Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

There Might Be a Financial Crisis, But the World's Arms Dealers Are Doing Just Fine

By Frida Berrigan , Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted September 30, 2008.


The weapons sector remains recession-proof.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Frida Berrigan

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The CEO of a weapons manufacturer has plenty of chances to rub elbows with deputy secretaries of defense, officials from Homeland Security, retired military personnel, and the best and brightest of the defense establishment almost any week of the year.

One such opportunity occurred at the ComDef 2008 conference, which wrapped up at the National Press Club in Washington on September 3. Sponsored by weapons giants like Boeing, Raytheon, and BAE Systems, the day-long conference was organized around the theme of "Defense Priorities in an Age of Persistent Conflict." It featured presentations from a Navy undersecretary, a deputy director at the Pentagon, several weapons manufacturers, and defense representatives from France, the Netherlands, Canada, and elsewhere. With this high-powered lineup, the conference probably delivered on the promise of its catch line: "Where the international defense cooperation community gets down to business."

Next on the calendar in mid-October will be the Women in Defense National Conference at the Crystal Gateway Marriott near the Pentagon. Sponsored by consulting giant Booz Allen Hamilton, the conference includes a panel on the "National Security Priorities in the Next Administration," moderated by a Lockheed Martin vice-president. Foreign policy advisers from the McCain and Obama campaigns will be on hand and -- in a nod towards inclusiveness -- representatives from Bob Barr's and Ralph Nader's campaigns have been invited. The closing reception is sponsored by Lockheed Martin, and Booz Allen Hamilton is picking up the tab for the "Breaking a Glass Ceiling" dinner featuring retired Air Force Major General Jeanne Holm. And then, who would want to miss flying south for the winter? The Defense Manufacturing Conference at Disney's Coronado Springs Resort in Florida in early December offers military industry executives the chance to soak up the rays and address the question: "Are we ready to provide affordable warfighting capabilities?"

One of the persistent themes of these and many other weapons industry conferences is the looming concern that the military budget -- which increased by two-thirds between 2001 and 2008 -- can't keep spiraling upwards forever. ComDef 2008 frames it like this: "persistent warfare is eroding the capability of our armed forces and hard choices will need to be made ... It is increasingly unlikely that more money will be found for defense." Last year, the Women in Defense conference addressed this issue with a panel titled "Shaking the Money Tree: Funding National Defense," moderated by a vice-president for programs and budget at Lockheed Martin.

Shaking the Money Tree

Lockheed Martin stands head-and-shoulders above its competitors as a professional tree-shaker. Between 2001 and 2008, the company saw its contracts from the Department of Defense jump nearly 130%, from $14 billion to $32 billion. In a stagflation economy, their profit margin is more than healthy. The Bethesda-based company reported a 13% increase in profitability for its second quarter -- from $778 million last year to $882 million this year.

The weapons industry's concern about belt-tightening notwithstanding, the military budget is likely to continue its dramatic growth. The Defense Department's base budget, which does not include funds for nuclear weapons or the $12-billion-a-month "global war on terror," has grown by nearly 70% -- from $316 billion in 2001 to a request for more than $515 billion for 2009's fiscal year (which begins in October). Despite the fact that these figures represent close to what the rest of the world combined devotes to the military, neither Barack Obama nor John McCain has adopted reducing military spending as part of his national security plan. In fact, as both of them talk about modernizing the military for the 21st century and expanding the size of the armed forces, the billions add up.

So the weapons industry's alarm bells are ringing prematurely and the future -- particularly in foreign weapons sales -- looks very bright. Take Lockheed Martin, for example: The company, which is springing for the floral arrangements at the Women in Defense conference next month, has more than $10 billion in proposed or recent weapons deals with foreign nations. The biggest deal could be worth $7 billion (that's a lot of gladiolas and irises for Women in Defense) to Lockheed Martin. The United Arab Emirates is interested in the company's THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) system. The mobile truck-mounted system is designed to intercept incoming missiles targeted at sites such as airfields or populations centers.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: defense budget, defense industry, weapons sales

Foreign Policy In Focus columnist Frida Berrigan is a senior program associate at the Arms and Security Project of the New America Foundation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The weapons sector
Posted by: Don Quixote on Sep 30, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if nobody would make money with wars there would be no wars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The weapons sector identified Posted by: ranchero42
If your operating assumption is forever war ...
Posted by: taxidriver on Sep 30, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then there's little chance the "defense" budget will be cut, or that arms sales will be reduced. Instead of a peace dividend for us, the good fellows at Lockheed Martin are cashing in their war dividends.

But most of these weapons are not useful in low-level, counterinsurgency war or pacification--unless "pacification" means blowing the enemy to hell, with a little collateral damage on the side.

If you think our country is sloppy with F-16s and Hellfire missiles, wait until they spread around the world to our "allies."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don Quixote
Posted by: Don Quixote on Sep 30, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wars are made for two reasons: the official reason and the real reason, which is, yes, you guessed it: money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US remains the leading Death merchant in the world
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Sep 30, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as the #1 weapons exporter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not that high Posted by: gellero1
» A Cool Israeli Weapons System Posted by: gellero1
Market Forces
Posted by: madmac10 on Sep 30, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please read Richard K. Morgan's brilliant novel "Market Forces" for a glimpse at how the military-industrial plutocracy that is the United States will continue to prosper in this age of "persistent conflict."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pukeworthy article deserves more than a few passing comments :.(
Posted by: stellabloo on Sep 30, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that's not a reflection on the quality of writing - how can anyone come away from this timely piece without a bad taste in their mouth?

I have seen Stephen Lewis, UN special envoy on the African AIDS crisis, in TEARS on camera. G8 countries have continuously defaulted on their financial pledges to help the poorest of the poor. Big Pharma absolutely refuses to lower their profits by either discounting their drugs or allowing manufacture of cheap generics for international aid.

I would like to point out right here that Eli-Lilly is mostly owned by the Bush family. Eli-Lilly, makers of the fine drug Prozac (and you still wonder why pot is illegal?). Search up "Eli-Lilly AIDS" and you will see that this company was handed 15 billion dollars for anti-viral drugs, to be paid for at full-market value of course.

Drugs and guns - just because the drug industry is also still doing quite well, thank you. Coincidence? After the financial crisis, you're going to NEED Prozac!

A couple of thought-provoking links, if you can stand to read anymore:

Bush biographer found dead

... which is a pretty balanced report on the story, except omitting the fact that the publishing company folded shortly thereafter (another fortunate coincidence).

9/11 witness dead

And I apologize (or not) for the fact this links to an obviously slanted report, but I saw actual news story briefly and now you can't find it anywhere but on the conspiracy sites.

Just another of those jaw-dropping coincidences like the fact that the rich (I don't CARE what nationality) are still getting obscenely richer while the rest of us run around ever-faster in our little hamster wheels.

FIFTY THOUSAND deaths per year in the US from LEGAL drugs. ZERO deaths from cannabis. Regardless of your opinion on prohibition, does it not strike you as another amazing coincidence that the War on Terror started just as the War on Plants began to stall due to lack of evidence? And now we all know that smoking pot HELPS TERRORISTS! Another AMAZING COINCIDENCE - brought to you by your own government!

Word up - electronic documents are not considered legal, technically speaking. There is too much chance of tampering. Some progressive countries still use hand-counted paper ballots! It is possible! But Amerika does not - paper is WAY too old-fashioned and inconvenient...
Argh, ANOTHER INCREDIBLE COINCIDENCE!

... guess I better stop now. Never mind. Enjoy your morning coffee :.(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best reason to oppose the Wall Street bailout
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Sep 30, 2008 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The system of patronage and corruption that sustains the activities described in this article (euphemistically referred to as "the economy") needs to be dismantled as soon as possible. A system based upon the soup kitchens and other types of volunteerism which would arise after "economic collapse" would make a much better base on which to build an ethical and sustainable economy than anything that can be derived from the current sytem which is dependent upon the production of cars, cruise missles and cluster bombs for "economic growth." The dependence of substantial numbers of people on the "economic growth" so generated for access to food, shelter and health care is used by those who benefit from this system to justify its continued existence.

Never mind that the time, talent - the lives - spent in these destructive endeavors is wasted. Apparently, only rich people should aspire to spend their lives doing something meaningful. The rest of us are supposed to be grateful for the opportunity to have one of their "jobs."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right Wing Psychoholic In Denial
Posted by: Right Wing Psychoholic In Denial on Sep 30, 2008 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh so now you're going to say we don't need any National Security Abuse I mean national security?! Is that what you tax and spend liberals are trying to come up with now!?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Armaments manufacturers are raping the taxpayers
Posted by: Garvagh on Sep 30, 2008 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With 4% of the world's population, the US is spending as much on "defense" as the rest of the planet combined. This spectacular idiocy is accomplished by having numerous generals and admirals, etc., on board at the "defense" contractors. The greatest cause of instability in the Middle East is the continuing theft of Palestinian land, water and civil rights by the occupying Israelis. Israel needs to get out of the entire Golan Heights and the entire West Bank, and end the occupation. Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Israel Posted by: gellero1
Arms Manufacture
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 30, 2008 8:29 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We make some of the best stuff.........why shouldn't we sell it. ??

Are there any other industries that are solidly here??

Do you think Iran , China and Russia won't fill the void? Look at their advances in rocketry.

We have to stay competitive, unless you agree we should have world hegemony in which case they won't need weapons of war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Have to agree with you Posted by: gellero1
Here's a Cool Italian Combat Vehicle FOR SALE
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 30, 2008 9:03 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ultra Ultra Volvo Powered Weapons System
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 30, 2008 9:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NOT YOUR FAMILY'S VOLVO

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MORE FUN THAN A GAS GUZZLING HUMMER
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 30, 2008 9:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Italian Soldato Futoro
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 30, 2008 9:46 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» RE: The Italian Soldato Futoro Posted by: Don Quixote
No kidding!!
Posted by: talkville on Oct 1, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that's just that part of the arms-dealing sector that operates in the light of day and within the sphere of law!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]