Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

What Should Democrats Do Now?

By David Sirota, AlterNet. Posted November 7, 2008.


Americans envision enormous progress in the months ahead, and Democrats will have no one to blame for failure but themselves.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"What do we do now?"

That's the question Bill McKay ponders in the classic movie "The Candidate" after he wins office promising "a better way." America will now ask Democrats the same haunting query following the historic election.

These are heady times for the party of Jefferson, Roosevelt and now Obama. Only a few years ago, Democrats were almost relegated to permanent minority status by a Mission Accomplished sign and a flight suit. But since President Bush's 2004 re-election, they gained at least 50 House seats, 12 Senate seats, seven state legislatures and seven governorships. As Republicans used "socialism" attacks to make the national campaign race a referendum on conservatism, Democrats also registered their biggest presidential triumph since 1964.

So, while the President-elect talks of forming a bipartisan cabinet, his victory wasn't the public's cry for milquetoast government-by-blue-ribbon-commission. As the Center for Community Change's Deepak Bhargava says, Obama's win was an ideological mandate presenting "an opening for transformational, progressive change."

Maximizing this opportunity relies on Democrats understanding the parable from Spiderman comics -- the one about great power coming with "great responsibility." In politics, that latter phrase is a euphemism for high expectations.

What the party gains in strength it loses in a Republican scapegoat that previously justified inaction. On huge issues -- whether re-regulating Wall Street, reforming trade, solving the health care emergency, or ending the Iraq War -- America envisages enormous progress in the months ahead, and Democrats will have no one to blame for failure but themselves. After all, with over 340 electoral votes, President Obama cannot credibly claim he lacks the political capital to legislatively steamroll a humiliated GOP and its remaining senators. The same goes for Democrats everywhere. Meeting expectations requires championing far-reaching -- even radical -- initiatives.

That was always '08's theme. Amid lipsticked pigs, Joe the Plumber and Super Bowl-sized candidate events, the election became a choice between continued conservative rule and a progressive agenda as far-reaching as the current crises. And as a defeated John McCain said, "The American people have spoken, and they have spoken clearly."

To meet the challenge, Democrats have to abandon their worst habits.

They must, for instance, acknowledge their progressive mandate, rather than denying it like Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) did on Tuesday. "This is not a mandate for a political party or an ideology," he fearfully told reporters.

They should also retire the Innocent Bystander Fable -- the myth about being powerless onlookers. Democrats first cited this fable as reason the Iraq War continued during their congressional majority -- expecting the country to forget that Congress can halt war funding. Today, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) says "there's not much we can do" to amend the sputtering bank bailout. In 2009, such mendacity will metastasize from banal dishonesty into grist for scathing comedy-show punch lines.

Democrats need to discard other lies, too -- especially those about Bill Clinton. To hear pundits tell it, Clinton's first-term pitfalls underscore why the next administration should avoid "governing in a way that is, or seems, skewed to the left," as the Washington Post's Ruth Marcus most recently asserted. History, of course, proves the opposite. Recounting Clinton's early years to Politico.com, a lobbyist correctly noted that the new president didn't move left -- he pushed conservative policies like NAFTA, thereby demoralizing his base and helping Republicans take Congress.

Obama rose on a promise to eschew those triangulations -- and he won because America realized invertebracy and sail trimming will not solve problems. Voters rejected Clinton-style incrementalism in the primary, then scorned conservatism in the general election, meaning Democrats' best response to Bill McKay's "what do we do now?" question is a two-word answer: Go big.

That is not merely the better way -- it is the only way.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: democrats, obama, progressives, government

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Right on but...
Posted by: Axiom69 on Nov 7, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Americans envision enormous progress in the months ahead, and Democrats will have no one to blame for failure but themselves."

Just relax. Democrats don't have to worry about accomplishing anything right away. I'm sure someone will find a way to blame Bush for congress's inaction even after he's out of office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Medicare for All ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Nov 7, 2008 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New jobs ? How about saving existing jobs? Medicare for All!

To get real money immediately into the economy we need Medicare for All. Medicare for All would help re-capitalize business (especially manufacturing), school districts, state and local government, individual payers and the under and uninsured. The states could use any excess of savings for unemployment and pension funds. Overall this could save hundreds of thousands if not millions of jobs while putting money quickly and directly into the system in the most efficient, fairest way possible ... taking care of people's medical bills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amen David!
Posted by: liblady2008 on Nov 8, 2008 3:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate all this center or center right talk,it's even worse that Reid is making noise like that.

We have a monumental mandate for sweeping change - Bush started ramming his junk through on us and he even lost the popular vote and in reality the whole election.

So the Democrats need to quit being afraid of their own shadow and start pushing a populist, progressive agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did you forget Hillarycare?
Posted by: randomsubu on Nov 9, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David:
While I agree the results - an electoral landslide and increased Democratic majorities - are a mandate, I still think we have to be careful. It's not just NAFTA that caused the 1994 loss, but Hillarycare as well. Demoralize the base, and energize the opposition.
One reason I supported Obama in the primaries was his recognition that mandated health care is not broadly acceptable. Americans don't like the government forcing them to do something.
Still, as I said, I believe this is a mandate for the country to turn left - just not too left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Construction jobs in New Orleans!
Posted by: fanny666 on Nov 9, 2008 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the most recent numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment in the construction sector is now over 10%.

This is INSANE in a Post-Katrina, post-Galveston nation. Not one construction worker should be unemployed right now.

Write to the incoming administration and tell them to put construction workers to work in New Orleans!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Should Obama Do First?
Posted by: AlteredStates on Nov 10, 2008 12:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Replace Harry Reid with someone who has balls, would be something Obama should suggest a.s.a.p.

Secondly, Obama should tell both houses of Congress, (discreetly) to "take no prisoners" regarding the "good 'ol boy" Republican party. Just to let them know, that, "their is a new sheriff in town".

Next, tell Ms: Nancy, to put her lipstick away, change her hairdo, and tell her to stop giving away everything in the store to the Republicans. Better yet, fire Nancy too, to show the country and the world, that the old ways of governing this country are gone i.e. blank checks on a war that is unwinable, and no over-sight committees to oversee where the money has gone. I think, then, Obama, will have a chance of getting Congress back on track.

Yes, Obama won the election, but look at what he has been handed; two wars that we are loosing, a shattered U.S.economy, a re-invigorated Al-Qaeda/Taliban, hiding in Tora Bora and performing hit and run gorilla tactics, that are wearing down the mightiest war machine in history, a crumbling U.S. infrastructure, and a world that hates the U.S. policy of "strike first and ask questions later"...much later. I just wonder, who would want a job like the one Obama is about to begin?

When Obama announced his candidacy two years ago, I thought; This guy is just what we need to save the Republic. He still is, the last best hope we have, but what an enormous challenge this job has turned into. After Bush and his flunky clones have turned everything they touched into shit, the American public are finally waking-up...to a nightmare. I wish him the best, but also expect him to age quickly, as all Presidents do, in a job that has grown into something far beyond what the founding fathers of this country ever envisioned. But, if anyone is up to the task, it is Obama. I shutter, when I think of that senile old man, McCain, as our next President, with Miss Lipstick, "you betcha", one wink and a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Did anyone, on the Republican side at least, ever think this McCain/Palin thing through? I think not. You do remember, the big crowds, (I mean, mobs) that attended Palin's rallies, wanting to fuck the shit out of her? American's do have short memories, and are willing to believe anything, as long as it lines up with their squirrel-cage, bat shit crazy, redneck, mentality.

However, we still have hope. Hoping, that life will go on, in spite of what Bush and his Neocon friends are leaving us with. Bush thinks, that his Presidency will be truly appreciated, fifty years from now, when his legacy, "Iraq" turns into a beacon of hope for the Middle East. Yeah, a three trillion dollar legacy, paid for by our blood and tears. But, not to worry, God told Bush to invade Iraq. And, with those credentials, what could possibly go wrong? I don't know, but, Obama is going to be the first to find out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Should Obama Do First? Posted by: AlteredStates
» RE: What Should Obama Do First? Posted by: oregoncharles
We All Have a Responsibility
Posted by: MsMike on Nov 10, 2008 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, the Democrats have the votes, but in order for them to be successful we all need to do our part: We must stay up-to-date and aware of what is going on; we need to write letters, write articles, post comments in favor of the progress we want and against obstructionism. To help Democracy to work we have to stay involved.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Becoming Effective Change Agents
Posted by: Mimi on Nov 10, 2008 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Go Big" is another way of saying that transformation is what we want -- not "fixing" all the broken systems so that they function as they once did, but CHANGING the system itself.

And change -- transformation -- is different.

We are all change agents, now. Our challenge is to become skilled and effective change agents.

What we need is something like "change literacy," knowledge and skills about how to DO transformational politics. We need to educate ourselves about change, about which there is a whole body of theory and practice, so that "the American genius for change," as Obama put it, can actually succeed at changing things.

I don't mean political change, only, or specific changes attached to a political ideology, which is where we are at right now in this change adventure. I mean the cluster of disciplines that more or less fall into "social change theory."

There are many models of change and methods for bringing about change in human social systems. The more we, the people know about these theories and methods that -- again -- are utterly independent from any political agenda, platform, party or ideology but are simply about change in general -- the better WE will be at practicing transformational politics.

One bold possibility for developing "change literacy" in the people (for lack of a better term) would be for Obama's Administration to evolve his fledgling website, www.change.gov, into an on-line resource for citizen education about change. This could take a variety of forms whose common purpose is to develop the "American genius for change," as Obama put it, toward the democratic end of 'perfecting the union.'

The more we all know about how to do transformational politics - Obama's transition team included -- the less time we will waste on Pelosi piecemeal-ism which CHANGES nothing.

Like I said, transformation is different.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Die Has Been Cast
Posted by: Will Miller on Nov 10, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The amazing issue is not what should "we" do now, it's the fact that we have elected a President who thinks for himself and already has an agenda that he will unveil in the coming months. Gone is the lackluster leader who works with his 'special interest' at the forefront.

Time will tell the measure of the man but it must be said that he will not be overly influenced by the herd mentality that binds us into inaction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good one, David!
Posted by: oregoncharles on Nov 12, 2008 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He says the Dems have lost "a Republican scapegoat that previously justified inaction."

Just what I've been saying!

So how do YOU read the latest straws in the wind, Mr. Sirota?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement