Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

WireTap

Has the Long Peak-Oil Emergency Begun?

By Ben Adler, Campus Progress. Posted May 17, 2006.


Interview: Writer and urbanist James Kunstler talks about America's auto-dependent culture, urban sprawl and what he sees beyond our dependence on oil.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Ben Adler

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

(Eds. note: this article originally appeared on CampusProgress.org.)

The record high price of gasoline has been all over the news in recent weeks. While Americans were smart enough not to fall for the congressional Republicans' ham-handed effort to buy votes with a $100 rebate, polls show that Americans are worried about gas prices, and are beginning to think about changing their energy devouring ways. All of this makes novelist James Howard Kunstler look very prescient.

In 1993, James Kunstler revolutionized the way Americans think about their landscape when he released his first non-fiction book, The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's Man-Made Landscape. The New York Times described it as "an impassioned rant against suburbia, shopping malls, cheap disposable architecture and the fragmentation of communities fostered by an increasingly mobile, car-oriented culture." He has continued this crusade with articles in a wide range of publications and in his most recent book, The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of the Oil Age, Climate Change, and Other Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-first Century. (Check out excerpts in Rolling Stone here.)

In this book, Kunstler argues that the world will soon pass "peak oil," the point at which more than half the world's recoverable oil supplies have been used. According to Kunstler, America 's auto-dependent culture and landscape will make this transition to a post-oil economy extremely painful. He predicts potential wars over dwindling oil supplies, massive abandonment of suburban sprawl areas, and, ultimately, a return to the time when people ate locally grown produce and did not commute dozens of miles to work each day.

We caught up with Kunstler to chat about the intersection of urban planning and progressive politics, and what the future will look like if, as he predicts, oil prices just keep rising.

Ben Adler: In your new book, The Long Emergency, you lay out this very, very pessimistic vision of the near American future --

James Kunstler: Well, it's only pessimistic if you think that living in Plano, Texas, is the world's greatest thing, you know?

BA: Well -- okay, that's a fair point -- I guess some of us would say that if Las Vegas really becomes a ghost town as you predict, that would be a good thing.

JK: That would be good for us in many ways -- not least of which is because Las Vegas is the holy shrine of a very pernicious religion -- which is the religion of getting something for nothing; the religion of unearned riches -- which is an idea that is extremely destructive and insidious and has now spread throughout our culture and has given people the idea that earnest efforts are not required to have good outcomes.

BA: Nonetheless, you lay out a vision that is very stark and extreme in what is going to happen to vast swaths of the country -- the South; the Southwest in particular. How do you respond to people who say the laws of supply and demand will dictate that as oil prices go up, the market will move to new kinds of energy and that some market correction will make these circumstances much less dire than you predict?

JK: Well, I wouldn't try to denounce them or anything. There's no question that as a society we are going to be doing some things differently, including some things that will surprise us. And not all of them will be terrible. Some of them will be beneficial. But I think on the whole, that there's a great deal of wishful thinking involved in believing that both the "market" and "technology" will bring some rescue remedy to stave off the discontinuities that we face.

BA: Tell us about your seminal work The Geography of Nowhere, in which you laid out the history of suburban sprawl and its negative effects on the American economy, culture, and landscape. What compelled you to tackle this subject?

JK: I was a young newspaper reporter during the OPEC oil embargo of 1973, and I was working in this brand new building out on this heroic suburban boulevard of commerce -- filled with the big box stores, and all the new malls, and the muffler shops, and all the other accessories of the world's highest standard of living. And so we went through this energy crisis, and it made quite an impression on me. Especially how dysfunctional our suburban living arrangements could become if anything went wrong. And so, I went on to do other things: I worked for Rolling Stone magazine and then I quit that, and kind of retreated to upstate New York to write novels. And after a while, I got back into journalism, focused on our living arrangements in America and land development. Well, we're basically destroying our country and also probably destroying our economy and our future by developing this economy based on the never-ending construction of more and more suburban sprawl. And so I wanted to explore exactly what the nature of this problem was as well as its most visible manifestations -- you know, the endless vistas of nauseating crap that we've smeared all over the landscape.

BA: In the years since it's been published, would you say that you've seen an improvement in the way new communities are being planned, or is it continuing to get worse?

JK: Well, in general, it's continuing to get worse. I was associated over the past 12 years or so with the reform group called the Congress for the New Urbanism which is made up of architects, planners, and some developers, who were trying to do something better -- trying to really revive the idea of a town. However, their work represented a tiny fraction of one percent of all the development done in America, or redevelopment of existing neighborhoods and districts. We have still done incredible damage over the last decade or so to the landscape -- and what's probably worse is that in the absence of having an economy that really produces things of enduring value, we have shifted insidiously to an economy that is based almost solely now on the housing bubble, and all of the activities associated with it like, you know, the creation of more strip malls, and big box stores, and stuff like that. So, the damage out there continues, and is putting us in ever more of a hazardous position.

BA: There have been studies that show the exurbs (far-flung suburbs), where mega-churches often serve as the main source of community, are trending very conservative politically. Do you see any connection between the rise in Christianist Fundamentalism and suburbanization?

JK: I do think that the preoccupation with evangelical religion has, to some degree, been a substitute for the destruction of public life in general, which has followed the destruction of public space. And the thing that's ironic and sort of paradoxical about it is that the whole Christian Fundamentalist sector employs the methods of big box chain retail in order to do their thing -- it all takes place on a massive scale which is rather defeating to the idea of belonging to any kind of comprehensible unit of anything.

BA: For young progressives who want to slow the rate of global warming and want to strengthen American communities following the principles of new urbanism, it seems like such a colossal problem to tackle. What can our readers do on the local and national level to change this pattern of development?

JK: Okay, I will give you a very specific answer to that. And I preface it by saying that the political progressive wing of American politics really ought to be ashamed for being as feckless and foolish as it's been in the last several years by not paying attention to any of these issues. And, one of the signs of that is what I'm gonna say next. We have a railroad system in America that the Bolivians would be ashamed of. There isn't one thing we could do in this country that would have a greater impact on our oil use than restoring the American rail system to something like a European level of service. It's something that we know how to do, the infrastructure is laying out there waiting to be fixed and re-used, and the Democrats are not even talking about it -- and I'm a registered Democrat -- and it ticks me off. I would like to see the politically progressive kids out there start militating to restore the American railroad system. The fact that we're not even talking about that shows me how un-serious we are.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Ben Adler is the associate editor of Campus Progress.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Peace, Nader
Posted by: Sojourner on May 17, 2006 1:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one has yet formulated a more just method than the market for distributing the fruits of our civilization. The alternative to the market is increased government regulation. We will tolerate that in time of war or crisis. But the rationale for the market is that citizens, when left to pursue their self-interest, will make a better decision (maybe not the best but still better) than central planners.

One favorite story I heard told by a woman of Native American descent is how the government workers came to the reservations claiming to protect the people from snake oil salesmen, etc. The feds assured the people they had the people’s interests at heart. It did not take long before the people realized that their instincts to distrust salesmen were better tools than the gullibility to trust government workers.

Look at transportation, since Kunstler points to rail as an alternative to the automobile. People love their cars; they confer a great deal of freedom. That has little to do with gasoline. When it was horses, everyone wanted their own horse. Until someone can suggest an acceptable way of distributing justly the privilege of possessing a personal vehicle, we shall run with the current system as long as we can.

It is only in our era of limits that the extravagant extent to which our American way of life depends on expansion became clear to me. It’s grow or die. Yes, that is eventually self-defeating. What matters most, however, is when? In the long run, we all die. However, simply indicating our mortality--or as with Kunstler’s issues, our phoniness and short-sightedness—has as much motivational zing as mother’s insistence that her boys sit straight in their chairs instead of slouching. That’s authority, not leadership.

It’s no criticism of Kunstler to point out that no one has the authority to implement such changes as he suggests. So then that only leaves leadership. That has always been a commodity in short supply. Perhaps it is unfortunate that in our political system we need people who would rather be president than be right. So it is. (Love, ya, Ralph. But it's winner take all.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peace, Nader Posted by: HeroesAll
» “The Motorcycle Diaries”? Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Peace, Nader Posted by: kick
A new and better analysis of suburban sprawl
Posted by: sprawlkiller on May 17, 2006 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those concerned about sprawl and want to find out exactly why all historical attempts to limit sprawl over the past half century have failed, read "Sprawl Kills - How Blandburbs Steal Your Time, Health and Money." You will learn the truth about sprawl politics, right-wing sprawl shills and the sprawl industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peak Oil and suburban sprawl
Posted by: itchyvet on May 20, 2006 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very appropiate article and time to publish as well.
Going by the comments made here in responce, it would appear many writers have missed the plot entirely.
For instance, a shortage of oil will increase the cost dramatically, as is currently being demonstrated.
People living in these wondorous suburbs with their two or even four SUV's are finding it incredibly difficult to afford the petrol that goes into their tanks, so they can go to work where they earn the money in the first place.
Second point, so far we've only dealt with petrol and getting to and fro from work, we seem to miss the on going and flow on effects of the oil shortage, that is everything we eat, requires OIL to manufacture/grow and delivery, cut out the oil and we're in some really serious shite making the trip to work and back miniscule in comparision.
Get ready for some serious starvation and population reduction in the coming years, the further out you live, the worse its gonna be, however, there is a glimmer of light on the matter, and that is many suburbs will DIE and others will reform into regional towns, demolishing many of those brand new super duper suburban homes and re-utilising the land to produce food which will in turn be consumed by the local regional town-s.
Your railways ???? You bet, they are once more going become the centre of all transportation, some comments have been made regards PERSONAL transportation, and I'd have to agree, however, the days of utilising such transportation for long distances are over, such transport will be utilised within regional township areas only, like from home to the market, work, farm, station ect, and more then likely wil be electrically powered via storage batteries.

Much of this has already been predicted in the not too distant past by people who had far better insight then I've ever had, who were ridiculed for their foresight and trouble, yet as developments today show, they were right on the money.

I'd suggest we all start to do some serious digging in our libraries and archives unearth these tomes and do some serious research, you never know, it just may save you and your families future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you responsible for what YOU do
Posted by: jeanie on May 20, 2006 2:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You get in a car and drive the two miles you could walk to the store in order to save time. Those same two miles afford an experience of taking in what is along the way. Could be garbage on the street that needs to be picked up. Could be a neighbor that needs help lifting something, or someone you could be saying "good morning "to along the way. Could be beautiful mountains in the distance to rest your eyes against.

You throw away something gooky wrapped in plastic because it stinks and is too much trouble to clean, but if you cleaned it, it could be effectively recycled.

That pot or plot outside your door could grow food if you put seeds and dirt and TLC with it.
What do you do after you get home from slogging it out on the job? You might consider planting or caring for...

What about those children you have had in daycare all day?

etc etc. Most of us know in our hearts the morally right thing to do

too many of us try to slip under the radar. When we ask ourselves about why that is, I think we will understand the growing nature of our government, our big businesses.

I believe the only way to become truly independent is to choose wisely ourselves with the adage in mind " do unto others as you would have them do unto you"

I am not a christian, nor do ascribe to any organized faith. I won't shop at Exxon or Walmart either. Still "do unto others then mind your own business" is the most logical social principal in existence, given the premise that we need to live together. Otherwise, we might as welll all buy guns and fend for ourselves.

So many of us are trying to think so big because it all seems so huge and it seems like we have to do something about it now. It's the fast food principal you are buying into. It's true, the powers that be need to be stopped. The only real fast food way is to kill them all. Well, that's not what any of us would do, even if we fantasize it.
Have faith in commitment. It's a slow steady powerful process that changes you and it, always for the better if you have good at the heart. If an opportunity comes to you and asks you for a gift that you can give, act on it I don't necessarily mean money. I mean something you have to give. Share what you have in order to make our world a better place.
I have lived a long time, and this is what I have seen work. I am always looking for ways to give what I have. I read the arguments and I learn. All I can say is that this is what has worked over time in the best, most comprehensive way for me. I'm here passing it on, in case anyone's interested. After that, I go back to doing what i can when asked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kunstler, stop scaring our youth.
Posted by: nickptar on May 22, 2006 8:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not necessarily so bad. Sure, things will change a lot, it'll suck for most people for some time, but Kunstler's apocalyptic vision is not guaranteed and (IMHO) not terribly likely.

Oh, and global warming is fixable too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement