Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WireTap

Over-Achievers With Low Self-Esteem

By Amy DePaul, WireTap. Posted March 28, 2006.


A look into the conflicted inner lives of young women who appear to kick ass everywhere -- in school and on the soccer field -- while secretly struggling with self-worth.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Amy DePaul

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If you read the most-emailed article in the New York Times at the end of last week ("To All the Girls I've Rejected"), then you know that some college admission offices are holding female applicants to a higher standard than their male counterparts in hopes of achieving a greater gender balance on campus.

That's because women's enrollment in college is dramatically outpacing men's. By the 2009-2010 school year, according to the Business Roundtable, women will earn 142 bachelor's degrees and 173 associate degrees for every 100 awarded to men in these categories.

American girls, meanwhile, are not only advancing in the classroom but on playing fields as well. One in three high school girls now plays a sport, compared to one in 27 before Title IX (an act that called for more college scholarships for women to ensure parity with male athletes in 1972). The cultural landscape has shifted accordingly, offering up highly empowered female heroines both real and fictional, including Mia Hamm, Lisa Leslie and "Buffy the Vampire Slayer."

But for all the undisputed advances made by young women, evidence suggests there is more to this story, a dark side that has long been acknowledged but seems all the more baffling in this era of increasingly accomplished girls.

Foremost, a young woman's body is still a battleground -- the relentless focus of the porn industry, the celebrity and the weight-loss industries. Advocates in the field of eating disorders remind us that these illnesses have doubled their reach in the last 30 years, that they are fatal in 10 percent of cases, and that they are affecting younger and more ethnically diverse girls. And it's not just about food and other forms of bodily self-abuse such as cutting. In a 2001 Harvard study, one in five teen girls reported being hit or being forced into sex by their partners. Depression is another pervasive affliction among college women, despite their groundbreaking achievements and presumably bright economic prospects.

The hazards that young women face on the way to adulthood are real -- as real as ever. The problem is how to understand them in light of girl power, Buffy and the WNBA.

Going public in Ohio

One window into the conflicted inner lives of young women who appear by every measure to kick ass -- in school, on the soccer field -- while secretly struggling with self-worth, was made available to me as an instructor at Miami University of Ohio. Founded in 1809, Miami is a mostly residential college of old brick buildings with ivy tendrils, majestic trees and verdant lawns. The social life is Greek-dominated, and the college is famous for its "Miami Mergers," that is, couples who meet in their undergraduate years and go on to marry.

But even a traditional campus in southwest rural Ohio -- deep in the red zone -- shows signs of change. Miami is one of the state's most competitive universities, drawing a select group of highly motivated, achievement-oriented young women among its students. These largely middle- and upper-class women are as vulnerable as anyone to the afflictions of modern American girlhood. Four years ago, a group of female students at Miami formed an organization to go public with their struggles.

The group was called Achieving You, and it was modeled on an organization at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The goal of its members was to provide support to one another and to younger peers. Many members of the group had faced down self-esteem-related disorders, and now they wanted to talk about their experiences and their recoveries. Eventually, the Miami students hoped to speak frankly about their lives to high school girls in the area.

Sharing stories

In late 2003, a group of about 20 Miami women came together at a large meeting room in the school's student union to share their stories of struggle. Pulling their chairs into a circle, many discussed depression, others eating disorders and still others abusive boyfriends or compulsive promiscuity. They described their lives in college and high school, where they had played a variety of sports, such as lacrosse, swimming and soccer. Most if not all said that in high school they took advanced placement classes and held leadership positions such as class officer. Now in college, many had joined sororities and relished the female camaraderie offered by Greek life.

Unlike the starving ballerina types so often depicted in journalistic accounts of female self-esteem disorders, all the speakers were wryly funny, self-aware and fully confident young women, or so it seemed:

"I was the captain of my water polo team in high school, in the honor society "

"I was a perfectionist in every sense of the word. I came home from school and would rewrite my notes from class. I had to be the president of every organization. You can guess my grades "


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Amy DePaul is a writer living in Irvine, Calif.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"...the very combination of empowerment and victimization
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 28, 2006 4:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that is so perplexing among American young women."

Compare that to the Orlando Patterson comments in Sunday's NYT's op-eds where he reports that there is no correlation between young African American males' lack of achievement and their self-esteem, which is high.

I don't know what to make of it, except that there's a missing link in attempts to relate self-esteem to achievement. Or else, there's a missing link between self-esteem and a a sense of victimization. Or else, a missing link between what young women report and what young African American men report and what's really going on.

In other words, maybe we're asking the wrong questions?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it about power, or perfection?
Posted by: mothersmovement on Mar 28, 2006 6:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An intriguing story, and clearly relevant to the media buzz about the professional fates of high-achieving women. However, I have to question the conclusion that young women's low self-esteem is merely a subconscious effort to dim the light of their brilliance. I suspect it's just as likely to be a by-product of trying to measure up to socially -- rather than internally -- imposed standards of excellence. There may be a crucial difference between having the willpower to exert the kind of concentration, competitive skill and self-control that facilitate acquiring the symbols of success -- whether it's being the captain of the basketball team or getting the corner office -- and having an internalized sense of power that informs the psyche that even with one's inevitable flaws and failures, one is just as influential and effective a person, if not more so, than everybody else.

If young women are still under the impression that it's undesirable to be too smart and too strong, it suggest to me that -- despite women's progress -- there are still cultural forces at play which undermine the development of precisely that internalized sense of power in girls, or females of any age.

People who aspire to leadership are expected to prove their competence on the field of battle. The key difference for high-achieving young women today is that they have fewer obstacles to surmount on their way to the top than previous generations of girls. The let down may come when young women begin to get an inkling that no amount of conforming to socially-defined standards of perfection -- whether in pursuing academic or professional goals or later life attempts to be the perfectly-perfect mother -- is going to deliver the sense of self-acceptance that converts self-destroying perfectionism into an authentic capacity for excellence.

Unfortunately, my personal experience suggests that kind of self-realization typically comes with age and after a period of painful introspection. But it would be great if we could figure out a way to infuse it into young women's lives a little earlier in the game.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I know these girls...
Posted by: windian on Mar 28, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
since nearly 1/3 of the recent grads of my kids' high school attend Miami. And assuming that the ones I know are typical, I think the situation is a little more complicated. Whether they admit it or not (and most don't), these girls are receiving powerful mixed messages from family and community. Most come from incredibly traditional Donna Reed farmilies. Mothers, though generally well educated, rarely work, are skeptical if not overtly disapproving of professional women, and have contrived over the years to make mothering, PTO, Booster Moms, Altar Guild, Junior League, etc., into a more than full time job. The very clear though rarely stated expectation is that the girls will go to Miami or someplace similarly Greek and midwestern, work for a year or two as a marketing managing or a grade school teacher, marry a nice boy from the next suburb over, and settle down to replicate their parents' lives. How, exactly, does that correlate with being valedictorian, class president, or captain of the champion soccer team? Wouldn't it make you crazy to be spurred on toward excellence, and in fact achieve it, but with no expectation that it could ever take you anywhere except where you already are?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I know these girls... Posted by: iloveyougalleries
» RE: I know these girls... Posted by: lionhead
we're not asking the right questions
Posted by: satterwa on Mar 28, 2006 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I attended a prestigious all-girls high school and graduated in 1991 - and I know these problems are still prevalent because I can see it on the young women's faces when I go back to speak at career day. It was particularly tough being a young black woman in that situation 15 years ago, and though there are more opportunities and the climate has changed somewhat, the pressure to overachieve and outperform can be brutally intense for [young] women of color. Why don't we talk about that?

I'm curious to know why the author of this piece mentioned the issue being more prevalent among more diverse groups of girls but didn't follow up with any additional info. I got the sense from reading this piece that this is still about white women and their issues, though I know in my reality that it's deeper than that. Throw race and class and geography and isms into the mix and the issue becomes more complex, but why don't people talk about that? Thanks, Sojourner, for mentioning Orlando Patterson's comments within this context.

I'm also concerned that the author only talked about the impact of abusive relationships with men. One of the main reasons smart women are in this predicament is because it complicates most of the relationships we have with men, especially intimate and professional relationships. Why aren't we talking about that?

Look at popular media, look at the images that permeate our cultural exchanges every minute of the day. Why are we surprised?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What?! I'm not the only one?
Posted by: cyclone2525 on Mar 28, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article was so right-on, it kind of scared me. I have always been professionally an over-acheiver, not bragging, just stating. I graduated 2nd in my class from high school and earned a full-ride scholarship to college where I continued to push myself to succeed and I did. However, secretly I fantasized, and still do as a career woman, about suicide. I had a self-destructive streak when it came to sexual behaviors and I put up with things from men that most people would never believe. I have no clue why I was this way sexually or why I could even think about suicide when it looks to the outside world that I have a great life. If anyone has an answer, I would love to hear it. Right now I'm just happy that I'm not the only one and this article has inspired me to start something at the college I am teaching at if other young women here feel this way. Thank you so much!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What?! I'm not the only one? Posted by: Samantha Vimes
» RE: What?! I'm not the only one? Posted by: cyclone2525
what society values
Posted by: alarm on Mar 28, 2006 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It shouldn't be a surprise that bright women are still vulnerable to eating disorders and abusive relationships. The fact of the matter is that male society at large does not value the intellectual acheivements of women as highly as physical attractiveness, and this includes some of the more intellectual members out there. As long as beauty is held up as the most desirable quality by the most vocal of prospective mates, intellectual acheivements will not provide much cushion from the insecurity being mostly rated on shallow principles can bring. All women, regardless of whether they are National Merit scholars with 4.0 averages or C students who might plan on community college, are rated by the same naturally unacheivable physical standards of beauty by society and media. Coming together and supporting other women like the Miami college women have done is the best way to form a community that is strong enough to resist the constant subtle undermining of self-image encountered in women's daily lives. In addition, the men out there who don't rate women so shallowly need to be brave enough to drown out the loudspeakers of those who do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same source for both trends?
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Mar 28, 2006 7:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't overachieving at least partly about image. I want people to think I'm smart; I want to be seen as strong.

The problem is that it can go too far. The desire to make a good impression on others can keep hands out of candy bowls and butts active playing soccer instead of parked watching cartoons, and society approves. But the girls are learning to ignore what they *want* to do in favour of what seems good to others.

How often is the abusive boyfriend someone who is seen as a 'catch' by others? How much would the girls be criticized, or think they would be, for dumping him. Women who broke up a relationship used to be called jilts. The term may not be used so much anymore, but the pressure is still there-- girls are supposed to make their relationships work, tame their men. If he's mean, maybe she needs to change. (grrrr...)

The girls are trying too hard to be perfect, and it is impossible, because everyone has a different definition of perfection.

I think the best thing is for girls to be taught that making themselves happy is important, even if it means sometimes being unproductive. And that *everyone* gets criticized, and it's best not to take it too seriously. And then the adults need to let up some of the pressure and actually mean what they said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amazing
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Mar 28, 2006 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your women are apparently way more talented, caring, sharing and hard-working - maybe you need to get a female president. Perhaps that will make up for the lack of university places.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just the sort of whining you get in rich countries
Posted by: Bobsays on Mar 28, 2006 11:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find these sorts of stories not helpful, but actually harmful. It delivers a laundry list of disempowering get-out clauses that just destroy young women. Any woman born into the wealthy and opportunity-rich world of the west, has little to actually complain about. The best thing they can do is to charge ahead and maybe put on pair of blinkers to keep the neurotics and feminazis out of sight. All the women I know - and its a lot - are very successful and very happy. They don't think much of academic feminists and they also spend little time thinking about them - they are just having too much fun and achieving. I have lived all over the world. You don't find neurotic anorexics in developing countries. In fact, you find very little of any of these neurosis. It is just a peculiar American thing to do. To always, despite obvious wealth and limitless opportunity, and excuse to blame society of men for problems. In this case, for these successful women, I say get over it and get up and resolve to do nothing more than have a lot of fun. Life will look better straight away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Virtuvixen?
Posted by: kelly.nickell on Mar 30, 2006 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife has one masters degree in women’s studies, and with that in hand she throws down the gauntlet with me continually over the patriarchal hand that is continually perched on the heads of the matriarchs of the world.

She grew up in Frankfurt Indiana under the stewardship of a dominant strict Roman Catholic mother, fresh from Italy, and an alcoholic father of fresh German blood that had found his wife while fighting as a U.S. soldier in WW II.

Through our discussions we also end up back at the suppressed and warped duality of sexuality as it pertains to the male and the female, moving into the gender discussion of a construction rather than a genetic reality; is gender a construction of the ages or not? For her it is, such that she has spent a great deal of time studying this idea and firming up her ideas. An underlying factor for both of us that floats as a constant has to do with the way sexuality creates rifts in the fabric of otherwise successful women, in the area that is most often tucked away into secrecy; sex and it’s enjoyment by anyone that can successfully throw off the yoke of the Donna Reed mother, or any masculine stereotype that comes to the service of our culture such as the recent event at Duke.

I think as a male that has been looking for some meaning here, that one of the most pressing problems we all have has to do with the fact that any enjoyment we derive from sex and it’s role playing are continually battered by the topical assault it receives at the media interface, all the way down into our souls. Somewhere along the way, we are forced to condemn what we like, so that Donna Reed can survive on the surface in a conservative community, and that the devil within can play in the darkness, some where. Depending on how much we like that little devil, the corollary is a deepening sadness over the melding the of the vixen with the virgin. In our society, the virgin wears white and is good, while the vixen wears black and is bad.

So while we wear our white to fit in, our inner leather needs air. Until women are allowed to express their black more openly with an eye towards white, the struggle towards gray will continue to create a patriarchy that lust for one while marrying the other.

No women should feel less than human for liking what she likes. This to me is something that must be reconciled in our culture to keep more successful women happy, rather than suicidal for winning in all battles except the one that gives us all intimacy. If you look closely at our society, all of the indicators of a Cartesian Duality are there; I think that in our current conservative climate it is becoming more pronounced as more want to jump on the return to traditional values, what ever the hell they are.

The fact is, the apples are out of the horse, and no amount of hand wringing for a return to virtue are going to push them back in. Until we deal more openly with our sexuality, we can count on more rifts in our soul that create male sexual predators, and women finding comfort in suicide, and any number of other self destruct mechanisms to keep the blackness from getting out.

We have to find our gray, and let it play – openly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poser
Posted by: angela3131 on Apr 3, 2006 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I totally feel like I should belong to this club. I did great in high school and college. Played softball at a division I school. Then immediately went onto graduate school. I have a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology and Biochemistry. I am currently a post-doc at an Ivy League School. All these accomplishments and I still feel stupid. When it comes to analyzing data, I always doubt myself. When someone asks a question about my work, I concede to their ideas. I feel like a poser and someone is bound to discover me soon.
Laking confidence sucks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poser Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Poser Posted by: Raelyn
» RE: Poser Posted by: Raelyn
Not the only one anymore
Posted by: notlistening on Apr 9, 2006 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Same with me! Although I'm not as old as those women, I have the same problem. Recently I was selected to go to the first part of an International Maths Competition, which was great! My friends didn't seem to think it was such a big deal, though. I am the cleverest girl in my class (not boasting!), but I'm very shy. I always feel like I need to prove myself, like I'm not good enough. Reading this has made me realise that being perfect is impossible. I didn't expect to be perfect, but I always feel like my blonde friends are in some way better than me simply they are blonde and white. That's absolute crap! Dumbing yourself down just to "get a guy", trying to be the best at everything and being perfect are all just part of the nonsense that ideals are. And anyway, generally people like other people who are not perfect. I mean, honestly, it's easier to have friends who have a few flaws than ones who are perfectionists.
So, it's great to know that there are other women and girls who are going through the same thing. I'm not anorexic or bulimic, but I still thought that I was a bit fat. That is, until one day when my friends were here and we were getting ready for some event or other, and they told me that I have the perfect body. That was such a great thing for them to do. I still don't think my body is perfect, but I appreciate it more. Giving someone a compliment may not mean much to you, but when you're feeling depressed, that one compliment may just make you feel a little better.
So, thanks for reading this. Letting it all out has made me feel way more free. Sorry if it sounded patronising or whatever, but that's just the way I am.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]