Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WireTap

Student Debt Crisis: Are There Any Solutions?

By Talia Berman, WireTap. Posted August 23, 2006.


A look at what's behind the ever-increasing cost of college and potential solutions offered by activists and government.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Talia Berman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Many would argue that higher education in this country is the best in the world. France has some of the best culinary schools, and Oxford and Cambridge have rivaling histories of literary renown, but only in the United States will you find comparable culinary and literary prowess as well as thousands of virtually every other topic one could imagine -- only to the United States do more than half a million students come every year to study.

But at what cost? Americans (and visiting students) have always paid more for education. And in the past 30 years, in the past 10 years, in the past two years, the cost of higher education, including tuition and loan repayment, has steadily increased. But 2006 will likely go down as the worst year in history for student borrowers, and as the mountains of debt grow, young peoples' lives are forever changing.

Holly MacGibbon graduated from NYU's theater program with $120,000 in debt, which has obviously prevented her from taking any entry-level theater jobs. "Without $600 a month in loan payments, I could take a lower-paying theater job instead of working outside my field. Summer theater jobs, where most young performers start out, pay $200 to $300 a week, which is just not enough when you have $600 in loan payments."

And Julia Stubben's post-graduate life has been entirely governed by her student debt. "Being in debt has greatly affected my financial decisions. I do not enjoy my job, and it is not the career I would have chosen for myself, and in order to take the job I had to move three hours away from my boyfriend, family, and friends. Pretty much, I live in seclusion in a relatively boring rural area and hate this stage of my life. The only reason I am in this situation is because of the job -- which is paying off my loans."

According to Toby Chaudhuri, communications director at the progressive research group Campaign for America's Future, continuing to charge exorbitantly for education will have grave results. "If you want to create an America that works for everybody, you have to give every child the right to education," he said. "Families are getting hit with interest rates and across the country they are pinching pennies to afford to send their kids to college."

What's behind the high cost of education

Student debt is climbing for three reasons: Interest rates have begun to rise, tuition is skyrocketing, and student aid programs are stuck in 2003.

2006 has been the worst in history for government action against student borrowers. In February, President Bush rolled out the Deficit Reduction Act, which cut $12 billion in federal student aid money. Part of the plan includes a hike in interest rates on federal student loans and loans taken out by parents. The interest rate on Stafford Loans to students rose from 5.3 percent to 7.14 percent on existing loans and to 6.8 percent on new loans. Interest rates for Parent Loans for Undergraduate Students (PLUS) loans increased even more dramatically, from 6.1 to 7.4 percent on existing loans and to a whopping 8.5 percent on new loans.

These interest rate hikes are designed to ease the federal deficit, but this very budget plan also includes tax breaks for Americans making more than $1 million a year -- a move that negates anything saved in the interest rate increase.

The Deficit Reduction Act is particularly egregious because low interest rates have historically been the way students paid for college. Just as low mortgage rates ease the ever-increasing value of real estate, low interest rates allow students to earn undergraduate and graduate degrees, and even have a little time to outrun their slowly collecting debt. Now, with those rates going up as tuition skyrockets, recent graduates will be caught and buried before they have time to throw their caps in the air.

Though it is not a new problem, student debt has quickly climbed in the last few years. Between 1993 and 2004, the percentage of students needing to borrow money jumped from 46 to 66 percent [PDF]. Debt for graduates averages around $19,000 across public and private schools. Ten years ago, public school borrowers needed about $8,000. Now they borrow about $17,250 -- a 65 percent increase, adjusted for inflation.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Talia Berman is a freelance writer living in New York City.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I'm left wondering why this doesn't happen in Japan
Posted by: akai ringo on Aug 23, 2006 4:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting but as so often, I'm afraid, in the case of news from the U.S., rather bewildering, and I'm left wondering why this doesn't happen in Japan, where I live. As a result of the declining birthrate here, we've now reached the position where pretty well anyone who wants to go to university can find a place, though not necessarily at their first choice, but at private universities, which make up the vase majority of HE institutions, all tuition has to be financed from fees or, in some cases, donations.
There is a scholarship-loan system, either interest-free or interest-bearing (annual rate calculated at 0.7%), but in most cases, I think it's a case of parents just tightening tbeir belts rather more, doing without a new car or whatever, plus part-time work by students. Don't these factors operate in the U.S.? Do parents just cut themselves loose from students at 18?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why does "free" equal "less quality"?
Posted by: FreeHigherEd on Aug 23, 2006 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was enjoying this article up until the closing paragraphs. Free does not equal less quality!!! Improvement of the US Higher Ed system does not have to mean less choice. Remember the GI Bill? The Labor Party has a viable proposal for Free Higher Ed for everyone: http://www.freehighered.org/

And read http://www.alternet.org/story/40440/ to contrast this story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Think people
Posted by: mom'z the word on Aug 23, 2006 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is education? Hello. Learning. What does it take to learn? A student and a teacher. Currently, 80% of the cost of education is spent on administration. Administration is all those things that have nothing to do with learning and everything to do with redistributing, co-mingling and redirecting the cost of an education into the administration of education.

How did Socrates teach his students? How much did it cost Copernicus to get an education? Think people money does not make the world go around. Teaching, nursing, firefighting, was once a vocation. Something you did because you loved doing it. Something changed. Now they are professions. If Socrates were an Administrator, Chancellor, Principal, secretary to the Chancellor, he would have had a great retirement package instead of students wanting to learn how to think.

The solutions given above are a product of our educational corporate mind controlling education and they suck. The solution is simple. It is a fact that student debt is debilitating. The simple easy solution is to simply forgive the debt. We forgave billions of dollars of debt Iran owed us. We forgave illegal immigrants and gave them a new start on life as legal immigrants. We forgave debt that Japan owed us from World War II. We bailed out Chrysler, savings and loans and the list goes on. We are very forgiving when it is comes to making a profit.

Corporate America owns the students and institutions. Fannie Mae, is privately owned by corporate America. Perkins, Stanford loans, credit card companies all make a profit selling debt to students. You can't get ahead if you are starting out 6 feet under. Every student that had to borrow money to get an education is starting out 6 feet under.

Forgive every student loan, get rid of the need for student to borrow money in the first place and you have given America a new lease on life. Things would change drastically for everyone if students began life debt free. Forgiving every student loan would solve the problem. However, America is not about solving problems. America is about whining about problems, pretending they have solutions and ultimately maintaining status quo. Under these conditions there never would have been a Socrates or Copernicus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Think people Posted by: DeeOhGee
» RE: Think people Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Think people Posted by: mom'z the word
» RE: Think people Posted by: mom'z the word
THE "REPUKES" WANT US TO STAY DUMB!
Posted by: krose on Aug 23, 2006 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THAT'S BETTER FOR THEM! FASCISM WORKS BETTER when the electorate are stupid. Keep them ignorant, & you will believe in Bush the "savior!" How else can he retain control?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worldtraveler
Posted by: world traveler on Aug 23, 2006 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really feel empathy for students today who are graduating with so much debt. It really is a trap that affects the rest of their lives. I graduated from a state college in 1990 with no debt. This would include student loans, as well as credit card debt or personal loans. I have a BA in history and political science with honors. My parents gave me a grand total of $1000 for school (as well as a few care packages of food). It didn't occur to me to take out a loan, I didn't know if I would have the money to repay. How did I do it? First of all tuition was far less than it is today, but I was starting with nothing. I worked as a resident assistant in the dorms for three years (my first I was a resident in the dorms) and so got my meals and room free. I worked every summer, every break and even worked three jobs while going to school. I had no car, no expectation of owning a cell phone, internet service, new clothes, meals out or anything that I take for granted now, 16 years later. I believed that the only thing I wanted was that college degree and so nothing else was a priority. It wasn't a total hardship since many people I knew at my school were in a similar situation. Six years later I graduated from law school. I graduated with $70,000 debt from a private law school. When I sat down and realized how much I would be paying in interest on the debt should I take the full time to pay it , my immediate concern was paying it off. My husband and I finished paying off my law school loans 8 years after graduating. He has worked as an engineer for 12 years, I ended up staying home to raise our daughter and making money with a couple of short term projects. I realize that everyone has a different circumstance, and that college costs in 1990 were way different than in 2006. With all the past wants becoming needs its really true that it is more expensive to live anymore. Hey future college students, you probably will have to graduate with some debt, but dont feel pressured to have it all now. The glory of being a college student is that you aren't expected to have money. Your young, your in college, your using your money for your education, the ultimate investment. Nobody expects you to have a new car, or a car at all, or a great present at holiday time. If you're already tightening your belt, kudos to you. If not, remember you dont have to live at the same level as your parents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

conspiracy, i tell ya
Posted by: browngoddess on Aug 30, 2006 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i think the rising cost of education is all part of a government plan to make sure the most struggling sectors of our society don't get an education. they want to uphold the status quo that gives them power and control, and one way to do that is to make sure that poorer people (who are disproportionately people of color) don't have the opportunity to achieve what they have

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: conspiracy, i tell ya Posted by: larry278
Cannon fodder
Posted by: astockton on Sep 3, 2006 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason nothing is done to make college affordable is that if everyone could afford to go to college, then no one would join the military to obtain GI Bill benefits. We had a saying in the Sixties, "What if they gave a war and nobody came?" Since the neocons won't let their own children join the military, they'd have no army to fight their never-ending wars with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]