 2008 12:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Molly Ivins described what Shrub did with Texas. I remember reading her book & kinda taking it in & thinking well on a national level nothing like that will happen. Being ignorant really isn't an excuse. So many millions of 'us' were energized to vote for Obama. We can only hope that we can express and use our power to press for change. What has happened on Wall Street and with the bailout, without any true explanation, truth, or transparency, is really disturbing. And the same explanation is being used. I'm older than dirt & I remember hearing that we couldn't hear about who really killed JFK, MLK, or RFK - it would cause a national panic. Well, alot of time has passed now, and we are still totally ignorant and being treated as dumbed down panic freaks. It's a lame defense, at best, and it's time for all of us to demand the truth about our past, our current state, and our future. Lack of confidence in our government, economy, and some safeguards - that's what causes panic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JustAConsumer
Posted by: avidAmerican on Nov 18, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm wondering if anyone has thought to investigate to see how much money was funneled back to Bush & Cheney & Gang?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Bilderbergers of course..!
Posted by: TJColatrella on Nov 18, 2008 9:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know who got the $2 Trillion from Bernanke...!


The Bilderberg Group shadow institutions..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get Rid of the Federal Reserve and Their Money as Debt System
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Nov 18, 2008 11:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did you know that in our current monetary system, if there was no debt there would be no money?

If we got rid of the current federal reserve system, Bernanke couldn't be conjuring up trillions of dollars and diluting the money supply which will rear its ugly head as inflation down the road.

Furthermore, they say the credit crisis is a result of banks unwilling to lend to each other. If a government bank was able to issue credit directly to smaller banks and credit unions this would not be an issue.



As a side note, am I the only one who thinks this recession became so severe because Bush, Paulson, and Bernanke scared the heck out of the public in getting the bailout plan passed and that is why consumer spending plummeted and it wasn't really related to the credit crisis?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bend over and skip the Vaseline
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 20, 2008 1:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Sums of incalculable size are being spent or pledged by Paulson and his playmate, Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, and nobody outside their organizations, or maybe inside them either, knows who got what, how much they got, and under what conditions they got it.

In the past couple of months Bernanke has loaned out $2 trillion to unnamed companies under eleven different programs and all but three of them were slapped together in the past fifteen months of financial crisis."

Huh?!

Unnamed companies? Eleven opaque programs slapped together during the financial crisis? Even MORE money disappearing down a rat hole?

This is nothing more than a "Shock Doctrine"-style looting of not only what is left in the treasury, but money that will have to be borrowed from "friends" like China and Saudi Arabia, and what WILL be confiscated from our children, in taxes and disappearing services, when they grow up, PLUS INTEREST, to pay back the debt.

Our "leaders" don't want to bail out companies that actually make something, the auto industry, because the Big Three have been irresponsible; but it's just fine to bail out Wall Street criminals who've committed the greatest fraud on the american people in our history – and oh, by the way, let's slip them another $1.3 trillion of other peoples money under the table ON TOP of the $700 billion we've already acknowledged.

The level of corruption and outright theft by our own government just beggars the imagination. It's almost to a point beyond what we're CAPABLE of imagining!

WHY IN HELL DO WE PUT UP WITH THIS CRAP!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement