Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WireTap

Speaking of Racial Profiling: Part II

By Dani McClain, WireTap. Posted May 9, 2006.


The profiling of black Americans had become less of a story since 9/11, but recent incidents involving black congresswoman McKinney and professor Akom are reviving the debate.
2225_55_display
Dr. Antwi Akom

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Dani McClain

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

(Ed.'s Note: On April 3, WireTap covered student walkouts at San Francisco State University in support of Dr. Antwi Akom, who was arrested on campus grounds. The walkout participants argued that Akom's arrest was motivated by racial profiling. Our readers commented that the incident had not received adequate coverage in the media and asked for more facts. Our in-depth investigation below is a result of that request.)

His is not a household name. And while the image of an Afro-haloed Angela Davis raising her clenched fist in a California courtroom stirs up a response in most members of a certain generation, relatively few are familiar with Dr. Antwi Akom or the confident smile he kept on his angular face throughout much of his recent trial. Despite its lack of national coverage, the arrest of Akom, a sociologist and Africana Studies professor, is among the latest incidents to stoke the ongoing national debate on racial profiling. Though Akom's arrest occurred last year, his case continues to pit some students and faculty against the administration at one of the country's most progressive university campuses.

The two central parties involved -- Akom and San Francisco State University's Department of Public Safety -- offer very different renderings of their interaction on the evening of Oct. 25. They do so only through written statements -- police reports, blog postings, and a well-maintained "Justice 4 Akom" campaign website. The criminal proceedings have ended, but because of the lack of resolution on San Francisco State's campus, neither party is speaking to the press. From the various documents that claim to chronicle the evening's events, the following picture emerges.

Sometime between 10 and 11 p.m. on a Tuesday night, Akom pulled his Land Rover into a parking space outside the Ethnic Studies and Psychology building near the heart of San Francisco State University's campus. After checking to make sure his five- and seven-year-old daughters were comfortable in the back, he stood to his full height of 6 feet 3 inches, locked the car doors and hurried toward the building's main entrance. He planned to stop by his second-floor office briefly, just long enough to pick up the books he needed to prepare for a lecture the following day.

Akom pulled open the front door, which had been propped open, but only after walking past Adalberto Guevara, a guard charged with keeping the site secure while a team of electricians installed new wiring in the classrooms upstairs. Guevara stood outside the lobby of the two-story building talking on his cell phone. He followed Akom inside the building and asked him if he worked there. The professor said yes and continued through the lobby and upstairs toward his office. In earlier police interviews, Guevara said he followed closely behind, asking Akom to see his identification card all the while. Guevara later changed his story, admitting that he never asked to see the professor's ID. It wouldn't have been a problem if he had, Akom says. His campus badge was in his pocket all along.

Guevara later told police that he wondered why this man, dressed in a black sweatshirt and sweatpants, was being so confrontational. Why had he gotten within inches of Guevara's face and shouted, "I'm tired of everybody messing with me!" and "Leave me the [expletive] alone!"

Guevara went back downstairs, called his supervisor at Wackenhut Security and explained the situation. Minutes later, 22-year-old officer Brandon Rodgers arrived. With Guevara nearby, Rodgers began searching the rooms on the building's second floor. Soon, Akom emerged from the office door marked "217."

And this is where the initial meeting of an employee of a company on contract with the university and a self-described "scholar-activist" of African-American and Ghanaian parentage morphed into a larger confrontation that would engulf the campus community and, more broadly, California's Bay Area. With Akom's emergence from his office, the accounts of what happened dramatically diverge.

Akom says that he walked out with his arms full of books and, upon seeing the police officer, repeated that he was a professor. He was walking toward the stairwell when Rodgers used force to stop him from behind, and only then, says Akom, did he fight back. At some point, though, the interaction between the two men drew a small crowd that included electricians who were working nearby, an undergraduate student who was studying on the floor and -- after Rodgers radioed for backup -- two additional members of San Francisco State's police force.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Dani McClain is a writer living in Brooklyn, N.Y. She also serves on the advisory board of WireTap Magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
yes
Posted by: rsaxto on May 9, 2006 4:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, racial profiling exists in SF and in all US communities because racism exists in all US communities. Income profiling exists in all US communities as well. Combine the two and throw in the Bushies and it can be clearly seen that the US is so far from being a real democracy that it is pitiful indeed. If racism were prohibited in every police force in the US then we would have to have vast firings and vast hirings to get back in cop numbers to where we started. It's a really sad America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some profiling is appropriate ...
Posted by: gpm on May 9, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... but being suspicious of a black man when you work in a building with an ethnic studies department is just dense.

Let's say you're a security guard at Bob Jones University. In that case, it would be perfectly reasonable to be suspicious of a black man on campus. (Leave aside the fact that it might be fun to see one of those racist finks get robbed or beaten -- it's still suspicious activity.) Likewise, the several times I was stopped by cops near my home in a black neighborhood (I am white) were also appropriate, because, let's face it, that's suspicious activity. And again, a nervous-looking Arab with little luggage getting on an international flight is suspicious. All examples of profiling, and all (in my opinion) perfectly reasonable.

Now, it looks to me like Dr. Akom was accosted for no good reason at all, and I have a hunch he wouldn't have been were he white. We do him and others in his situation a big disservice to lump this case in with every other claim of unfair racial profiling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not at all. Posted by: gpm
» RE: Not at all. Posted by: squattyroo
My rants
Posted by: Angie on May 9, 2006 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is difficult to live in societies where you have a reasonable expectation of respect, to then live in this society where there are daily assaults, however subtle or flagrant, based on the amount of melanin in your skin. Racist notions are even perpetuated by other minorities who are desperate to maintain their rank on the hierarchy of white supremacy. It is conceivable that someone who is subjected to repeated disrespect and unfairness could explode in anger. However, Prof Akom was trained in the art of diffusing tense situations. I don't know how the initial encounter played out, but I think some apologies are necessary from the University and the Mayor's Office. If there were procedures in place (like asking for ID) to prevent such incidents, and Dr. Akom did not comply, then he would be wrong. God forbid he should have an angry outburst for being unjustly accused. A shuffle dance for massa would've been much more appropriate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A lot of missing information, but here it is:
Posted by: supercrisp on May 9, 2006 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a very complex case. I understand its importance as an example of "profiling," but that's no reason not to give us enough information to accept Akom's innocence. I went to the support websited mentioned in the article to flesh out the events for myself. Here are some things I found important:

First, Akom had already had a run-in with security when an officer opened his office door one night at 11pm while Akom was working. That startled Akom, and he jumped up. The officer put his hand on his gun. That scared Akom more. The officer left after Akom said he was a professor, then he came back to ask for ID.

Akom's e-mails about this incident were quite reasonable and generous. He certainly doesn't seem explosive. But this does explain why he might be yelling something about why these guys keep messing with him. I would be. Anyway, here he is at pretty much his most aggressive in these e-mails: "Overall officer Troy is a nice guy. But nice guys make mistakes sometimes. Moreover, I think it is better to talk about intercultural relations and protocol rather then to let people walk around thinking they are 'just doing their jobs,' which is true, but fails to capture the complexity of the situation" Keep in mind, these e-mails might have been cherry-picked, but the selection presented on the advocacy site paints a picture of Akom as a pretty reasonable and generous guy about this.

In the story above, we're not told what the police said happened outside Akom's office when he was trying to get on the elevator. Here's their version, pulled from that website: "The police claim, outrageously, that Dr. Akom—a man with no criminal record, who had come to pick up books from his office for a morning lecture—threw his books down and assaulted the three officers before him." The website obviously puts their spin on it, but it really does sound improbable to me too that Akom would do that, judging from his e-mails and by the fact that he's the sort of guy who's working at 11pm on more than one occasion.

Anyway, I think it's really important for us to accentuate how normal and human these people are who are getting othered by racism. NOW, don't get me wrong: it's wrong to think that someone who's black, brown, yellow or whatever has to be all nicey nice so as not to deserve racism. I'm just saying it makes a more convincing argument if we show people to be respectable and reasonable actors when we can. After all, racism works by dehumanizing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe a Simple Solution?
Posted by: davidt on May 9, 2006 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This stinks but it is a stew of ingredients that can come to a boil at any time, no matter how innocent.

1. The media is replete with White/Black/Hispanic policemen arresting/questioning/testing for sobriety Black citizens on the street. Just check out COPS--which in spite of the furor engendered by various discussions/treatments/films on racial profiling--is broadcast on a daily basis. And I think these are REPEATED programs.

2. Blacks who sport dreadlocks are portrayed as aggressive, aligned with the drug-drenced Jamaican-Caribbean mobs, militant, gang-affiliated. Not intellectual, academic, civil or religious. This varies according to what you watch or hear but, on the whole, I think this is correct. When do you see on the Four Stooge Network a person sporting dreadlocks NOT portrayed in a nefarious light? If someone can correct me please do.

3. The fact that some Blacks, in polls that may or may NOT be credible, agree to certain tolerance of racial profiling in order to maintain their personal safety JUSTIFIES the media's continual stereotypical and dogmatic portrayals. These types of "justification" have been dredged out whenever an incident that can be described as within the parameters of racial profiling. MESSAGE is: But THEY asked for it!!! This is paper-thin but Big Media continues to cater to WASP sensibilities, despite the BILLIONS that is spent by non-WASP consumers!

Solution? It stinks, but sometimes we have to pick our battles in this war for equality & this is a pretty simple option that will put a person who is vulnerable to becoming a victim of racial profiling in the optimum legal position. Wear the stinking badge and enhance it's visibility.

That is what cops/FBI agents do to justify THEIR actions so they won't be questioned/arrested.

It will put you in the strongest legal position IF, heaven forbid, an innocent incident precipitates a dengerous one.

That is also your civil right.

David T. Gray
Claremont, NH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe a Simple Solution? Posted by: mkwagner
Sounds Familiar
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on May 9, 2006 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was a victim of profiling when I was selling books in Oklahoma. I was about 23, on foot in Guymon, a small Oklahoma panhandle town and I was picked up by the cops even though I wore a suit and tie.
He said I looked "suspicious." Suspicious of what, I asked him. He said someone said there was a young Black man who looked out of place (no joke, dude! After all, this isn't Dallas!) and carrying a briefcase.
So, I was handcuffed and forced to spend a night in a cell without a phone call or anything to eat or drink while the police ran a background check.
My supervisor found me exhausted, dehydrated and hungry and furious. I was in a cell and alone. It was a surreal feeling.
My crime? Making a living.
Authorities make a good living on harrassing minorities and look what we've done to our Hispanic brothers and sisters. They're being profiled as much as we are.
We're all not "suspects" and go around causing antisocial behavior. People with badges and uniforms need to understand that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just a thought.
Posted by: zipper696 on May 10, 2006 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this guy had already had the previous incident with the security staff, and as a professor of Ethnic Studies presumably tuned in to the realities of living as a black man in the US why on Earth didn't he flash his badge when first questioned by the rentacop? He didn't have to wear it, just reach into his pocket (slowly!!) and clear the air.
This has all the hallmarks of a tiny incident that was allowed to get out of hand, with faults on both sides, it shouldn't be simply used as a gathering cry for various anti-discrimination groups to latch on to.

(excuse the mixed metaphor and dangling participle)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just a thought. Posted by: Kym525