Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

WireTap

The Greening of Campus Life

By Joel Makower, Grist.org. Posted October 3, 2006.


At colleges and universities across the country, students and administrators alike have enthusiastically embraced the idea of sustainability.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Joel Makower

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The dawn of the new school year has brought with it a corps of fresh-faced ideas and initiatives aimed at making colleges and universities cleaner and greener. And, like any freshman class, they are all beaming with potential: Most will succeed, a handful will excel, and a few will end up disappointing their parents.

The greening of academe is nothing new, but it seems to have taken root in a big way. Today, it's not just about doing a few good, green things -- recycling, buying green energy, building green buildings, and all the rest -- and it's not just about saving money or being seen as a good neighbor. It's about being seen as a sustainability leader in order to attract students, funding, and media attention.

As a result, in a growing number of schools, "green" has become the Big Meme on Campus.

But getting colleges and universities to make the grade as environmental leaders is no slam dunk. Like their corporate counterparts, schools face a variety of challenges and barriers, from a lack of top-level commitment, to institutional inertia, to a dearth of answers to the seemingly simple question "How good is 'good enough'?"

Companies and activist groups alike are trying to help schools answer that question. For example, General Electric and mtvU recently launched an ecomagination Challenge, with a $25,000 prize for the school proposing "the most impactful and innovative project to 'green' their campus." It joins the Campus Climate Challenge, an activist-led network of more than 300 schools promoting leadership on global warming.

So, how do you green a school? When viewed through a green lens, colleges and universities are, in fact, businesses. A decent-sized school can combine the environmental footprint of a myriad of operations: office buildings, hotels, food service, laundry, retail, vehicle repair and maintenance, energy production, waste hauling, construction, health care, even road building and small manufacturing. And if there is scientific research going on, it may involve a witch's brew of hazardous chemicals and materials, from urethane to uranium.

Forget a business. A college is actually more like a small city.

A matter of policy

So, how do we make all that activity safe for people and the planet? First, someone's got to take the lead. At some schools that leadership comes from the administration and faculty. At others, it comes from the real powers that be: the students themselves.

Historically, students have been the major drivers, says Julian Dautremont-Smith, associate director of the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. "They can make things happen in a way that staff or faculty haven't. That said, there is increasingly leadership from school presidents that are committed to these issues. It's developed into a more high-level activity. Schools are trying to compete -- be the leader in environmental studies or sustainability."

Inevitably, though, it takes a village. For example, at the University of California campuses, students have proposed dozens of policies that have been embraced by administrators, from green building designs to organic produce in the dining halls. Student representatives from throughout the UC system created the California Student Sustainability Coalition "to fight for a sustainable University of California," according to the group's website. Activist groups have played a role. A campaign sponsored by Greenpeace targeted system-wide policy changes to bring green buildings and renewable energy to all UC campuses. (Full disclosure: My firm, Clean Edge, authored a report funded by Greenpeace as part of that campaign.)

The UC administration has pitched in, too. The university system's governing body, the UC Regents, approved a Green Building Policy and Clean Energy Standard [PDF] in 2003, which mandates that new buildings outperform state energy-efficiency requirements by at least 20 percent. And in the UC's Office of the President, there sits a "sustainability specialist."

Sustaining and broadening campus greening initiatives over time has proven to be very difficult for most students, who typically cycle in and out of the campus every two to four years, says Julian Keniry, who heads the National Wildlife Federation's Campus Ecology Program. "We've encouraged addressing this in three ways: cultivating administrative champions who can adopt and build programs over time, hiring sustainability directors to lead and facilitate these initiatives, and developing alumni networks to serve as fiscal sponsors and watchdogs," she says, adding that there has been good progress on the first two: "Administrative champions are emerging who are networking through their planning, business, and physical-plant associations, and dozens of colleges and universities have created a sustainability director or similar positions."

Fee to be, you and me

How to pay for green investments, like solar panels or green building designs, is another matter. Cash-strapped school administrators may balk at spending extra money for such things, even if the investments will yield savings within a few years. Students inevitably end up paying the extra costs, either through tuition hikes or voluntary fees. For example, in July, the Tennessee Board of Regents approved increases in student fees to fund renewable energy at Middle Tennessee State University and Tennessee Technological University. The $8-per-semester fee hikes had previously been approved by almost 90 percent of students at both institutions. Students at Central Oregon Community College voted last spring to increase their $1.75-per-credit hour student fee by 25 cents in order to purchase renewable energy.

It can be money well spent, and not just for the environment. The process of greening campuses can provide a learning opportunity for students that will be directly transferable to greening their future employers, says Liz Maw, executive director of Net Impact, the 10,000-member association of MBA students and recent grads, which runs a Campus Greening Initiative. "Students build project-management skills, cost-benefit analytical skills, change-management skills, and communication skills," she says.

Ultimately, the real challenge is determining how much is "enough." There is no certification program or generally accepted definition of a "green campus," leaving each campus to define its own goals. As with companies, this leads to some schools hyping what amounts to a so-so greening effort -- the equivalent of a C student acing a single course and claiming to be a scholar. "There are some schools not doing as much as they could do and claiming to be leaders," acknowledges Dautremont-Smith. "But some are putting sustainability into their guiding documents -- their mission statement, master plan, and strategic plan." That, he says, is the sign of a true leader.

Tools rush in

Despite the lack of standards, there are several tools to assess sustainability on campus. The most comprehensive is the Campus Sustainability Assessment Framework, the result of more than two years of intensive work by a master's student at Royal Roads University in British Columbia. It covers 170 social, environmental, cultural, political, and economic indicators to assess campus sustainability, including short-term and long-term goals for many indicators. Schools all over Canada are using it to support sustainability progress, says Dautremont-Smith.

That's a long list, to be sure. Others have come up with simpler checklists -- see here and here, for example. However "simpler," they still describe the full range of potential activities in which a comprehensive sustainability effort needs to engage.

It's a lot of work, to be sure. It requires tilting against windmills (or maybe installing them), enlightening and inspiring leaders, and getting bureaucracies to change their well-worn habits.

At minimum, it's good practice for what students will face after graduation.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
another campus greening framework
Posted by: irreverentprimate on Oct 3, 2006 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.iisd.org/educate/declarat/talloire.htm

It should be noted that like the UC system, the California State University system also passed a sustainability policy. The problem in both systems has been the actual implementation of the goals of these policies. Lack of institutional commitment is a big problem.

Same thing with the Talloires Declaration. My alma mater ratified it, but there hasn't been much movement towards implementation of the Declaration's lofty goals. Clearly what is happening is that in many cases, campuses are agreeing to pass student-advocated campus-greening policies just to get the students off of their backs and/or to make themselves marketable (remember, colleges are businesses constantly needing to attract new "customers") as a campus committed to sustainable environmental practices. But the actual level of commitment to seeing these values implemented is typically low on most campuses. On campuses where students have been successful in getting administrators to pass campus greening sustainability and renewable energy use policies, they must remain vigilant and keep their administrators' feet to the fire to ensure that the policies actually get implemented. If not, then the policies aren't worth the virgin tree paper they were most likely printed on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But they can be like developers
Posted by: edith on Oct 3, 2006 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Universities are big institutions in many cities. Often they destroy neighborhoods where poor and working people live to build or rehab buildings for dorms or labs.

Universities don't pay property taxes. They take taxable land off the rolls, depriving schools and public safety of needeed resources. Colleges can have both good and bad effects on their communities.

Progressives need to be objective about universities. they do indeed hire leftist, oddball traditionalist right wing professors and interesting artistic people. Ideas unwelcome in "capitalist" society sometimes can be heard only on campus. Many colleges have quality radio stations, newspapers, and journals unavailable elsewhere in the area.

But it's easy relatively for them to be more "green" or politically correct than for- profit companies. but when it comes to land and buildings expansion in cities like NY, DC, Boston and others, larger universities can and do push people around like those developers who often sit on college boards of trustees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're doing our best...
Posted by: badassmonkeykid on Oct 3, 2006 12:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but theres more work to be done. UMBC (my university) has a chapter of the Campus Climate Challenge that i personally started (though it has moved on to environmental science students who actually know what they are doing), but the physical plant resists every possible change we could make. The idea of green is great, and the longterm savings may be good, but the cuts in budgets that schools are dealing with inevitably lead to resistance to any sort of transition toward sustainability. So what do we do? add a student fee that will go toward sustainable energy for the campus? Students won't see a gain from it during their tenure, so why would they allow it to pass?

Having deat with these issues myself its hard hope anything but a more central societal shift will be able to save us from our desires.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

getting better...
Posted by: kpara3 on Oct 8, 2006 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a freshmen this year I had considered and thought about how college students may treat this issue. We are improving... each student dorm room has a recylcing bin and there are many recycling bins around campus. There are also many groups that take part in cleaning up the campus and the city. Another big part is that we are now being educated more about the issue. These are all good steps towards a "greener" campus and world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

getting better...
Posted by: kpara3 on Oct 8, 2006 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a freshmen this year I had considered and thought about how college students may treat this issue. We are improving... each student dorm room has a recylcing bin and there are many recycling bins around campus. There are also many groups that take part in cleaning up the campus and the city. Another big part is that we are now being educated more about the issue. These are all good steps towards a "greener" campus and world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement