Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

WireTap

Taking Latinos from the Streets to the Polls

By Paloma Esquivel, The Nation. Posted September 25, 2006.


Young, U.S.-born Latinos who took to the streets in massive numbers to push for immigrant rights are hoping to become a potent political force in this year's midterm elections and beyond.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Paloma Esquivel

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On March 10 Germain Castellanos, 23, took to the streets of Chicago in defense of his family and friends. Castellanos, a teacher, community volunteer and son of Mexican immigrants, is a U.S. citizen: free to work without fear of being discovered, free to vote his discontent. But on March 10, before most Americans had heard of HR 4437, a proposal introduced by Wisconsin Republican Representative James Sensenbrenner to make felons of undocumented immigrants, Castellanos marched alongside Chicago's immigrant community. "My parents risked a lot for me to be here, to be a citizen," he explains. "To be indifferent is not acceptable."

After Chicago, the image of tightly organized immigrant marches became common, but for Castellanos, who has been a community organizer for years, that spring day was special. "To see everyone behind one issue," he says and then pauses. "Only in the movies -- only in the civil rights movies."

Pundits may decry the political disengagement and cynicism of the Jon Stewart generation, but students, young workers and young families have played a major role in mobilizing immigrant communities to become politically engaged. Across the country, they led street mobilizations, school walkouts and teach-ins. As one 16- -- year-old who walked out of school in Santa Ana, California, told the Los Angeles Times, "We don't want to just read about democracy in our textbooks. We want to experience it firsthand."

Now young organizers are taking their influence from the streets to the polls. In Chicago Castellanos and eighteen other young fellows are among those recruiting the U.S.-born children of immigrants to vote with the help of the We Are America Alliance. In July We Are America, a coalition of national and community-based immigrant-rights groups, kicked off a nationwide campaign to register 1 million voters for the midterm elections. In May the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project launched a $1 million voter-registration and get-out-the-vote campaign targeting the sons and daughters of immigrants. And on August 1 syndicated radio DJ Renan Almendarez Coello, known as "El Cucuy," started a two-week bus tour from San Francisco to Washington, DC, to help get 1 million new voters registered by November.

Democrats and Republicans may dismiss young voters as disengaged and potential no-shows at the polls, but these groups are counting on the young U.S.-born children of immigrants to make a difference starting this November -- and even more so in 2008.

A recent report by the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights and the Center for Community Change puts the number of potential young voters in perspective:

  • Nearly 2 million U.S.-born children of immigrants, 18-24, are not yet registered to vote.
  • Nearly 2 million U.S.-born children of immigrants, 18-24, are registered to vote.
  • More than 1 million additional U.S.-born children of immigrants will be eligible to vote by 2008.
  • In California alone there are 1 million U.S.-born children of immigrants ages 18-24 who, if mobilized, could change the course of the 2006 midterm elections. Adding them to the population of legal immigrants of all ages would create a nationwide bloc of more than 14 million potential voters.


Organizers are aware of the challenge they face: Young people vote at lower rates than the rest of the country; Latinos vote at lower rates than blacks and whites; among 18- to 29-year-old Asians, voter participation has fallen in recent years. But organizers are also hopeful. First, they say, statistics don't paint a complete picture, since the voting habits of the children of immigrants aren't well documented. Certainly not all Latinos or Asians are immigrants or even the children of immigrants -- nevertheless, these two groups showed up in big numbers at immigration marches.

Among many organizers, the best strategy is to get young people talking to their peers; by recruiting and encouraging them to vote, the young people in the street at immigration marches will translate into victories on election day. Studies show that a young person asking a peer to vote raises the likelihood of turnout by 8 to 12 percent.

In Massachusetts, the Student Immigrant Movement (SIM) has allied with the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition (MIRA) in recent months with the goal of registering 7,000 U.S.-born children of immigrants by the midterm elections. SIM is one of several organizations nationwide created to push for the passage of the DREAM Act -- a bipartisan bill introduced in the Senate to allow immigrant students to pay in-state tuition for college.

Carlos Santos, SIM's 20-year-old co-founder, says the immigration marches made him optimistic about the sometimes-daunting prospect of galvanizing young voters. "We're going to take over the streets, not marching, but doing voter registration," he says. SIM and MIRA are working strategically to target races where they can make a difference.

Santos is clear that the goal is to urge voters to support candidates who defend immigrant rights -- but he is less clear about who those candidates are. While many young organizers are optimistic about their ability to get their peers to the polls, they're not so positive about who they'll vote for. In Massachusetts, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Tom Reilly has said he would consider deputizing state troopers to enforce federal immigration laws -- a plan most organizers find repugnant.

While Republicans were the dominant force behing HR 4437, not all Democrats are strong advocates of immigrant rights, say organizers. Several Senate campaigns provide an example: In Arizona, Democrat Jim Pederson campaign website declares that "illegal immigration is endangering out security, putting a huge burden on our communities' schools and hospitals." In Missouri, Democrat Claire McCaskill includes building border fences as part of her immigration strategy. In Montana, Matt McKenna, spokesman for Jon Tester, indicates the Democratic candidate "would not offer amnesty to illegal immigrants."

Without clear-cut political heroes, young activists might have a difficult time getting their peers to the polls. Some organizers fear that without a strong showing this November, the immigrant rights movement will loose momentum. But newly minted young activists say their organizations will provide a foundation for future efforts -- in and out of electoral politics.

"It's exciting," says Castellanos. "It's history going on again."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Paloma Esquivel is a Summer 2006 intern at The Nation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Si se puede!
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Sep 25, 2006 12:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Viva la revolucion!

(Apologies for any spelling mistakes, I study Portuguese, not Spanish!) ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, do you now? Posted by: edith
» RE: Oh, do you now? Posted by: symcokid
Immigrant rights are listed by their visa type
Posted by: cinattra on Sep 25, 2006 1:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Immigrants already have rights. Like the right to return to their home country when their visa expires. A visa is a contract and when you violate the terms of that contract you have no rights in the face of the law to dispute deportation.

ILLEGAL immigrants on the other hand do not deserve rights and neither do their offspring who are born in the U.S. Why even bother with a visa when you can get in for free. Why go through the legal channels setup for entrance into America when I can sneak into America?

Close off the pipeline for Cubans also. What makes Cubans more deserving than any other country on this earth?

Guard the borders and support those who do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Troll alert... Posted by: adp3d
» RE: Troll alert... Posted by: edith
Placing demands
Posted by: YogiBear on Sep 25, 2006 1:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What bothered me the most was those original marches in which the illegal immigrants and their supporters chanted "We demand our rights!" Not: "We need more rights," Not: "We're asking for more rights," but "demand." It really ticked me off. It was very arrogant.

I was working a temp job at the time and my immediate co-workers broached the subject. They all agreed that it seemed unfair of the illegal immigrants to make such demands on the U.S. populace. That was myself and one other white man, a black American woman, and a black immigrant from Liberia, who had spent years trying for residency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Placing demands Posted by: Teka
nice
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 25, 2006 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be nice if all the new immigrant-related votes made the difference between a Republican-run congress and a Democrat-run congress and also the difference between a dead planet and a living planet. Vote for a future instead of staying home and waiting to die in an anti-environmental holocaust.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

where they live
Posted by: edith on Sep 25, 2006 2:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
immigrants cluster together. and so it was with italians, jews, irish etc. eventually, as assimilation and desire to live in "better" housing emerge, immigrants to some extent mingle, integrate, intermarry and disappear as distinct groups living in distinct neighborhoods. Until then, gerrymandering assures that the immigrant neighborhoods send Democrats or people of their own ethnicity. That is fine. However it means that they are written off by the middle class middle areas where national elections and control of Congress and legislatures are decided. In fifty years, if immigration is regulated and the flow slowed but not stopped, today's immigants will be tomorrow's conservatives, if history proves reliable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

children of immigrants should run for office
Posted by: irreverentprimate on Sep 25, 2006 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
at the end of this article the author discusses how young US-born latinos may get to the polls in greater numbers and then be faced w/ the unfortunate dilemma of having no one worth voting for.

these young latinos need to look in the mirror and ask, if not me, then who? simply put, they need to run for office and stop waiting for others to defend them in Congress or the state legislatures.

i hope they do this. we need more diversity of candidates anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Mexicans lost?
Posted by: tashi on Sep 25, 2006 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets face it, the tide of Mexican immigrants coming into what used to be Mexican territory is not going to halt.
US corporations want these immigrants to work on Industrial farms, meat-packaging/slaughter-houses, in construction etc.
Yes it does depress the wages earned by average Americans.

Corporations rule America. Theses corporatiosn dictate foreign policy/wars and domestic policy.

And who is the biggest supporter of Corporate America? Republican party (and the Democratic to a lesser extent).

So conservatives (Republicans) will get re-elected this Novemeber on the illegal immigarnt issue. But once they get back to Congress, they won't pass any meaningful immigration reform.

After all it was the great Republican President Reagon who gave amnesty to millions of illegals in the 80s!

Yet blue-collar America continues to vote against its own interest by voting Republican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What Bush wants Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
If not me, Then Who?
Posted by: Snott on Sep 25, 2006 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love that reminder! I was proud yesterday that at my Catholic parish in Washington State we had a bulletin insert from the Washington State Catholic Conference entitled CALL TO UNITY - Justice in Immigration Policies. "The presence of so many peoiple from such diverse cultures and backgrounds in the United States invites us as Church to a profound conversion so that we can truly become a sacrament of unity." (US Catholic Bishops, 2000. "Welcoming the Stranger Among Us.")

Among important questions/answers addressed in the Washington document are: 1) The Catholic Church does not support illegal immigration. 2) The Catholic church is involved in immigration politics because "Immigrants, like all persons, possess inherent human dignity that must be respected regardless of their legal status." 3) "The bishops make it clear that people who cannot find employment to support themselves and their families in their country of origin have a right to find work elsewhere in order to survive. As a sovereign nation, the United States should provide ways to accommodate this right." 4) "Available statistics do not support this conclusion" (that immigrants are taking jobs from US Citizens.) 5) "By some estimates, immigrants will contribute $500 billion toward our social security system over the next 20 years. Immigrants pay state and federal taxes in the form of income, property, and sales tax. A range of studies finds taht immigrants pay between $90 and $140 billion a year in federal, state and local taxes. Even though they pay taxes, immigrants are restricted from most public assistance programs." 6) "The net benefit of immigration to the U.S. economy is estimated at nearly $10 billion per year." 7) "Approximately 75% of today's immigrants have legal, permanent visas. Of the 25% that are undocumented, 40% overstayed temporary visas."
Statistics cited may be found at www.justiceforimmigrants.org under "learn the issues".

Many people don't realize how much money it takes to go through the process to become "legal."

I participated in the Memorial Day demonstrations and it literally made my soul shout for joy that so many came to stand up for their rights, and to be in comraderie with our neighbors and co-workers.

And, by the way, if you are looking for candidates who will support the immigrants' causes, look to the Green Party which has a REALISTIC view of how immigrants contribute to our society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» IT's TIME TO WAKE UP! Posted by: nurstat
» IT's TIME TO WAKE UP! Posted by: nurstat
Racists: Quite your ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT WHINING!
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 25, 2006 2:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Florida, widespread panic emerged when it was believed a shortage of illegal immigrants would cost farmers billions due to unpicked agricultural goods. The immigrants are right by the way, you cannot have it both ways. These same immigrants, who are here illegally, have millions in payroll taxes taken from their pay and never receive a dime back. By the way, as for their offspring, born in the USA makes you a US citizen. Same as how most other countries do it. Now, in Florida, California, and Arizona it is common to see illegal immigrants camped out in certain parts of town, waiting to be "picked up" for a days work, often in the construction industry. The reality is that Americans won't work or do not want the jobs illegal immigrants take. So, put it all together, and America benefits greatly from "illegal immigrants." So what is the problem? And, I have not even considered here how the USA created much of Mexico's poverty with its foreign policy and NAFTA crap. Also, much of Mexico's problems now are connected to the drug cartels taking over. And guess who buys those drugs by the way? But I suspect there is another real reason why many "anglos" are so up in arms about "illegal immigrants." It is called the color of their skin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cesar Chavez was a racist??? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: Cesar Chavez was a racist??? Posted by: Aussie Kim
» Cash on the line Posted by: edith
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement