Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Financial Meltdown 101

By Arun Gupta, Indypendent. Posted October 13, 2008.


Everything you ever wanted to know about the biggest economic meltdown since the Great Depression but were afraid to ask.
Advertisement

Max Fraad Wolff consulted on and Michelle Fawcett contributed to this article. Illustrations By Frank Reynoso and color by Irina Ivanova. This article relied on many sources, including "The Subprime Debacle" by Karl Beitel, Monthly Review, May 2008. This essay was printed in the Oct. 3, 2008, issue of The Indypendent, and the November 2008 issue of Z Magazine.

From 1982 to 2000, the U.S. stock market went on the longest bull run ever, as share prices rose to dizzying heights. In the late 1990s, a combination of factors, which included the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates, created a huge price bubble in Internet stocks. A speculative bubble occurs when price far outstrips the fundamental worth of the asset. Bubbles have occurred in everything from real estate, stocks and railroads to tulips, beanie babies and comic books. As with all bubbles, it took more and more money to make a return*. This led to the Internet bubble popping in March 2000.

During this time of market mania, the Fed guts the Glass-Steagall Act, which was enacted during the Great Depression to prevent the type of banking activity that led to the 1929 stock market crash. In 1996, the Fed allows regular banks to become heavily involved in investment banking, which opens the door to conflicts of interest in banks pushing sketchy financial products on customers who poorly understood the risks. In 1999, under intense pressure from financial firms, Congress overturns Glass-Steagall, allowing banks to engage in any sort of activity from underwriting insurance to investment banking to commercial banking (such as holding deposits).

*For instance, if you purchased 100 shares of Apple at $10 a share and it rose to $20, it cost $1,000 to make $1,000 profit (a 100 percent return), but if the shares were $100 each and rose to $110, it would cost $10,000 to make $1,000 profit (a 10 percent return -- and the loss potential would be much greater, too.

Many Americans joined the stock mania literally in the last days and lost considerable wealth, and some, such as Enron employees, lost their life savings. When the stock market bubble erupted, turbulence rippled through the larger economy, causing investment and corporate spending to sink and unemployment to rise. Then came the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, generating a shock wave of fear and a drop in consumer spending. Burned by the stock market, many people shifted to home purchases as a more secure way to build wealth.

By 2002, with the economy already limping along, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and the Fed slashed interest rates to historic lows of near 1 percent to avoid a severe economic downturn. Low interest rates make borrowed money cheap for everyone from homebuyers to banks. This ocean of credit was one factor that led to a major shift in the home-lending industry -- from originate to own to originate to distribute. Low interest rates also meant that homebuyers could take on larger mortgages, which supported rising prices.

In the originate-to-own model, the mortgage lender -- which can be a private mortgage company, bank, thrift or credit union -- holds the mortgage for its term, usually 30 years. Every month the bank* originating the mortgage receives a payment made of principal and interest from the homeowner. If the buyer defaults on the mortgage, that is, stops making monthly payments, then the bank can seize and sell a valuable asset: the house. Given strict borrowing standards and the long life of the loan, it's like the homebuyer is getting married to the bank.
*Shorthand for any mortgage originator.

In the originate-to-distribute model, the banks sell the mortgage to third parties, turning the loans into a commodity like widgets on a conveyor belt. By selling the loan, the bank frees up its capital so it can turn around and finance a new mortgage. Thus, the banks have an incentive to sell (or distribute) mortgages fast so they can recoup the funds to sell more mortgages. By selling the loan, the bank also distributes the risk of default to others.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: financial crisis

Arun Gupta is an editor of the Indypendent. He's writing a book about the decline of American Empire to be published by Haymarket Books.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Very well written explanation
Posted by: skoog5600 on Oct 13, 2008 1:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you to the author of this very well written easy to understand debacle, no that is not strong enough, what is it that Jon Stewart says, oh yeah "Clusterf$%k to the poorhouse."

Really this should be required reading for every American so that these same kinds of mistakes won't get made again. But more importantly so that they don't continue to get fleeced by the greed that so corrupts the minds of the populace. Unfortunately, I don't hold out hope for most Americans (alternet readers excluded) that they will take the time to really understand what went wrong, and how they are just as much at fault as the system.

Why does everyone want to live beyond their mean? There needs to be a fundamental shift in the consciousness of America before anything really changes. I don't see it happening anytime soon, at least until the country truly hits bottom like an alcoholic or drug addict, then and only then will change truly occur.

Good luck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It gets my seal of approval Posted by: Iconoclast421
FASCISM 101 = CRASH ...(by Organized Corporate Crime)
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Oct 13, 2008 1:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting overview that lacks the core reason for our latest rigged crash in a series of boom-crash cycles.

The nation's economy is a planned "Keynesian" farce lorded over by a ruling class Ponzi scheme: a private Fascist bank monopoly better known as the "Federal Reserve" Corp (never federal and with minus ZERO reserves) that prints money out of thin air and charges the nation interest for it. This snake oil trap has been illegal and unconstitutional (article 1 section 8) since the "Fed" sting was hatched in 1913.

All of this is in service to a parasite of a Monopoly Organized Corporate Crime Regime that has been soaking the “masses” from before Karl Marx coined the hoax term “capitalism” that DID NOT EXIST when he invented the word (“capitalism” requires real competition and free, open markets that didn’t exist then and don’t exist now under essentially the same monopoly ruling class).

But the west’s economy based on a naked bunko con is but the foundation for the madness that has come home to roost.

The fact is America creates virtually NOTHING of real value other than Hollywood intellectual property and a bit of technology that amounts to a feeble share of what a “1st world” economy should produce. In the place of an industrial economy we have a paper recycling casino that creates gaming profits collected by ruling class Wall Street lackeys primarily out of New York and London (the Ponzi nerve centers of global financial and ruling class power).

At the head of this sham is the subprime and derivatives scam built on a “Federal Reserve” Corp bubble that Ben Bernanke, Goldman Sachs’ Hank Paulson, Alan Greenspan (whose doctorate work was based on housing bubbles) and all the rest have cooked.

Courtesy of Jim Sinclair, the trillions dollar derivatives “market” scandal:

1. Without regulation.
2. Without listing on public exchanges.
3. Without standards; not the least bit transparent; without an open market of the bid/ask type.
4. Dealt in by private treaty negotiations.
5. Without a clearinghouse
6. Unfunded without financial guarantee of any kind.
7. Functioning as contracts of specific performance.
8. Financial character or ability to perform is totally dependent on the balance sheet of the loser in the arrangement.
9. Evaluated by computer assumptions made by geeks, non-market experienced mathematicians who assume religiously that all markets return to their normal relationships regardless of disruptions.
10. Now in the credit and default category alone considered by accepted authorities as totaling more than USD$20 trillion in notional value.
11. Notional value becomes real value when the agreement is forced to find a real market for ending the obligation which is how one says sell it…


The latest series of deceptions came from Alan “Bubbles” Greenspan who kept recycling lies till he left office followed by Bernanke and Hank Paulson that put together their Wall Street “bailout” months ago when they were reassuring the naïve that:

“Our financial institutions are in a strong financial position, and our economic fundamentals are healthy…”
Hank Paulson (IMF meeting 10/20/07)

Gee, could these be words of a Fascist serving a corrupt old Fascist ruling class?

J.M. Keynes who crafted the World Bank and IMF for the Rockefellers produced similar a lie:

"We will not have any more crashes in our time."
John Maynard Keynes (economist credited with “Keynesian Economics” advocating centrally planned and controlled economy. Quote two years before the Great Depression. 1927)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Age of Positivity and Community is coming!
Posted by: thinkverybig on Oct 13, 2008 2:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is my goal to get in touch with someone from the Obama campaign and share with them my desire to be a part of his inauguration by reciting a poem I wrote called “We Must Change,” and I kindly ask for your help in doing so.
Go to youtube and do a search for "thinkverybig" and watch all of those videos. The one called "We Must Change" would be fitting to recite at Obama's Inauguration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM58nqX1ehE

Here are the words! http://www.thinkverybig.com/We%20Must%20Change.htm


"I Don't Understand" video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN_pGy_1bEg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm Afraid....
Posted by: CatDad on Oct 13, 2008 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that this issue is too complex (complex in that it might involve having to READ for twenty minutes to understand it) for many voters.

The entire Right and the MSM seems to be peddling a different story and I'm afraid it's being believed: That the entire financial meltdown was caused by liberals who forced Fannie Mae give loans to poor (mostly of color) people who had previously been shut out of the mortgage market. The far right is adding their own embellishments...that this entire meltdown was caused by Barney Frank and his former gay lover at Fannie Mae. Frank is becoming a "Jane Fonda" type lightening rod/scapegoat figure for the Right.

The reality that their "free markets" might be a fairy tale like communism is simply too painful to comprehend. Mythologies must immediately be created counter reality. Yet, like "Enron," this financial collapse may be impossible to summarize in ten second soundbites...other than the "answer" of "Liberals and homosexuals and Fannie Mae" being peddled in 24/7 rotation in the MSM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thats ok, Barney Frank Posted by: CatDad
» "low information" voters Posted by: xvictor
the difference is...
Posted by: ellie on Oct 13, 2008 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that the IMF and WTO put their foot down this weekend, and other countries, especially asian and eurpoean markets are working TOGETHER to find a way out of this mess that the US started...

the US is still doing the toss the garbage can against the wall method to see what sticks method...

and they think another round of free??? money checks will do the trick this time (again)... this is gonna be more then $700 bil, that was just the down payment kids...

just wish I has the one who cold cocked that guy from Leahman Bros in the gym, and that big party AIG had on OUR $$ complete with pedicures should have been a police sting with all attendees now in jail...

in a strange way, hope all the fed 'ideas' go bust before spending OUR MONEY... yup, still mad here about our tax $$ being used still to re-finance the rich and don't see that changing any time soon...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oops, forgot to add...
Posted by: ellie on Oct 13, 2008 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
guess who has the most stable economy in the world right now??? one of the few non WTO-IMF players... answer: IRAN!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A glowing example Posted by: John Annis
In the olden days they just called it
Posted by: owlbear1 on Oct 13, 2008 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Counterfeiting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Melt-Down Is Neo-Cons' Economic 9-11-Well Planned Like 9-11
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Oct 13, 2008 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like in 2004, the Democratic presidential and vice presidential candidates are not being truthful about the fake war on terror, a false flag attack of 9/11, the scam of the Federal Reserve Bank and the easily hackable electronic voting machines and central tabulators.

The reason is that the Democrats have been completely complicit in all of the criminal actions and war crimes committed by Bush. If they blow the whistle, then they will be implicated.

Guess who the biggest campaign contributor to George W. Bush is? MBNA, a big credit card company. MBNA wrote the legislation that radically changed the bankruptcy laws in the US.
Predatory lending, which used to be the province of criminal loan sharks, is now the norm in the lending industry in the US.
Today's banking crisis is the THIRD trillion dollar plus US-caused financial meltdown in the last twenty years.
Each one of these crises came into being through the same basic mechanism...the fraudulent over-valuing of financial assets by Wall Street - with a "wink and a nod" (and sometimes a lot more) from the White House and Congress. The fraudulently valued assets stimulate the economy, impart the illusion of health and then, inevitably, the fraud goes too far and the whole house of card comes painfully crashing back to earth.
The White House stood in the way of any state prosecuting federal banks and mortgage companies for predatory lending. They actually used a portion of the enabling act creating the US Comptroller of the Currency to preempt the regulation and prosecution of these banks for fraudulent loan activities. This is why Eliot Spitzer was politically assassinated. He wrote an editorial in the Washington Post three weeks before his assassination accusing the White House of preventing any state Attorney General from prosecuting these criminal activities. Of course, the mainstream media did not report the actual reason that this politician’s sexual indiscretions were reported so immediately and excessively.

The mainstream media never reported on Bush planting in the White House press corps a gay escort, Johnny Gannon. Gannon based on the Secret Service records of visits to the White House visited the White House over 200 times and stayed overnight at least two times.

Go to my website, www.911insidejob.net and read many articles and watch videos on the well planned takedown of the US dollar by the Bush White House and the Federal Reserve Bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

USA COMPARED TO THE REST
Posted by: Bob Graham Las Vegas on Oct 13, 2008 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do and always have thought the USA was the best country in the world. Even since we have decided that our constitution no longer is good enough to follow to the letter, the USA is still best when compared to others. Our freedom of speech, though diminishing is still better when compared to others. Our right to bear arms although being highly infringed upon is better, when compared to others. Our economic structure though decidedly socialistic and slanted towards making the rich richer is better , when compared to others . Our freedom of religion though greatly diminished and highly distorted is better, when compared to others. Our standards of living though declining rapidly is better, when compared to others. Our infrastructure though in bad need of repair is better, when compared to others. Our schools and building blocks for our children is better, when compared to others. Our jobs and employment of the people is better, when compared to others. We have been lead along by our politicians and been told we are better when compared to others.

Something does not seem quite right when all we do is compare ourselves to others and leave behind the attitude of being the best we can be and measuring ourselves by none, rather making each successive day better than the day before . The days of following the best plan of freedom, "OUR CONSTITUTION" being all but gone completely, our jobs having been shipped out to other countries, engaging in wars for the sole sake of engaging in wars along with a host of other ideas sold to us as good for our country, leave me wondering. "Is it okay with everyone to be the best pile of manure in the pasture, or is it time for change?

"We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate". ~Thomas Jefferson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You can have the "best" USA Posted by: sfortuna
» RE: You can have the "best" USA Posted by: richholland
» RE: You can have the "best" USA Posted by: richholland
» My country right or wrong? Posted by: donl51
MISERS
Posted by: melpol on Oct 13, 2008 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big secret is out. Politicians and the media were hiding the fact that American households have a net worth of over 56 trillion dollars. That is more than half the household wealth of the world. Those statistics come from the Federal reserve Flow of Funds Summary Statistics Second Quarter 2008. If there was a way to get the hoarders of those bucks to go on a long shopping spree the recession in the U.S. would quickly end. But our politicians fear talking to those idle saving account owners and their potential to stimulate our economy, they would rather increase the national debt than anger millions of cheap voters. Consumer spending determines the health of the economy not inflationary government handouts. Until some miserly Americans start digging into their over loaded bank accounts and start spending money our recession will continue indefinitely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mindboggling Stupidity Posted by: tommy_slothrop
Maldistribution of Wealth and SPBW economic policies.
Posted by: bthespoon on Oct 13, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SPBW stands for "Simlutaneous Parallel Backwards World".

Money trickles up, not down. If no one acts to counter-balance this fact, essentially all of our wealth eventually ends up in very few hands. Bush pushed the process into over-drive when he redistributed our wealth in precisely the wrong direction for the Good of the Whole, and the $700, no make that $840 billion "bail out" went to the top as well.

As long as no one understands the problem, we have no hope of it being solved.

Ironically nationalizing health coverage rather than socializing the credit industry would be the single best thing for our economy and our people. We would save hundreds of billions of dollars per year, and millions of innocent American lives from being destroyed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SAd
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 13, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems to me that during the "sub prime" days, bankers and brokers alike were getting filthy rich writing loans to anyone who applied and happily taking their commissions. Now that it has blown up in their faces, Main Street America is expected to, and HAS bailed them out. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.

Jiff
Online Privacy when it Counts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FINALLY, a sum of it all. THANK YOU !
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 13, 2008 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I strongly recommend that people take this summary of America's DYSFUNCTIONALITY that's been going on for 3 decades and try to cooperate with those of us trying to undo the damage please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» wouldn't that be nice! Posted by: donl51
How We get Disaster capitalism
Posted by: wallisp on Oct 13, 2008 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The market will continue to fall until these big monied holders of OUR money can get pennies on the dollar for any of America's assets, that are left. Then we will all be poor, and they will be in total control of the country, and be super rich. The Disaster capitalists tried to pull off the same thing in Russia when Yelsin was in power. This sysytem of takeover was made possible by Milton Friedman, and he got a Nobel Peace prize for it, imagine that. It has been used over the last 35 years in Chile, Argentina, China, Russia. Millions have died in camps from torture, starvation, etc. Folks hold on to your ass, it will be all you hhave before long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Executive pay again....
Posted by: warrior woman on Oct 13, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As of this weekend, Paulsen plans on infusing money to buy preferred shares of bank stocks, therefore and with luck, shoring up the tanking economy and bolstering it for the future.

In today’s NY Times, White House Overhauling Rescue Plan, it stated, “Industry executives quickly told Mr. Paulson that they liked the idea, though they warned that the Treasury should not try to squeeze out existing shareholders. They also begged Mr. Paulson not to impose tough restrictions on executive pay and golden-parachute deals for executives who are fired.”

Any cash infusion should be predicated on a moratorium of bonus pay for all employees and any severance packages known as “golden parachutes”. In other words, rewrite the contracts as part of the deal. In addition, tough restrictions should be a part of the deals. Taxpayers do not deserve this program to begin with and sure shouldn’t end with such chicanery. No bonuses should be allowed for the past year’s performances nor any in the future until such time that the bank is standing on it’s own performance and not relying upon taxpayers to share in business of banking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xecutive pay again.... Posted by: JSquercia
The God That Failed: The 30-Year Lie of the Market Cult
Posted by: chlamor on Oct 13, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the most striking fact revealed by the global financial crash -- or rather, by the reaction to it -- is the staggering, astonishing, gargantuan amount of money that the governments of the world have at their command.

In just a matter of days, we have seen literally trillions of dollars offered to the financial services sector by national treasuries and central banks across the globe. Britain alone has put $1 trillion at the disposal of the bankers, traders, lenders and speculators; and this has been surpassed by the total package of public money that Washington is shoveling into the financial furnaces of Wall Street and the banks. These radical efforts are being replicated on a slightly smaller scale in France, Germany, Italy, Russia and many other countries.

The effectiveness of this unprecedented transfer of wealth from ordinary citizens to the top tiers of the business world remains to be seen. It will certainly insulate the very rich from the consequences of their own greed and folly and fraud; but it is not at all clear how much these measures will shield the vast majority of people from the catastrophe that has been visited upon them by the elite.

Year after year, the ordinary citizens were told by their governments: we have no money to spend on your needs, on your communities, on your infrastructure, on your health, on your children, on your environment, on your quality of life. We can't do those kinds of things any more.

Of course, when talking amongst themselves, or with the believers in the think tanks, boardrooms -- and editorial offices -- the cultists would speak more plainly: we don't do those things anymore because we shouldn't do them, we don't want to do them, they are wrong, they are evil, they are outside the faith. But for the hoi polloi, the line was usually something like this: Budgets are tight, we must balance them (for a "balanced budget" is a core doctrine of the cult), we just can't afford all these luxuries, sorry about that.

Let's say it again: The money was there all along.
Money to build and generously equip thousands and thousands of new schools, with well-paid, exquisitely trained teachers, small teacher-pupil ratios, a full range of enriching and inspiring programs.

Money to revitalize the nation's crumbling inner cities, making them safe and vibrant places for businesses and families and communities to grow.

Money to provide decent, affordable and accessible health care to every citizen, to provide dignity and comfort to the elderly, and protection and humane treatment for the mentally ill.

Money to provide affordable higher education to everyone who wanted it and could qualify for it. Money to help establish and sustain local businesses and family farms, centered in and on the local community, driven by the needs and knowledge of the people in the area, and not by the dictates of distant corporations.

Money to strengthen crumbling infrastructure, to repair bridges, shore up levies, maintain roads and electric grids and sewage systems.

Money for affordable, workable public transport systems, for the pursuit of alternative sources of energy, for sustainable, sensible development, for environmental restoration.

Money to support free inquiry in science, technology, health and other areas -- research unfettered from the war machine and the drive for corporate profit, and instead devoted to the betterment of human life.

Money to support culture, learning, continuing education, libraries, theater, music and the endless manifestations of the human quest to gain more meaning, more understanding, more enlightenment, a deeper, spiritually richer life.

The money for all of this -- and much, much more -- was there, all along.

LINK

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Which god is that? Posted by: donl51
» Bravo -- well said Posted by: nearblindjames
Too Much
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Oct 13, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got completely lost reading this article. I guess I'll never understand economics, nor do I care to. But one thing kept drumming through my mind through all of this - the word "racketeering."

What a racket - lending, borrowing, and redistributing imaginary money. Without anyone minding the store. No wonder it's such a mess.

The Bible and the Quran both speak against money lenders, gambling and the charging of interest. Now we know why this is supposed to be a sin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Too Much Posted by: donl51
What year was it?
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 13, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the article, the Fed raised interest rates that burst the bubble. What year was that and who made that decision?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Stuff
Posted by: Timberbee on Oct 13, 2008 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many, many more articles such as this one, please. While I do not yet completely understand this occurring crisis, I do feel that Some of the fog is lifting, and I am at least beginning to get a sense of the lay of the land. Inform us! Don't play to our fears, or our worst tendencies. We are made more able, as we are made more knowledgeable.

Wonderful Article

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Stuff Posted by: donl51
Admiring ACORN
Posted by: Urgelt on Oct 13, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any effort as vast as ACORN's is bound to generate some errors. Humans are imperfect (some more than others). Knowing this, they screened and flagged those registrations which were suspicious before turning them in. Under the law, they had to turn all of them in. The law didn't require them to flag suspicious registrations, but they did it anyway. I cannot imagine how they could possibly be more responsible than that.

If our democracy is to have any chance of surviving, it will be because eligible voters shed their indifference and become involved. ACORN is helping to make that happen.

As for intimidating community bankers, that's a good thing, too. Banks were busily redlining entire districts and refusing to look within for eligible, reliable mortgagees. They deserved some intimidating. But ACORN did much more than intimidate. They helped those banks identify and vette good borrowers (and avoid bad ones). That was a service to the banks as well as to borrowers.

Those borrowers are not implicated in the current meltdown, and saying otherwise is pure disinformation. We know the real culprits: predatory lenders throwing ballooning mortgages at people with no money for down payments, inadequate income, and no clue what they were signing up for. (Had ACORN been involved for all of those clueless borrowers, I don't think it could have happened.) These "sub-prime" mortgages then were turned into derivatives and resold far and wide, and faux "insurance" was sold by the likes of Lehman without any capital reserves to back them up. Huge profits; huge risks. Now the dominoes are falling.

We can't lay the blame for any of that at ACORN's feet. They're heroes in my book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wake Up America!
Posted by: tgranger on Oct 13, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must get to the root of this thing to make a difference with it! Ever since World War II we have been fed the line by Madison Avenue that "WE NEED STUFF" to be happy, sexy, healthy, and nice smelling. We bought IT! Hook line and sinker and the consumer economy was born!
Congress allowed predatory lending practices in the credit card industry which allowed us to "GET THE STUFF WE NEED" before we produce the funds to acquire it. And no body noticed the effective cost of our acquistions after the interest and fees waere paid.
Then they sold us (and we bought) the old saw that the industrialists used to bribe immigrant labor to do desperate jobs to build the infrastructure of the Country! "Do this lousy job for 20 years and we will then take care of you for the rest of your life" (What they didn't say was your life will last an average of 6 months after you quit working!)
The retirement myth set the stage for the international banking community to accumulate over 75 trillion dollars in funds held for the benefit of those "retirment bound" working people and the push was to maximise the yield on those funds. Enter Greed!
Then the Neo-Cons dissolved regulation of the economy and suddenly there was a way for us all to get the money to pay off the credit cards used buy the STUFF we agree "we need" and put away funds for our "retirement". The Wall Street greed factor created more and more abstract investment vehicles to produce higher and higher yields (and fees to them) resting on greater and greater leverage ratios, while convincing more and more investors that their risk was spread wider and wider until the bubble finally burst. What's the source? We think we need stuff to be happy, alive, fullfilled and sexy; we think retirement is desireable, and we think that others can take away the risk of being alive. WAKE UP AMERICA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To those who think that "retiring debt" is a viable solution...
Posted by: lexicon on Oct 13, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the "411" on what it all means: YOUR debt is the engine of growth for the financial industry.

Eliminate YOUR debt, and you've eliminated THEIR money.

Here's a hint: I personally, purchased a parcel of land for CASH, some few years ago. In doing so, my debt burden went way down, and my CREDIT RATING went way down too. In fact, it tanked.

When you buy something on credit,(debt), you create money for the financial industry to play with, and they reward you by calling you a "preferred customer". When you CANCEL debt (as I did by "failing" to take out a mortgage on the land, instead of buying outright) you REMOVE money from their system.

Our economy used to be based on WEALTH. Now, it is based on MONEY. Those are two different things. Related, but different.

By rights, the financial industry (the trading and management of money) should be sized at about ((( GDP * interest rate) * 2) + "30 day transactions value"). This would result in a financial system that performs it's vital role, of providing for the clearing of value transactions between holders of wealth. In such a world where this equation were 'honored', the basis of the economy would be the transacting of, and conversion of, wealth.

Instead, the financial industry is many times that size...I've seen estimates that it's 40% of our GDP. what that means, is that instead of representing the movement of money to transact WEALTH, it is involved in the movement of MONEY to transact MORE MONEY.

See..."wealth" is tangible, physical stuff. It's "nouns". stuff you own or have. Trees on your land, minerals in the earth. The ability you have to work or create. The FUTURE ability you have to work or create. That's REAL WEALTH.

Money...money is not a "noun" thing...it's a "verb" thing. It's a FLOW. it's a transition of wealth between one state and the next. It DOESN'T REALLY EXIST. If you have 'wealth', you can say, "I have a CAR." If you have 'money', you would have to say, "I have a 50 miles-per-hour." The existence of MONEY happens when you put a unit of wealth "into play" in the economy.

...the problem is the movement of the economy away from "real" wealth, and toward "fake" wealth, or money.

Why does that matter? well, it's pretty simple. Even though money isn't "real", it DOES have some real characteristics. As a placeholder value for a wealth transaction, it represents the transactional value of that wealth transaction. If money itself becomes "worthless" (which is where we are headed), then the effect is, that the whole process of wealth transactions become "mis-calibrated", and mis-calibration means that arbitrage exists...and those who are positioned to take advantage of arbitrage (the very rich) will be able to consolidate and expand their holdings of real wealth (regardless of the value of the money), compared to those who are NOT in a position to arbitrage...who will lose ground.

In other words, the "financial bubble" will result inevitably in a wealth transfer up the chain. Happens in every depression.

High volatility in the value of money means real wealth will be stripped from the lower economic players, and conversely, high stability in the value of money results in the growth of real wealth in the lower economic tiers.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

throw $$ at it worldwide...
Posted by: ellie on Oct 13, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
seems to be the news of today... DOW is up almost 500 points since the fed removed all restrictions on who gets what $$ and how over the weekend including foreign investors...

now that the toothpaste is out of the tube, wonder how long this will last before the elite totally siphon out the fed... or is it time to fire up the press and print more dollars with nothing to back it up??? the power elite will bleed it dry and say, too bad, suck it up...

now it's not just propping up the american economy with funny money, but the world... horrible part of this is that our kids and grandkids will get stuck with the bill...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One Essential part that is missing
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Oct 13, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is important to understand that our financial markets have been gamed constantly over the last few decades. It's all gamed. So you cant just look at the sheer absurdities of all these SIVs and CDOs and MBSs and say "no wonder it collapsed". That mentality would simply lead you to have predicted it would collapse in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006. In other words, you'd end up being another boy who cried wolf every year, and then no one would listen. Certainly that is a part of what caused this. That's where peak oil comes in.

From 2005 up until now, global oil production has been peaking, or plateauing. It hasnt yet declined, but it hasnt grown to meet expectations. That is what caused the bubble to pop. It is extremely important to understand the fact that IF oil production kept increasing since 2005, instead of plateauing, then there would have been more energy available to the economy, which means more supply, and lower energy prices. Which means less mortgage defaults, more discretionary spending, the whole ball of wax. It's all about energy. But that part of it gets very little mention.

All the banking regulation in the world is not going to produce more energy. And in fact, if it were not for this alphabet soup of financial wizardry, the market and the economy would have imploded about 2-2.5 years ago. All that financial wizardry was the bankers solution to peak oil, to keep the bubble floating for as long as possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where was your Congressional representation
Posted by: SlyGuy on Oct 13, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...when the lights went out? Answer: in bed of course, with the finance industry. Did any of those with the responsibility to ensure the commonwealth against all such chicanery have the slightest idea how all this would work? Did they have any interest in upholding the public trust? Some did, most didn't. They don't even write or read the legislation anymore, you know. The lobbyists do.

We need more articles like this, and the 60 Minutes episode from Oct. 5 explaining in layman's terms such oddities as "credit default swaps." If you haven't seen it, do it now. There is no excuse for people who respond to these articles with comments like, "Gee, I just can't understand all this stuff. It's beyond me." Guess what, if it is beyond you, a few days of reading and perusing objective sources will give you some clues. That is, unless you are transfixed by sports and dancing with has-beens TV shows. Abdicate your responsibility just because others have? Re-read Thomas Paine.

Another must read: Empire of Debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corrections
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Oct 13, 2008 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the late 1990s, a combination of factors, which included the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates, created a huge price bubble in Internet stocks. (pg 1)

The easy money era began at the end of 1994. That was when the I-Net stock bubble started. One can see this clearly on a 25-year chart of the S&P 500 index.

Greenspan's famous "irrational exuberance" speech was made two years later, in December 1996, even though it was his policy which had created the bubble (stocks up 65-70% already), seeing as how the money injected into the system starts out in the New York money centers, and so naturally a certain percentage of it finds its way into the stock market. The markets would more than double again in the 3+ years following the speech as the easy money policies of the Fed continued.

During this time of market mania, the Fed guts the Glass-Steagall Act... (pg 1)

I had problems with this entire paragraph. First, the Fed had no such power to "gut" the act. Second, yes it was Congress which repealed many of the key provisions, in 1999. That part's right. But it's not quite right to blame this just on "intense pressuring" from the financial industry, since Congress is always being strongly lobbied by virtually every industry.

In fact, the financial industry had been working for more than a dozen years on this -- just like it took the better part of a decade to get the bankruptcy laws changed in their favor (with Joe Biden being the big supporter of that bill in the Senate - he voted for it four times - and thus making it respectable for D's to go along.)

The vote on the final bill in 1999 was 362-57-15 vote in the House and 90-8-1 in the Senate. So it's not like this was a Republican bill which the Democrats fought long and hard against. In fact, Clinton's Treasury Secretaries, Rubin and Summers, who are now Obama's economic advisers, were in favor of the deregulatory 'reforms', and thus Clinton signed the bill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

making money
Posted by: cbishopp on Oct 13, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some people might have a hard time grasping this article not because they are not smart enough but because the language of economics is designed to confuse. Once you read through the article you come to see that all it is are acronyms and misleading labels. This is wealth fabrication.
Here is how your money is created...(partially excerpted from Freerepublic.com but there are many sources)
The first fact that needs to be considered is that our money today has no gold or silver behind it whatsoever. The fraction is not 54% nor 15%. It is 0%. It has traveled the path of all previous fractional money in history and already has degenerated into pure fiat money. The fact that most of it is in the form of checkbook balances rather than paper currency is a mere technicality; and the fact that bankers speak about "reserve ratios" is eye wash. The so-called reserves to which they refer are, in fact, Treasury bonds and other certificates of debt. Our money is pure fiat through and through.
The second fact that needs to be clearly understood is that, in spite of the technical jargon and seemingly complicated procedures, the actual mechanism by which the Federal Reserve creates money is quite simple. They do it exactly the same way the goldsmiths of old did except, of course, the goldsmiths were limited by the need to hold some precious metals in reserve, whereas the Fed has no such restriction.

In a booklet entitled "Modern Money Mechanics", the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago says:

In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face amount.

What, then, makes these instruments -- checks, paper money, and coins -- acceptable at face value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses? Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they will be able to exchange such money for other financial assets and real goods and services whenever they choose to do so. This partly is a matter of law; currency has been designated "legal tender" by the government -- that is, it must be accepted.

In the fine print of a footnote in a bulletin of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, we find this surprisingly candid explanation:

Modern monetary systems have a fiat base -- literally money by decree -- with depository institutions, acting as fiduciaries, creating obligations against themselves with the fiat base acting in part as reserves. The decree appears on the currency notes: "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private." While no individual could refuse to accept such money for debt repayment, exchange contracts could easily be composed to thwart its use in everyday commerce. However, a forceful explanation as to why money is accepted is that the federal government requires it as payment for tax liabilities. Anticipation of the need to clear this debt creates a demand for the pure fiat dollars
Part of this crisis rests in the fact that "the SIVs created products called asset-backed commercial paper (short-term debt of 1 to 90 days). Asset-backed means it is backed by credit from the sponsoring bank. The SIVs then sold the paper, mainly to money market funds." In other words they minted money, creating value from nothing backed by credit.
Textbooks on banking often state that money is created out of debt. This is misleading because it implies that debt exists first and then is converted into money. In truth, money is not created until the instant it is borrowed. It is the act of borrowing which causes it to spring into existence. And, incidentally, it is the act of paying off the debt that causes it to vanish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lest you come to believe that the 'Gold Bugs' are right about money...
Posted by: lexicon on Oct 13, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In many ways, gold-based currency is just another form of fiat.

"fiat" currency means "It's money because we SAY it is".

Now, "money" isn't real. It comes into being as a way to consummate a transaction of WEALTH.

The amount of Money that's floating around at any given time is the amount of VALUE of the wealth transactions occurring in that time period. (transactions may not "clear" instantaneously..they may take months to "settle").

If money is based on gold...then the size of the money supply is NOT based on how much wealth is being transacted, instead the size of the money supply is based on how much gold we've managed to dig up and put in a vault somewhere.

So, you can see, a gold-standard currency, really is a completely arbitrary thing. It is MUCH more "real" to base money on the transacting of wealth (i.e. GDP) than on some arbitrary amount of metal sitting in a vault.

Now, the place that the gold-bugs ARE right, though...is when you start creating money, not by transferring wealth, but by playing shell games with that money...then you have a serious problem.

So, the problem isn't that we went off the "gold standard"...the problem is that the currency needs to be indexed very rigorously to wealth. When we had a gold-based currency, it was just naturally indexed...to an artificial measure of wealth, the amount of gold. But the problem wasn't leaving gold behind...it was that we didn't quite understand what gold provided...that RIGOROUS index to wealth. Without that index (or, "peg"), we find the currency flailing around, acting unpredictably.

Banks, subject to strict reserve requirements (the RIGOROUS INDEX TO WEALTH), function quite well in creating our currency for us. But greed steals in, as it will, and banks have figured out how to use loopholes and cracks and crannies in the regulations.

If you subvert the regulations or deregulate any part of the banking system, you are DE FACTO relinquishing control of the currency, and removing it's relationship to actual wealth.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Solid reasoning Posted by: Last Chance
Not the Reason
Posted by: websmith on Oct 13, 2