Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Truth, Lies, the Bailout and CEO Pay

By Sarah Anderson and Sam Pizzigati, AlterNet. Posted October 6, 2008.


The bailout does precious little to limit the extravagant pay that gives top executives the incentive to behave outrageously.
Advertisement

Democratic lawmakers went into their bailout negotiations with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson with some promising approaches for restraining executive pay.

We don't yet know what happened inside those negotiations, aside from a bit of reported shouting. But we do know what came out: a bailout that does precious little to limit the outrageously extravagant pay rewards that give top executives the incentive to behave outrageously.

Members of Congress who back the bailout, you may have noticed, have been singing a different tune. Rep. Barney Frank, a lead negotiator on the bailout bill, has even hailed the legislation's executive pay provisions as the first "restrictions on excessive CEO compensation" in U.S. history.

The bailout bill's one-page summary delivers the same celebratory message. The title for the summary's section on CEO pay: "No Windfalls for Executives."

The bailout now blessed by both the Senate and the House does, to be sure, include some long-overdue reforms on executive pay. The legislation has a ban on "golden parachutes," for instance, and language that lets the feds "claw back" executive earnings based on phony accounting.

And the legislation also includes a provision that places a $500,000 cap on the individual executive pay that bailed-out companies can deduct from their taxes. Any executive pay over that cap -- including pay in the form of stock options and other so-called "performance-based incentives" -- will now be taxed.

This represents a solid advance over current law. Our current $1 million deductibility cap on executive pay only applies to straight salary. Companies can deduct everything else, no matter how many millions that everything else ends up totaling.

All these executive pay restrictions in the bailout bill, listed like this, certainly do sound impressive. So what's the problem? Just this: Nearly every executive pay restriction in the bailout bill comes with a built-in loophole.

Take, for instance, that $500,000 cap on how much executive pay bailed-out companies can deduct off their taxes. This cap only applies when the Treasury Department buys up over $300 million of a company's "troubled assets" through an auction process. If Treasury Secretary Paulson's people buy up a company's troubled assets directly, the $500,000 deductibility cap doesn't apply. Nor does the "clawback" provision.

Even the bailout bill's celebrated ban on golden parachutes comes with a loophole. The golden parachute ban, in auction bailout situations, only applies to executives hired after the auction takes place. Those executives who led their companies into the bailout zone will be able to ride off, into the sunset, with saddlebags stuffed with windfalls.

But that's not the worst of it. In situations that don't involve auctions, the bailout legislation directs the Treasury secretary to "require that the financial institution meet appropriate standards for executive compensation." Who will define "appropriate"? The legislation leaves that up to Secretary Paulson.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ceo pay, bailout

Sarah Anderson directs the Global Economy Program at the Institute for Policy Studies. Sam Pizzigati, an associate fellow at the Institute, edits Too Much, an online weekly on excess and inequality.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Tha Plan is to Bail Out Wall Street Felons
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 6, 2008 1:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TARP was designed to bail out wall street felons from the onslaught of hundreds of billions in lawsuits ... and criminal prosecution ...


"The mystery has been solved.

For nearly a year, we have been asking ourselves why the investors and foreign banks that bought up hundreds of billions of dollars of worthless mortgage-backed securities (MBS) from US investment banks have not taken legal action against these same banks or initiated a boycott of US financial products to prevent more people from getting ripped off?

Now we know the answer. It’s because, behind the scenes, Henry Paulson and Co. were working out a deal to dump the whole trillion dollar mess on the US taxpayer. That’s what this whole $700 billion boondoggle is all about; wiping out the massive debts that were generated in the biggest incident of fraud in history. Rep Brad Sherman explained it like this last night to Larry Kudlow:
“It (The bill) provides hundreds of billions of dollars of bailouts to foreign investors. It provides no real control of Paulson’s power. There is a critique board but not really a board that can step in and change what he does. It’s a $700 billion program run by a part-time temporary employee and there is no limit on million dollar a month salaries……. It’s very clear. The Bank of Shanghai can transfer all of its toxic assets to the Bank of Shanghai of Los Angeles which can then sell them the next day to the Treasury. I had a provision to say if it wasn’t owned by an American entity even a subsidiary, but at least an entity in the US, the Treasury can’t buy it. It was rejected."


not one dime

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They Struck The Match, Then Fanned The Flames
Posted by: GeraldD on Oct 9, 2008 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The People Who Struck The Match, Set The Fire, and Fanned the Flames Which Are Burning Our Economy To The Ground Are Conspiring To Shift Blame And Avoid Jail Time. And One Of Them Is Set To Be Our Next Attorney General.

The Major Players Including Jamie Goerlick, Franklin Raines, Daniel Mudd, and Jim Johnson are at the heart of this meltdown.

Aided By Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, Chuck Schummer, Henry Waxman, Maxine Waters, ,a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2008/10/06/democrats-were-wrong-on-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac.html">Artur Davis, Gregory Meeks, Lacy Clay, Harry Reid, John Kerry, Barrack Obama, and Nancy Pelosi.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

These people owe the American People an explanation, an apology, and perhaps some jail time. Don't take your eye off of the ball. These are the people who lit the match and fanned the flames. One Of The Players, Jamie Goerlick is set to be our Next Attorney General. We simply CAN'T let this happen or they will all go free.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=67068

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]