Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

How World Leaders Can Reverse the Economic Meltdown

By Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot, Campaign for America's Future. Posted October 12, 2008.


A broader stimulus package is desperately needed to right a listing economic ship.
Advertisement

The current economic crisis is the result of an extraordinary period of extreme economic mismanagement. The world's central banks, most importantly the Federal Reserve Board in the United States, made the decision to ignore, if not actively cultivate, the growth of asset bubbles. This was the case with stock market bubbles in the 90s and housing bubbles in the current decade.

They compounded this mistake by ignoring the explosive growth of credit and new complex derivative instruments. They allowed financial institutions to become hugely over-leveraged, ensuring that the collapse of the bubble would lead to major financial disruptions.

Finally, they failed to recognize the seriousness of the problem, understating the size of the problem at every step. This has slowed efforts to muster an adequate response to the situation. President Bush and other political leaders markedly worsened the situation when they raised the specter of the Great Depression and otherwise sought to raise fears in order to gain public support for the bank bailout package.

The meeting this weekend of the G-7 provides an extraordinary opportunity to begin the reversal of this dismal record. First, it is necessary to have a coordinated financial and monetary policy to stem the immediate financial crisis. This will require bank bailouts that focus on the direct injection of capital into the banking system, following the example of the United Kingdom earlier this week.

The financial system will also benefit from further cuts in overnight lending rates, especially by the European Central Bank (ECB). The ECB's focus on concerns over inflation at this economic junction is almost as foolish and potentially more harmful than the decision to ignore the growth of the housing bubble.

The other key component of an economic recovery package should be a coordinated fiscal stimulus. In the United States, this stimulus should be on the order of $300 billion to $400 billion (2.0-2.7 percent of GDP). This stimulus is essential for counteracting the sharp falloff in consumption that is following the loss of $5 trillion in housing wealth and President Bush's scare tactics for promoting his bank bailout.

The stimulus should be designed to quickly boost demand. In the United States, this can best be done by aiding state and local governments, extending unemployment benefits, tax rebates to low income individuals, accelerating infrastructure spending and support for energy conserving retrofits of homes and businesses. It is also essential that the dollar fall against other major currencies in order to bring the trade deficit back to a manageable level.

It is possible that even larger boosts to spending may be necessary to restore normal economic activity. The federal government must be prepared to spend whatever amount is needed to keep the economy creating jobs. This was the main lesson that we learned from the Great Depression. Concerns over deficits prevented the government from taking sufficient measures to boost the economy out of its slump until World War II left the government no choice. It would be an enormous tragedy for the country and the world if the United States were to repeat the same mistakes almost 80 years later.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: financial crisis

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director and co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Interesting How Mr. Baker's Proposals dovetail precisely with what I've been proposing all along!!
Posted by: yellow on Oct 12, 2008 2:37 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It wasn't the extent of the credit creation but the extent of capital market leveraging which could have been offset by strictly enforced capital/asset ratios to prevent liquidity problems, capital shortages and a freeze up of credit markets. The system was overburdened with risk.

Furthermore, the use of massive consumer debt to fund consumption and drive the economy, with home equity cashouts accounting for a third of the GDP growth over the last decade and a half, was needed only because of low and declining real average incomes. Let public sector investment create jobs and boost income growth. This will stimulate demand and GDP growth. Reregulate the financial sector and use capital controls to make monetary policy effective. We also need to aim for full employment and to lower energy costs with conservation and alternative fuels programs; two goals which are mutually complimentary and which will sustain economic growth through investment, job creation, resource saving and environmental protection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

your essay could have been replaced with one sentence
Posted by: Spot on Oct 12, 2008 8:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
base the economy on the needs of the citizens, and not the whims of the elite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Classic Metaphor
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 12, 2008 9:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you've been flying in a big economic balloon for many years and it starts to fall because of a leak, do you pump more air into it or do you fix the leak? You pump more air for a safe landing and then fix the leak. So when you go flying up again, another leak opens up because the skin of the balloon is old and weak. Do you keep on landing and fixing the leaks as long as you can, or do you manufacture a new balloon, or do you decide flying is for the birds and instead concentrate on living a better life on the ground?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Solution: Medicare For All ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 12, 2008 11:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Medicare for All would relieve states, local governments, school districts, companies and individuals of their health care costs, leaving billions exactly where it is needed as local taxes and business income slow appreciably.

It would assure the public that they wouldn't be bankrupt from medical costs, companies better competitive advantage from companies at home and abroad that don't supply coverage and states whereby they could maintain their workforces and fund what are going to be large and on-going unemployment benefits.

Politically impossible ? Maybe ... but there has not been a better time or a better reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And The $45 Trillion in Debts ...?
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 13, 2008 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Nobody is talking about a debt write-down or moratorium. The subprime mortgage problem could have been solved by writing down just $1 or $2 trillion of the face value and interest rates of predatory loans. Instead, the $10+ trillion in financial-sector damage in recent weeks reflects Wall Street's fraudulent packaging and sale of junk mortgages at unrealistically high prices, using junk mathematics to calculate junk derivatives and sell them to gullible investors who believe that the pretenses these mathematics, credit ratings and projected income have a basis in reality."

"No reversal of the Bush tax cuts is offered to re-inflate the economy, no move toward more progressive taxation of Wall Street speculators who pay only a 15 percent "capital gains" tax rate instead of the much higher income-tax and FICA withholding rates that wage-earners pay. (Wall Street has its own golden parachute program, so why should it pay for Social Security for the rest of society?) There is to be no reduction in the special tax benefits for real estate, whose tax favoritism led to the crisis by "freeing" more income from the tax collector to be pledged to mortgage bankers as interest.

The Bubble Economy is to be re-inflated by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA lending to help buyers bid up housing and commercial office prices once again to a rate that promises to impose debt peonage on homeowners.

The budget deficit will soar, without any prosecution of tax evasion scams by UBS or KPMG. Instead of a fiscal or regulatory comet driving these dinosaurs to extinction, the climate has turned more conducive to their proliferation. Our Age of Deception is to be locked in even more tightly. The Congressional bailout's suspension of mark-to-market rules to rely on Wall Street's "self-regulation" should win a prize for Oxymoron of 2008 as investors have no clue as to what financial assets are worth. No wonder lending has dried up, especially to banks themselves.

Just as financial victims fail to vote and support their self-interest, predators also turn out to pursue self-defeating "free market" strategies. The financial sector's short-termism is the greatest enemy to its survival. It has translated its wealth into a fatal political control of its legal climate, blocking Congressional efforts to rewrite the oppressive bankruptcy laws that credit-card banks lobbied so hard to pass. These hard bankruptcy terms prevent the courts from renegotiating homeowner debts to keep property occupied, accelerating the real estate price collapse. The result is today's negative equity, posing the question of just who is to bear the cost of bring debts back in line with the economy's ability to pay. Will it be the financial institutions that sponsored asset-price inflation and lobbied for deregulation of lenders? Or, will it be the debtors who thought they were riding the wave to get an inflationary free lunch?

Can Congress Bail Out of the Bailout?

by Michael Hudson

~~~~~~~~

Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot have completely ignored the $45 trillion elephant in the room ... the massive debt the public and private sectors have and the impact of ignoring them while endorsing what will be trillions of dollars of new tax payer debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The mind boggles
Posted by: Old Horse Being Put Out To Pasture on Oct 13, 2008 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come on "experts", you make as much sense as a classroom full of first-graders.

A "stimulus package" of 500 billion dollars eh? Where, how, what form, with what money? To solve what problem exactly? Has the economy been in the doldrums long enough that we need a new Hoover Dam? Not enough wars maybe?

Like printing another 500 billion dollars and doing the command economy dance is going to strike a blow for healthy capitalism. Additionally, caring about inflation is so yesterday, after all only people who cannot move their money overseas will be hit.
Pentagon just asked for another 500 billion for the next five years. Hell, why not.

"The financial system will also benefit from further cuts in overnight lending rates, especially by the European Central Bank (ECB). The ECB's focus on concerns over inflation at this economic junction is almost as foolish and potentially more harmful than the decision to ignore the growth of the housing bubble."

What exactly does the ECBs lending rates have to do with the US housing bubble? Anyway, have a look at the graphs on this page:

http://mises.org/story/3146

Looks like moving the lending rates is not going to help a lot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ye Olde Bailout . . .
Posted by: 6399 on Oct 13, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prepare for hyperinflation, folks. Dollar destruction is on its way now that HankCo has promised unlimited liquidity that we don't have. Look for a $2 trillion budget deficit this year. Oh, yeah - that's right, deficits don't matter. They're actually right - I think we'll be defaulting on our debt in less than 3 years time.

Cash positions are actually undesirable at this time. Get into undervalued large caps while you can, and then cash out again in 3 months (or around Xmas if this shopping seasons turns to shit) when this turns out to be a bad idea and the markets start tanking again. You will have doubled your money and can run off laughing like the corporate scum will do.

Don't let them be the only ones to take advantage of an engineered event. They drove out the little guy and now they just got the Fed's tacit approval to go wild and lend, lend, lend. And lend they will as they drive the market up for one last orgiastic draining. Get in on it now!!

The Asians and Arabs were promised this for the toxic debt on the books. Don't believe me? Watch how many sovereign wealth funds will be sniffing around the DOW today. America is now on sale. DING, DING, DING!!! DOW UP 450 today - next stop 12,000

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

george
Posted by: mopar1938 on Oct 13, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THERE WAS A BOOK THAT CAME OUT IN THE 90'S THAT HAS CAUTIONED US OF THE "NEW WORLD ORDER".
IT IS CONTROLLED BY THE ELITE FEW THAT WILL CONTROL THE MONEY.
HOW COME WE NEVER PUT A STOP TO THE COMPLETELY ILLEGAL FEDERAL RESEVRE BANK.
IT ALL STARTED IN 1913 WHEN TAFT WAS SNOW BALLED IN A LAME DUCK SESSION THAT WAS CALLED BACK DURING THE HOLIDAYS TO PASS THE LEGISLATION. IT STATES IN OUR CONSTITUTION THAT NO PRIVATE PERSONS CAN HAVE CONTROL OVER THE FEDERAL BANKS OR MONEY. IS IT NOT TIME WE TOOK BACK OUR CONTROLLING INTERESTS IN HOW THE FEDERAL BANKS.
WHY IS IT CALLED THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK WHEN IT IS NOT CONTROLLED BY US THE TAXPAYERS???????? THIS KEEPS UP AND THE TROOPS WILL ME CALLED INTO STOP AN UP AND COMING REVOLT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Stimulus" package ? Excuse me but that's RAYGUN talk !
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 13, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody needs a "stimulus" package. What they need is a FRUGAL AND BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION package. All this propaganda that only spending drives the "economy" has got to stop. It's time for people to SHUT THE FUCK UP AND STOP LAUGHING AT THE FRUGALS !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Financial Addiction
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 13, 2008 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When debt junkies go bankrupt they think all they need is more money, but their counselors tell them to cut up their credit cards and submit to strict spending limits. No more expensive war toys for the kids, no more lavish parties to impress the neighbors and no more foreign vacations. Spend your money here at home for basic needs. Sounds like good advice for all the nations of the World.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

latest on Palsen
Posted by: warrior woman on Oct 13, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As of this weekend, Paulsen plans on infusing money to buy preferred shares of bank stocks, therefore and with luck, shoring up the tanking economy and bolstering it for the future.

In today’s NY Times, White House Overhauling Rescue Plan, it stated, “Industry executives quickly told Mr. Paulson that they liked the idea, though they warned that the Treasury should not try to squeeze out existing shareholders. They also begged Mr. Paulson not to impose tough restrictions on executive pay and golden-parachute deals for executives who are fired.”

Any cash infusion should be predicated on a moratorium of bonus pay for all employees and any severance packages known as “golden parachutes”. In other words, rewrite the contracts as part of the deal. In addition, tough restrictions should be a part of the deals. Taxpayers do not deserve this program to begin with and sure shouldn’t end with such chicanery. No bonuses should be allowed for the past year’s performances nor any in the future until such time that the bank is standing on it’s own performance and not relying upon taxpayers to share in business of banking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't get it.......
Posted by: premarachel on Oct 13, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So people make vast fortunes, by moving around speculative money and creating a massive imaginary wealth bubble that everyone feeds off. The bubble bursts and we re-inflate it with another $700billion taxpayer money and watch Wall street start playing again. This is like going to a football game, watching your dream team get crushed, then paying all over again to watch it happen again. The players get richer, you get poorer. Yes, people are starting to buy again on Wall St in the hopes that the bottom has been reached, but ultimately wealth based on speculation is not a sound policy and will do nothing to stimulate the economy for middle America, and without a stable, working and buying middle class, we have nothing to support our economy. That $700billion would have done a lot more had it been put to work for middle America in building sustainable living based on our own renewable energy sources and the jobs that would create, real assets for our future and our children. I'm afraid the foxes are in the chicken house devising plans for their own permanent food supply as we middle Americans become bones and feathers. We are witnessing the biggest heist in world history and the beginning of a dark period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They Knew Full Well
Posted by: cherylholmes on Oct 13, 2008 1:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what they were doing to the economy and didn't give a shit! It has absolutely nothing to do with any miscalculations etc...

Yes, we do need a stimulus package again this year and an extended tax cut for us poor. We need more social programs to help us too. The poor, like me, disabled and elderly are taking the brunt of this failure. That's not right!

But merely a lousy $300.00 goes no where..we need more like $1000.00 per person or even more. These assholes can give away tax dollars to the rich bastards who created this..so they can not only get richer but afford luxury vacations, but won't give it to the actual consumers who need it most and are the basis for propping up the economy by being able to purchase their goods and services that made them rich in the first place.

Christmas for families will be a disaster this year since most are maxed out on credit, now having poor credit, are are in foreclosure to boot. Not being able to buy anything for anyone at Christmas will create more job losses and sales revenue losses, as well as tax revenue losses...Expect to see more businesses going under after the holidays...(I haven't been able to afford Christmas or birthdays in a good 10 years now...and in the recent months, can't afford food either..have to make choices again between food, meds, and bare necessities) These rich bastards are going down but not before they screw us over with more bailout money...BEND OVER AMERICA...and get some vasoline..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

" ...only a Expert can deal with a PRoblem... "
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Oct 13, 2008 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
.
.
. . . " ... if there's no Expert there's really twice the PRoblem... "

"Only An Expert" - from Laurie Anderson "HomeLand" 2008 release with french subtitles




Spread Love, not corporate dependence...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
~~~
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
"Violence can only be concealed by a Lie, & the Lie can only be maintained by Violence." ... "Any man who has once proclaimed violence as his method is inevitably forced to take the lie as his principle" – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn "
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

despicable corporate stooges world leaders?
Posted by: avatar_singh on Oct 13, 2008 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WORLD LEADER? ? what percentage of population do they reprant?
they are not the richest either-they are BANKRUPT.
stop self aggrandissmnet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]