Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WireTap

Campus Papers Can Save Journalism

By Sara Gruen, WireTap. Posted June 24, 2006.


As media mergers and budget cuts squeeze local papers ever tighter, indy campus journalism is breaking news that the mainstream outlets miss.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Sara Gruen

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It might never occur to an average news reader to venture over to a local college campus and pick up one of the free indy papers strewn around libraries and student centers. But if they're hungry for vital, original reporting, it wouldn't be a bad idea. As mergers and budget cuts squeeze local papers ever tighter, indy campus reporting has an increasing role in documenting local news.

Taking their cues from alternative weeklies like the Village Voice and the San Francisco Bay Guardian, feisty indy student papers explore the connections between local economies, politics, social trends and campus life. This year's winners of the 2006 Campus Independent Journalism Awards (CIJA) present the mature forefront of these papers and zines.

Both the official and indy papers usually receive funding through the allocations of student governments (though the budgets of independent papers are dwarfed by those of mainstream dailies and weeklies, which traditionally hire and pay their student staff). The real distinctions between independent-spirited campus papers and the official newspaper -- that is, the publication recognized by the campus administration as the official paper or record -- are those of mission, coverage, style and tone.

"It's not a matter of being better than the campus daily, or their being better than us," explains Kay Steiger, editor-in-chief of the University of Minnesota's the Wake, which won for Best Independent Campus Publication of the Year (with a budget over $10,000). "We have a whole week to plan and carry out stories in-depth, so that means we cover a different kind of story and have a different kind of responsibility as reporters and editors. Someone has to cover the meeting of the board of regents; that's important. But we look elsewhere for stories."

Looking elsewhere has meant investigating issues like racial tensions between a growing Somali immigrant population in St. Paul, Minn., and students, or profiling the work and lives of local graffiti artists.

Occasional crossover of reporters from mainstream college dailies to alternative publications where they can find the time and freedom to work on stories they care about is not uncommon. Many journalists see working at the official paper as a prerequisite for entry into journalism school or a position at a mainstream newspaper.

"If you're working at the daily, you're there because you want to go to j-school or you want to get an internship at a paper when you graduate. You don't do it for kicks," noted Michael Hagos, illustrations editor at University of Virginia's Declaration and winner for best artwork/cartoon. "No one's at the Dec because it's a chore they're doing for their resume. Everyone's doing it for the love of great journalism."

Though that may be so, many past winners of the CIJ Awards have found careers in the independent press at publications like Salon.com, The Nation and Mother Jones.

Substance with style

The drive to report creatively carries over into the design and layout choices at indy publications. Brown's College Hill Independent, winner for best design/layout, uses a mixture of grids and open fields that conveys a sense of freedom and play. "The daily has a more formal, text-heavy appearance that's consistent with what they do. We have purposefully built in space for experimentation," explains editor Ben Mercer. "The designers make choices for each issue, and the editors live with it."

Yale's beautifully designed Environmental Leadership Magazine [PDF], winner for Best Independent Publication of the Year (with a budget under $10,000), aims to do nothing less than use design to reinvent environmentalism. "The idea with ELM was to use design to carry a message about environmentalism: that they can be one and the same."

At its best, the freedom to innovate with style, tone and topic makes for storytelling that's unapologetically impressionistic, yet deeply researched and rigorously fact-checked. Megan Murry, a staff writer for Ithaca College's Buzzsaw Haircut, produced a remarkably nuanced look at her small town's Republican mayor for her winning article [PDF]in the GLBT coverage category.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Sara Gruen is the coordinator of the Independent Press Association's Campus Journalism Project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
matt
Posted by: peaveygtr on Jun 23, 2006 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, great article - very informative. The national groups you provided were very insightful. This isn't being covered often, though it should be. I am a college student and noticed this trend starting about a year ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOPE for thr Fourth Estate
Posted by: wawa on Jun 24, 2006 6:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a 52 year old peace activist who did not go to journalism school but because of my "community engagement" with a non-profit foundation I traveled to Israel Palestine three times since June 2005 and have been reporting what the MSM and most alternative outlets refuse to.

All media who interview Vanunu, the ex-con, whistleblower of Israel's WMD program are required to go thru ISRAELI MILITARY CENSORS.

WAWA did NOT!

"30 Minutes with Vanunu"

is free to you as a public service from those of us who are the .org
WEAREWIDEAWAKE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HOPE for thr Fourth Estate Posted by: peaveygtr
SALVO
Posted by: SALVO on Jun 24, 2006 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "enemy" now controls the press, radio and TV with a dwindling number of exceptions here and there. We fight on valiantly from the web, our blogs, books and the newspapers of small independent publishers-- guerrilla warfare. no less. But be of good cheer. The big battles are yet to come and we have powerful allies in the wing--Truth and the Common Sense and Decency of the People.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SALVO Posted by: Loopylafae
» RE: SALVO Posted by: peaveygtr
The need for real investigative journalism
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 24, 2006 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even thouh campus papers provide outlets, forums, and so on, and though everything in this article is true, that's not the problem that the American public faces. The problem is a lack of reliable information on a wide variety of topics. The problem is that open information is a threat to a heirarchical, top-down control, plantation-import based political - industrial system. Yes, we supposedly live in a democratic republic, but the central goal of the Bush&Co. loonies is to undermine that democratic republic and replace it with a permanent Republican majority - budding fascism.

Investigative reporting is the antidote. Here's a fun exercise for you- go and pick up the sports section of a local paper and look through it - you'll see the last bastion of investigative reporting in modern journalism. You'll see unbiased criticisms of players and coaches, you'll see extensive statistics on teams, you see play-by-play reporting of games. Now stop and ask yorself, why isn't there a similar level of detail applied to business, politics and govenment? The last of our real journalists are, amazingly enough, the sports journalists. That's where you find the hard-bitten and hard-biting personalities that epitomize traditional American investigative journalism. What a shame.

If you want to do good investigative reporting, you need an assistant and a tough editor who has her own independent fact-checkers. This takes money and time, and the powerful interests who control the US media don't want their huge piles of dirty laundry aired out in public. So we find ourselves in this atrocious situation.

Well, the college indy papers are a step in the right direction; the reporting is a bit low-quality, and there's often a yellow journalism slant, like the students are taking their cues from FOX news style 'reporting'. I suggest reading the sports section instead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm hopeful. Reservedly so, but hopeful nonetheless.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 24, 2006 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will they find their way city and regional dailies? I hope so! There's something nostalgic about opening up and reading a newspaper. I miss doing so, but I also found myself becoming more and more annoyed by all the poor grammar, typos, and spelling errors. It's sometimes hard to take the view seriously, when you can't help but wonder how such bassoons* got put on the payroll. Being a "feisty young writer" is not enough; being able to put together a cohesive thesis, with complete sentences, conveying such feist should be the goal.

Mark Twain had a different take:

That awful power, the public opinion of a nation, is created in America by horde of ignorant, self-complacent simpletons who, having failed at ditching and shoemaking, fetched up in journalism on their way to the poorhouse.

Clemens was no saint, but I find his long-past point of view germane to the current state of media affairs. Maybe these budding by-liners will "grow up" to change that perception? Let us hope. I'd love to hear that rustling sound as I shake open the evening copy, and read some well thought-out pieces on the national, local, and regional news and moods. Bonus points if they at least let Bill Gates spell and grammar check their work.

*Bill wouldn't have caught this one. A decent editor should.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good direction, wrong destination
Posted by: scnissen on Jun 24, 2006 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I fear your story is incomplete. First, you disregard the college dailys who aren't dependent on schools for funding. These papers are generally regarded as near or above professional competitors for similar sized markets. They are the paper of record for their community because the community supports them - not the school administration. (Think: Michigan State, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Texas, Oklahoma, Oregon, Iowa, etc.)

Second, your argument contains a fatal flaw. You criticize newspapers for their inability to produce fair, investigatory, balanced and ultimately spin-free journalism. But what you explain later is you aren't looking for spin-free journalism, but instead journalism spun your direction.

I understand the importance of advocacy journalism. (Why else would I be here?) I'm a fan of AlterNet and the topics it covers. But such media is marginal, not wholly because of the powers that be, but because it serves a margin audience. (I recognize their are mitigating factors in our society, etc.) But the organized presentation of facts that fit a criteria of news values is a different business than that of advocacy.

Just because large media companies are often regarded with contempt, doesn't mean the disdain should trickle down to all schools' dailys.

Lastly, isn't their something wrong with the leader of an indy newspaper group critiquing indy newspapers? Why not let the president of Exxon critique oil companies for the next article? My point isn't to bash the technique, but just outline its limitations. So, you see, you can't just throw the baby out with the bathwater.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The pervasive influence of the public relations industry
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 24, 2006 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This web site contains a 1999 transcript of a discussion of PR industry tactics in New Zealand. As newspapers and media outlets have been reduced in size and consolidated (in the continuing trend), PR news releases packaged as 'real news' are more common then ever.

http://www.radioproject.org/transcript/1999/9946.html

Nothing is preventing the PR industry from planting their stories in these media outlets as well; they just have to use more devious methods, like planting a few well-paid 'students' on the paper's staff - nothing illegal there, is there?

The only times when PR is effective is when its invisible, which is why the industry does all it can to deny its own existence. Journalists can be unwitting accomplices or active participants in these schemes; the output is more or less the same in either case.

What's really kind of bizarre is when people start believing that this is what journalism and education is - some kind of mental molding and perception management to get people to act and think in particular ways. This is why PR professionals always are interested in "what makes poeple tick" - they view people as little automatons whose buttons can be pushed at will.

Still, it's a lot better then living in China's media environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New College Clarion
Posted by: chomsky on Jun 24, 2006 7:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a grad student at New College of California in the Media Studies program; we just started a student news publication much like the ones mentioned above. One of the issues we have come across is that the administration at our small progressive socially change oriented college in San Francisco (the only college with a program in activism in social change in the world) is that it is hard to be independent and still be objective. Anyone who we would report on is someone that you see everyday at the Café, or walking across Valencia Street going to class.

This has shifted our publications focus outside of the school to local issues and focusing on investigative journalism. Our first "issue" (if you can call a website that) has just gone live, and the feedback has been great, but I think that reporting on issues within the College would be much easier if our staff had a little distance from the administration. Our site is at:

www.newcollegeclarion.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But There's a Fly in the Ointment
Posted by: Newsguy on Jun 24, 2006 10:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An organization started in 1978, the Institute for Educational Affairs has been successful in starting up conservative, right-leaning campus newspapers.

Of course these papers are the antithesis of real journalism; instead of "afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted," their instinct is to do just the opposite, following the lead of their hero, George Bush.

The IEA was funded by such corporations as Dow Chemical, Coca-Cola, and General Electric.

Some of the papers carrying the conservative banner include the Dartmouth Review, The Michigan Review, The Primary Source at Tufts, The Harvard Salient, The Princeton Tory, The Oregon Commentator, and The Virginia Advocate.

It puzzles me how college students can morph into toadies to the entrenched reactionary establishment at such a young age. Their brains must be entirely fossilized by the age of 30.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wildcat
Posted by: wildcat on Jun 24, 2006 10:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is disturbing to see anybody in progressive journalism still worshiping the "objectivity" god. There is no such thing as objective journalism. The concept of objective journalism was an early "right wing talking point" invented by the pro-capitalist press to smear the labor press. All journalism runs through the worldview filters of the reporters, editors and publishers. There exists a wealth of credible social science and history studies on this subject. Have you read, just for starters, The Mind Managers, by Herbert Schiller?

I otherwise really enjoyed this article. I worked for many years, as a student, and then as a consulting alumnus, on The New Indicator, at UCSD. The broader progressive community probably ought to give more support to the indy campus press. Folks, have you thought about becoming a continuing financial supporter for your nearest progressive campus paper?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come on people - relax
Posted by: peaveygtr on Jun 25, 2006 2:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I noticed a lot of immature, crazy banter in response to this article. Most of it was off topic and commenting on the "evil mainstream media". No wonder why many liberals are discredited...

I basically think this article was wasted on a lot of people.

Anyways, many of these college students (whom you cheer on) go on to join big media corporations (whom you all dislike). So how about just staying to comments related to the article which most of us can understand or not mind thinking about. There is an interesting connection which you people could draw from within the article worth discussing I think.

How will mainstream media outlets react to this? Do mainstream media outlets need public financing? Are college students picking up on the culture's opinions and adapting journalism to the culture's needs?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

extremism
Posted by: peaveygtr on Jun 25, 2006 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a point when extremism goes to far and you get discredited. You crossed that point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: extremism Posted by: peaveygtr
yea
Posted by: peaveygtr on Jun 25, 2006 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work for a number of small dailies (still in college)

The problem really is editors stretched between 3 different papers who edit your work and screw up the meaning - make typos - ect. By the time they tell you there are changes, the article is published and the reporter gets blasted no matter how much time was spent on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elitist twerps don't make good journalism
Posted by: Bobsays on Jun 26, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know campus journalism all too well. It comes in mainly two varieties: bland and bory hack copy trying to get some clippings for the application to journalism post-grad; and the kind of attention-seeking crap that you find at the ivy league schools. It is a simulacre of investigative journalism, but it is produced by students so inflamed with their own self-importance, it falls to get the goods on the bad guys (and how much muck raking can an undergrad really do between classes?). No, the only place you can find non-mainstream media that actually breaks new stories, is on the web or in the very few alternative papers out there who still put some money into journalism. All else is a fudge, opinion and hearsay dressed up as journalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Factually, no.
Posted by: scnissen on Jul 2, 2006 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your contention that all schools' papers of record are controlled is wrong.

There is and admittedly-elite group of newspapers under the organization Western Association of University Publications Managers (http://www.waupm.org/). They're elite in the sense that only the best newspapers can join. The best, in journalism, means impartial, investigatory, responsible, honest, factual storytelling, as well as presenation, grammer, et al.

None of the papers on their roster, despite how much one person or another may dislike them, are subverted by the University.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Factually, no. Posted by: wildcat