Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Wall Street Bailout Takes Us Back to the U.S.S.R

By David Sirota, AlterNet. Posted September 26, 2008.


Lawmakers are pushing kleptocratic socialism -- a system where the objective is theft.
Advertisement

When I worked for then-Rep. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in the late 1990s, Washington was in the panting throes of a deregulatory orgy. Many lampooned my boss's opposition to the grotesquerie, and his notoriety as the only self-described socialist in Congress. Nobody guessed that a few years later, our country would become the globe's newest U.S.S.R.: The United States' Socialist Republic.

Yes, a red flag is rising over the Capitol, only the laborer's hammer and sickle has been replaced by a baron's top hat and monocle. America is Amerika, and throughout Washington a socialist rallying cry echoes: Politicians and lobbyists of the world unite! -- unite to rescue Wall Street capitalists with a $700 billion taxpayer bailout.

Though socialism seems new in the U.S., it isn't. Using public resources and government power to control the economy is as Amerikan as the Pentagon and the Patent Office. And the problem is not socialism itself, but our uniquely destructive version of it. Amerika's is not the democratic socialism of many countries. Ours is kleptocratic socialism -- the objective is theft.

Unlike European comrades, our socialists rarely mandate returns on taxpayer investments. The same 19th century socialism that gave the Mountain West to railroad companies became a 20th century socialism subsidizing oil and drug industry profits. Now, our 21st century socialists propose giving financial industry con men the national credit card, confirming Marx's theory that history repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce.

Bolivian socialists nationalize to combat wealth stratification, remove greed from human necessities like energy, and allow the public to own the means of producing valuable commodities. Amerika's socialists nationalize to preserve inequality and force the public to own the means of worthless production. Most recently, taxpayers' $85 billion will purchase bankrupt AIG and its means of producing paper, all to let speculators continue profiteering off the human need for housing.

Close a factory in socialist Denmark, and workers get immediate government help, along with their free health care. Shutter one in Ohio, and workers get nothing, except politicians saying their jobs are never returning and national health care is "unaffordable." But if investment banks teeter, those same politicians quickly find billions for bailouts.

Of course, socialist revolutions can share key traits.

Many feature aspiring dictators like Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, a former Goldman Sachs banker. He is pushing Hugo Chavez-style legislation demanding totalitarian authority to spend the $700 billion "without limitation" or "review by any court of law or any administrative agency." And surprise -- Paulson's scheme would enrich his Goldman Sachs pals.

Amerika, like other socialist nations, also has its share of faux converts and unconvincing agitprop.

John "I am fundamentally a deregulator" McCain has suddenly gone French, embracing regulation with the zeal of a beret-wearing Parisian reciting "Das Kapital" in a left bank coffeehouse (call him Monsieur Jean McCain, s'il vous plait). CNBC's Larry Kudlow justifies kleptocratic socialism by absolving the financial elite and blaming the meltdown on that all-powerful Poor People Lobby, which he claims is "forcing banks to make low-income loans." And New York Times' columnist David Brooks, long the ruling class's Minister of Propaganda, applauds the "public spiritedness" of Paulson's "Progressive Corporatism."

As this socialist uprising intensifies, the most prominent counterrevolutionary is none other than Sanders. Now a senator, he is calling for both re-regulation and a millionaire surtax to pay for the bailout and avoid adding its full cost to the national debt.

"The people who can best afford to pay and the people who have benefited most from Bush's economic policies are the people who should provide the funds for the bailout," he said.

Once the federal government's only (admitted) socialist, Sanders is evidently its only fiscal conservative, too. It's time Amerika listened to this original visionary.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: wall street, bailout, nationalization

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
State-Managed Capitalism
Posted by: Last Chance on Sep 26, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Socialism is when factories and farmland are owned and operated by the workers themselves. It's impossible for a capitalist empire to practice socialism. What the Bush Administration is trying to force upon the American people is state-managed capitalim, the federal government directing and regulating various profiteering corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"A Kleptocracy madame for as long as you can keep it..!"
Posted by: TJColatrella on Sep 26, 2008 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article David a good explanation of what is really going on..

Wall St. has created these instruments 3 times now to bleed our Treasury bilk it..

First, was the S&L scandal of which McCain was deeply involved as well as Neal Bush and others that time they used Junk Bonds..

Second, was the Dot Com collapse then they used internet stocks...

Third: This time it's the Sub Prime and Alt Prime Mortgages..

Also the deregulation of these markets allowed this to occur and go without being addressed even though many saw it coming..

I was warning of this and had a solution way back in February ran it past my brother a Hedge Fund VP and some others at a dinner they thought it was a great idea..

How can Congressmen or Senators feel they are surprised when I was addressing this almost a year ago..

Goldman Sachs is pulling all the strings on this, and they have Obama by the "short hairs", among so many other politicians of both parties and the Treasury in their pocket like it's their own credit union..

Morgan Stanley and UBS too..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor wording
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Sep 26, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've heard this Bush nonsense called cowboy socialism, fascist business model, etc. It should be called crony capitalism: reward your friends and rob your opponents. It's been around for hundreds of years. Even the facist business model is a better system than crony capitalism because it at least tries to get some benefit for more than a few well placed rich folks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America needs a good dose of real,bottom up,democratic socialism.
Posted by: BlueGorilla on Sep 26, 2008 4:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a big gap between the US and Europe,in our respective attitudes to socialism.
My ancestors,here in the UK,all voted Labour,(long ago,when the party stood for fairness and equality),and basically backed policies that would have been branded comunist in the US.They weren't educated people,but they beleived in free healthcare,a fair education system,free trade unions and a fair days pay,for a fair days work.In the US some would have used the words "evil"in reference to them,and the millions like them..a vile judgement on decent people.
From the post second world war generation,we have been handed down a legacy of free healthcare,welfare rights,and a sense of class.The present generations of relative numbskulls,are sadly allowing this legacy to dissapear..they are too influenced, by a twisted patriotism,and Murdoch's propaganda sheets.
The fact is though,even with the limits of the health budget,and the systems opening up to low value for money,private health companies,we would still as Tony Benn said,have a revolution on our hands,if the National Health Service (NHS)were abolished.
Even at its present level,the welfare state,is far superior to what exists in the USA..number 37 in the healthcare league.
The point is,that the bits of socialism we have had,have often been popular and largely successful.
I am pleased that the author of this article,makes a distinction between Euro-socialism,and US "socialism"..but he is making a gross error, by using the term in reference to a ruling class greed-fest.This is pure naked capitalism..and capitalists, have never been afraid to take every red cent of public money.Free marketeers? what rubbish,these people work by one principle only "grab all you can,as quickly as you can,from any sucker who lets you "
Such misuse of the term "socialism" usually a product of US right-wing obsfuscation..in whose world everything bad, is somehow a result of Satanism and socialism.
When my mum and dad came back from t'factory they would enjoy slaughtering a goat or two,and preying to Old Nick that they would have enough money to provide food and clothing etc ,for the family.
The sacrifices were well received with decent wages,and child benefit payments from the state (that they had paid into).
I am ashamed to say that the evil,that they practised is still alive in my heart.

Until the USA stops seeing benign public intervention, as sinful ,im afraid you and the rest of us,will continue to live under a dictatorship of the rich..
Take the red pill,or take the blue pill..the choice is yours..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

there are just not enough
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Sep 26, 2008 7:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bilked investors carrying guns and shooting wall street bankers. then something meaningful might happen. wouldn't it be great to see hoards of people dismantling the property of some of these bastards? walking off with their furniture and driving away in some of their collectable cars? take their clothes too. nice suits $5.95. used.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Roll on that day. Posted by: BlueGorilla
Bourgeois Socialism
Posted by: pdxjoe on Sep 26, 2008 10:12 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sirota may like to think he's dropping ironic anti-socialist rhetoric in an effort to stick it to the bailout and its supporters. He does them more a service than I think he realizes. The anti-socialist rhetoric comes from within the damaged ideology that is scrambling to make sense of the financial meltdown.

On the one hand, there are those who would like to, as it were, socialize the losses in the form of this bailout. If we had to, we could probably call them bourgeois socialists. On the other hand, there're those who do not want the bailout, but cast the potential collapse in the safe and tidy terms of self-regulating competition.

If Sirota wants to be ironic, he needs to either use the well analyzed phenomena Marx gives us, Bourgeois Socialism, or else do what the House Republicans won't do: call this meltdown for what it is: a failure emerging out of the very structure of Capitalism. Otherwise, he's just another opinion writer in the echo-chamber. What's worse is that by using anti-socialist rhetoric in a polemic against certain Capitalist excesses, he's making for an alliance between corporate Capitalism and socialism that makes me and should make everyone else very uneasy---an alliance at other times known as National Socialism

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sirota Takes the Low Road ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 26, 2008 10:44 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call it what it is Sirota ~ Fascism!

You and so many other professed progressives haven't the balls to name the beast that is devouring our country ...

Take a cue from Robert Scheer and find your balls again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Read Some History Boy
Posted by: Malcolm Medgar on Sep 27, 2008 5:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as capitalism climbs on to its death bed, idiot liberal bourgeois commentators like Sirota start calling it socialism. Don't these snot nosed dilettantes make you sick? Read some history boy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Call it capitalism?
Posted by: rickiey on Sep 29, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think not. In a capitalist country, there would be NO bailout.

The market would solve the problem by letting the irresponsible companies die.

The bailout is an attempt to apply socialism to a capitalist country.

It doesn't work that way. And it won't work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Problem Posted by: pdxjoe
Not so fast
Posted by: talkville on Oct 1, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a mighty impoverished and quite generalized and vulgarized conception that would make use of the term 'socialism' in these circumstances.

What is going on seems to be much the opposite; the integration of the State into the Forms of the Private Corporation and its use in the direct and specialized direction of taking over functions for these private entities: functions such as labor discipline, police protection and maintenance of all conditions necessary for the smooth and untrammelled operations of these various private entitities. The State is becoming Corporatized and constructed in the interests of Corporate Capital and (as can be seen in this current 'bail-out' situation) made an integral entity in the pursuit of Profit. That is, in a nutshell, a Corporate-, Capitalist- State; a Fascist entity standing above and not beholden in any way the People (however that term may be defined).

"Socialization" maybe; definitely not socialism. This is a capitalist response to a capitalist crisis, not only nationally but internationally; and it's 'solution' will serve the interests of capitalists and not labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By Ignoring impeachment, the Dems have lost the moral courage to save America
Posted by: JohnHKennedy Denver CO on Oct 1, 2008 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

It really doesn't matter.

When Pelosi took Impeachment Off The Table, she told all of the voters and all of the World that an election was more important than standing up for the Constitution and the Rule Of Law.

Pelosi has lost the respect of her own party.

My Democrats have lost the moral authority to accomplish much of any anything.

Standing up to Bush and Cheney is the last thing they will do. Doing the right thing by the voters on the bailout is doubtful. They will do the politically expedient thing of course covering their own butts for the election.

John H Kennedy, Denver CO
Impeach Colorado Coalition

..



[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT'S called FASCIM
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Oct 3, 2008 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for the merger of state under monopoly corporate power.

This is about a parasite Fascist Monopoly Corporate Crime State that dictates virtually all the phony crisis and then foists up the equally phony "solutions" at public cost for private profit.

Propaganda Fascism is a place where "capitalism" and "democracy" don't exist anymore except as Orwellian slogans to confuse the gullible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]