Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Not My Financial Crisis -- I've Got Literally Nothing to Lose

By Alexander Zaitchik, AlterNet. Posted October 13, 2008.


Like most people I know in their 20s and 30s, it takes a stretch of the imagination to understand that I have a stake in the national economy.
Advertisement

In a literal sense, the financial meltdown has hit me close to home. The smoking ash piles on Wall Street lay just a 10-minute walk from my front door in New York's Chinatown. But my sense of proximity to events stops there. In terms of their impact on the soundness of my sleep, at least so far, the economy in question might as well be North Korea. My feeling of remove from the crisis is a product of the fact that I don't have much to lose. Like millions of Americans, I own nothing -- not property, not stock, not a 401(k) plan, not health insurance, not a car, nothing.

Like most people I know in their 20s and 30s, it takes a stretch of the imagination to understand that I have a stake in the national economy. In terms of day-to-day life, my only ties to large financial institutions are a Bank of America checking account, a single low-limit high-fee Visa card, and a Kilimanjaro of student debt, which I have come to accept as something I will die with, not from, like a benign but grapefruit-size tumor or peaceable parasite dwelling in my large intestine. When people use scary terms like "unchartered territory" and "total meltdown," my first thought is, "Would an economic cataclysm wipe out my student debt? If so, then let's press reset and start the whole damn thing over! Burn it clean!"

I haven't heard much from or about people like me in the last month. Watching the media report on the crisis, you'd think the United States had achieved the Republican dream of becoming a full-fledged "ownership society" populated by an upwardly mobile class of home-owning day traders sitting on fat nest eggs. But it hasn't. So here's a news flash from the young-and-indebted demographic: Those of us without retirement plans or health insurance, who just barely make rent and buy food in the real economy, a lot of us aren't as scared as maybe we should be. We have our own gut take on the disappearance of $9 trillion in electronic NYSE casino chips. And that is, we could give a shit.

There is even less angst when it comes to the popped housing bubble and fractured sub-prime mortgage mess that triggered the cascade. To paraphrase Stalin: no mortgage, no problem. If you occupy your home -- in my case, a small loft that I share with seven people -- on the basis of a month-to-month lease, you're not going to mourn a steep drop in housing prices. You are going to throw a party and hang a piƱata in the shape of your landlord. If my landlord faces foreclosure on his property and I am evicted, my next crisis-era apartment will be that much cheaper, assuming I can find enough work to make rent. But what else is new?

I realize at some level that it's facile to think I don't have a stake in a stable economy, or that further meltdown will affect only those with the most to lose. As the economist Max Wolff told Josh Holland in his weekend roundup of progressive expert opinion on the crisis, "The banks' pain is ours. Millions will be fired. When it rains on the top of the hill, those who live on the bottom of the hill drown." I get that. Scraping by will likely become even harder in the days ahead for people in my income bracket. But it seems to me that a decade of scraping by is good practice for whatever's coming. And it's just a fact that this particular era of capitalism hasn't been very good for those of us at the bottom of the wealth pyramid. If it takes some creative destruction to herald a new, more egalitarian, better regulated economy, then so be it. Millions of us are waiting for the reckoning with belts already tightened. They've been tightened for as long as we can remember.

Even though I don't own a home and likely never will, I sympathize with those now trapped into mortgages they can't afford. I made the exact same mistake 16 years ago, when I signed a bunch of dotted lines in order to attend a private college. I learned my lesson early and have lived within my means ever since, getting by hand to mouth on an average freelancer's salary south of $25,000. Eighteen was a good age to learn the massive-debt lesson. Unlike all those foreclosed homes, nobody can take away my fancy if useless liberal arts degree. The best side effect of the tightening credit crunch is that U.S. banks are closing down their private student loan operations, saving a new generation of high school grads from borrowing tens of thousands of dollars at high interest rates just so they can play the prestige name game with a bunch of prep-schooled future investment bankers.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: national economy

Alexander Zaitchik is a freelance journalist.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Young people are screwed with an attitude like that...
Posted by: skoog5600 on Oct 13, 2008 1:32 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, I can only say that for someone in their late 20s or 30s reflected in this author's attitude, you are going to be in bad shape for the rest of your life.

Rather than complain and piss and moan about having signed on the dotted line in order to obtain a school loan, why not look at what you might be able to do to make a difference. This is exactly the mentality most Americans young and old have. I don't have anything, but I want to be like those that have something so I will do what I can to live beyond my means.

It is a sad state of affairs in the US. I would venture to say that the US will someday be a 1st world, 2nd tier country servicing the powerful countries of China and India where young people work and study hard in order to excel and improve their countries situations. Do you see that in the US? No, just a freelance journalist pissing and moaning about what he doesn't have and doing nothing about it.

Good luck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hope? Posted by: benzene
» Good angry rant Posted by: skoog5600
» What's your point? Posted by: blogbooks
» Worthless education Posted by: Cathyc
» There you go playing the victim Posted by: skoog5600
Thanks for this.
Posted by: nihilozero on Oct 13, 2008 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I needed the laugh. Well written and funny. A bit too optimistic, but I enjoyed reading it anyway.
Nihilo Zero

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Right ,this was funny Posted by: plantland
elc
Posted by: Songaweek on Oct 13, 2008 3:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm 50 something with little to lose as the economy founders. There are a lot of us with educations and no killer instinct who haven't prospered since our long ago graduations. When my millionaire employer got off the phone one morning last week and said to me, teary eyed, "Do I look like a woman who just lost half a million dollars of her own money?" I had trouble tacking the proper expression on my face. Meanwhile, I lose sleep every night over the plight of my children, two of whom are attending college on student loans and their own paychecks. I don't even know what they will owe when and if they graduate. One is in a PA state university and one is attending community college. That's as affordable as it gets, and for people like us, it is still nearly impossible to keep up with the extras, like books.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well... Posted by: BreeMass
Now Hold On
Posted by: Godfather89 on Oct 13, 2008 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am only 19 and I know the consequences if I lose my job in this shitty market. It is in the best interest of everyone to keep the market stable yet prepare for the worst. It is time to stop trying to live beyond our means and actually save away money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Now Hold On Posted by: lil ole me
Wallstreet did a Project Mayhem on itself
Posted by: merik on Oct 13, 2008 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Noam Chomsky recently said that the situation was too dire to indulge in schadenfreude. (I had to look it up too.) Nonetheless, I agree in sentiment with the author and some of the commentators. I was in my second year of college when Fight Club came out. I think that captured the feeling of a lot of us. We obeyed the cradle-to-grave advertising as our budgets and credit card balances allowed. We went to college. We did what we were told. It led to deeper slavery and deeper despair. In the climax of that movie, the Club blows up the headquarters of the credit card companies in order to cause a complete economic meltdown through the loss of credit. Who would have thought that we needed not Tyler Durden but patience? The System did a Project Mayhem on itself! I ain't gonna cry about it. In fact, I'm going to smile. Even though my father lost a big chunk of his retirement, the pain of the fat parasites in New York City is just too sweet. There's a crack in the American Dream and it's time, like the Berlin wall before it, to pull it down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What a great analogy. Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Too Big To Go Down, Too Big To Be Believed
Posted by: thebeerdoctor on Oct 13, 2008 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alexander Zaitchik's biting comments represent a much needed scorn for those who embrace this idiotic mythology of medieval feudalism (should the peasants offer their forelock to the moneyed nobles, those titans of commercial paper fraud?). Only this morning on business television, I heard the wailing and gnashing of teeth for Morgan Stanley, who struggle to not be seen as the first in line, awaiting their government handout.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» worse than slavery... Posted by: Cathyc
At the other end of the spectrum
Posted by: girvind on Oct 13, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think what most bothers me about the current "crisis" is that no-one claims to have seen it coming whereas it has, in fact, been approaching with all the subtlety of a freight train for years. Lack of sustainability has been a prime feature of the American, and unfortunately by definition, the global economy for decades. I was a willing participant for many years and made a comfortable living working, in the good American way, far too many hours for not enough money but around 2001 became increasingly uneasy about my vulnerability to forces outside my immediate control. I became less and less comfortable with the predatory nature of US banking in general so when I turned 60, I sold my largish, highly mortgaged house (before the bubble burst), closed my one-woman business and moved to a less frenetic society. I purchased a much smaller fully paid up house (in Scotland) and settled down to live within my means. I am not particularly bright, so if I could see this, how come all these "experts" couldn't? This writer is correct, if you don't have too much, you are less likely to lose it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm lovin' it!
Posted by: Farasien on Oct 13, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an member of the thirtysomething generation, I have to say, though Chomsky said Shadenfreud was un-called for, I'm taking mine where I can find it. Though I'm in better shape financially than most people in my generation, I'm definitely not and am almost certain-thanks to the rules now making it all but impossible (bankrupsy laws, corrupt corporate systems, etc.) to ever be rich. The current situation was waiting to happen, and I've been seeing the tower leaning for a long time. When people saw Google and other overpriced add agencies taking off and said it was a miracle and how the 'next big thing' was HERE, all I could think of was how these clowns, like investment bankers, were selling nothing but empty AIR to unwise, greedy idiots. When you look at the systems in place currently, the rules have been skewed in such a way to create and continue a slave-like state where workers' rights are stripped, the social safety nets-put in place after the LAST crash-are cancelled and upward mobility is made all but impossible for those who don't already sit near the top of the socioeconomic ladder. When things started breaking down, though I do have a little to lose, I was cheering for it- and I still am. If I were to lose everything and see the whole building collapse, I consider it a worthwhile expense. If I manage to live to see the vast majority of the assholes who lord over us all take a poverty missile, it'll make the pain I've lived through worth it.

Its about damn time there was a reshuffling of the deck. I just hope I'm there to see the boomers who perpetrated this horror line up in the bread lines right next to those they beggered.

Just desserts!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm lovin' it! Posted by: lawana
Fact of life
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 13, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The richer just keep on getting richer (at Main Street Americas expense) and the poor, well you know...

Jiff
Is your ISP watching you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Don't Remember the Great Depression
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Oct 13, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like nearly everyone still living, I don't remember the Great Depression but in reading this article it occurred to me that my generation (I'm in my 60's) is perhaps the last one who could see the influence that the Great Depression had on some people. By and large, was not a pretty picture.

I did not grow up in poverty, but my parents had known the hardships of the depression and the memory of those years was strong, particularly for my father. He never talked of it much, but he was so very careful about spending money it often seemed funny to me. It was not that in his later years he was particularly poor, it was that the Depression had left such an impression on him.

Spending money was always exceedingly painful for him. Whenever he finished eating an apple, the only thing left were the seeds. In going over his effects after he died, I found his wallet - probably the same one he had used for 30 or more years, the leather paper-thin and re-stitched by hand again and again to get a few more years of use from it.

A second and even Greater Depression is not at all a funny thing to contemplate, particularly for those of you just finishing school and with no resources to fall back on. Your concern should not be that of doing without television and a cell phone but instead about where your food, clothing and shelter will come from. Take a look at people now living on the streets to see what it might mean, even for someone with a newly earned bachelor's degree.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Responsibility Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» Positive Effects Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» I have to quibble Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: I have to quibble Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: I have to quibble Posted by: tommy_slothrop
Yep, this country is too selfish. A too individualist society often ends up in failures such as this
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 13, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try to get cooperation and sharing with one another involved and you get hissed and sneered at. No wonder

GOD IS SEVERELY PUNISHING THE USA TO ETERNAL DAMNATION FOR BEING A NATION OF SELFISH ASSHOLES !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Get a grip, max. Posted by: helenahanbasquet
» RE: Get a grip, max. Posted by: maxpayne
» There is no god, mad max... Posted by: Cathyc
Ironic Socialism
Posted by: benzene on Oct 13, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't help but see the glaring irony that, in the face of this economic collapse, the word "socialism" has suddenly become in vogue as a political insult. It's even funnier that the bailout itself was a form of economic socialism, invented to fix that which the Almighty Free Markets had wrought.

Socialist countries, e.g., Sweden, France, Germany, Cuba, are a whole lot better off in this international shock. I can't speak for their upper-crust (like a booger!) investment bankers, but I can confidently state that their citizens will be much better off if this keeps going than many people here. At least they'll continue to have free health care, housing, education, and access to food.

Having just graduated like the author, also under a pile of debt, I certainly understand his viewpoint. I'm happy just to be able to afford chicken breasts instead of butt meat. In my field, biotechnology, the only current high road to wealth remaining open is that of pharmaceutical development (let's cure Restless Leg Syndrome!). Those of us who actually like to do science are struggling to keep the research going in the face of less and less money to compete for. But that's a free market at work, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ironic Socialism Posted by: wolfgangmo
» RE: Ironic Socialism Posted by: richholland
» Beware that chicken meat! Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Ironic Socialism Posted by: richholland
use the 700 billion to pay off--
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 13, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all these student loans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I SECOND THAT! Posted by: benzene
» RE: I SECOND THAT! Posted by: ellie
Amen
Posted by: Pinorrow on Oct 13, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for capturing my sentiments exactly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why No Bailout for Student Loans?
Posted by: benzene on Oct 13, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The $700B bailout represents the worst of trickle-down economics. Gold doesn't run downwhill, however, shit does. The $700B bailout will allow the banking industry to put a Band-Aid over their superficial cut (it's all imaginary money anyway) and continue on as normal, thus not helping the normal people who really need it (sorry, but I don't really sympathize with the banker who can no longer afford a personal driver and $70 appetizers).

Why not use that $700B to buy out student debt. The institutions that made the loans would get their money now, thus giving them instant liquid capital and stabilizing them. The individuals whose loans get paid off would have their credit scores, disposable income, and health rise. These rises would in turn increase the ability of the individuals to buy more stuff, perhaps even invest through the very institutions that are foundering. This increase in disposable income increasing consumption would further stabilize the economy. Throw in a buy-out of bad mortgages, and then we have a happy society and a happier economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THOSE WHO CALL FOR BOTTOM-FEEDER DEBT RELIEF AREN'T PAYING ATTENTION
Posted by: lexicon on Oct 13, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the "411" on what it all means: YOUR debt is the engine of growth for the financial industry.

Eliminate YOUR debt, and you've eliminated THEIR money.

Here's a hint: I personally, purchased a parcel of land for CASH, some few years ago. In doing so, my debt burden went way down, and my CREDIT RATING went way down too. In fact, it tanked.

When you buy something on credit,(debt), you create money for the financial industry to play with, and they reward you by calling you a "preferred customer". When you CANCEL debt (as I did by "failing" to take out a mortgage on the land, instead of buying outright) you REMOVE money from their system.

Our economy used to be based on WEALTH. Now, it is based on MONEY. Those are two different things. Related, but different.

By rights, the financial industry (the trading and management of money) should be sized at about ((( GDP * interest rate) * 2) + "30 day transactions value"). This would result in a financial system that performs it's vital role, of providing for the clearing of value transactions between holders of wealth. In such a world where this equation were 'honored', the basis of the economy would be the transacting of, and conversion of, wealth.

Instead, the financial industry is many times that size...I've seen estimates that it's 40% of our GDP. what that means, is that instead of representing the movement of money to transact WEALTH, it is involved in the movement of MONEY to transact MORE MONEY.

See..."wealth" is tangible, physical stuff. It's "nouns". stuff you own or have. Trees on your land, minerals in the earth. The ability you have to work or create. The FUTURE ability you have to work or create. That's REAL WEALTH.

Money...money is not a "noun" thing...it's a "verb" thing. It's a FLOW. it's a transition of wealth between one state and the next. It DOESN'T REALLY EXIST. If you have 'wealth', you can say, "I have a CAR." If you have 'money', you would have to say, "I have a 50 miles-per-hour." The existence of MONEY happens when you put a unit of wealth "into play" in the economy.

...the problem is the movement of the economy away from "real" wealth, and toward "fake" wealth, or money.

Why does that matter? well, it's pretty simple. Even though money isn't "real", it DOES have some real characteristics. As a placeholder value for a wealth transaction, it represents the transactional value of that wealth transaction. If money itself becomes "worthless" (which is where we are headed), then the effect is, that the whole process of wealth transactions become "mis-calibrated", and mis-calibration means that arbitrage exists...and those who are positioned to take advantage of arbitrage (the very rich) will be able to consolidate and expand their holdings of real wealth (regardless of the value of the money), compared to those who are NOT in a position to arbitrage...who will lose ground.

In other words, the "financial bubble" will result inevitably in a wealth transfer up the chain. Happens in every depression.

High volatility in the value of money means real wealth will be stripped from the lower economic players, and conversely, high stability in the value of money results in the growth of real wealth in the lower economic tiers.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You miss my point Posted by: benzene
» Wow... Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: Wow... Posted by: lexicon
even more of us
Posted by: HoldmAccountable on Oct 13, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm in the top end of that age range - divorced when I was 40, after 16 years of marriage - with no retirement for my hard work. Supporting kids, even with a degree, in a lower paid job as an educator - I didn't get a pension unless I worked 14 years - by then I had to move to help elderly parents.
I'm depending upon social security - which these politicians say won't last - because THEY think it's more important to put our tax dollars into the MILITARY in stead of helping our citizens with education, health care and prosocial aspects that government should be spending tax on! Just look at the better position of people in countries where they DON'T spend the majority of their money on warfare!!
NEITHER CANDIDATE is talking about cutting the military budget - no, they're going to INCREASE IT!! We need a 2 party system again! (at least - we need the Green Party!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Leave a thought for the families
Posted by: MazdaMX5 on Oct 13, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been where this writer has been. I too was a student who shared house with people and even squatted. I owned nothing and left home