Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Really Hard-to-Swallow Truth About the Bailout

By Joe Bageant, CounterPunch. Posted October 3, 2008.


We somehow came to believe Wall Street's success was ours too, and that the bills we owed were never going to come due. Well, they are now.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Myriad cultural historians have noted the American belief that success is a sign of God's favor. Over the past couple of decades, He has had a downright lovefest with the already-rich -- so much so that the richest 400 Americans now have more money stashed away than the combined bottom 150 million Americans. Some $1.6 trillion.

This was accomplished by selling off or shipping out every available asset, from jobs to seaports, smashing usury and anti-monopoly laws, raiding the public coffers and manipulating the medium of exchange and blackmailing the peasantry regarding common needs such as health care and energy to keep their asses warm, to name a few. The ultimate coup was to convince the entire nation that the well-being of the rich, meaning the well-being of Wall Street, was indeed the common man's well-being.

All went well for a while. People went into credit card hock up to their noses in order to provide 26 percent credit card interest to Wall Street, etc. And when that became untenable, flimsy mortgages were cranked out by the millions, ensuring that every American who could hold a crayon could sign to purchase a home. To facilitate this, all sorts of shaky "mortgage instruments" were created -- balloon (sign here Jeeter, you're gonna flip it in a year and make a hundred K on this house trailer), interest only, and finally, negative-balance mortgages where you only paid part of the interest and the rest was rolled back into the principal balance. And joy of joys, you could refinance a couple of times while the inflated value of these houses was on the way up. Life was good for everybody.

The bill was never gonna come due because God, in His wisdom, had deemed that capitalism would defy the second law of thermodynamics and expand forever. So every time a bank made a mortgage loan of say, $400,000, even though the debtor hadn't even made a payment yet, the loan was declared a bank asset and another $400,000 was loaned against it. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve Bank yelled whoopee and printed another $800,000 in currency. Of course, at some point the country had to run out of customers, so the loans got easier and easier. No matter that debt is not wealth. Wink and call it that, and most folks won't even look up from their new big-screen high-resolution digital TVs.

The problem was that all the jobs to pay for this stuff were stampeding off toward places in China with names containing a lot Xs and Zs and praying for a vowel. It was becoming clear that the entire economy was running on fumes -- in fact, less than fumes. It was running on the odor of paper. Mountains of the stuff. Bundles of mortgages and very strange securities and derivatives of unknown origin and value. Paper that stated its own worth and signed by some mystic hand no one could quite identify though the blurry signatures looked to read Greenspan, Paulson and Bernanke.

But there was a rub. Things reached the point where there simply was not anything left to defraud the public out of, nothing left to steal from the nation's productive capability, no matter how much paper Jeeter and Maggie signed for that trailer house, no matter how secure Brian and Jennifer out there in Arlington, Va., and Davis, Calif., thought they were. So the only thing left to do was steal from future generations of Americans and accept an I.O.U., which the government would happily sign on behalf of the people and enforce. By the wildest coincidence, under the Bush administration this I.O.U. happened to tally up to about $700 billion.

Seeing the oncoming train of financial disaster, the financiers just about wet their pants and screamed, "We want it all now! And if we don't get it, the 'economy' will lock its brakes and crash. Remember, we control the medium of exchange. Nobody gets a paycheck if we don't. Remember that it's lines of credit from us that back every working man's and woman's paycheck in the country. So pay the hell up."

Folks, they've got us all by the nuts and nipples. McCain knows that. Obama knows that. In the end, regardless of the so-called dissenters in the House and the Senate, we will pay up. It's election season, and the dissent is for show. So it looks like we will get some "concession." For example, we will get shares in these "toxic assets" that are stinking up the joint. The rich need to dump them and dump them fast. In another magnanimous concession, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will raise the insurance on "our savings" to $250,000. (How many readers have $250K in the bank?) But it will be redeemable in even more inflated currency amid an inflationary environment. And, in case you didn't know, the FDIC has up to 10 years to pay up on that insurance. So don't get any ideas about running off to Mexico, to which, by the way, we are a net debtor nation.

We will pay. We will pay because the European banks holding all that bad paper we wrote demand that we make good on it so even more of their banks will not fail. We will pay because the Chinese, the Japanese and everyone else will cut off the loan tap with which we pay the interest (not the principal) on our exploding supernova of national debt. We will pay because God loves the rich. We will pay because we will not be offered any other choice. We will pay because George Bush worked hard for all those Ds in school and became the first MBA president. We will pay because our media has internalized the capitalist system so thoroughly they can only talk in Wall Speak. We will pay because the only language we have to describe our world is that of our oppressors because we have been taught to think in Wall Speak. We will pay because we hitched our wagon to last-stage capitalism and even though the wagon has now two wheels over the cliff and roars forward, we don't know where the brake handle is located. And because we don't know any better or understand any possible resistance to the system because we have been kept like worms in a jar and fed horseshit.

And as we all know, worms do not rise up in revolt.

That takes a backbone.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bailout

Joe Bageant is author of the book Deer Hunting with Jesus: Dispatches From America's Class War, about working-class America. He is also a contributor to Red State Rebels: Tales of Grassroots Resistance in the Heartland (AK Press). A complete archive of his online work, along with the thoughts of many working Americans on the subject of class, may be found on ColdType and on Joe Bageant's Web site, joebageant.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
great insights ....
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 3, 2008 12:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one disagreement ... we will have deflation, not inflation ...

credit is drying up for 4 reasons. banks are tightening loan standards, banks don't trust one another, banks are hoarding cash for the coming onslaught of bad debt on their own books and people are tightening their belts. all money is created and sustained by loans in banks. when loans aren't made, are paid off or go bad, money is destroyed.

when credit contracts ( fewer loans ) money is destroyed. we are already seeing the effects in the commodities markets, and with all the fear out there gold has done very little. government securities are getting more expensive lowering rates. consumer spending is falling off a cliff.

get ready for hard times ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: great insights .... Posted by: 911FalseFlag
» RE: great insights .... Posted by: jooljetkmae
» RE: great insights .... Posted by: phindrup
FDIC - Backed by government, but not really?
Posted by: aouie01 on Oct 3, 2008 2:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the goal is to back FDIC, and prevent runs on banks, then laws need to be in place that assures backing by the government. The FDIC hasn't failed to repay insured amounts on any bank so far, but as bank failures are expected to hit unprecedented amounts since FDIC's creation, thought needs to go into whether or not FDIC should be backed by the people (through the government). If the answer is to back FDIC, then it should be in writing (laws). There should also be some short time stipulated (e.g. 3 business days) as the maximum time before money is handed to the account holder on demand. Below are some related thoughts.

There is little reason to increase the insured amount for individual accounts as people could just split the money across different banks. Businesses on the other hand will need higher amounts insured depending on the money flow needed for the business. The banks should pay a proportional amount to the amount of insurance sought (and the banks could pass on the charge to customers (maybe by a slightly lower interest on savings accounts and CDs)).

Rather than deal with the scenario if and when it occurs, it would be good to decide ahead of time as to what needs to be done. In some ways the likely increase of the FDIC insured amount to $250K increases the risk that FDIC could run out of funds much more quickly. If I had money in a bank that is probably having liquidity problems, then I would feel pressured to remove the money from the bank. If there was a written guarantee that the money would be made available by the government with a short time (say 3 business days), then I might be less likely to contribute to runs on banks.
Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» richholland Posted by: bobtr900
Selfish people can't share
Posted by: weathered on Oct 3, 2008 3:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its in their DNA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is indeed a big difference between the two ends of I-66.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 3, 2008 3:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having visited Northern VA, I can tell you that once you get past Fairfax county, Main Street looks even more obvious that DC would look like a greater distance. It is amazing that DC is out of touch with folks even 40 miles away.

P.S.: What's going on in Winchester, VA these days?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When will Bush be blamed for intentional criminal actions
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Oct 3, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just like in 2004, the Democratic presidential and vice presidential candidates are not being truthful about the fake war on terror, a false flag attack of 9/11, the scam of the Federal Reserve Bank and the easily hackable electronic voting machines and central tabulators.
The reason is that the Democrats have been completely complicit in all of the criminal actions and war crimes committed by Bush. If they blow the whistle, then they will be implicated.

Today's banking crisis is the THIRD trillion dollar plus US-caused financial meltdown in the last twenty years.
Each one of these crises came into being through the same basic mechanism...the fraudulent over-valuing of financial assets by Wall Street - with a "wink and a nod" (and sometimes a lot more) from the White House and Congress. The fraudulently valued assets stimulate the economy, impart the illusion of health and then, inevitably, the fraud goes too far and the whole house of card comes painfully crashing back to earth.
The White House stood in the way of any state prosecuting federal banks and mortgage companies for predatory lending. They actually used a portion of the enabling act creating the US Comptroller of the Currency to preempt the regulation and prosecution of these banks for fraudulent loan activities. This is why Eliot Spitzer was politically assassinated. He wrote an editorial in the Washington Post three weeks before his assassination accusing the White House of preventing any state Attorney General from prosecuting these criminal activities. Of course, the mainstream media did not report the actual reason that this politician’s sexual indiscretions were reported so immediately and excessively.

The mainstream media never reported on Bush planting in the White House press corps a gay escort, Johnny Gannon. Gannon based on the Secret Service records of visits to the White House visited the White House over 200 times and stayed overnight at least two times.

Go to my website, www.911insidejob.net and read many articles and watch videos on the well planned takedown of the US dollar by the Bush White House and the Federal Reserve Bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Never Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Never Posted by: hagwind
» treason Posted by: veggiegrrrl
God Damn Ronald Reagan
Posted by: LMNOP on Oct 3, 2008 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For me, the most indelible and nauseating images of the cursed Reagan years is the one of that doddering old fool with his jet black hair and rouge red cheeks irreally styled like the madam of a cheap whorehouse, his head titubating like a bobble-headed doll, smirking and grinning with obvious self-satisfaction whilst smugly quipping "The scariest words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government, and I’m here to help’" I would like nothing more today than to unearth his decaying cadaver from its crypt, reanimate it with wires like a marionette, stand it upright in front of a television camera, make it bob and smirk that same sentence out to the the nation and split open and splatter his soggy head with a baseball bat mid-sentence as Congress writes the bail-out check.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: God Damn Ronald Reagan Posted by: Grandma Crabby
» RE: You too? Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: God Damn Ronald Reagan Posted by: shinseiji
We want to try to make it on our own
Posted by: Drume on Oct 3, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with his sentiment at the end: it takes backbone to agree to do this on our own. To not bailout.

And as millions of American citizens have demonstrated over the last week and a half, or two weeks, WE WANT TO TRY. We do not want this bailout. We want to get back to sound personal and national financial practices.

By favoring the bailout, members of Congress are issuing a vote of no confidence in the strength of the American people.

For shame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Bail Out The Homeless
Posted by: Dboy on Oct 3, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All that would do is give people an incentive to remain homeless.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bail Out The Homeless Posted by: DaBear
RE: Bail Out The Homeless
Posted by: Axiom69 on Oct 3, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In theory it sounds good. Unfortunately many people who are homeless are that way due to mental instability/illness or drug addiction. Not someone you want to give 250k to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Bail Out The Homeless
Posted by: yesman on Oct 3, 2008 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting that as we are preparing to dump 700 billion dollars (700 BILLION DOLLARS!) into the coffers of Wall Street thieves and thugs, I just saw a news report on the burgeoning tent cities in Reno NV and elsewhere across the country. Hundreds of billions in bailouts for fatcat gamblers, and nothing for unemployed homeless citizens living in tents in our own hometowns. Maybe it's just me, but something appears very wrong with this picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money is the greatest lie ever told !!!
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Oct 3, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People have treated me like a pariah in recent years because of my unpopular assertions about the nature and effects of money. Guess what, I was 100% right and everyone who "spit in my face" and told me to go away is now paying the piper for that arrogance and ignorance.

Want to survive the upcoming great debacles? Then swallow your pride and listen to what I have been saying over the last few years.

All money will die shortly and the unraveling and blowback will be terrible. What will you do?

Truth and wisdom are the keys to your survival...

Peace now, before its too late...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Back To The Land Posted by: Last Chance
» Name one... Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Name one... Posted by: EncinoM
The rest of the world may save the US
Posted by: Placidbro on Oct 3, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the only thing left to do was steal from future generations of Americans and accept an I.O.U., which the government would happily sign on behalf of the people and enforce. By the wildest coincidence, under the Bush administration this I.O.U. happened to tally up to about $700 billion.

I hope thing don't get that bad. America's status has to change. The rest of the world may have to cancel debts to allow the US economy propped up like some third world country. We must not allow a world hegemonic power to come to the rise again.
Nations of the world must help one another
http://inthesenewtimes.com/2008/10/03/the-rise-of-the-rest/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To heck with Wall Street
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 3, 2008 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I want to know is WHAT exactly has Wall Street EVER done for Main Street America? Thats what I thought, NOTHING. Those pompous overpaid morons dug their own hole, now let them sleep in it!

Jiff
Online PRivacy when it COunts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Price of Failing to Impeach
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 3, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Bush's so-called "bail out" is a grand theft of public money for private bankers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X-POLYGAMIST WIFE in ARIZONA
Posted by: X-POLYGAMIST WIFE on Oct 3, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Warren Jeffs and his white supremacist cronies were raping underage girls and bilking Arizona taxpayers out of millions, including bankrupting the Ephraim Bank to build the YFZ Ranch in Texas, the all white Wall Street Monarchy was raping the American people and building their off-shore portfolios.

God help us all!

BANKING ON HEAVEN . COM
http://www.bankingonheaven.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sick of the temper tanrums over credit debt...
Posted by: ellie on Oct 3, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok, here it goes... have owned my own small business for over 30 years, very successfully by the way...

'da rules of my small business:

1. no credit ever... we do not owe anyone but the landlord and utilities

2. you want our stuff, a down payment and contract is needed for your order. Down payment cover materials needed for the job...

3. customer pays balance before forking over merchandise...

4. everybody happy, no loose ends... plus because I know you paid for the materials in advance, the order is much less likely to be canceled.... if it is canceled, deposits are not refundable... period...

5. if you need a line of credit for your business, you have expanded beyond the ability of your bottom line... scale back...

6. payroll is paid after expenses are paid, never had anyone miss a paycheck... that's what savings comes in... always save enough to meet your payroll and taxes up front before paying yourself, the owner... see rule 2...

7. refuse lines of all too willing credit from your suppliers and pay with a check or company debit card...

8. no company credit cards, no matter how many offers the mailman delivers...

9. if you need equipment, pay cash, look for good used equipment, stay within your means, meaning buying with cash not credit...

now if we can get this through everyone's head, we can rebuild this economy with trust, integrity and reliability... you would be amazed at how well this system works...

customers trust us to deliver, we trust that the bills get paid and everyone's good... plus, we build a larger customer base every year because of these principles...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What I don't get is Posted by: EinMD
Economist Dean Baker on the Bailout Panic
Posted by: fanny666 on Oct 3, 2008 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Economist Dean Baker: Is The Bailout Necessary?

Are we even going to have HEARINGS before we give away $700 Billion?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the wealthy 400
Posted by: cbishopp on Oct 3, 2008 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want names.
If petitioning our government won't work, if the electoral process is defunct, if calling and faxing your representative or senator brings no result, if there is no food in the cupboard and no gas in the tank what should we do?
Let's go to the source. This is not Darwinism this is ridiculous.
This game is fixed and the argument is that we need credit to function as a society. That is a bad sign in itself. We are slaves and we lose no matter what we choose to do.

The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem.
--Milton Friedman

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.
--Thomas Jefferson,

The art of leadership, as displayed by really great popular leaders in all ages, consists in consolidating the attention of the people
against a single adversary and taking care that nothing will split up that attention into sections.
The more the militant energies of the people are directed towards one objective the more will new recruits join the movement,
attracted by the magnetism of its unified action, and thus the striking power will be all the more enhanced.
The leader of genius must have the ability to make different opponents appear as if they belonged to the one category;
for weak and wavering natures among a leader's following may easily begin to be dubious about the justice of their own cause
if they have to face different enemies.
As soon as the vacillating masses find themselves facing an opposition that is made up of different groups of enemies
their sense of objectivity will be aroused and they will ask how is it that all the others can be in the wrong and they themselves,
and their movement, alone in the right.
--Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. 1, ch. 3, 1925

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the wealthy 400 Posted by: stopthemaddness2
Food for Thought
Posted by: katfish on Oct 3, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eckhart Tolle, taking it to another level:

"...don't confuse cause and effect. Your primary task is not to seek salvation through creating a better world, but to awaken out of identification with form. You are then no longer bound to this world, this level of reality. You can feel your roots in the Unmanifested and so are free of attachment to the manifested world. You can still enjoy the passing pleasures of this world, but there is no fear of loss anymore, so you don't need to cling to them. Although you can enjoy sensory pleasures, the craving for sensory experience is gone, as is the constant search for fulfillment through psychological gratification, through feeding the ego. You are in touch with something infinitely greater than any manifested pleasure, than any manifested thing.

In a way, you then don't need the world anymore. You don't even need for it to be different from the way it is."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here's A Better Idea Posted by: Last Chance
Tell it, Joe!
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 3, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But don't fergit that some of us still have guns and know how to use them. Some of us have backbones and aren't afraid of relying upon them.

The rich ignited the ultimate shitstorm with this bailout. Not one rich person is safe. No justice/fairness, no peace. Not ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tell it, Joe! Posted by: Collielady
british asault on america revisited.-this bailout is for the british lovers in america.
Posted by: avatar_singh on Oct 3, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
German labour minister Franz Muentefering has compared hedge and other speculative funds to locusts ravaging fragile economies and enterprises for short-term gains.






This review appears in the February 23, 2007 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
BOOK REVIEW
Britain's Assault on America Revisited

by Jeffrey Steinberg

The Anglo-American Establishment
by Carroll Quigley
New York City: Books in Focus, Inc., 1981
354 pages, paperback

Professor Carroll Quigley (1910-1977), the noted Georgetown University historian, completed the writing of The Anglo-American Establishment sometime during the late 1940s. Yet the book was never published until 1981, four years after the author's death. Since the publication was delayed for more than 30 years, it is not at all inappropriate to publish a review of this important work 26 years after its first publication. In fact, one would be hard-pressed to find a more useful moment to review this invaluable account of the British oligarchy's assault on the United States.

Since the inauguration of George Bush and Dick Cheney in January 2001, the United States has been under relentless attack from within. Many a sage Bush-Cheney critic has observed that the current Administration has done more damage to the United States than any foreign enemy could ever inflict. From the Iraq War, to the looming preemptive attack on Iran, to the collapse of the physical economy, to the disintegration of conditions of life for the vast majority of the lower 80% income brackets, and the assault on Constitutional rights, the Bush-Cheney Administration has successfully turned most of the world against the United States, and turned millions of Americans against their own elected government—and against the very idea of government acting on behalf of the general welfare.

Yet few critics, with the exception of Lyndon LaRouche, have raised the specter of a foreign hand behind the Bush-Cheney wrecking operations. This is largely explained by the fact that the vast majority of Americans, including within the political class, have lost a true sense of history. They perceive the consequences of the government's actions from the more limited standpoint of relatively near-term cause and effect, or from the vantage point of a specialist's limited historical lens. Moreover, they all generally accept the false notion that the British hand in world affairs has been vastly reduced, and that the impulse towards empire has been abandoned or suppressed, due to England's "diminished" condition. One need only read the inserted special report in the Feb. 3, 2007 edition of the Economist to recognize that the City of London is now celebrating "another British imperial moment," centered around the successful promulgation of yet another devastating myth: that globalization is an irreversible, driving force in world economic and political affairs.

It is in this context that the present review of the Quigley book is written. For what Professor Quigley recounts, with impeccable documentation, is a more than 100-year assault upon the American Constitutional republic by a conspiracy of leading British imperialists, who saw the survival of the British Empire in apocalyptic terms: Either the United States would be coopted back under London domination, or the Empire would crumble. Based on this assessment, a tight-knit group of leading British oligarchs launched a series of projects, aimed at recasting the British Empire as a "Commonwealth of Nations" and drawing the United States, forever, back into the fold.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

british evil designs in this anglosaxon war -economic and others-againstthe rest of the world races.
Posted by: avatar_singh on Oct 3, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from -----http://www.larouchepub.com/

This article appears in the April 20, 2007 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.

Where the Future Lies
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.


British evil designs.

" since the days of foolish Louis XIV, it has been a persisting, pro-imperial, Anglo-Dutch Liberal "geopolitical" strategy, sometimes called a Fabian strategy, to lure targeted rivals into wars by which they ruin themselves to Anglo-Dutch Liberal strategic advantage. This was the way in which the British East India Company acquired its private world empire, through the so-called "Seven Years War" culminating in the February 1763 Peace of Paris, and the London determination, from 1763 on, to crush those American colonies which had been crucial in Britain's war to wrest Canada from France.

The U.S. War in Indo-China and the current U.S. military operations and postures in Southwest Asia, are typical of the ways in which London has induced the U.S. government to, repeatedly, play the fool in this way. Indeed, many among our Baby Boomers in the U.S. Congress are still playing the role of official dupes of that strategic game.

World War Three, or its equivalent, is a proposition now on the table, a policy to be openly rejected now, or to be adopted by default. The London-centered, still-as-always-geopolitical intention, is to pit the U.S.A. into a virtual, even an actual, nuclear war against Russia, China, and India. The number of suckers ready to bite that bait, within the U.S. Senate, for example, is more disgusting than it should be considered surprising. A Baby-Boomer fish, running for President or otherwise, that would swallow Gore's "Global Warming" swindle, is clearly prepared to swallow almost any similarly baited hook.


The brief, but crucial role of that de facto political boss of the British East India Company, the Eighteenth Century's Lord Shelburne, in his 1782 accession to the post of Prime Minister, was not only a crucial turning-point of inflection in course of world history; it has crucial relevance for any competent understanding of the strategic crisis of this planet today.

Not only did Shelburne maneuver the Americans' allies, the U.S.A., France, and Spain, into separate peace negotiations, but, with the assistance of relevant freemasons under British control, notably the Martinist freemasonry, orchestrated the series of 1782-1789 developments leading into the self-destruction of U.S. ally France, that in a series of events which began with the atrocious farce which the British orchestrated as Philippe Egalité's July 14, 1789 assault, armed and directed by him personally, at the Bastille. This was the assault conducted ostensibly on behalf of Philippe's crony Jacques Necker's candidacy for Prime Minister of Louis XVI's France.[2] These events included such delicacies as the succession of that Reign of Terror, and that Bonaparte tyranny which Count Joseph de Maistre's Martinist freemasonry orchestrated as the economic spoiling of continental Europe for British imperial advantage.

Thus, following the American defeat of London's Cornwallis, there was a period of more than seventy years, from those France events of 1782-1789 through the U.S. victory over London's Confederacy in 1865, during which the British Empire's control over the world's monetary-financial systems was frequently challenged, but without actual success. However, by the time of the U.S. Philadelphia Centennial celebration of 1876, the U.S. 1865 victory led by President Lincoln over the globally orchestrated, anti-U.S. schemes of Britain's Lord Palmerston, had created a new situation in the world at large.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

controlled economic demolition
Posted by: scienceisnotconsensus on Oct 3, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People have to wake up and realize that this is a controlled economic demolition of our economy. This is not hitching "our wagon to last-stage capitalism". This is an engineered corralling of the sheeple into accepting handing over their economic freedom into a global finacial control grid. Next stop the Global Reserve Bank of the western world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: controlled economic demolition Posted by: scienceisnotconsensus
My thoughts from Monday
Posted by: roncypert on Oct 3, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The purpose of the bailout/rescue legislation is to soften the blow, to adjust the degree of decline to that of a really steep hill rather than a sheer drop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My thoughts from Monday Posted by: scienceisnotconsensus
Wonderful!
Posted by: openeye on Oct 3, 2008 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the best synopsis that I have seen of the whole situation, and even includes the much overlooked printing of currency, which is now done with no published accountability at all. (!) I especially love the black humor aspect - we definitely need to start laughing down more of the ridiculous aspects of our "supportive" governmental policies instead of honoring them with "serious" debate. But what the heck, brainwashing generally does not lend itself to serious thought....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Can we Fight Back
Posted by: Gravitas on Oct 3, 2008 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are plenty of us who do have backbones. But how can we fight back. I think some kind of protest is necessary to let them know that we are not going to take this. I don't mean demonstrations; they really do not hurt anything. Maybe everyone should use this years "buy nothing day" as a way to let our dissatisfaction be known. It might at least put a little pain in the pocketbooks of the large corporations. It is also not as risky to people as a national strike because many would be too afraid to lose their jobs. The important thing is to send the message we CAN organize and act. They have counted on us being passive for too long!!! Anyone have other ideas or now of movements being set up to fight this! Come on folks! We can NOT just do nothing!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How about a little wisdom... Posted by: SevenStarHand
» RE: How Can we Fight Back Posted by: VZEQICVA
THE ABSENCE OF REGULATIONS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 3, 2008 1:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was allowed to happen. The laws we once had to prohibit predatory lending and usury were gone. Unsecured loans became OK. Home equtiy loans (second mortgages) were pretty much forced on people. The world of credit revolved around the fact that real estate "always" increases in value. Except of course when it doesn't. It's human nature to go after a better lifestyle and greed is part of being human. That's why we all need rules. Allowing a free for all was wrong. Much of this came to us by a lack of leadership. We had a president who never lived by any rules. He had contempt for any and all authority all of his life. I guess he thought a country could run that way and he didn't much care about consequences. After all, it never came back to haunt him. It is back to haunt us. I was employed by Wall St. firms for 20 yrs. and I have a good understanding of the picture and how it came about. But the best explanation of the problem and the solution came form Warren Buffet interviewed by Charlie Rose. Politicians are not economists. We don't need any new laws. Just dig out the old ones. They worked just fine. We have to go back to making our own 'stuff'. The China thing just isn't working. As for Bush's favorite 'mom and pop' operations: News flash George, they cannot exist in a world with a Walmart a mile away. They have destroyed our domestic production and people's opportunity to earn a living is gone. To China. That has to change. We have alot of work to do and We shouldn't let these newly elected people go a day without hearing from us. We have a responsibility to keep them in line. They have to take care of us before themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The future of 100 million US children
Posted by: eeezzz on Oct 3, 2008 2:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has just been aborted by the GOP, oh wait - Obama actually twisted arms to make this happen... never mind. It's all good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now What Was Sown Shall Be Reaped
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Oct 3, 2008 4:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting

You needn't worry about the United States becoming a police state, that's already happened, on paper at least. All of the tools Bush needs are already law to rule from the Oval Office. He simply needs to declare a national emergency.

Congress won't stop him, they've enabled every illegal move he's made in the last eight years, hiding behind a few token scraps to make it look like they actually oppose him. They will be null and void anyway. It's all legal.This isn't ranting. I draw your attention to the linked texts. These are actual facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Woman, 90, Shoots Self Inside Foreclosed Home
Posted by: chlamor on Oct 3, 2008 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
link

Woman, 90, Shoots Self Inside Foreclosed Home

By UPI

WASHINGTON, Oct. 3 (UPI) -- The plight of an Ohio woman who shot herself as deputies tried evict her from her foreclosed home was part of congressional debate on the $700 billion bailout.

Addie Polk, 90, was being treated at Akron General Medical Center after shooting herself Wednesday as deputies were at her door with eviction papers, U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, said Friday during floor debate on the rescue plan for U.S. financial markets. Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM) foreclosed Polk's home after acquiring the mortgage in 2007.

Kucinich used Polk's circumstances as he spoke against the rescue plan that eventually passed the U.S. House of Representatives 263-171.

"This bill does nothing for the Addie Polks of the world," Kucinich said. "This bill fails to address the fact that millions of homeowners who are facing foreclosure."

The bill, which passed the Senate Wednesday, "will take care of Wall Street," Kucinich said, "but democracy is going down here."

Robert Dillion, a neighbor, climbed a ladder to enter a second-story window in Polk's home after he and the deputies heard the noise from inside, CNN reported.

In 2004, Polk took out a 30-year mortgage for $45,620 with a Countrywide Home Loan office in Ohio, CNN said. Polk had missed payments on her home during the next few years. In 2007 the Federal National Mortgage Association (OTCPK:FDRNP), or Fannie Mae, assumed the mortgage and later filed for foreclosure.

Akron woman, 90, facing eviction, shoots self

By Beacon Journal staff

POSTED: 04:04 p.m. EDT, Oct 02, 2008

A 90-year-old Akron woman, about to be evicted from her La Croix Avenue home for failing to pay her mortgage, apparently shot herself Wednesday while Summit County sheriff's deputies were knocking on her door.

A neighbor and the deputies found Addie Polk in an upstairs bedroom suffering from multiple gunshot wounds to her upper body. A handgun was found near her.

She was taken to Akron General Medical Center, police said, and is expected to recover.

Akron police are investigating the incident.

A 90-year-old Akron woman, about to be evicted from her La Croix Avenue home for failing to pay her mortgage, apparently shot herself Wednesday while Summit County sheriff's deputies were knocking on her door.

A neighbor and the deputies found Addie Polk in an upstairs bedroom suffering from multiple gunshot wounds to her upper body. A handgun was found near her.

She was taken to Akron General Medical Center, police said, and is expected to recover.

Akron police are investigating the incident.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Put the Horse in from of the Cart
Posted by: Traven on Oct 3, 2008 6:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go read the Powel memo here:

http://www.mediatransparency.org/story.php?storyID=21

And then realize almost everything the super rich have done to the United States was done on purpose to kill off all social progress made by ordinary Americans, not since FDR, but all the way back to the first unions in the 1870s.

There is this myth that some day America could build a regulated form of capitalism, with a safety net, protection for the small businessperson, protection for workers, respect for human rights and laws to enforce environmental standards.

If the last thirty years has proved anything it is that vision of a fair version of capitalism with democracy is not what the super rich believe in, or even bother to consider.

All laws can be ignored, watered down, or re-written by lobbyists and when people object too much and become too revolutionary, there are always death squads that have run rampant all over the third world now for forty-five years.

Private armies of the Blackwater type real purpose of existence is the fall back defense of the super rich to inflict on Americans, the justice of big money – no one shall dare question their divine right to massive wealth , no matte the cost to the world at large.

If America is broke and Americans have come to rely too much on credit cards it is because wages have fallen so low, and so many millions of good jobs have been shipped overseas that it has become a matter of survival, for the vast majority.

The middle class people who abuse credit cards and then default were a straw horse gimmick to hide the truth about the falling standard of living the last thirty years.

You what real democracy? Fair capitalism where the rule of law is real, then out law all personal wealth over, say two million and tax all wealth back into a real national bank for Americans to vote on via national policy discussion…

But here’s some news – those advocating fair capitalism are just as likely to end up dead as all those utopian socialists when the armies of the night go on their rampage to teach humanity no one shall challenge the golden rule.

After Hitler came to power, within a short period of time he murdered the left wing of the Nazi party, so much for the notion the Nazi state was socialism gone mad. The Nazi State was the super rich gone insane – using the mad little man to protect their wealth from the masses… all the rest is window dressing and water under the bridge of history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TOO LATE
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Oct 4, 2008 12:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The protest should have happened today, when the Representatives were still on their way to vote again on a bill that they had already rejected. DC should have been locked down like Seattle during the WTO meeting, making the session of Congress impossible because the Representatives would not have been able to show up. But, the people allowed Congress to have their vote, and therefore allowed them to pass the law.

Now, all that is left is a massive debt, the payments for which the government will collect from us, eventually. It's every person for himself now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

100% apt and accurate
Posted by: GarrisonPayneLeonard38H on Oct 4, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Joe Bageant!

This piece should be cited far and wide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The U.S. Federal Reserve and IRS
Posted by: Maxemum on Oct 5, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aaron Russo's documentary that never made it to the national airwaves. This is from the guy that brought us the lethal weapon movies. The movie goes into great detail about the Federal Reserve and the IRS. A very good watch and highly educational.

Aaron Russo's Freedom to Fascism
http://tinyurl.com/4xavrh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bad analysis
Posted by: cinnamon45 on Oct 5, 2008 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One myth about the current financial crises is that it is the fault of ordinary Americans, who imprudently took out loans they could to afford. This is simply not true.
The current crises is not the fault of ordinary Americans.
It is true that many Americans took out loans they could not afford. I don't know why people did this - some, with credit cards maxed out on vacations, took out a home loans , and instead of paying off the credit card, took another vacation. Others were optimistic, egged on by the relentless propaganda that home ownership is good. Others were, perhaps , elderly and confused, or lost their jobs, or had medical bills. I don't know how many people acted in different ways, but i do know this: every single solitary mortgage had to be approved. Every single mortgage had to be approved by underwriters and bankers. Now, if someone, asks for a loan,and even the most cursory examination shows that that person cannot possibly pay, who bears more responsibility: the person asking, or the banker who approves it.
I further know that many ordinary Americans are

Another myth about the current crisis is that rather then resulting from too little govt regulation, it was the result of liberals messing with the free market, by forcing banks, with a law known as CRA, to make loans to poor or minority applicants. This question has been studied again and again by the Federal Reserve; suffice it to say, CRA loans were not the problem.

However, the question of who or why these loans were made is a red herring; it was not the approval of imprudent loans that has made the current crisis so severe. All the bankers who approved these loans are not actually the main culprits.

The people who bear direct responsibility for the current crises are people like Paulson; as CEO of Goldman Sachs, he and people like him are directly responsible for the current problems; that he is sending our tax dollars to his buddies to fix the problem is only icing on the cake of gall. Not only are people like paulson responsible for our current problems, they appear to have acted from the basest of motives - greed. I think that it was the desire on the part of people like Henry Paulson for larger paychecks that led to reckless behavior on the part of wall street; this reckless behavior generated large profits, justifying large salary's, but this same reckless behavior has gotten us to where we are today.

Another myth about the financial crisis is that it is incredibly complicated. While the technical details of loans may be complicated, the behavior and actions that led to this state are not at all complicated, and are similar to what we do every day.

As an example, this week, the wall street journal examined why AIG, one of the largest and most respected financial institutions in the world, suddenly collapsed. Turns out, they had a unit in london writing insurance; while it sounds complicated, its just insurance - someone pays you some money, the premium, and you promise to pay back a lot more if they have a problem. And what did AIG do with the huge premiums they recieved ? they did not put any money aside for a reserve.
LET me repeat that: they spent all the money on salarys. So when the mortgage market went south, all of sudden people said, hey, AIG owes, in theory, a gazillion dollars of insurance, and they don't have any money set aside to pay it.
When people heard this, you had the famed loss of confidence, and AIG tanked.
While this may be a worst case, similar behaviour by virtually every wall street firm, which, in its most charitable interpretation was allowed to occur thru negligence by people like paulson, this behavour is what has made the crisis much much worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Oct 5, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a brilliant article. The last few decades with few interruptions where democracy reared its head...have been all about supporting the nanny state for the wealthy.

And here is the bad math: Depress wages. Have regressive taxes. Have those regressive taxes enable the wealthiest to bid commodities and housing sky high - way beyond true worth. Offer dubious and usurious credit to those wage depressed workers. Inflame them with wealth envy so that they would do ANYTHING to keep up - buy overpriced McMansions - make stupid decisions like not paying their mortgage so they could take their kid to see a Miley Cyrus concert (this one is true - at least the mother was considering such a stupid move if not having already done it). Lastly, anyone who proposed rational thought in the face of rising home prices that had nothing to do with rational economic policies - why these people weren't forward thinking! They were chumps! Run with the market! Inflame it! That stupid thinking is what got us here and they got us good with the herd instinct too. Why, just what was it we were getting in on back then - the highest home prices in history? It blows your mind. What happened to buy low, sell high? Another old concept disrespected by the masters of the universe who were so busy making new economic drecky concepts so they could continue the great rip-off of the American consumer.....

The tenants of old that have always worked - save, be prudent, have progressive systems, do not depend upon house prices to make you rich (because in the end you still need somewhere reasonable to live) - it was all about investors and not about Main Street at all. But they got over good on this one. The herd instinct, the stupider than anything culture....all of it has now imploded.

Now that Main Street is finally broke and the truth comes out......we have financed them again with $700B. Incredible.

And now that wallets are empty, maybe an old concept can come back - that of actually thinking through and logically analyzing what is going on out there - if it looks too good to be true.....then it is. And lastly, realizing that trickle down is a Ponzi scheme - always has been, and always will be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: IPF
» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: CommonDreamer
Convenient and lopsided
Posted by: IPF on Oct 5, 2008 5:41 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author conveniently glosses over the facts and history of this crisis. He uses an emotional call to throw in against the present administration but the roots of this problem go deeper and further.

It was during Clinton's administration that laws were changed so as to allow any and all to get loans for a house. Whether you had a qualified income and credit rating was secondary to the need of buying a house and the need for politicians to be able to say that they are providing housing loans for a record number of Americans. Alas, the chickens have come home to roost, and those that created the problem must find a fall guy for their actions.

The real truth of things is that we've now had 2 and 1/2 years of democratic change. When the dems got a hold of the congress - gasoline was just over two dollars a gallon, the stock market was doing quite well and the economy was chugging along. Now after two and a half years of totally bankrupt and ineffective inactivity, we have seen the results of our "let's give the dems a chance" folly.

Do we really want to give O'bama a mandate for more of this type of change? I, for one, have had enough. Vote Mcain/Palin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Convenient and lopsided Posted by: CommonDreamer
» Con "logic", AKA ideo-illogic Posted by: GarrisonPayneLeonard38H
» maxpower Posted by: maxpower
Take a stand
Posted by: sicntired on Oct 6, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This bailout only succeeds if each and every American taxpayer bends over and asks for more.Refuse to pay that portion of your tax bill that goes to paying for this outrage and the scam falls flat.They will make this a patriotic issue because they have no real justification for asking the very poor to support the very rich.Succumb to this and generations of your children will pay for this into eternity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't let Clinton off the hook
Posted by: vertical on Oct 6, 2008 7:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all love to blame this mess on Reagsn and Bush, but it was under Clinton's watch all those safegaurds put into place by FDR to prevent another 1929 were reversed. Democrat Republican it does not matter which you are not worth spit unless you have a seveb figure income!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't look now . . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 9, 2008 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . but the tottering giant has just tripped over its own fool's gold-plated lead feet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement