WIRETAP  
comments_image -

Worst. Congress. Ever.

Your representatives in Washington have worked less than any Congress in almost 60 years. But what's even worse is that on those rare times they do work, they work to pass laws that screw us all over.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest WireTap headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

"For those who really believe in limited government, then there's virtue in being away from Washington, it's not all bad that we spend less time here. A lot of what we do and a lot of the disdain people have for Washington is because we do too much, not too little. I still believe that if people understood exactly what we do here, they'd probably demand we take more time off."

-- Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.

If you can follow the aptly named Jeff Flake's circular wordplay above, as reported by ABC News' John Cochran, he may persuade you that it's fair for our elected representatives to get so much time away from the office. But it's hard to believe that the average American, who annually earns somewhere in the mid-40s depending on whose numbers you believe, likes the fact that their elected representatives take home around 150K a year for less work, not more.

How much work are we talking about? Suck on this, prole: By the time 2006 dies, the House of Representatives will have met for less than 100 days [PDF] for the first time since 1948. In case you're a fan of the math -- which you should be, since you're paying their salaries -- that means your representative is working roughly one-third of the year and getting paid three times as much as you.

Who's the slacker now?

Of course, the numbers don't end there, and the more they're sorted out, the more they add up to a reasonable, evidenced conclusion: The 109th Congress is one of the worst in U.S. history, if not the worst. And it's not just the House that has seemed to have lost its keys to the car, because the Senate fares no better. They're projected to knock heads for less than 130 days in 2006, which is approximately the sixth fewest meetings since 1948, a year of infamy that found Harry Truman similarly knocking heads with the 80th, which he nicknamed for the history books as America's "Do-Nothing" Congress.

The 80th would have met even less if they could have, were it not for the fact that Truman called them into extraordinary session twice. So far, the 109th hasn't done anything extraordinary for the American people, nor has president Bush asked them to. No wonder there: Bush himself has taken more vacation days than any other president, breaking his mentor Ronald Reagan's record in August 2005. When in Washington ... Or is that Crawford?

What the 109th Congress has done to the American people is another matter entirely, and it's appropriate once more to name-drop the oft-mentioned year 1948 before letting it rest. Why? Numbers, people, numbers. That was the year George Orwell turned inside out, literally, in his game-changing dystopian novel 1984, and we all remember how that narrative ended. (With one plus one equaling three, to be exact.)

And on that score, pardon the pun, the 109th Congress cannot but help dredge up the memories of both 1948 and 1984, because although they have managed to pass little if no legislation to help the average American get through the night, they have bent over backwards to reward the rich and empower the executive branch at the expense of civil liberties, the Constitution and democracy itself. If that's not Orwellian, I don't know what is.

For example, take a look at the actual work they did manage to get done. The recently passed Military Commissions Act of 2006, roundly derided as the "torture bill" by those with a secure sense of history, gives president Bush authority that would make Big Brother tingle in places Mark Foley would like to touch. Section 950j of the bill outright criminalizes Supreme and other court challenges to the Act's legality; subsection 4(b) (26) of section 950v offers up anyone, not just military personnel, who is "in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States" to the mercy of military tribunals; and the bill itself redefines the meaning of terrorist so loosely that it now includes those who take part in "the destruction of any property" and "any violent activity whatsoever if it takes place near a designated protected building," as well as those who illegally occupy property and or steal, well, pretty much anything at all.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest WireTap headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: politics, wiretap, elections, congress
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Oops! Romney Launches Twitter App, Misspells "America"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Ed Schultz On Florida's and Purge of 180,000 Voters

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Stewart Lays Into Fox News, GOP, Double-Standard on "Socialism"--Plus Michelle Obama!

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Five Things You Need to Know About the ‘NATO 3’ Arrested in Chicago for "Terrorism"

By Shay O'Reilly | Campus Progress

 
 
Pot Legalization Advocate Wins Texas Congressional Primary

By Phillip Smith | Drug War Chronicle

 
 
NBC Throws Chris Hayes Under The Bus: Social Distance and the Tyranny of Personal Experience

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
Fox Blames Obama for Manufactured "Gas Crisis," Even After Prices Fall

By Shauna Theel | Media Matters

 
 
Why Did the Associated Press Make an Anti-Choice 'Correction'?

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Minimum Wage Not Enough for a 2-Bedroom Unit in Any State (Unless You Work Way More Than a 40-Hr Week)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board Will Investigate ALEC for Lobbying Violations

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]