Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Let's Just Say You Had $700 Billion to Spend

By Allison Stevens, Women's eNews. Posted October 9, 2008.


A look at what we could do instead with $700 billion to spend fixing up our world.
Advertisement

Anti-poverty and women's rights lobbyists are looking at the government's $700 billion bank bailout and seeing a way to talk about national spending priorities.

"It's obviously incredibly unfair," said Irasema Garza, president of New York-based Legal Momentum, a legal advocacy group for women. "We're willing to get ourselves in that type of debt to take incredible risk to bail out those industries but as a country we're not willing to take a fraction of that particular risk to make sure we have sound economic policies to give the citizens of our country the basic things they need to live: a place to live, health care, food, education for their kids and the creation of good jobs."

In his personal blog Duncan Green, head of research for Oxfam Great Britain and author of the 2008 book "From Poverty to Power," notes that $700 billion could eradicate world poverty for more than two years.

That would disproportionately benefit women, who make up 70 percent of the world's poor, according to Washington-based Women Thrive Worldwide, a group that lobbies for aid for women in developing countries.

"It's important that we help people here who are in need and have been hurt by this financial crisis," said Nora O'Connell, vice president of policy and government affairs at Women Thrive Worldwide. "But we also have to realize that the impacts of the crisis don't stop at U.S. borders."

$150 Billion for Global Poverty

Worldwide, Green estimates that about $150 billion each year could help governments meet the United Nations millennium development goals, a global set of anti-poverty guidelines -- including gender parity in education and improved maternal health care -- laid out by 189 nations in 2000.

The Institute for Women's Policy Research, a think tank in Washington, D.C., that focuses on women and the economy, is hosting an Oct. 30 panel discussion on the impact of the financial crisis on women featuring the institute's president, Heidi Hartmann; Erica Hunt, president of the 21st Century Foundation, which focuses on economic development in the African American community; and Legal Momentum's Garza.

"We all now recognize that the economic crisis is No. 1; severe," Garza said. "But before this crisis hit Wall Street, people on Main Street were already hurting. Within that, working women were taking a big hit and have been over the last five years."

Carrie Lukas, a budget analyst with the Independent Women's Forum, a free-market think tank in Washington, D.C., said she would use the money to simplify the tax code.

"Women need a growing economy which provides jobs, especially a wide range of jobs that offer women a variety of work arrangements, and a less burdensome tax structure would certainly help toward that end."

Other advocates said they would spend the money to enhance government.

The National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, a lobby in Washington, D.C., estimates that $759 million -- about 1 percent of the rescue plan total -- would enable the country's low-cost health care clinics to provide all eligible individuals with the full range of family planning services: access to contraceptives, counseling, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, poverty, bailout


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
That's a lot of great ideas but unfortunately, the USA has been trained to be a war/corporate hog !
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 9, 2008 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until Main Street stands up to the RIGGED market dubbed "free" and until the electorate quits defining foreign policy as "free" trade (actually a phony disguise oxymoronic phrase for slave-trade and selling out) and endless resource wars especially for oil, America is a LOSERS' nation for the foreseeable future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cue the fat lady
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Oct 9, 2008 1:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With America entering its last days as a viable democracy, it's almost time for her to sing.

Old enough to remember WWII, I can't begin to tell you how far our nation has fallen from grace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unemployment ssolution at no cost
Posted by: isoptera@mchsi.com on Oct 9, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the work day or work week were lowered to 6 hours or 4 days respectively, unemployment would virtually disappear overnight. It would not solve disparity in income, but unemployment is the most serious problem an individual faces.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Is it Really that Simple? Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
There is no 700 billion dollars.
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 9, 2008 4:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't exist, except as more debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

With great reluctance
Posted by: Sushi on Oct 9, 2008 4:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that our leaders always "with great reluctance", vote through bills they know suck but do it anyway? "Geez, I know I shouldn't be buying this $700 billion pair of shoes, but I just HAVE to. It's not my fault. They made me do it. If I don't, they will call me names and point fingers."

I do not mind paying taxes that go to the common good. I know that built into the system there is waste and fraud. But this is outright theft. Vote them out of office and we get a new set of thieves lined up right behind them.

We cannot live on mythical "hope" any more.

Does anyone wonder that if any one of these behemoth banks are "too big to fail", why then are they allowed to grow even bigger by swallowing each other up?

Sushi
" CONGRESS VIRUS: Attaches itself to your cache. Cache deleted."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why? Posted by: Last Chance
LOL
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 9, 2008 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US Government does not care about the people in need or "Main Street America" as its so recently called. The Bush Regime only cares about the filthy rich and sadly, nothing will change that. The rich get richer and the poor, well they just keep getting stepped on. Business as usual in the new Regime!

Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

forgiveness on student loans
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 9, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel another good idea is to use some of the money to forgive in whole or part student loans for people who have pursued higher education. Maybe in return for community service.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bail-Out-Big Step Towards Fascist take-over
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Oct 9, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like in 2004, the Democratic presidential and vice presidential candidates are not being truthful about the fake war on terror, a false flag attack of 9/11, the scam of the Federal Reserve Bank and the easily hackable electronic voting machines and central tabulators.
The reason is that the Democrats have been completely complicit in all of the criminal actions and war crimes committed by Bush. If they blow the whistle, then they will be implicated.

Guess who the biggest campaign contributor to George W. Bush is? MBNA, a big credit card company. MBNA wrote the legislation that radically changed the bankruptcy laws in the US.
Predatory lending, which used to be the province of criminal loan sharks, is now the norm in the lending industry in the US.
Today's banking crisis is the THIRD trillion dollar plus US-caused financial meltdown in the last twenty years.
Each one of these crises came into being through the same basic mechanism...the fraudulent over-valuing of financial assets by Wall Street - with a "wink and a nod" (and sometimes a lot more) from the White House and Congress. The fraudulently valued assets stimulate the economy, impart the illusion of health and then, inevitably, the fraud goes too far and the whole house of card comes painfully crashing back to earth.
The White House stood in the way of any state prosecuting federal banks and mortgage companies for predatory lending. They actually used a portion of the enabling act creating the US Comptroller of the Currency to preempt the regulation and prosecution of these banks for fraudulent loan activities. This is why Eliot Spitzer was politically assassinated. He wrote an editorial in the Washington Post three weeks before his assassination accusing the White House of preventing any state Attorney General from prosecuting these criminal activities. Of course, the mainstream media did not report the actual reason that this politician’s sexual indiscretions were reported so immediately and excessively.

The mainstream media never reported on Bush planting in the White House press corps a gay escort, Johnny Gannon. Gannon based on the Secret Service records of visits to the White House visited the White House over 200 times and stayed overnight at least two times.

Go to my website, www.911insidejob.net and read many articles and watch videos on the well planned takedown of the US dollar by the Bush White House and the Federal Reserve Bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would change it for coins use the metal to reinforce the levees...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 9, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in New Orleans, or offer targeted relocation assistance to get people out of the "you're gonna get flooded, stupid" zone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
It's Not Going to Work
Posted by: websmith on Oct 9, 2008 9:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't expect these robber barons to put their money on the line now that they have it all and the entire world operating on a credit basis. Stop giving the banks money.

The reason that the founding fathers didn't allow for regulation at the federal level is that they knew, as we are seeing now, that this would lead to the government being run by business and that business would eventually strip the population of its wealth. In a free market, every single penny comes from the population. If the population has no money, the market fails.

The government is now trying to replace the population as the source by giving money directly to business, but business will still have no one to sell their products to no matter how much you give them. The only fix for this is to put money in the hands of the population, but our government no longer thinks in terms of the Citizens.

Now that Congress has spent, given away, and wasted $11 trillion of the population's money, we have a problem.

If you want to stop this madness, go here.

http://ewebsmith.com/self/StandUp.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do you want to pay off this deceptive debt?
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Oct 9, 2008 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did you know that you owe $33,555+ on the current national debt? Hence, a family of three owes some shadowy cabal over $100,000, on top of how hard life is, by default. This is proof that money is virtual slavery and a great deception. Who claims you as their slave?

Here's a good national debt clock site. It's a little busy these days, so it'll probably take multiple screen refreshes to get though. Also, here's a CBS NEWS article about the Bush admin's contribution. Do the math and think about it. 200+ years to get to 6 trillion in debt and BushCo. will have added another 5+ trillion before he's done, for 11-12 trillion (or more...).

Feel like a slave yet?

Peace and Wisdom...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You damned liberals
Posted by: EinMD on Oct 9, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and your damned logical ideas. What's wrong with you people? Why do you hate the rich? They've done so much for this country... like help enable George W. Bush to become the awesome president that he is. They do their part for the economy.

All those gold plated diamond studded Caribbean Islands aren't going to buy themselves after all. Somebody has to take one for America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You damned liberals Posted by: edgar1
» RE: You damned liberals Posted by: yale
$700 billion
Posted by: PaulK on Oct 9, 2008 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For starters, round up 10,000 genuine inventors and pay them all $20K per year subsistence and $10k/year garage space and legal fees. The richest inventors won't care, ten thousand others will. Make the law friendly so they can collaborate easily and get paid in the end, not take all of their inventions to the grave in secrecy. That's only $3 billion/year.

I would go after improvements in deep-water wind power, non-photovoltaic solar electricity and 100 diverse attempts at transit improvements. I'm personally working on solar building heat, thank you.

I forecast driving the price of both wind power and nonphotovoltaic solar generation below 2 cents per kwh within 10 years. This will crush the daylights out of clean coal and lipstick nuclear.

IF we ever get our feet off the desk, transit can be electric, automated, much faster and the freeway equivalents much cheaper than now.

The rest of the $700B is needed to rewire our electric grid to at least 90% sustainable, to rebuild 90% of our houses to not require fuel oil, and to replace our unsustainable road/car system with something far better.

Unfortunately the deck is stacked, the system is rigged. Bringing a new transit system to market costs a minimum of $100m for crash testing. So, you will never see most of these advances in your lifetime if you can't get change in the innovation field out of your government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

National Priorities Project
Posted by: fanny666 on Oct 9, 2008 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some example of different ways to spend that money from the National Priorities Project:

51.6 million people with health care for four years
181.2 million homes with renewable electricity for four years
2.9 million elementary school teachers for four years
27 million four-year scholarships for university students

Incidentally, all government spending is a type of economic stimulus, and so spending on these things would also help "the economy" - these priorities would happen to help "the economy" of working people. McCain is wrong when he says "you don't raise taxes during an economic downturn..." That's precisely when you DO raise taxes- but on CAPITAL, not labor. You want to get capital out of "storage" and into circulation. The tax rate on the wealthiest during WWII was over 90%. That's how you win a war and get out of a depression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Game over for freedom
Posted by: blogbooks on Oct 9, 2008 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you bring about true globalism and one world government without fighting WW3?

Well, you create a global economic system upon which everyone is dependent for survival, then you crash the system and nationalize all the banks.

Welcome to 2008.

All major banks are being "nationalized", i.e. direct government control of the global economic system.

Is this the "New World Order" mentioned by Bush #1? Concerted efforts by international banks around the world. The take over of all failed banks. Take overs by whom? You can rest assured the central bankers aren't being "taken over."

The Central Banks are making another power grab and bringing about the next stage towards true, totalitarian, one world government under their corporatist/fascist system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Heartbreak
Posted by: melpol on Oct 9, 2008 4:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have lost everything including my live in girlfriend. My portfolio was worth over three million dollars only four years ago---now it is worthless. My creditors have been hounding me day and night and I had to disconnect my phone service in order to get some sleep. All I am left with is savings of less than 75 hundred dollars. I blame my stock broker for advising me to invest all my hard earned money in the auto industry and even my car needs a new transmission. Instead of me weeping I have started over again by mopping floors in the local fast food restaurant. We all learn from experience and what I learned is to keep my money under the mattress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» look in the mirror Posted by: edgar1
» RE: My Heartbreak Posted by: PaulK
» RE: My Heartbreak Posted by: bobtr900
power to the people
Posted by: edgar1 on Oct 9, 2008 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
give every penny back to the taxpayer. and slash military spending 60+ percent. Give that all back to the taxpayer. Screw the govt. It doesn't know how to spend a frigging penny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Would I Buy?
Posted by: hilly7 on Oct 9, 2008 6:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our Government back! But that wouldn't take that much, they're pretty cheap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we have 700 billion for a bail out but not for health care!!!!!!
Posted by: cori on Oct 9, 2008 6:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I can say is they are liars and cheats and they are robbing us blind and until we are too poor to spend and too poor to pay them they will not stop. The parsite will destroy the host.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

700 Billion
Posted by: bobtr900 on Oct 9, 2008 10:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
700 billion to alleviate or lessen poverty, the Republican party and their minions the Religious Right, Robertson, Dobson, Hagee and the Pope (my religion) would never allow that to happen. They consider it to be social engineering, to them it is socialism, a form of Communism. They would rather people suffer and die, all except for the fetus, or so they claim. These people are all about poverty, chastity and obedience.

The powerful always want to keep people intimidated so they will do what they are told. And the aforementioned always KNOW what people must be told, to save their eternal souls. They must do exactly what the aforementioned tell them to do. Of course the aforementioned always live in stunning opulence. So it is quite easy for them to speak out on everything including the behavior of the average person and especially the poor. These people are intent on keeping people miserable, though they themselves are far from it.

Shame on all of them for their most egregious hypocrisy. By what right..., by what right , indeed? How dare they deign to tell anyone anything about anything. They are all totally bereft of any humility. They are all dripping with the sin of Pride.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 700 Billion Posted by: richholland
» RE: 700 Billion Posted by: bobtr900
Pay for Higher Education
Posted by: pdxjoe on Oct 11, 2008 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Adolph Reed argues that with less than $50 billion, or five months worth of the Iraq War, we could pay for tuition and fees at all public institutions for higher education.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]