Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Don't Look Now, There's a Huge Wave of Inflation Coming Toward Us

By Kevin Phillips, Huffington Post. Posted October 29, 2008.


Paulson and Bernanke's "rescue" have only begun to do their full long-term damage.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Kevin Phillips

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The time has come to review how back in 2005-2006 George W. Bush -- now increasingly perceived as another Herbert Hoover -- picked two top appointees who helped steer him towards his fateful 2008 rendezvous with a second Great Crash.

One of them, a top level financier, insured that Washington's eventual rescue policies would concentrate on trying to bail-out Wall Street while ignoring the gnawing cancer of its warped ambitions and financial malpractices. The second, a professor, misapplied dogma about how to guard against severe downturns into a disastrous attempt to refight the onset of the 1930s depression -- his academic specialty. He did not understand the very different context of our own era of cyber-spatial financial recklessness and gathering global inflation.

Henry Paulson, Bush's pick as treasury secretary, was not your ordinary gray-flannel investment bank CEO. One 2006 Business Week article spotlighted the new secretary as a high-roller: "Think of Paulson as Mr. Risk. He's one of the key architects of a more daring Wall Street where securities firms are taking greater and greater chances in their pursuit of profits." That, the magazine added, "means taking on more debt ... it means placing big bets on all sorts of exotic derivatives and other securities." That means stuff like collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and credit default swaps (CDSs), innovations we now know to have spread toxicity, opacity and paralysis.

Economics professor Ben Bernanke, before replacing Alan Greenspan as Federal Reserve Board chairman in early 2006, had served almost three years as the Chairman of George W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers. There he had been a cheerleader for Bush economic policies, including upper-bracket tax cuts, Social Security privatization, "securitization" of assets and "safe" financial derivatives. On top of which, he was an academic and theoretical specialist in monetary policy and economic depressions - a man who boasted of understanding downturns' critical preventative. The Fed should pump up the money supply or liquidity which would overcome any credit crunch. As a card-carrying monetarist, he also insisted there was no meaningful inflation during the 2005-2007 period even though global commodity price indexes had been soaring.

Thus, and without knowing it, did an inept George W. Bush assemble his two chief architects of neo-Hooverism. They would pick up where the original Disasterman, Alan Greenspan, Fed Chairman between 1987 and early 2006, had left off. Together, alas, the two would steer U.S. policy towards false pretenses, panic and economic disaster - Old Hoover outcomes re-achieved through new biases, ideology and myopia.

Wall Street's "Mr. Risk," calling the shots at Treasury, would focus the Bush administration's 2008 economic "rescue" policies not on the broad national interest but on bailing-out the "Frankenstein Fifteen" top U.S. financial institutions - the big five investment firms, the five largest commercial banks, the four mortgage biggies, and AIG, the rogue insurance giant. Along with the buccaneering hedge funds, these were the big firms that borrowed huge sums, merged grandiosely,, experimented with all "the exotic derivatives and other securities" and led the multi-trillion-dollar metastasis through which finance ballooned to take over domination of the U.S. economy by 2004 with 20-21% of the U.S. Gross Domestic product. Although in mid-2007, Paulson pretended that the emerging crisis involved no more than bad real estate lending practices, the cynical observer can assume that "Mr Risk," the arch-insider, knew what he was covering up - how deeply the malpractice and deception ran -- and on whose behalf.

If Paulson wanted to keep the spotlight off the real culprits -- the Frankenstein financial and mortgage banker laboratories, with their several trillions of exotic mortgages, toxic CDOs and Las Vegas-like credit swaps -- then narrow-gauge academician Bernanke at the Fed was the perfect sidekick. The economic ivory-tower theory in which Bail-out Ben had immersed himself for thirty years ignored 21st century mega-innovations and looked back seven decades to the Crash of the 1930s and how that long-ago debacle might have been prevented.

Alas, poor Ben -- his economist heroes have long been Milton Friedman and the latter's wife, Anna Schwartz, who some four decades ago co-authored a landmark volume entitled A Monetary History of the United States. On October 18, in a prominent interview published by the Wall Street Journal, Anna Schwartz opined that Bernanke was simply getting Fed policy wrong. The problem does not lie with the money supply or liquidity as it did in the 1930s. It lies with all these toxic securities the Wall Street geniuses dreamed up, gorged on, and sold around the globe in huge quantities between 2003 and 2007. "They're toxic," says Ms. Schwartz, "because you cannot sell them, you don't know what they're worth, your balance sheet is not credible, and the whole market seizes up." In fact, by giving transfusions to otherwise insolvent banks, Paulson and Bernanke have prolonged the crisis: "They should not be recapitalizing firms that should be shut down ... Firms that made wrong decisions should fail." That, of course, was how it worked in the old days when "creative destruction" kept capitalism on its toes. Now, of course, it's on its butt.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: george bush, inflation, bernanke, paulson

Kevin Phillips's new book is Bad Money: Reckless Finance, Failed Politics and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism, published in April by Viking.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bernanke Knows All About FDR's Bank Holiday ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 29, 2008 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What FDR, Norway and Sweden did to avert their banking crises is well known to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. That is to audit every financial institution, re-capitalize the solvent, seize, bankrupt and merge insolvent institutions with the solvent.

Bernanke and Paulson are putting our whole economic system in peril by playing favorites while costing the tax payers hundreds of billions if not trillions. One unanticipated shock could bring this whole house of cards, known as our financial sector, crashing down.

As far as the liquidity they have been pushing into the system, it has no place to go. The money supply has two legs. The first is the actual nominal amount of money, the second is the speed or velocity with which the money moves around the system. Even if there is a pile of money it does nothing unless it moves through the system.

What needs to be done is to nationalize the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve, institute a FDR style Bank Holiday while establishing a Public Central Bank that manages credit and money creation as a public utility.

No more Hedge Funds and Investment Banks leveraging at 30 to 100 to one. No more off the books, over the counter derivatives that currently are in the hundreds of trillions. Yes, that's right, while our entire economy produces around $14 trillion a year in GDP there are in fact over $600 trillion in derivatives. In other words, 30 years worth of gambling chits.

But, sorry to say, any reform looks entirely unlikely as Obama has been truly bought by Wall Street. Only if the situation gets truly desperate and Obama seeks real advice will any good come of this. We, our children, and our children's children will be paying for this unless Obama does the right thing and nationalizes the Federal Reserve and treats money and credit creation as a public good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He's right about Obama Posted by: Artkansas
The Die Is Cast...
Posted by: gazooks on Oct 29, 2008 2:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...by "leaders" that apparently believe that a nation can just borrow it's way out of debt.

Not that they truly do, it's simply the means to total political control of a helpless herd and nothing more.
Anyone that can't see that we're totally screwed is either mad or dead.

Thinking a "worst case" scenario of our near term economic future improves with each passing day regardless of who wins this election.

The sleight of hand, in the end, will leave us all helpless, helpless, helpless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The indelible image of Greenspan
Posted by: Gregory Kruse on Oct 29, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They robbed me. I'm like a sheep that painstakingly grew his own wool and they fleeced me. Ayn Rand is to thievery as Ernst Rudin is to eugenics. These people were simply encouraged to take my money, and there is no possibility of redress. Those same people, who whine about paying taxes and are warning against Obama raising taxes on me, just took my money without even a twinge of guilt, and are using it right now to enjoy themselves. I will never get it back. It is gone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't willingly put on rose colored glasses Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: The indelible image of Greenspan Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Don't Loan Money to a Compulsive Gambler
Posted by: popeurbanxxiii on Oct 29, 2008 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no need to worry, folks. Bernanke and Paulson have a hot tip on the seventh race at Pimlico. Sure thing! Don't worry! I'll pay you back the money tomorrow! You know I'm good for it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Couple of Thoughts
Posted by: cokids on Oct 29, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm.....could this not be part of a strategy to hamstring the next administration? Inflation will hit after the new Pres takes office. HE'LL get the blame and the Repub party will benefit...IF Obama is elected which looks likely right now. Of course, that would be a gamble...should McCain win, HE would take the blame, but I don't think the Repubs much like McCain anyway.

The other scenario is the promise of Grover Nordquist to sink the baby WITH the bathwater. WEll, the bath is full and the baby is sinking. They have delivered on their promise to turn the clock back 70 years....I think they promised 50 years, but hey, why not 70 instead?

As a retiree on a very fixed/limited income this is terrifying...with rising food/fuel costs! The quick way out is to starve because i think that would be less painful than freezing ot death! (I live in Maine).

Oh, and another bit of interest I just mUST get off my chest this AM, Yesterday we had a very strange happening where i live. The tide suddenly surged and brought high water to our harbor (only one other harbor up and down the coast reported this effect). They claim that this surge happened 6-7 times during the day. Boats were damaged and docks left high and dry from the unusually high tides followed quickly by unusually low tides. STRANGE!! Anyone have any thoughts about how a storm surge could cause this to happen in TWO harbors on the coast of Maine without it happening up and down the coast, if it truly were a storm surge as reported. Surely fishermen and coastal residents would have noted such bizarre tidal behavior had it happened anywhere else!!??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Couple of Thoughts Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: A Couple of Thoughts Posted by: Knot_Rich
» No Blame Game here folks Posted by: jon B
» You experienced a rip tide Posted by: lexicon
Kevin Phillips --->
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 29, 2008 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A question: During the Great Depression of the 1930s, prices dropped down to nickels, dimes and quarters. But this time you say we're headed for inflation. How so?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Kevin Phillips ---> Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Kevin Phillips ---> Posted by: Knot_Rich
» inflation? Posted by: jon B
borrowing money out of debt
Posted by: cyr3n on Oct 29, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it doesnt take an economics major to realize that borrowing money to get out of debt only INCREASES debt.. unless that cash is going towards activities that abolish debt.

What I dont understand is how a 30%+ apr is even legal. 50 years ago, charging more than 5% was illegal in some places. Even a mafia loan shark has better rates at 20%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Fed does not create policy, it administers money so
Posted by: IPF on Oct 29, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the idea that somehow the Fed is responsible for this mess belies a propagandist agenda.

The congress makes policy, steers the country and our economy. The blame lies there.

Why do you think they are scrambling to find a guilty party among ALL sectors? The Fed, the Treasury, the banks, short sellers, profiteers, the previous Fed, the SEC, Insurance companies, etc., etc., etc..

Private business is VERY predictable - it will try to make a profit. Government's meddling with this in its never ending search for additional money is what causes all the problems.

Why is it that companies CEO's are expected to drop their pay, management is expected to reduce their salaries, companies are expected to trim their costs - but government forever increases their pay, size and expenses?

It's time to trim the fat.

Reduce government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LMAO. Posted by: pinkfloydd
» RE: LMAO. Posted by: Von
» RE: LMAO. Posted by: pinkfloydd
» RE: LMAO. Posted by: Von
» RE: LMAO. Posted by: leafsong1
» Drive-by idioting Posted by: leafsong1
ALL THREE !!!
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 29, 2008 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peacefully reduce government, business and population, then there will be plenty of resources for everyone!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember Stagflation?
Posted by: PaulK on Oct 29, 2008 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wars cause borrowing sprees. They can be real cash borrowing sprees or they can be infrastructure borrowing sprees against our children.

Borrowing sprees, as we found out in the 10 years after Vietnam, cause stagflation. The jobs go down and the inflation goes up.

There! How's that for an economics lesson?

Follow the wisdom of people who lived through hyperinflation. Go buy foreign stocks first (to avoid both the stagnation and inflation) and domestic stocks second (to avoid the inflation). If you want the near-equivalent of bonds, invest in foreign utilities first and domestic utilities second. Buy the inflation-proof type of U.S. bonds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: emember Stagflation? Posted by: leafsong1
Aren't you glad that we didn't put Social Security into the Stock Market?
Posted by: Artkansas on Oct 29, 2008 1:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember when Bush was pushing investing the Social Security money into the stock market? Our current situation could have been worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

inflation is nothing more than a re-allocation of capital from the have-nots to...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Oct 29, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... those in the know or are on the political gravy train.

We all must know... that the plutocrats, their politicals and the elites who ensured their electability must understand the basic fundamentals of this current fiscal reality, and won't be hurt by this shift in capital... its like its been planned!

The wealth that so many had built up over the past 30 years is now wiped out... re-allocated ala inflation, all 401K accounts have been reduced to a fraction of their worth... and home equity doesn't cover the cost of the bills you've rung up due to family members health care costs...

What are the causes and effects... lets make a list...
1.) Why did we deregulate... especially in certain markets were regulation is a must?
2.) The healthcare crisis!... everyone eventually falls into this hole and the credit munchers will latch onto anything and everything of value you have... 35+ years and its effects are home to roost... deregulation just hid this cost from regulators but what about the years before when it was supposed to be regulated?
3.) what about the cost of litigation? and incarceration? ... their are to many laws that have nothing to do with public safety and protection but are actually graft machines for politicals and their friends... justice should be for everyone, not JUST US
4.) What about your tax dollars... can you actually see the results of the tax dollars collected actually working for you? I'm talking about TRILLIONS here
5.) The Republican passed bankruptcy law amendments have/are wiping out our wealth and giving/leaving a lifetime of individual achievements in ruins!

This is the legacy of the Republican controlled Executive, House, Senate and Judiciary
but it goes back much further... much much further... as Rethugnicans have always been about "Fear and Loathing"... and I fear, the Demoncrats aren't/won't be any better...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inflation has one purpose: it makes people work
Posted by: Bobsays on Oct 30, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't be mistaken: the governments around the world have chosen to hyperinflate their way out of this crisis. Why? Because it is the least worst option if social stability and control is to be maintained.

How does this work? Hyperinflation raises prices for basic goods like food and heating. Everyone needs to eat and keep warm. Thus, they will do whatever they can to keep eating and warm. And that means still working and earning: they have no choice.

In an economic crisis you do not want people sitting around and bitching and having pity parties. You want them back at work and stressed so that they need o behave themselves. Hyperinflation does the trick.

It forces savers back into the game, it wipes out any retained wealth.

Once everyone is put in this situation, then it is possible to move to the next phase: attacks on Iran, Pakistan and Syria.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» if there is work to do Posted by: jon B
Blame Alan Greenspan
Posted by: Democritus on Oct 31, 2008 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kevin Philips gets part of it right, but he doesn't mention the true cause of our financial meltdown and what is sure to be rampant inflation. Alan Greenspan (he who was shocked that the markets failed to self-regulate), kept interest rates low too long in his quest to quell inflation. You can only do that by pumping huge amounts of money into the banks. The banks, with nowhere for that money to go, and desperate to appease their investors, managed to concoct all sorts of "derivatives," and to advertise that anyone, regardless of credit risk, could get a low-rate mortgage.

So it was inevitable that the bubble would burst, and burst it did all over Paulson and Bernanke. But they don't learn. Now they both want to keep pumping money into the system and continue to lower interest rates. Don't they understand the old adage about shunning the fire after getting burned? Poor Obama. He's going to inherit the worst inflation since Carter. Don't keep your money under the mattress, folks; it's not going to be worth very much four years from now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]