Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

WireTap

Honor the Hand That Harvests Your Crop

By Howard Zinn and Eddy Morales, WireTap. Posted March 31, 2006.


Opinion: When we shrink the wages and benefits of students and campus workers, the quality of education declines.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Howard Zinn Eddy Morales

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

College campuses nationwide are centers for free thought and the exchange of ideas. The research, technology and other developments that universities create are and should be used for the public benefit. But recently, some of these hubs of objectivity have been subjected disproportionately to corporate interests over the common interests of students and campus employees.

Although everyone should respect a professor's academic freedom and choice to research a wide variety of subjects, administrators should hold them accountable to higher ethical standards as to the end products and use of their research. Professors who moonlight as paid consultants to corporations should be particularly careful as such activity limits their accountability to the university and to the students. Even worse, corporate interests by their very nature must prioritize profit levels above all else -- including quality of education and campus climate. This often leads to less competitive pricing for students and shrinking wages and benefits for campus workers.

But when professors start consulting for corporate interests who seek to limit workers' ability to organize and collectively negotiate for better conditions and pay, they add yet another barrier for workers -- graduate student employees, cafeteria staff, janitors -- to organize and articulate their collective voice to assure fair wages and benefits. In most cases, forming a union is a worker's only chance for a fair deal.

For example, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce -- a network of companies, business associations and state and local chambers -- recently contracted professor Jarol B. Manheim of George Washington University to draft a briefing entitled Trends in Union Corporate Campaigns. In Manheim's conclusions, he loosely suggests that in order to protect the interests of Big Business, the Chamber should push for more regulation on union activities. Manheim specifically refers to corporate campaigns -- tactics used by workers to identify where they may have leverage over a particular employer in order to win improved wages and benefits. Manheim, who has worked for other corporations, wrote this barely a year after students and workers at his own campus fought for an increase in wages and benefits during the National Student Labor Week of Action, organized annually by the Student Labor Action Project (SLAP).

Coincidentally, shortly after the release of Manheim's report the U.S. Chamber of Commerce initiated a project with Richard Berman to manage Unionfacts.com, a website attacking the AFL-CIO and its members. The site claims not to be anti-union, but attacks almost all unions in the United States. It encourages workers to decertify from their union, and identifies specific corporate campaigns organized by unions as "hassles to an employer." It is not a stretch to say that this $8 million project, based in part on Manheim's report, will not help the cause of workers on his campus or anywhere else.

Since its founding in 1999, the Student Labor Action Project (SLAP) has been working to support, advise and solidify the student-labor work on campuses and in the communities across the country. SLAP works with other organizations to coordinate the National Student Labor Week of Action each year to work out a strategy of support for campus workers across the country. SLAP aims to demonstrate the direct self-interest all students have in defending workers' rights. This year is no different as students around the United States gear up to SLAP Corporate Greed on campuses, targeting contracted corporations at their school and university officials that defend their interests more so than those students and campus workers.

A professor's responsibility, just like students and workers, should be to educate first -- not to beat back campus workers' rights or increasing a corporation's profitability. Everyone wants dignity, support and the ability to work in a climate that values their presence. The standard of living for campus workers affects a student's ability to get the most out of her or his college experience. Professors, of all campus groupings, should understand that.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

For more information about the National Student-Labor Week of Action, contact SLAP@jwj.org or visit their website at Studentlabor.org.

Eddy Morales is the president of United States Student Association. Howard Zinn is the author with Anthony Arnove of the "Voices of a People's History of the United States" (Seven Stories Press) and of the international best-selling "A People's History of the United States."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Please allow me to respond...
Posted by: clntbrtn on Mar 31, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will keep my response short, and to the point...

Unions suck.

Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How does one explain the continued decline of General Motors?
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 31, 2006 5:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's what sucks, dude.

I see recently that GM needs to sell off, at a profit, its investment in two successful Japanese auto makers in order to boost its cash flow and keep itself from shutting down completely.

How did it happen that American auto makers, who dominated that industry for so long, have now sunk so low? My limited acquaintance with our local Boeing facility suggests that the failure cannot be blamed on the United Auto Workers, since America remains competitive in commercial airline sales.

So, how did GM management manage to squander the huge American advantage in international auto sales? It's a disgrace. And I believe that typifies the US situation more than any complaints about union leadership.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No sense of history
Posted by: redstarwraith on Apr 8, 2006 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These blanket statements like, "Unions suck" -- show an appalling lack of any sense of history. I would agree with such a statement if it decried the current state of unions in America, or criticized the ridiculous bureacratization of many unions, but the basic philosophical and ethical underpinnings and the exploitative historical conditions that gave rise to the unions are all still present. You think unions suck? See how badly life as a worker sucks without the unions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What sucks:
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Apr 8, 2006 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, unions suck, but so does unbridled, conscienceless capitalism, which is what gave rise to unions in the first place. The thing, you see, is that unions merely replaced the capitalists when they got powerful enough. Now, there are industries that are shutting down because the salaries for the workers have priced those industries out of the competitive market place. The rebound from this is that large corporations are starting all over again in countries with sweatshop environments.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dancingwithcrows
Posted by: dancingwithcrows on Apr 10, 2006 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with your comment on conscienceless capitalism, and that unions have perhaps emulated the structure and techniques of capitalist enterprises--but to let corporations off the hook by saying they must stay competitive places the blame squarely on the shoulders of unions and by extension union workers. Perhaps it's time to think about how we can make capitalism ethical--and that might mean buying union made products at higher prices--instead of supporting companies that take their manufacturing elsewhere. It might mean buying products from companies that treat their workers ethically--union or not. At the end of the day, we can either be in control of the conditions around us--or let someone else take care of things based on whtever their own self interests are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement