Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Can Obama Stop the Bush Administration's Final Economic Heist?

By Naomi Klein, NaomiKlein.com. Posted November 6, 2008.


Terrible looting of public capital has a habit of taking place during periods of dramatic political transition, and Bush has one underway.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Naomi Klein

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

To understand the meaning of the U.S. election results, it is worth looking back to the moment when everything changed for the Obama campaign. It was, without question, the moment when the economic crisis hit Wall Street.

Up to that point, things weren't looking all that good for Barack Obama. The Democratic National Convention barely delivered a bump, while the appointment of Sarah Palin seemed to have shifted the momentum decisively over to John McCain.

Then, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failed, followed by insurance giant AIG, then Lehman Brothers. It was in this moment of economic vertigo that Obama found a new language. With tremendous clarity, he turned his campaign into a referendum into the deregulation and trickle down policies that have dominated mainstream economic discourse since Ronald Reagan. He said his opponent represented more of the same while he stood for a new direction, one that would rebuild the economy from the ground up, rather than the top down. Obama stayed on this message for the rest of the campaign and, as we just saw, it worked.

The question now is whether Obama will have the courage to take the ideas that won him this election and turn them into policy. Or, alternately, whether he will use the financial crisis to rationalize a move to what pundits call "the middle" (if there is one thing this election has proved, it is that the real middle is far to the left of its previously advertised address). Predictably, Obama is already coming under enormous pressure to break his election promises, particularly those relating to raising taxes on the wealthy and imposing real environmental regulations on polluters. All day on the business networks, we hear that, in light of the economic crisis, corporations need lower taxes, and fewer regulations -- in other words, more of the same.

The new president's only hope of resisting this campaign being waged by the elites is if the remarkable grassroots movement that carried him to victory can somehow stay energized, networked, mobilized -- and most of all, critical. Now that the election has been won, this movement's new missions should be clear: loudly holding Obama to his campaign promises, and letting the Democrats know that there will be consequences for betrayal.

The first order of business -- and one that cannot wait until inauguration -- must be halting the robbery-in-progress known as the "economic bailout." I have spent the past month examining the loopholes and conflicts of interest embedded in the U.S. Treasury Department's plans. The results of that research can be found in a just published feature article in Rolling Stone, The Bailout Profiteers, as well as my most recent Nation column, Bush's Final Pillage.

Both these pieces argue that the $700-billion "rescue plan" should be regarded as the Bush Administration's final heist. Not only does it transfer billions of dollars of public wealth into the hands of politically connected corporations (a Bush specialty), but it passes on such an enormous debt burden to the next administration that it will make real investments in green infrastructure and universal health care close to impossible. If this final looting is not stopped (and yes, there is still time), we can forget about Obama making good on the more progressive aspects of his campaign platform, let alone the hope that he will offer the country some kind of grand Green New Deal.

Readers of The Shock Doctrine know that terrible thefts have a habit of taking place during periods of dramatic political transition. When societies are changing quickly, the media and the people are naturally focused on big "P" politics -- who gets the top appointments, what was said in the most recent speech. Meanwhile, safe from public scrutiny, far reaching pro-corporate policies are locked into place, dramatically restricting future possibilities for real change.

It's not too late to halt the robbery in progress, but it cannot wait until inauguration. Several great initiatives to shift the nature of the bailout are already underway, including http://bailoutmainstreet.com. I added my name to the "Call to Action: Time for a 21st Century Green America" and invite you to do the same.

Stopping the bailout profiteers is about more than money. It is about democracy. Specifically, it is about whether Americans will be able to afford the change they have just voted for so conclusively.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: democracy, economic crisis, bailout, financial crisis

Naomi Klein's latest book is The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Didn't Obama
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on Nov 6, 2008 12:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
vote for the bailou...err...economic stimulation package?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Didn't Obama Posted by: Rolomax
» stlagflation rings a bell Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: Didn't Obama Posted by: sonofmarilyn
» RE: Didn't Obama Posted by: oregoncharles
Bush was groomed by the Corporate
Posted by: Von on Nov 6, 2008 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and Obama was ( is being ) groomed by the Corporate.The illegal war on the People of Iraq was a corporate sham for contracts, wealth and opening up fresh territory for investment purposes.

Obama's paymasters ( the Corporate ) will now fully expect to have their backs scratched..which should come as no surprise at all.

General Patreus that is overseeing the illegal operations inside Iraq, has been given additional oversite that includes the Afgahanistan / Pakistan areas. Perfect timing or coincidence?

I say Perfect Timing becasue the fact of the matter is that Obama has already clearly stated a military escalation in that area will be coming from his regime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This a question Naomi
Posted by: weathered on Nov 6, 2008 1:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that a Justice Dept./SEC/FTC should ponder, but because these depts.and orgs. are populated w/criminals - little will be done, save of course you pointing out the obvious and championing your book sales.

Ms Klein when you call out Mukasey for what he is I'll read your book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What an ego Posted by: wolfgangmo
» She's too little way too late Posted by: weathered
The bailout was Congress working for the Crooks...
Posted by: -matti on Nov 6, 2008 2:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... Want to get them working for the People again?

Ever thought that maybe the bailout would never have gotten through in this awful form if the unorganized, individual pressure on Congress had been organized and coordinated?

Ever wish that there was a national group specifically dedicated to pressuring Congresspeople to vote for overdue legislation like single payer health care and a decent minimum wage?

One that worked not by lobbying in D.C, but by organizing in every district in the nation?

Well, you're in luck, 'cause one is forming RIGHT NOW!

Go to http://november5.org watch the short explanatory video, and join the November Fifth Movement today.

Let's put "we the people" back into the Federal Government YEAR-ROUND!

Not just every other November.

-matti.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I signed up. Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» Hoorah!!! Posted by: -matti
Two Theories Re The Current Economic Crash - Deliberately Planned or Accident
Posted by: opmoc on Nov 6, 2008 2:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel much happier taking the view that the current economic crash was an accident due to overwhelming greed and extreme right wing economics. These factors obviously played an enormous part. If this is the case, then it should be relatively easy to fix. Not only that but greed is an easily understood human trait, that arguably isn't intrinsically evil. Society doesn't lock up people who are greedy providing they don't break any laws.

The alternative theory - that the crash was Deliberately Planned - I find quite horrifying.

Analysis of Deliberately Planned means that the players in the system - ie the City and Wall Street Boys - as well as the bankers at least at the Street level giving loans away that could never be repaid - were just pawns being set up to fail.

But Deliberately Planned soon takes you down the path of the type of "conspiracy theories" propogated by people like David Icke, Lyndon LaRouche and many others who I have generally thought to be nuts and not taken too seriously.

However, the problem of not taking such people too seriously - is that most of their predictions have been exceedingly accurate.

That means that we have got a very serious problem - that maybe extremely difficult to fix. The reason for this is that Deliberately Planned - means that the people who actually are in control - are far more powerful than Government, highly intelligent and with such vast wealth - almost untouchable.

They are also incredibly evil, and almost certainly leading the entire human race to the mass genocide of Billions.

If politicians at the highest level are "in their pocket" ie they have been selected and very well prepared to perform an extremely well laid out plan to take us down a path of mass poverty and an enormous cull - then we are in deep shit.

However, even if all this is true, we don't have to just lie down and take our own demise.

These people are all just human beings. They maybe incredibly wealthy and powerful - but there are at most only a few thousand of them.

Hopefully they will see the errors of their ways before its too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Checkout "Political Ponerology" Posted by: begruntleed
» Accident Posted by: solrev
The Audacity of Hope? Or: The Hypocrisy of Obama?
Posted by: Physiocrat on Nov 6, 2008 2:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Klein -- why won't you level with the American people?

If you will not, I will...

Did you all know that Rahm Emanuel, a multimillionaire investment banker, is Obama's chief of staff?

And that one of Obama's main economic advisors is Robert Rubin, a Citigroup bigwig? That another one of Obama's main advisors is Larry Summers, former World Bank hotshot? And even more advice from Buffett, America's richest person?

Austan Goolsbee has been Obama's main economic advisor for a long time - he is an extraordinarily centrist/mainstream defender of the economic status-quo.

Obama's "chief campaign strategist" was David Axelrod, the millionaire owner of a major political consulting company?

Did you know that Obama's National Finance Chair is Penny Pritzker, a billionaire from one of the richest families in America where each member of the immediate family is, in fact, a billionaire?

Change?! YEAH RIGHT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I like you, your not one of the Sheeple Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» "your" a grammar sheeple Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
» RE: "your" a grammar sheeple Posted by: Cybershaman
No, I don't think it can be credited to the econ troubles
Posted by: goeswithness on Nov 6, 2008 3:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I recall, and it hasn't been that long, Obama was at least slightly ahead of McCain. Then M selected P as running mate, and that got people excited, so their numbers shot up. However, the bloom was already coming off the rose, as I knew it would, reality was settling down, and they had pretty much evenned out. THEN the crisis.

I think he'd still have won.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Single women and starry-eyed kiddies
Posted by: BillWhedon on Nov 6, 2008 3:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We had two experienced, level-headed people on the ticket opposite OBlah-blah. We got single females and starry-eyed kiddies fresh out of diapers voting because the man is an accomplished orator who told them precisely what they wanted to hear.

There's an old story called "The Flim-Flam Man" that I'd forgotten until Obama came along. Nice job of stealing the election, Barry. You gonna release your college records now? Where's that vault birth certificate from Kenya, dude? We aren't gonna forget these things you swept under the rug, boy.

Don't worry about your 700 billion, America. It'll be in good ol' Democrat hands now. Clinton era revisited. You believed the slick lies, now get ready for the harsh truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And South Africa Posted by: Karina
» You Posted by: peskyfly1
Can super Obama STOP, Bush/Cheney's run away TRAIN?
Posted by: Ottomatic on Nov 6, 2008 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush/Cheney's Runaway TRAIN

They're killing, spying, lying, shredding and stealing everything,
Even the stuff nailed down.
W and The Forty Thieves are pillaging Washington and looting America.
After they leave, there will be nothing left.
The Focus should be on holding Bush/Cheney accountable for their Crimes.
Prosecute them for their Crimes against the Humanity.
Accountability is job one!

All that we have left is the shirt on our back,
the sweat on our brow and a strong pair of hands.
The Treasury is empty.
The Government is Privatized.

Start over with a clean slate,
Rebuild, renew and revitalize.
Reaffirm our positive Goals, Values and Ideals.
Strengthen the Foundation that:
The Republic of The United States of America was built upon.
The Bill of Rights will contain these new human rights:
The Right to Health Care,
The Right to Elderly Care,
The Right to Dental Care,
A Living Wage,
The Right to Affordable Housing,
The Right to Clean Air and
The Right to Pure Water.

Also amend The Constitution to include these progressive changes.
Corporations have no Human rights: They are reclassified MACHINES.
The 1st Amendment: Freedom of the Press will include a limit on Media concentration:
One outlet in One Market.
And also provide for the Expansion of Local Independent Media.
The BUCK stops here.
Send it back to Europe with Allen Green-spam, Ben Ben-ickie and the Federal Reserve Debt.
Issue United States Notes backed by a fixed amount of labor and or Commodities.

SURGE
PURGE
Update and
REBOOT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dude, really Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
Goosing the Goose
Posted by: 1jason8 on Nov 6, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by Robert Callaghan
L'Amable, Ontario Canada

When your job is to be allowed to print money and loan the exact same
dollar over and over again simultaneously, each time for interest,
then please let me know, how do you screw that up? Here us normal
folks are slaving away to pay banks back while they mess up the goose
that laid the golden egg.

According to U.S. federal reserve documents, the banks basically
"loan" our money into existence when each different person borrows the
same dollar over and over again at the same time. This is called
"fractional reserve banking." This kind of banking has its origins in
17th century England and France.

But because real money is based on trust, and not on debasing that
value, then how many times can you lend out the same dollar before
it's gone? Vanished! Poof!!
The answers is, quite a few—yet, only so many times. You can't just
keep spreading risk while trying to crash through the theoretical
barrier of absolute zero. After all, you can only get so much blood
from the same stone.

Yet the U.S. Federal Reserve just keeps printing money, giving it to
banks who still are too afraid to lend. So they just hang onto it, or
buy other failed banks to pay their own huge, year-end bonuses.

An ever-increasing number of American families owe more on their homes
than they're worth. Soon, what the average person will realize, as it
shudders across the body politic, is that if everybody owes the banks
trillions and trillions of dollars — then THEY have a problem. U.S.
government efforts to put a stop to the political Katrina of
foreclosure evictions only acknowledges this reality.

If you search for the word "homeless" on the American You-tube, you
will see things like police in Florida cutting up homeless people's
tents; or a 60-plus-year-old woman getting tackled by a cop during a
foreclosure eviction. I just heard today how 2 women and 3 guys were
shot in a homeless tent city in southern California.

If you look at the related video category of You-tube you will see
obvious, early-stage signs of the collapse of civil society including
videos of the spread of tent cities across the U.S. and their
attendant problems of poverty, crime and lawless exploitation.

As urban people well know, if you don't invest in society, you gonna
git trouble. And that rhymes with T and that looks like me... or you,
or any other person paying a mortgage from paycheck to paycheck.

Like Chuck Gallozzi says, if you like life, love and liberty then you
had better actively take care of it because it won't take care of
itself.

Our neighbours to the south are ruled by a brutally violent,
politically corrupt, corporate kleptocracy. But when the government
solution is to just try to make deficits sexy again, then I worry what
will happen before mainstream media admits we're broke and can't
borrow our way out of debt. Twenty-first century problems cannot be
solved with idiotically glib sound bites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You want real tax change?
Posted by: douglashoyt on Nov 6, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't tax income, tax property.

Exempt most of what the working class, retired and disable have, but tax the corporations, and rich who's 1 percent of holdings amount to 57 percent of all wealth in this nation, maybe more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Key to the argument
Posted by: warrior woman on Nov 6, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To see if Obama will try to stop this heist, it will take a quick appointment of a new Secretary of the Treasury who will speak against the unregulated policy of Paulson and his pals and propose alternatives. If he doesn't, well, therein may lay the answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I nominate Posted by: jackyD
Obama- Time to End Federal Reserve Bank
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Nov 6, 2008 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, not having four more years of John (George Bush) McCain is a very good result. The fact that the neocons could not or did not hack the election is also very good news.

With that said, I do not consider myself to be cynical but only a realistic skeptic. If I know that:
1. there are gaping holes in the 9/11 official conspiracy theory and if anyone looked at, not only what happened on that day, but the political landscape leading up to that day, they would know that 9/11 was an inside job,
2. the only way to be sure that our votes are counted as they are cast is by using a paper ballot and at the current electronic voting machines are completely hackable and the transmission of the vote count from each precinct to the central tabulator is completely hackable,
4. the last two presidential elections was stolen by a voter suppression and computer fraud,
5. the Federal Reserve Bank is a private cartel of banks that operate as any other corporation with a profit motive, that every dollar that they print is lent to this government and in return the Federal Reserve Bank receives a US treasury bond which is a debt owed to the Federal Reserve Bank,
6. that George Bush and his administration intentionally lied to the Congress and the people of this country in order to attack Iraq to control its oil and the oil supply in the Middle East by US military continued presence,

Then the U.S. Congress knows this or is turning its back on this because at this point they are almost all complicit with the Bush administration and its agenda. It is my opinion that "the powers that be" are not the President and the U.S. Congress but the Secret Government talked about by Bill Moyers in his 1987 documentary that was aired on PBS. You can watch this video on the homepage of my website. This Secret Government is in bed with the military-industrial oil private central banking complex.

This Bush administration appointed many members of this Secret Government to positions of power. This Secret Government has grown, in conjunction with the military-industrial oil Central banking complex, since the creation of the CIA in the 1940s. This Secret Government planned and orchestrated 9/11 and the rest of the fascist takeover, under the cover of fear of terrorists, is there to be seen if anyone is willing to look at it.

The "powers that be" will never let the truth be told about 9/11, the Federal Reserve Bank, the stealing of elections by computer fraud end the lies told by the Bush administration to attack Afghanistan and Iraq.

History supports my contention. The truth has never been disseminated by the "powers that be", which now includes the mainstream media, about the Gulf of Tonkin lie to compel the US to attack Vietnam, FDR allowing Pearl Harbor to occur so the US would enter World War II, the CIA's overthrow and/or political assassination of any countries leader who would not succumb to the takeover of that country's resources by multinational corporations with the assistance of the World Bank and the international monetary fund, George HW Bush's lies to start the first Gulf War, George HW Bush's involvement in the Iran Contra affair, the assassinations JFK.RFK and King, the political assassinations of Clinton (although he is part of the "powers that be")Eliot Spitzer, Gary Hart and Ross Perot.

Obama will not promote any criminal prosecution of Bush. Just like Nixon and George H.W. Bush were let off the hook by their successors, Obama will do the same. Obama has said many things that clearly indicate that he believes in the validity of the war against terror.

I do not believe any significant changes will be made by Obama. Real change can only occur if it is not based and built upon lies that have never been officially admitted to.

www.911insidejob.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something We Can Do
Posted by: suckerbeagle on Nov 6, 2008 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Matti says it above. Go to november5.org and sign up. Citizens are organizing in all the congressional districts to focus the pressure on congress. Currently there is nothing out there to pull it all together. november5.org could be that organization. Signing up involves no committment at this point. You will get information and can decide if you want to become part of it. That's november5.org
Jeanne

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scary
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Nov 6, 2008 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I know is that the sooner we get Dictator Bush out of office, the better off we will all be. His Regime has literally crippled the country and change is needed now more than ever.

Jiff
Is your ISP watching?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now is the Time for the Left To Get Aggressive
Posted by: Shankari46 on Nov 6, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Start with a compulsory voting law. Who got Obama into office? Look at who actually voted for him. He was not elected by the anally retentive, "religious", fearful, white people. He was placed into office by the liberal white and the minorities. It's pretty simple people. He needs to take a hammer to the corporations, runaway Wallstreet, polluters, the military industrial complex. This requires a revolution. Get everyone to vote, and the "conservatives" are gone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Private financing of Green Projects
Posted by: Russianrocket on Nov 6, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the banks go under, who is going to finance green projects? If a factory or power plant wants to impliment expensive carbon mitigation technology, they are likely to get a loan to rely on it. Or if a utility wants to install wind turbines, they will probably also need a loan to finance it.

It may be shitty and it may not be fair, but the costs to the US will be far greater if we don't bail out the banks. Sometimes you just have to be pragmatic and choose the lesser of two evils.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not With the Millionare Dems in Congress
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Nov 6, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fat chance
You Libs need to realize that Uber Rich Dems dont pay taxes: but YOU DO! There is a reason why Wall Street gives more money to your guys becuase they know how to work the system, while you people just bitch and moan. I was bumbed out for a while then I realized I'll be alright however it will be you guys back to protesting with in two years. One of the keys is Iraq (when they dont leave) however wait... that war is being won (holy shit).
I'm telling you guys now, save your money, buy a hybird and discover your local Wal-Mart (or Target) becuase its going to be some rough times ahead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We the people.......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 6, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For almost 8 years we the people have been lied to, manipulated thru fear, stolen from, and been kept in the dark, by an Administration that has been working for the corporate and elite! I say no more, ENOUGH!!!!

This election was about we the people - all of the people! Corporations and their elite supporters have on average for the last 30 years have paid less and less taxes as a proportion of the income that they are reaping in! Not to mention in many cases they are getting refunds (the nerve)!!!! It is time that the corporate and elite stop sucking the rest of us dry - and pay their share! I would suggest flooding the offices of Congress to remind them exactly why the tide has turned and can turn again!!!!

Now is definitely not the time to sit back on laurels and think (a)our President can do it all by himself, and (b)pretend that until the "new" Congress takes over that those currently in office will try to "give" the corporations the food off of our collective tables!!

Remember those in power never ever are willing to concede that power without major demands!!!! Well, everyone it is time to start demanding!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ITS GOING TO FALL!
Posted by: vconcerned on Nov 6, 2008 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its comeing,and thats for sure.The doller has had its day,USA colapse is just around the corner and who's holding the baby?BARAC OBAMA.He will go down in history as the only black president of the USA because Whats comeing in the very near future is War with Iran.That will be Americas bailout cause it allways is when the money s**t hits the fan.Just look back at your history.When the depresion hits is when it will happen,and that Will come when BRIC sack the DOLLER.USA prepare for the ride of your lives my friends.And as for the banking crisis,well,Thomas Jefferson warned of bankers destructive powers if left unregulated in 1802.something about Americas children haveing no homes.Hmmmmm,look arund you America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wedjat
Posted by: Wedjat on Nov 6, 2008 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What ever, whom ever..all I really suspect is that Geoge Bush gave himself (and his cronies) a nice "little going away gift".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Without question"?
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier on Nov 6, 2008 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My understanding is that Obama began to surge in the polls four days before the economic crisis - precisely the time when Governor Palin appeared on the nightly news with Katie Couric.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Without question"? Posted by: yale
Let's not be naive
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Nov 6, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Note, first, that Larry Summers and the other economic advisers have spoken against "the misguided policies of the 1930s" - meaning they don't want a policy that directly aids and employs the public. A trade & contracting policy that directly aids Wall Street and giant corporations is just fine, however, because those people give a lot of fat bundled contributions to politicians. That's the reality: the government works for the people who pay their salaries. A lot of poor and low-income people gave money to Obama, so he will hopefully take their wishes into consideration. Goldman Sachs employees also gave a lot of money to Obama - over half a million - etc.

Those who expect Obama to take on all their pet projects are misguided about the media-controlled political process in the U.S. Now is a good time to look back on the media coverage of this election and ask - where were the issues? Such as:

1. There was little if any detailed discussion of Iraq: how we got into it (lies), what the real goals were (privatization, permanent military bases, and oil), and when we'll leave (within 16 months? or even sooner?).

2. There was even less discussion of Afghanistan. The one "success story" in Afghanistan is opium cultivation, which broke records last year, and will likely do so again. There was absolutely no discussion of that, which is not at all surprising. Imagine this question: "If an opium traffiker was helping to fight the Taliban, would you allow him to keep shipping opium?"

3. What about the cost of the war, the massive deficits, the blatant fraud in the reconstruction contracts? No mention of government corruption ever passed the lips of TV broadcasters this past season. Corruption - it means government getting in bed with private interests, with money serving as lubricant. Business can't be corrupt on its own - that's the natural state of business deals, after all. That's why you need independent government regulation - which no longer exists.

Separation of Business and State - that's what is needed.

A far as stopping the bailout? Note also that the Supreme Court has been taken over by corporate tools who look like they'll do anything Big Business wants - they already tossed Exxon's damages for the Valdez spill, and are now looking likely to give Big Pharma permanent protection from lawsuits - remember, those are the jackals who gave us Bush in the first place, on a 5-4 vote - they're just as corrupt as Congress is.

There has been a vast redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the billionaire class over the past few decades - a process engineered by both Republicans and Democrats, though usually led by Republicans. That process has to be reversed, but the Big Money doesn't like the idea at all. If serious reforms are put in place in the U.S. (which will be a massive struggle), then that money will try and do what it did in the 1930s - go find some totalitarian states to invest in.

How do you think Hitler built his army up in war-ravaged Germany, after all?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rahm Emanuel
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 6, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr NAFTA, Mr Dereulation, Mr DLC is supposed to be the White House CoS for Obama.
Can anyone tell me why and how these DLC people keep rearing their ugly heads like the undead in a horror movie? Rahm did a pitifully bad job in 2006 on the DCCC, supporting DLC types that in may cases lost and starving grassroots/netroots candidates that won or came very close without DCCC money.
He's toxic and Obama should leave him on the Hill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Wall St. Failure was a scam!!!!
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Nov 6, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To have this war Ol' Junior had to put us in hock...BIGTIME!!!! He borrowed a trillion from China and another from Japan. None of us knew that. Nor did we know the terms of repayment.
But we know the cost. One life too fucking high!!!!

The 700 billion dollar ripoff of the taxpayers was just the first installment on those loans. Once again using misdirection to make us think otherwise,like loosing your savings,they made a cash-grab.If they had told us they were gathering 700 billion to payback war loans,how fast do you think that would have been shot down. Pretty damn fast I'd say.

Truth is Wall St runs on greed. So it's always going to be up and down. Some stocks are made to drop just so some fast money can be made by insiders. Wall St lives and dies by their own greed. They are really no help to the average American but to the government...they are the perfect scapegoat to create panic amongst the people.

FUCK WALL ST. Give the money to the People.
The 52% of us that live on less than 32,000 a year,including all SSI folks and disability recievers. Wall St would get the money soon enough because we'd all start buying things Wall St's stockholders make and might even invest some, but probably not with Dow Jones...
that guy is a dick!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is a proven sellout & Naomi Klein = intellectual dishonesty – AGAIN
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Nov 6, 2008 2:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The question now is whether Obama will have the courage to take the ideas that won him this election and turn them into policy."

Obama and his entire selection machine was bought and paid for by monopoly Organized Corporate Crime Rule.

Obama personally made sure the martial law blackmail Wall Street "bailout" was rammed through by calling virtually every democrat on the hill. Barack Obama leaned on his party to pass this Fascist giveaway by and for those that literally brought him to Washington.

Naomi Klein's other premise -- that "capitalism" is the problem is the other red herring sold by her and others:

"Democracy" and "capitalism" (that requires real competition and free markets by definition) CANNOT and DOES NOT EXIST under Fascism which is the true system in place. Never has, never will.


"It is absurd to claim that a progressive "movement" with a potential for profound social change can coalesce behind a candidate who repeatedly and reflexively aligns with the worst corporate malefactors on the planet, the very same individuals who brought about the current catastrophe."
Glen Ford (executive editor Black Agenda Report for the journal of African American political thought and action. October 15, 2008)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have you seen who Obama is chosing?
Posted by: hilly7 on Nov 6, 2008 4:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is the same old, different flavor, and I'm sure, different term. Where Bush called people who didn't go along with his war mongering corporate benefiting ways unAmerican, the same will be done under Onama only people will be called raciest.


The choices he has thus far made show me I wasted a vote on a man no different than his challenger or for that matter his predecessor.


Same ole same ole. It now becomes a choice we made, the flavor of Facism, chocolate or vanilla, big deal. He already aligns himself with scum, different faces, same type people. Rev Wright seemed a good man, wonder how dissapointed he will be? I know I am.

I also detest the fact he is compared to great men, one of which was Dr Martin Luther King, now there was a great man, one who cared more for people than bankers, corporations, and money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Have you seen who Obama is chosing? Posted by: left_libertarian
Maybe Paulson could put the next bailout on his Visa card?
Posted by: blogoffanddie on Nov 6, 2008 4:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who can save capitalism from itself? Not Obama.

Obama endorsed the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street – a bailout of the wealthy on Wall Street not the US economy. Obama speaks of change but reveals himself as just another corporate toadie.

Henry Paulson while an executive at Goldman-Sachs. made over 500 million dollars in pay, bonuses, and stock options. Maybe he could put the next bailout on his Visa card?

The bailout attempts will inevitably fail. The creation and then payment of the bailout debt (by the US taxpayer) will ultimately leave the taxpayer with less to spend, causing their economy to drop even further, resulting in more job losses, less investment and, once again, a further downsizing of the economy. This economic animal is eating its own tail.

http://blogoffanddie.wordpress.com
http://theimpolitecanadian.wordpress.com/

Remember your history people, if at first you don't succeed, destroy all the evidence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]