Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Capitalism Triumphs Over Democracy as Bailout Passes the House

By AlterNet Staff, AlterNet. Posted October 3, 2008.


After much arm-twisting, the financial giants get their pay-day.
Advertisement

The House voted this afternoon to pass a modified version of the Bush-Paulson bailout plan by a 263-171 margin. 172 Democrats and 91 Republicans supported the measure.

Before the vote, CNN reported, "At least 20 House members said Friday they had switched positions and would now support the proposed $700 billion bailout of the nation's financial system.

"Among the 20 converts is Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Illinois, his chief of staff, Kenneth Edmonds, said.

"Edmonds said Jackson is changing his vote because "he received assurances from (Sen. Barack Obama) that, if elected, his administration will aggressively use authority in the bill to prevent foreclosures and stabilize the housing market."

"Rep. Howard Coble, R-North Carolina, said he plans to switch his vote because constituents began urging him to do so. He said the people he represents initially urged him to oppose the plan.

"Other Republicans who said they plan to change their votes to support the bill include Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, Rep. John Sullivan of Oklahoma, Rep. Jim Ramstad of Minnesota, Rep. John Shadegg of Arizona and Rep. Sue Myrick of North Carolina.

"The Senate bill passed Wednesday night included measures that:

* Allow Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to buy up to $700 billion in bad mortgage-related securities and other bad assets.

* Allow the Treasury Department to modify mortgage terms to help homeowners avoid foreclosure.

* Permit the government to receive equity in companies it helps so taxpayers get a share of any future profits.

* Restrict executive pay for companies aided by the program.

* Create an independent oversight board to oversee the Treasury Department program.

"Besides Jackson, at least 12 Democrats who opposed the bill announced plans to change their vote, including Rep. Shelly Berkley of Nevada, Rep. Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri, Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, Rep. Betty Sutton of Ohio, Rep. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Rep. Bruce Braley of Iowa, Rep. John Yarmuth of Kentucky, Rep. Bill Pascrell of New Jersey, Rep. Donna Edwards, of Maryland, Rep. Lynn Woolsey of California and Rep. Hilda Solis of California."

Rep Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), who voted against the bill, released the following statement:

“The public is being led to believe that Congress has reconsidered its position because we have before us a better bill than we had a few days ago. It is the same bill plus hundreds of new pages for hundreds of millions of tax breaks. What does this have to do with the troubles of Wall Street?

“Driven by fear we are moving quickly to pass a bill, which may produce a temporary uptick for the market, but nothing for millions of homeowners whose misfortunes are at the center of our economic woes. People do not have money to pay their mortgages. After this passes, they will still not have money to pay their mortgages. People will still lose their homes while Wall Street is bailed out.

“The central flaw of this bill is that there are NO stronger protections for homeowners and NO changes in the language to ensure that the secretary has the authority to compel mortgage servicers to modify the terms of mortgages. And there are NO stronger regulatory changes to fix the circumstances that allowed this to happen.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: congress, kucinich, bailout, financial crisis


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Suggestion to the Editors
Posted by: EJW on Oct 3, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Editors of Alternet

I read your Newspaper (newssource (?), what do you call an online newspapger) everyday. Sometimes I agree with your editorial decisions and sometimes I don't. You often shy away from difficult, real issues and news that need to be addressed (DU, Unpopular Middle East points of view, prirates off of Somalia, etc).

A simple annoyance I have with your content and that is that you don't include information and links to further research a subject. Case in point, this article doesn't list the Bill number, a link to the content or a link to the actual role call. All this can be found a Thomas if you have a Bill Number.

Please consider documenting your articles so that we readers can check sources and get further information.

Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» House Roll Call is up! Posted by: Spot
Absurd headline for this article.
Posted by: James W. Harris on Oct 3, 2008 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This wasn't a "triumph of capitalism." The Ron Paul / libertarian / free market capitalists I know are appalled by this monstrous bill. This was a triumph of State Capitalism, or Crony Capitalism, or Corporatism.

These distinctions are important -- vital -- if we are to know our enemies and our allies. Some of the staunchest opponents of this bailout are libertarians and free market-limited gov't types on the right.

They are also among the strongest enemies of the Bush torture/spy state, and of the Iraq war.

If we don't learn about one another, and work together when we can, we will all, to quote Franklin, hang separately.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Next Step
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 3, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where will this bankrupt government find the money to pay for this enormous give-away to bankrupt bankers? Where else but from the social services most Americans rely on to survive from day to day, Social Security, Medicare, Housing and Urban Development, the Consumer Protection Agency, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, and all the other regulatory agencies that were supposed to protect us from predatory corporations? Now we're all wage and debt slaves to a state capitalist plutocracy that will bleed us dry until our money is replaced with tickets for company soup and sandwiches! So, what are the people going to do about it?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Next Step Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: The Next Step Posted by: Last Chance
Fighting Back
Posted by: Gravitas on Oct 3, 2008 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So how do we fight back? Is there a movement starting with concrete suggestions for concrete steps to fight back? Obviously letter writing campaigns and protest are not effective because the corporate lackeys who are our "leaders" do not care what we want. We need economic boycotts. We need something that can cross over other ideological lines and stick to the specific issue, this bailout. If you have suggestions, or now of what is being done, please post. Lets keep the brave spirit of the American Revolution alive and get our country back!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fighting Back??? Posted by: Last Chance
Democrats shot themselves in the FOOT
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 3, 2008 11:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I greatly fear the Democrats shot themselves in the FOOT by passing this bill . The Republicans will now link THEM to this highly unpopular bill . We have seen the spectacle of McCain who said "I'm ALWAYS in favor of Deregulation " posing as someone who is going to clean up the greed and corruption on Wall Street . Unfortunately a great many people will believe this BS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Applause for Rep Dennis Kucinich
Posted by: NyghtOwl on Oct 3, 2008 2:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Rep Kucinch for saying what needs to be said, in the face of extreme and overwhelming pressure. Thank you also for voting NO. Thank you Alternet Staff for posting this informative piece and for giving us Rep Kucinich's statement. Thank you also, to all the other Representives and Senators who voted NO in the face of adversity.

For EJW and everyone else, here is the roll call: Roll Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

And here is the bill information: Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

JSquercia please reread Absurd headline for this article above, this is not a democrat or republican issue, stop looking at this internal attack as a two party battle. This is a govenment against it's people issue, there are good people on all sides fighting against the corporatism that has overtaken our democracy. This is precisely the reason they are winning, because people keep trying to compartmentalize instead of joining forces. Today lets try to be patriots not republicans or democrats or independents, we are all Americans!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» kucinich and kaptur - a ticket worth voting FOR. Posted by: GarrisonPayneLeonard38H
They Wanted to Get Home, Didn't They?
Posted by: websmith on Oct 4, 2008 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not a free market triumph over Democracy. This is a Communist triumph. There is not such thing as a regulated free market.

The calls and emails were still 90% against the bill and Americans are fed up with a government that doesn't listen.

They wanted to get home and the Senate sprinkled sugar on a theft and they jumped for it.

The news for Congress and Senate members, Democrats and Republicans, is that Bush doesn't care if you get re-elected and he doesn't care about what happens to the country.

This is a man who has been a failure at everything he has tried while he was being groomed to transfer more wealth to the elite. He only cares about the wealth he's going to start receiving in a few months unless his buddies do to him what he's done to the country.

Nancy Pelosi was right when she said that the next step is accountability. There are now 263 Congress members and 74 Senators who need to be dumped in a month like they dumped the country so they could get out of town.

We are going to be right back where we started in a few months and we need to have a government in place that will deal with the problem instead of play games.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]