Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Bailout Rejection Sends out Financial Shockwaves, But It's Also Good for Democracy

By William Greider, TheNation.com. Posted September 30, 2008.


Bowing to public outrage, the House rejected the bailout and Wall Street swoons. The political bedlam in Washington is as real as it gets.
Advertisement

All of the political leaders blessed the deal, but the House of Representatives spit it out anyway. The Wall Street bailout is so odious to public opinion, the "people's house" rejected it today, 228-205. The fever chart in Wall Street -- better known as the stock market -- swooned instantly, with the Dow falling 700 points. The political bedlam in Washington is as real as it gets.

The party leaders will probably try again. I doubt they have the energy or courage to renegotiate the terms in any serious way. A majority of Democrats voted for the measure, but most Republicans took a walk. They will be scolded -- and pounded by captains of industry and finance -- for being "irresponsible." But I doubt the public will agree.

In all of elected Washington, representatives are closest to the people and they know a vote for this outrageous measure is going to end the careers of some colleagues -- maybe many of them. This time, the dissenters can claim principle and say they are voting with the folks, while also voting to save their own hides.

It adds another deep shock to the system, both in politics and economics, but what an invigorating moment for democracy.

The financial bloodbath will continue, but unless the deal on the table changes significantly, Henry Paulson gets to decide who lives and who dies. The former investment banker from Goldman Sachs would be empowered as treasury secretary to play savior or grim reaper, the liquidator who essentially pulls the plug on some banks and financial firms or the man who rescues them from ruin. Of course, Paulson would consult with other government officials. But you can be sure that, behind closed doors, he will ask former brethren in Wall Street to help decide which club members are worthy of saving. This power to pick winners and losers would remain in Paulson's hands until a new president arrives in January.

This the essence of "the deal" Congress worked out over the weekend and was stymied today. Some bells and whistles were added to make the transaction less obnoxious to public opinion, voters and taxpayers. They are not meaningless, but both parties lacked the nerve to tamper with Paulson's basic proposal. This is still a massive bailout of imploding Wall Street, financed with the public's money. And it is still a massive crap shoot for the American people.

If the billions from Washington somehow restore temporary calm and balance to global financial institutions and markets, then the usual cheerleaders will proclaim the "system" has worked. Most Americans, I predict, will not join the cheering. Too much destruction lies ahead, both in the financial system and in the real economy where people live and work. Too much bitterness and rage will be attached to the White Knight at Treasury when he dooms one pension fund or bank, but rescues others. Too much deceptive sleight-of-hand is already embedded in Paulson's approach for ordinary mortals to even recognize what Paulson intends to accomplish.

The essential political failure, in my view, is that Congress did not step up and assert the full emergency powers of government in this epic crisis, that is, take temporary control of the entire financial and banking system so regulators and policy makers can steer the US economy to safer ground, compelling the private institutions to follow their lead. This rescue plan remains essentially voluntary. Yes, the Treasury Secretary would be awarded gargantuan personal powers, but there is not much in writing to compel the banking behavior of private interests he chooses to rescue them. One assumes Paulson will demand some private deals and use his enormous leverage to squeeze anyone who resists. But there is nothing to guarantee this path is taken. The bailout will belong to the club and the club will manage it.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: congress, washington, wall street, bailout, finance industry

William Greider is the author of, most recently, "The Soul of Capitalism" (Simon & Schuster).


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Keep Calling/ Faxing/ Emailing Capitol Hill
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 30, 2008 12:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zip link to your Senators and Representative

Isn't it obvious by now that they intend to pass this bailout of Wall Street billionaires ...

Tell the NO ... Tell Them NO NOW !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Another quick petition site Posted by: fanny666
Hats off...
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 30, 2008 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to the Democrats and Republicans who voted AGAINST the Bush/Paulson giveaway plan.

Well done, ladies and gentlemen. You showed the world what REAL democracy was all about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hats off... Posted by: Beck
» from the GOP Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: Hats off... Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Hats off... Posted by: Von
» Hats off... Posted by: John Orford
Don't Buy Into Their Crap ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 30, 2008 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Stock Market is not the problem ... The Credit Markets are the problem and this Bill does nothing to clear up the financial freeze.

The reason the financial markets are not running smoothly is that there are insolvent banks out there so no banks want to do business for fear of getting stuck with these banks bad debt. This Bill just throws money at the problem without addressing the problem of these insolvent banks.

This is a terrible Bill, a bailout that will be followed by another and another bailout because it doesn't address the fact that insolvent banks must be taken out of the system.

Please Keep calling Congress until this either passed or killed ... we just had a major victory today ... Do Not Give Up ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amusing
Posted by: Dboy on Sep 30, 2008 12:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's going to be interesting to see how the tune changes around here when companies are unable to make payroll.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So, in your opinion... Posted by: ~Fiona~
» RE: So, in your opinion... Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: So, in your opinion... Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: So, in your opinion... Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: So, in your opinion... Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: So, in your opinion... Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: So, in your opinion... Posted by: Hajoda
» RE: So, in your opinion... Posted by: nochicagoboys
» Not (just) by the Fed... Posted by: photon's feather
» More 'amusing' Posted by: feduphoosier
» Extraordinarily MORE 'amusing' Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: xtraordinarily MORE 'dumb' Posted by: kungfoofighterx
» RE: xtraordinarily MORE 'dumb' Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Amusing Posted by: donl51
» RE: Amusing Posted by: Dboy
The Democrats Need Their Own Plan ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 30, 2008 1:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
~A new plan such as the Brad De Long / Stiglitz Plan a la the Scandinavian Plan must be readied for implementation by the Democrats.

Why ? The Democrats must have an alternative to the Bush- Paulson giveaway ... In this way they have something they can pass and shove down Bush's throat and say they did something should the economy go south. A plan that would work and is recommended by notable economists is just the antidote for Shock Doctrine Treatment the Democrats are getting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One article by Stiglitz: Posted by: photon's feather
Tinkle Down Economics!
Posted by: Ottomatic on Sep 30, 2008 3:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a Consumer Based Economy more than Schlock!
Get America what Warren Buffet got for his money.
Preferred stock that pays a 10% Dividend.

* Re-Regulate the financial institutions, and take an ownership stake in exchange for any Taxpayer support
* Provide mortgage relief to ordinary Americans
* Putting millions to work by investing in new green energy jobs
* Investing in a Health care, Elderly care and a Dental plan that covers everyone
* Free the Media from corporate Control by Breaking up the Media Monopolies.

Multi-national Corporations are the problem,
The People are the solution.
Put the money where it is needed most, in the pockets of the American People.
Put America First!

Bailing out The Big Three is a Bad Joke,
If, after a 100 years they still have trouble building a decent car they should go out of business. The problem is that the C.E.O.s are stealing all of the money instead of putting it into the cars.
Ask G.M. where the EV-1 is?
The Corporate system is a complete and utter Failure!
It fails the People.
Greed is a negative human trait,
It is the EVIL that we must fight in America, today.
Unbridled Corporate GREED!
There is no money left for their incompetence.
Enough already!
They believe in a free market system.
He who lives by the sword must die by the sword.

Start over!
Build a Consumer Based economy.
They had their shot,
Now it is our turn.
Let’s create a system that provides Citizens with what they need and want instead a pile of GARBAGE.
Build a cleaner, more Efficient, Ecological friendly, locally Independent, Progressive, Self Sufficient, Sustainable, Socially Responsible, Model Society

A Trillion Dollars could buy us Millions of Green Energy Jobs and a way out of this mess.
Giving it to Wall Street will only postpone the inevitable,
We have more important work to do.
Start over with a clean slate.
America is drowning in Corporate Greed and Corruption.
Stop sinking money into the COR-PIRATE Black Hole and bail out Main Street U.S.A. instead.

Vote No!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: auto Posted by: jon B
» RE: Tinkle Down Economics! Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Tinkle Down Economics! Posted by: wonkywriter
The MSM decries the Bailout rejection!!
Posted by: xvictor on Sep 30, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not one major media source received the bailout rejection news as a positive outcome. They criticized those brave congress folks who voted 'no' on the wasteful, ill-conceived bill. This demonstrates an irrational bias bordering on the absurd. Not only that, they showed us what a bunch of unthinking cry babies they truly are!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Major Tax cut for Dividends??
Posted by: Inlander on Sep 30, 2008 4:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What does that have to do with rescueing failed banks? Isn't that what the Bush/wall st boys wanted all along. That and a huge taxpayer influx of cash known as the Social Security trust fund? Yeah, that would have been just great had it taken Washington and Wall st. all of a few years to lose all our country has gained over decades.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Must Be High
Posted by: Direct Democracy on Sep 30, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one bowed to public pressure. They just need more time to bury the bodies and cover up the paper trail.

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Must Be High Posted by: EncinoM
» A better question Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: A better question Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: You Must Be High Posted by: Von
jdsmith1975
Posted by: Skippy on Sep 30, 2008 5:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I called my Republican congressman to vote "yes" on this rescue plan because he is a Republican and I want him, and all Republicans, to have to eat this one. His office flunky tried to blame this mess on Bill Clinton. I swear, Republicans will try to blame Adam and Eve's fall from the Garden of Eden on Bill Clinton! If my congressman was a Democrat, I would have urged a No vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jdsmith1975 Posted by: badkitty68
» RE: jdsmith1975 Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: jdsmith1975 Posted by: Dboy
» Nancy is that you? Partisan Hack Alert Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: jdsmith1975 Posted by: HoboHomo
Swindle Rejected By Alert Congressmen
Posted by: melpol on Sep 30, 2008 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can McCain describe himself as a Maverick and a Fiscal conservative after supporting the bailout swindle?? He no longer can be seen as an expert in economics but only as a team player with the government--banking complex. It is now almost impossible for him to attract voters who believe in the free market system and responsible government. The only way that he can be elected is by constantly talking about national security and the Iranian threat in the Middle--East. If he can get enough Americans frightened they will look to him as an experienced warrior who can defeat the foe. But his call to arms might not be loud enough to make him our next president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Mro
Posted by: RON Mro on Sep 30, 2008 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Greider, You are absolutely correct. The market should be left alone until we have a plan that really protects the American middle and poor class. The Republicans, using Reagan as a shining example of everything that is good is so much crap. Reagan and his so called "trickle down" economics won't work,mainly because the rich and those who wish they were are too greedy. Barack needs to stand up in the next debate and outline his specific plan,using some of your suggestions. FDR in the 30's took the hard steps and declared a bank holiday and other unpopular steps in order to sort out the mess. We need another leader ,such as Barack to assume the mantle of FDR and show real leadership. The Republicans have failed miserably in their leadership. While on the subject of buyouts-Why don't we buy out Bush and Cheney and let Pelosi do the dirty work before the next President comes on board. She is tough and capable.I am sure they have about $600,00 floating around of taxpayers money. Now that would be a worthy expense. Ron Mro

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: on Mro Posted by: Dboy
» Ah, but... Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Ah, but... Posted by: Dboy
Who Cares
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Sep 30, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I could care less about the stupid DOW or even stupid Wall Street as a Whole! I dont CARE. And I dont think anyone from Main Street America cares about a bunch of over paid and under worked wall street snobs. I mean really. Keeping food on the table and gas in the tank is ALL that matters.

Jiff
Online Privacy when it Counts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who Cares Posted by: EncinoM
» YEAH! you tell 'em Posted by: donl51
» YEAH! you tell 'em Posted by: donl51
» RE: Who Cares? I sure as hell don't! Posted by: countingdaisies
Smartest guy in the room syndrome
Posted by: SteveO on Sep 30, 2008 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paulson did the typical CEO thing, he said give me 700 billion dollars, no restrictions and trust me. The American people, after being screwed by these slimes for the last 30+ years finally said "NO".

Nancy the capitulator and Barney the reactionary need to step down. We need new leadership who is actually willing to lead, not just stand there with their eyes on their political barometers and their ears plugged into the banking lobby.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Prediction on Bailout
Posted by: US Citizen on Sep 30, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prediction on the Bailout. The Bailout will pass.
For a few days, Wall Street will have a large rally. Some nimble traders will make billions of dollars in stock deals. These nimble traders will be praised widely in the media for their acumen, but they have actually received inside detailed information ahead of time, including exact timing and specifics of the bailout actions. After a few days, the market will start falling again, and we will be in the same financial crisis we are now, except minus $700 billion..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You can thank Schumer&Feinstein Posted by: weathered
Wall Street's Marie Antionette moment
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 30, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is really reminescent of what it must have been like in France 1789:

"What?!? How DARE those peasants refuse to give their tribute! What next--a Revolution?!?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Predictions?
Posted by: Hovey on Sep 30, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the big flurry after the defeat of the first bailout is. "We will be driven into a recession if we don't do something now." I have to predict it is here already. This is the cover for 8 years of failed policy.

Bush and Republicans in hindsight will say it was all caused by Congress not acting quickly enough. The recession was coming anyway, we as a country have a 9 trillion dollar debt and the free marketers in both parties have done nothing to stop its growth. Demodracts refuse to fight against the massive military spending while wanting to get something for lower income people. Republicans want the massive military becasue somewhere in their pea brains it makes them feel safer. They cut taxes (spineless dems again fail here) creating even more debt as the wage wars to keep the military supply companies rolling in deficit dough.

We voters, that about half the eligible adults in the country share in the failure every time we fall for a no new taxes pledge. Every time we think it is some other country that is the problem. Every time we create a new agency with tens of thousands of employees with benefits those of us in the private sector can only dream about.

In the end it had to collapse, so here we are. And what is the response to the conditions we created, more monopoly money. An utter failure of protecting our way of life for our kids and grandchildren. This is a fine mess we have gotten ourselves into. In hindsight we will blame those who did not agree with us and nothing would have changed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Predictions? Posted by: Von
Capitalism to Socialism
Posted by: solrev on Sep 30, 2008 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is nice to see that conservatives won the battle yesterday. The people chose free market capitalism, and today they will start whining about free market capitalism and the evils it has wrought. Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do. Just out of curiosity would one of you geniuses tell me if the 5+ trillion freddies fanny hook you are on, does that include freddies fanny bad paper? If we already own freddies fanny, we may as well have gotten the rest of the bad paper and put it in the SS lockbox room, there is plenty of space. 700 hundred billion seemed like a cheap price for the American people to buy Wall Street. Since the 700 hundred billion is not exactly about Wall Street and thanks to the American people, never will be, we can get on with business as usual. I wonder how many of you know what the other 700000 billion out there is and how this bailout is connected to that money. Well you are going to get the bailout, so squeal little piggy like a stuck hog, but you have been rope a doped. For those of you folks who think, congress is going to wave a magic wand and create the New World order that you wish for, do not hold your breath. It would have been easier to buy Wall Street and change it, than build New Street. Next time and there will be a next time, use those rational minds a little better, don’t get even get ahead. Invest 700 and get a 700 hundred billion return or do not invest and go to zero. You should have bought Wall Street or at least had that illusion to use as propaganda for the revolution of 2012.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The vote is in
Posted by: practical idealist on Sep 30, 2008 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are too stupid to live!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO BAIL OUT
Posted by: grkjr on Sep 30, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is indeed curious why congress, national news programs etc all seem to present only one side of the issue... to bail out one would think is the only thing to do.. the american people seem to be smarter than those in the "know".
1. They realize that the credit crunch is about the banks running scared, not the american people. After all, they can choose right now to loan money to qualified customers.. that is why they are in business.
2. The second group running scared are those, like wall street and individual high risk speculators, who are trying to recap their losses due to bad judgement brought about by greed. Not the american people.
This can be over before it starts if we hang tough, do not give in to congress pressure to run "scared" and let the market of the common man correct the economy by choosing where he makes his deposits; with those banks willing to lend money...letting those responsible for the scare by refusing to loan money to close shop.
If the banks not in this fix continue to close down credit, then they too deserve to fail and are truly shooting themselves in the foot and that will be them, not us, bringing this house of cards down beyond what is necessary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NO BAIL OUT Posted by: jon B
» RE: NO BAIL OUT Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: NO BAIL OUT Posted by: grkjr
Don't Believe New Bailout Hype
Posted by: melpol on Sep 30, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a new beginning on the horizon. the big bad boys are now out of the banking business and three large American banks will become leaders in the recovery without any need for a government bailout. They are the bank Of America, J.P. Morgan and Citi Bank. But the big bad Wolves are still not dead. They have some friends in congress that are still trying to give them 700 billion dollars so they can get back in the game of fleecing the American public. The latest trick is a con job to make people believe that there is a new bailout bill being written. But it is the same swindle with the paragraphs put in different places and the words more deceiving. It is now up to the American public to let their Congressmen know that they want the new bailout proposal rejected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: new bad boys Posted by: jon B
nostalgia
Posted by: imors on Sep 30, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was very surprised to learn the bill didn't pass. It was almost nostalgic. However, I do not believe this is a new beginning. Not unless the people keep up the pressure on all fronts and take back their government ON ALL FRONTS. These cretins are only concerned with saving their seats, their clout and their contributors so that they can live to see another donation. They are only concerned with POWER. I do admit, though, that being blackmailed on both sides (Wall Street and the people), that the people, after so long at the mall, made the best argument: cease and desist or die (politically).

I also won't be surprised if we, the people, go right back to sleep and dream of shopping. Pleased to be proved wrong on this one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 -